The information is capable of being confidential

The defendant owes a claimant an obligation to keep the information confidential

And used information to breach the duty Has the third limb gone slightly
changed still there however- no longer really have to show detriment that much
Trillingham, Mosely v Green shows how it has altered. Reasonable expectation
of privacy would be quite difficult to prove.
How has protection of confidential information developed since the HRA 1998 act
Douglas v Hello the second element of having a relationship no longer exists.
Once the information engages in Von Hannover.
There is no law of privacy.
Is the law of BoC changing?
X v Y and Netherlands
Von Hannover defines a public figure
BoC and Privacy = trying to shoe-horn into the circumstances.