Rabbi meir moskowitz and Attorney herb franklin will present two sessions. Part 1: Negotiating with terror Israel set 1,027 prisoners free in exchange for Gilad Shalit. Part 2: Torturing to Save Lives The "torture report" alleges that the brutal interrogation techniques used by the CIA in the aftermath of 9 / 11 were ineffective.
Rabbi meir moskowitz and Attorney herb franklin will present two sessions. Part 1: Negotiating with terror Israel set 1,027 prisoners free in exchange for Gilad Shalit. Part 2: Torturing to Save Lives The "torture report" alleges that the brutal interrogation techniques used by the CIA in the aftermath of 9 / 11 were ineffective.
Rabbi meir moskowitz and Attorney herb franklin will present two sessions. Part 1: Negotiating with terror Israel set 1,027 prisoners free in exchange for Gilad Shalit. Part 2: Torturing to Save Lives The "torture report" alleges that the brutal interrogation techniques used by the CIA in the aftermath of 9 / 11 were ineffective.
12:00pm -1:30pm at Law Offices 555 Skokie Blvd Northbrook or 7:30pm - 9:00pm at Chabad 2095 Landwehr Rd Northbrook 3 MCLE General or Ethics Credits Lunch Class presented by Rabbi Meir Moscowitz and Attorney David Kaufman Evening class presented by Rabbi Meir Moscowitz, Attorney Jonathan Nye and Attorney Herb Franks Cost: $100 includes textbook and lunch ($36 without credits)
Register Today at www.ChabadNorthbrook.com/CLE, reply to this email or call 847-5648770
Part 1: Negotiating with Terror
In 2011, Israel set 1,027 prisoners free in exchange for the release of Gilad Shalit. More recently, the rise of ISIS and the murders of James Foley and Steven Sutloff and others have forced us to revisit this heart wrenching debate: Should we pay hefty ransoms or release dangerous criminals in exchange for the life and freedom of an innocent hostage?
Part 2: Torturing to Save Lives
The recent "Torture Report" alleges that the brutal interrogation techniques used by the CIA in the aftermath of 9/11 were ineffective. But what if they did yield valuable information--would they have been justified? While the evils of terror must be combated, human rights must also be protected. How are we to balance these competing values?