This document contains questions about key concepts related to constructicons, including meaningless constructions, inheritance, syntactic amalgams, complete inheritance, and redundant representations. Meaningless constructions are problematic for constructicons because constructicons are meant to represent forms with meaning. Inheritance refers to the relationship between more abstract and more concrete constructions, where concrete constructions exhibit features of abstract ones. Syntactic amalgams illustrate sentences where different constructions are interlaced. Complete inheritance stores inherited information only once at the most general level, while redundant representations involve storing the same information multiple times across abstraction levels.
This document contains questions about key concepts related to constructicons, including meaningless constructions, inheritance, syntactic amalgams, complete inheritance, and redundant representations. Meaningless constructions are problematic for constructicons because constructicons are meant to represent forms with meaning. Inheritance refers to the relationship between more abstract and more concrete constructions, where concrete constructions exhibit features of abstract ones. Syntactic amalgams illustrate sentences where different constructions are interlaced. Complete inheritance stores inherited information only once at the most general level, while redundant representations involve storing the same information multiple times across abstraction levels.
This document contains questions about key concepts related to constructicons, including meaningless constructions, inheritance, syntactic amalgams, complete inheritance, and redundant representations. Meaningless constructions are problematic for constructicons because constructicons are meant to represent forms with meaning. Inheritance refers to the relationship between more abstract and more concrete constructions, where concrete constructions exhibit features of abstract ones. Syntactic amalgams illustrate sentences where different constructions are interlaced. Complete inheritance stores inherited information only once at the most general level, while redundant representations involve storing the same information multiple times across abstraction levels.
from the following texts: a. John talked with an old colleague. b.Would you cry if I die tomorrow? c.What kind of constructions did you identified? d.Eric plays football and Steven, too. e.Mike talked about the earth quake, not his brother. f.Laura reads. g.Max left a T-shirt on the armchair and another one behind it. h.I will pay you a visit or at least I will call you tomorrow morning.
4.Why are meaningless constructions considered
problematic for the construct-i-con?
Some researchers think that meaningless
construction should be taken into account as a part of the construct-i-con, although the construct-i-con is supposed to be a repository of forms with a meaning.
5.Explain what Hilpert wants to say when
he talks about inheritance
Relation between more abstract constructions
and more concrete constructions in which the more concrete ones exhibit formal and functional features of the more abstract ones.
6.Identify the types of inheritance links from the
following examples: It was then that she threatened to spill the beans about her affair with the president. You drive me bananas with your daily complaints about the cold weather. Mikes flight has been cancelled. Joe gave Sally the ball. oYou must be crazy to say such things to her. oKevin must be at the university at 12 oclock! Dana baked a pie. Dana baked Ioana a pie.
7.What do you understand by syntactic
amalgams?
Illustrates a sentence in which two or more
different constructions are interlaced.
8.What Hilpert means when he talks about
complete inheritance and redundant representations?
Complete inheritance this view assumes that
inherited information is stored only once, with the most general construction that carries this information, in order to be worked out.
Redundant representations multiple
memorizations of the same pieces of information (across different levels of abstraction); these fade in time, but are refreshed by new usage events.