You are on page 1of 1

Za prevod :

-polje A: veza pozicija 339 sa 400 je V sa provarom i kopanjem. Na predlog je da


se radi V sa provarom bez kopanja, kako bi smanjili unos energije i samim tim
smanjili mogunost deformacije nosaa. Slina situacija je i sa vezom pozicije 340 sa
267 i 339.
-pozicije 313 i 314 zavarene su za poziciju 304 V sa kopanjem i provarom. Zbog
velike duine i oekivane deformacije predlaemo da bude V +ugaoni.
Molimo za hitan odgovor.

1. Field A : The weld conection between items 339 and 400 is given as single V
butt with gouged-out root and back weld. Our suggestion is to do single V butt
with full penetration (white circle in designation) without gouged-out root and
back weld.Reason for this is to decrease amount of energy and the same time
to decrease posibility for distortion (deformation) of girder.
The similar situation is at weld conection item 340 with items 267 and 339.
2. Items 313 and 314 are welded with item 304 with single bevel butt weld ( V)
with gouged-out root and back weld. Due to of big length and expected
deformation (destortion) we suggest solution with single bevel butt weld ( V)
plus fillet weld.

Please send to us answer at your earliest convenience. Thanks in advance


Dragoljub Ilic, graduated mechanical engineer

You might also like