Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Open Mind
Open Mind
Session Outline:
Objective:To get people thinking and challenging themselves to be more open minded and successful
Agenda: 1 hour total, small groups (5-7 people each), handouts to each person.
Intro.: 5 min-Facilitators act out "Nan-in" story below before the entire plenary (with narrator).
Plenary: 5 min-Go over objective of session and delegates role in it
5 min-Distribute handouts to delegates & divide into small groups
Group: 30 min-Work through #1-4 in a group and use questions to help guide group discussion
Plenary: 15 min-Bring groups back together. Ask what (if anything) was learned from the session.
Ask if they can apply these ideas when interacting with other cultures, with LCs, NCs, AI,
project, programmes, with other people's ideas & with themselves.
Note:
This session outline is provided to delegates so that they can repeat the session if they
want back in their own countries
Group Exercises:
1. Read over the story below. Are you a "full cup" of your own opinions & speculations, that
nothing more can go in?
"Nan-in, a Japanese master during the Meiji era (1968-1912) received a university professor who
came in to inquire about Zen.
Nan-in served tea. He poured his visitor's cup full, and then kept on pouring.
The professor watched the overflow until he no longer could restrain himself. 'It is over full. No
more will go in!'
'Like this cup.' Nan-in said, 'you are full of your own opinions and speculations. How can I show
you Zen unless you first empty your cup?'"
From The Learner Within, IBM
2. Read over "50 Excuses of a Closed Mind". (from the "Learner Within")
Do you find yourself using one or more of these excuses?
When do you use them?
What are some "Sayings of an open mind" that you could use to help shape new ideas and
make them even better, rather than "kill them".
3. Read over "50 Successful Thoughts". (Author unknown)
Do some of these attitudes and actions apply to you?
Which of these ideas do you see as most helpful in helping you be successful?
4. To become more open minded and allow greater capacity for learning, there are two main skills
needed: reflection and inquiry.
& Reflection is the deliberate exposure and surfacing of our thinking processes to become more
aware of how we form our mental models / paradigms / perceptions.
& Inquiry is the holding of conversations where we openly share views and develop
knowledge about each other's assumptions.
Read over the "Ladder of Inference" concept (from The Fifth Discipline Fieldbook).
What instances can you think of that you "climbed the ladder" of inference?
The examples below are real situation common in AIESEC, how might you address them when
you see them happening? What are alternative explanations from the ones below?
Situation: AI judged by delegates
I will just ignore what AI
is doing and do my own
things
AI's activities are not
relevant to me
AI is out of touch with
what is happening at LCs
& NCs
AI is not providing what I
need at conferences
AI refuses to change the
conference agenda for me
I'm not getting what I
want from this conference
The conference agenda is
presented to the delegates
Delegates judged by AI
We must have more
sessions
on
AIESEC
philosophy
They don't understand
AIESEC's purpose
All the delegates want to do
is drink, party and sleep
They must be at the
conference for something
else
Coming late means they
don't care about the session
AI notices some delegates
are coming late to sessions
Sessions are late getting
started
What other situations of "climbing the ladder" do you notice in AIESEC or beyond?
How are some strategies to help you be "climb" or get to the "right" conclusions in different
situations? How can you ensure you get to the "right" conclusion with other people you
interact with at this conference?