Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter 06 - Exploration
Chapter 06 - Exploration
Exploration
Land Acquisition
The Petroleum Landman
Role and function
The private ownership of land is permitted in many countries of the world. Some countries (e.g., USA, UK and
Canada), allow the private ownership of oil and gas interests or rights. Typically, such rights predate an act of union
(e.g., USA) or act of parliament. Invariably, governments control the leasing of most oil and gas interests on the
continent (i.e. on-shore) and all of the interests off-shore. Therefore, an exploration company seeking both access to
land and the right to explore/produce oil and or gas must determine who holds the rights and the steps necessary to
acquire and maintain that lease. In North America, that person is the Landman. The role and function of the Landman
may vary from company to company; however, all successful Landmen share the same professional attributes, they are
knowledgeable and skillful negotiators.
The Petroleum Landman may be involved in any one or all of the following activities (Tinkler, 1992), the acquisition
of leases and drilling rights, the maintenance of leases, agreements, contracts and legal obligations, and ultimately the
disposition of leases and termination of contracts.
Acquisition
The acquisition of leases begins with the examination of public records to determine who holds oil and gas rights in a
given area of interest. A review of previous lease sales in the area or adjoining area will be under taken and perhaps
the past and present activity of other companies will be researched. The Landman must also determine the necessary
terms to obtain a lease if privately owned, or the value of the lease, if the lease is awarded on the basis of a sealed-bid.
If leases are awarded on a first-come-first-served basis, then appropriate steps must be undertaken.
Fundamentally, the Landman must obtain the rights to explore and produce oil/gas. In addition to the acquisition of the
oil and gas lease, there maybe permits to acquire and contracts (such as Farm-outs or Joint Operative Ventures) to
negotiate and asset trades to deal with.
Maintenance
Once a lease or an agreement has been attained there then follows a period of maintenance during which the
administration of the lease must be maintained. For example, during this time the processing of payments or royalties
must be maintained, land titles and leases may require curative work or maintenance and there will be a need to keep
track of all lease and contractual obligations. It may also be necessary to enter into contractual negotiations with
investors or outside parties who have an ongoing interest, or who have developed an interest, in the associated venture.
This may lead to farm-outs and farm-in agreements, seismic options, bottom-hole contributions, etc.
Disposition
Ultimately a decision will be made to trade, release or surrender the lease, and terminate contracts, or to permit them to
expire. Therefore, the Landman will be involved in the possible Farm-out, sale, or disposal of oil and gas interests.
Whatever transpires, company records must be maintained and the filing of all necessary documents with the
appropriate government department or agency should be done in a timely manner.
Farm-out and Farm-in: If an oil and gas company holding a lease (hence known as the Farmor) agrees to assign a portion of
that lease (called the farm-out-area) to another company (the Farmee), in consideration of the Farmee drilling a specified number
of wells on that Farmed-out-area, then the Farmor has made a Farm-out and Farmee has made a Farm-in.
Joint Operating Agreements (JOA): A JOA, or operating agreement, occurs when two or more companies who share a
working interest share the risk of drilling, developing and operating an oil or gas venture. Typically one of the companies acts as
the operator for all the companies bound by the JOA. The JOA also specifies how the costs and revenue will be shared and how
leases will be acquired, maintained and disposed of (Tinkler, 1992)
82
Exploration
The legal description of the well/property by township, range, section, block, survey or LSD1
The names of operators and / or leases
Surface land ownership, and
Mineral ownership (if different from the surface land owner)
Lease status
Pertinent well data, such as well name, well status, total depth
The names of significant land marks, such as roads, streams, lakes.
Figure 109. A representation of the Public Lands Survey system of land subdivision used by many states in the United States of
America. For example, the legal description for well Y shown in the 40-acre subdivision above (D) would be Township 2 North, Range 2
West, nth Principle Meridian (T-2-N, R-2W, nthPM), Section nineteen (19), southwest quarter (SW/4) of the northwest quarter (NW/4),
southeast corner (SE Cor.). Putting that together we would have: SE Cor., SW NW, Sec 19, T-2-N, R-2W,nthPM.
LSD: (Legal subdivision) a legally defined subdivision of land or territory: an area composed of subdivided lots
83
Exploration
sections. Each section contains 640 acres or one square mile. Because of the Earths curvature, corrections must be
made ever 30 miles, which is every 5th Township line.
The subdivision of land in the Provinces of Alberta, Manitoba and Saskatchewan within Canada is similar, in that it
uses imperial units of measurement, and is based upon a Township and Range planimetric grid system. However,
because this system is based on the Torren System, the numbering of sections differs from that used within the Public
Lands System of the USA, and note also that the subdivision of each section uses a grid of 16 40-acre blocks. The
subdivision of
land
is
represented in Figure 110.
Adjacent to the western side
of a meridian the subdivisions
are of standard proportions,
consisting of full quarters. To
compensate for the curvature
of the Earth, subdivisions are
often irregular, consisting of
partial or make-up quarters
close to Provincial borders
and along the eastern side of
each meridian. The minimum
spacing for a conventional
well is 40 acres, gas well = 80 Figure 110. A representation of the Torren Survey system of land subdivision used by some of
acres. Wells are located by the the Provinces of Canada. For example, the well in the 40-acre LSD above (indicated by a ) is in
further subdivision of each Township 2, Range 2West of the X Meridian, Section thirty (30), LSD 13. Putting this all together
we would have: 6-13, T2, R2WX.
LSD and then using Lat. and
Long.
84
Exploration
Figure 112. The Quadrant system of the United Kingdom (off-shore). The planimetric grid that
subdivides offshore England and Scotland into numbered Quadrants is based upon lines of longitude
and latitude. The inset diagram (blue border) illustrates the numbering and subdivision of each
Quadrant. England and Scotland are shown in solid grey (modified from the U.K. Department of Trade
and Industry, PON12, 2005; Crown copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the
Controller of HMSO and Queen's Printer for Scotland ).
85
Exploration
Figure 113. The sequential transformation of crude oil due to weathering. Physical and
chemical changes are summarized (above) and the end product, a sample of Pyrobitumen from
Western Canada, is shown right. The Pyrobitumen displays a characteristic optical texture
(indicated by the arrows) due to an increase in molecular order when examined in cross
polarized reflected white light. The image is approximately 150m across. (image courtesy of
L. Stasiuk).
Classification of seeps
Upon encountering a surface seep, the first step would be to characterize the seep material and determine if the seep is:
active (i.e., live), inactive (often manifest by the presence of solid bitumen impsonite or grahamite), or a false seep
such as those associated with landfill sites. Link (1952) offered a simple classification of seeps that was related to their
geological mode of occurrence. Most seeps occur at basin margins and in sediments that have been either folded or
faulted and eroded. The classification of Link (1952) is straightforward and relatively uncomplicated, consisting of:
1. Seeps emerging from homoclinal beds, the ends of which are exposed and the beds outcrop at the surface (e.g.,
Trenton Limestone, Canada).
2. Seeps associated with source rocks that have become fractured or exposed to the Earths surface (e.g., Green River
Fm, Uinta Basin, USA).
3. Seeps from large hydrocarbon accumulations that have been exposed by the erosion of faulted or folded reservoir
rock (e.g., Masjid-I-Sulaimin field, Iran, or the Hombre Pintado field, Venezuela).
4. Seeps along the outcropping of an unconformity (e.g., Athabasca oil sands, Canada).
5. Seeps associated with igneous intrusions, salt diapirs, or other local sources of extraneous heat that may mobilize
a small portion of a reservoir (e.g., Golden lane, Mexico).
Exploration
association of paraffin dirt. Paraffin dirt is typically yellow, behaves elastically and resembles natural gums and
resins in appearance. However, paraffin dirt does not contain hydrocarbons of thermogenic origin. It is composed
almost entirely of microbial cells and bacteria (including methane-, ethane-, propane-, and butane-metabolizing
bacteria), and metabolic by-products.
Underwater seeps
Live or active seeps have been found on the continental shelf off the coast of California, such as those associated with
the Ventura field, California. Underwater oil seeps have been identified visually, since gas bubbles are amenable to
visual detection. The unambiguous detection of a thermogenic gas seep requires the use of sophisticated gas sniffers.
Such devices are sensitive detectors with claimed detection limits of 0.5 ppb. However, like all techniques, the user
must be aware of certain limitations. It must be determined if the gas is biogenic or thermogenic, the latter implies the
presence of an active source rock and migration system. Whereas biogenic gas is the by-product of the microbial decay
of buried organic matter and may not be linked to an economic accumulation of petroleum! The presence of propane
and ethane (plus others) is often taken as an indicator of thermogenic gas, but should be confirmed by isotope analysis.
Offshore gas sniffing is also difficult to interpret in areas frequently used by shipping, or in coastal areas adjacent to
cities or industrial centers. Surface prospecting techniques, such as all exploration (i.e., prospecting) techniques may
or may not work with equal success in all areas. Each area must be evaluated on its own merit!
Geophysical exploration
Introduction
With costs rising, no one would seriously
consider drilling a well using any of the
reconnaissance techniques prevalent in the
nineteenth century.
Business decisions
require data and a detailed prognosis of the
play to be explored. Acquiring subsurface
data by drilling a borehole is expensive and
while it provides a great deal of geological
data, the reliability of that data, beyond the
confines of the borehole is unknown.
Fortunately, there are techniques that can be
used to provide information of an area of
interest and/or help relate one borehole to
another.
seismic surveying
Both magnetic and gravity survey techniques are reconnaissance type surveys, often conducted from the air to facilitate
speed and permit the surveying of large tracts of the Earths crust. In contrast, seismic surveys, provide a greater
degree of subsurface detail, but require physical contact with the ground.
87
Exploration
Gravity surveying
The gravity method is also used as a reconnaissance tool. However, gravity surveys are capable of suggesting the
presence of small scale structures, such as salt domes and reefs. Gravity surveys are feasible because global and
regional variations in gravity exist due to crustal heterogeneity and differences in rock density. The unit of gravity
measurement is the Gal, named in honor of Galileo, which is divisible into mGal and Gal. 1.0 Gal is equal to 1 cm
sec2. Generally gravity decreases with increasing distance from the center of the Earth; either as a function of the
Earths shape (as an oblate spheroid) or due to changes in elevation or with changes in mass! The presence of a rock
unit of differing density from the surrounding rocks will cause a local perturbation in the Earths gravitational field,
generating what is commonly known as a gravity anomaly. Once corrections for surface effects, latitude, elevation, tide
and instrument drift have been made, the presence of bodies of varying mass result in variations in gravity, or
anomalies (Figure 115). A gravity anomaly can be expressed by differences in rock density:
p
where,
P1 - P2
88
(8)
Exploration
Lithology
Clay
Shale
Sandstone (Cretaceous)
Sandstone (Tertiary)
Sandstone (Carboniferous)
Chalk
Limestone
Dolomite
Halite
1.63
2.06
2.05
2.25
2.35
1.90
2.60
2.28
2.10
2.60
2.66
2.35
2.30
2.55
2.90
2.88
2.90
2.40
Seismic surveying
Introduction
Seismic waves are parcels of elastic strain energy that propagate outwards
from a seismic source (e.g., explosion). The velocity of a seismic wave is
determined by the physical properties of the rock(s) transmitting the wave. If
the rock properties are homogeneous (i.e., isotropic) then the wave front
travels at the same speed in all directions and the locus of the wave front
would define a sphere, rather like ripples on water (Figure 116). Physical
properties, such as mineral composition, grain size, shape and sorting, porosity
and pore fluids type combine to determine the density and elastic modulus for
a given rock unit, and, therefore, seismic velocity. Compressional wave
velocities (Vp) vary from 0.5 to 1.0 km s-1 for dry sand up to 2.0 to 6.5 km s-1
for anhydrite (Table 9). In general Vp increases with depth of burial, due to the
combined effects of increased confining pressure, compaction and
cementation, although frequency decreases. The presence of gas also reduces
shear wave velocity (Vs) (Keary and Brooks, 1991).
Energy sources
Land:
Vibroseis or Vibrator truck has rapidly become the most common
non-explosive method utilized on land. These truck-mounted pad vibrators
(Figure 117; Video 9)) are capable of creating a sweep signal from 10 to 80 Hz
for extended periods of time. Vibroseis units can also be used as linked units
by phase-linking each unit, thereby permitting deep seismic penetration of the
crust. Because such units require good contact between pad and ground they
work best on firm ground, and unlike dynamite they are urban environment
friendly. Land-based recording devices are called geophones (Short, 1992).
Table 9. Compressional
wave velocities (Vp) for
selected geological materials.
Material
Vp (km s-1)
Sand (wet)
Clay
Sandstone
Tertiary
Carboniferous
Limestone
Cret. chalk
1.5
1.0
2.0
2.5
2.0
4.0
2.5
4.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
2.5
4.5
4.5
Carbonif. lms
Dolomite
Salt
Anhydrite
89
4.0
6.0
5.0
6.5
Exploration
Marine: There are many seismic source options for use off-shore that are typically chosen for a specific depth of
penetration and resolution. The most commonly used include the air gun, water gun, sparkers, pingers and boomers.
Air guns (Video 10) are capable of deep penetration whereas water guns can achieve high resolution because there is
no bounce back, a phenomenon associated with pneumatic devices. Sparkers are electrical devices that can achieve
high resolution but are best suited to shallow depths. Marine recording devices (Video 11) are called hydrophones
(Dessler, 1992).
Which relates the angle of incidence and refraction to the propagation velocity within the two media.
90
Exploration
Figure 120. Common depth point (CDP) reflection profiling. (a) The seismic reflector is a horizontal surface. The common
midpoint (CMP) directly overlies a common depth point (CDP) which is common to all source-detector pairs. (S1 to S3; D1 to D3
respectively); (b) For a sloping reflector there is no common depth point and the reflection point differs for ray pairs S1-D1, S2-D2
and S3-D3 (after Duncan, 1992).
91
Exploration
If the survey line is at some angle to the dip of the reflector (e.g., along the strike) in a 2D-seismic survey, the
reflection point is displaced out of the plane of section, i.e., cross-dip (Keary and Brooks, 1991). Cross-dip cannot
easily be resolved with two-dimensional (2-D) seismic surveys and represents a problem and limitation regarding 2D
seismic data. However, the problem is easily resolved using three-dimensional (3-D) seismic surveys, since reflection
points can be migrated in any azimuthal direction.
(a)
(b)
(c)
Figure 121. Example seismic traces showing the result of various types of seismic processing. (a) The shot-to-receiver offset is zero at the
center and increases to 2000 m at either end. Note the presence of offset related hyberbola due to normal moveout. (b) After the
application of normal moveout correction (NMO) the horizons are flat. (c) A seismic section is produced by combining and stacking six
adjacent shots (Duncan, 1992; images courtesy of Landmark Graphics Corporation).
Figure 122. Seismic data from the Santa Barbara Channel, offshore California, USA. (a) A CMP stacked data showing multiple
crossing reflections, (b) Correcting for the mispositioning of dipping reflectors and collapsing diffraction curves, migration reveals
a series of tightly folded anticlines and synclines (Larner and Hale, 1992).
92
Exploration
3D and 4D Seismic
Geologists are comfortable working with cross sections and so are comfortable with 2-D seismic sections. However,
for reasons outlined above, 2-D seismic does have some limitations particularly relating to the optimal orientation of
the section and during signal processing (e.g., migration). Furthermore, since traps are three dimensional entities a two
dimensional seismic line may not present the optimal subsurface image (Hart, 2000). 3-D seismic surveying overcomes
many of those concerns. Marine 3-D seismic surveys utilize a series of closely spaced parallel lines (line shooting)
whereas on land receiver lines are arranged parallel to one another with the shot points positioned in a perpendicular
direction (swath shooting) (Yilmaz, 1992; Hart, 2000). The distance between lines in 3-D seismic surveying is
typically 50 m or less, compared to 2-D seismic surveying which may be 1 km or more. As a consequence hundreds of
thousand to hundreds of millions of traces are collected during a 3-D seismic survey, generating gigabytes and
terabytes of data. 3-D seismic data is available as vertical sections along the in-line or cross-line orientation (Figure
124a) and as horizontal sections (time slices) (Figure 124b). Multilayer time slices permit the generation of contour
maps (e.g., isochron) or the identification of subtle types of trap, such as a meandering stream that otherwise would be
problematic with a 2-D survey (Brown, 1988).
Time lapse seismic surveying (Video 12), often referred to as 4D seismic, is the sequential surveying of a producing
reservoir over a set period of time. Time lapse seismic surveying seeks to ascertain changes within a reservoir due to
the withdrawal of petroleum, in which areas within the reservoir containing untapped oil will show little to no change.
Time lapse seismic surveying has been used with great success in many producing fields in the North Sea.
Figure 124. Examples of 3-D seismic showing (a) data volume around a salt diapir depicting vertical sections in both in-line and
cross-line orientation, and as time slices (image courtesy of Hunt Oil Company); (b) a time slice showing a meandering stream (used
by permission of Sunoco, Inc.).
93
Exploration
Figure 126. Isopach map of the South Glenrock oil field, USA, showing an
ancient (i.e. buried) meander belt (Curry and Curry, 1994).
94
Exploration
Cross-sections
Cross-sections are graphical representations of slices through the earths crust that are commonly used by the
petroleum geologist to clarify or help interpret geological relationships (Boak, 1992). There are three basic type of
cross section: correlation, structural, and stratigraphic cross-sections.
Correlation cross-sections
Such cross sections may be the first to be drawn and are often based upon seismic data. Such sections also evolve,
modified, updated and refined as data becomes available. Correlation cross-sections are often large scale and do not
permit the extrapolation of high-resolution stratigraphic equivalence between wells or proposed wells. Although, it was
in dealing with seismic data and the construction of cross-sections that prompted Vail et al., (1977) to devise the
concept of sequence stratigraphy.
Structural cross-sections
The structural attitude of strata, or any
geological feature of interest, is typically drawn
from seismic, or using seismic and borehole
data (Figure 127). Such cross-sections are
drawn in relation to sea level, or some other
datum. Structural cross-sections are particularly
effective when interpreting the location and
nature of faults.
Stratigraphic cross-sections
The detailed correlation of strata between wells
is typically performed via the construction of
stratigraphic cross-sections in which a given
stratum is selected as the datum horizon, and all
others 'hung' from that horizon. The data is
often derived from wire-line data or from a
composite log consisting of wire-line data and
drill cuttings, core or paleontological data.
Such sections may reveal features or used to
identify subsurface sequence boundaries (Vail
et al., 1977); typically deduced from wireline
log responses, supplemented by core and/or
drill cuttings. Cross-sections are a powerful
visual, interpretative, tool; even more so if
combined with a base map as a fence diagram
(Figure 128). A fence diagram or panel diagram
accommodates a number of interlinked crosssections within a single three-dimensional
diagram. Using a perspective view, each panel
or fence is projected below a surface grid (the
datum) and linked to one another. They can be
an effective means of deriving a solution when
data is limited.
Maps
Basic requirements of a map
What ever map is used it must be as accurate as possible. Errors and inaccuracy on subsurface a map may be more
misleading, since the map represents a visual summation of data and is mostly responsible for molding our
interpretations of a given data set or subsurface feature and the basis upon which exploration decisions hinge
(Weissenburger, 1992). There is also trade-off between the inclusion of complex data and simplicity, and because each
of us has individual thresholds of comprehension and confusion, the usefulness of a map should be gauged by the ease
by which others can comprehend the data, or interpretation. Furthermore, all maps for a given basin, field or play
should conform to one another; not only in scale, but also in style, concept and possibly interpretation. This is often
95
Exploration
difficult, or impossible when a basin straddles a political boundary where differences in nomenclature, units or
geological resolution may occur. However, resolving differences or anomalies may yield insight.
Contouring
There is an increasing reliance upon computers to construct a subsurface map. However, it should always be
remembered that subsurface maps, more than topographic maps, require interpretative skills and that an interpretation
is controlled by a variety of factors of which the relative abundance of data and well control is perhaps the most
critical. The creation of bulls eye contouring by computer should always be questioned, since mapping software still
lacks the ability to apply geological intuition. When dealing with a limited data set, contour in keeping with the
structural style of the region; for example, don't invoke block faulting if simple folding is thought to dominate the
structural style of a region. With a limited data set, remember a number of interpretations are possible, increasing the
data set will eventually narrow the options and number of interpretations.
Isopach maps
Isopach maps record the thickness of a given formation. Such maps
can be local or regional. Note that with such maps, formation
thickness does not always coincide with basin subsidence: carbonates
or sand bodies are often thickest on the margins of basins, and local or
regional truncation may result in formation thickness! An Isochore
map is a specific type of isopach, depicting the thickness of an interval
between the oil-water contact and the cap rock. Similarly, net pay can
be depicted using a ratio of gross pay to net pay within a reservoir.
Figure 129.
1994).
Reserve Calculations
Estimates
Estimates of recoverable reserves must be made when conducting an appraisal of a reservoir, pool or field and updated
whenever new data or information becomes available. There are several parameters that should be known, calculated or
estimated including, for example, reservoir volume, reservoir porosity, water saturation (Sw), a recovery factor, and an
estimation of the formation volume factor (i.e., stock-tank shrinkage). The estimation of reserves may also include
other assumptions; such as, the presence/absence of a gas cap, the geometry of the oil/water interface and that the
reservoir is regular and divisible into units to facilitate volumetric calculations. Calculated figures should never be
regarded as absolute; they are estimations because our knowledge of the reservoir is not perfect and is always subject
to change or revision. However, even as estimations, those calculations should be as accurate as possible since they
form the basis for a number of business decisions regarding the possible outcome of a reservoir, pool or field.
Rough estimate:
where:
Roil
Vb f
Roil
Vb
f
=
=
=
(9)
RKB: the rotary kelly bushing, depth measurements are commonly referenced to the kelly bushing.
96
Exploration
Reservoir volume
There are various other formulae by which it is possible to
estimate recoverable reserves using actual data. Most
however, utilize a formula that calculates a tabular volume,
such as the area of a pyramid or a hemisphere (Dahlberg,
1979).
An isopach map is often the starting point for most reservoir
volumetric calculations (Figure 130). The basal area for each
contour interval is then derived using a planimeter, or by
dividing the area into a square grid or by using some other
means of measuring area.
The cumulative area occupied by the reservoir is derived using
the contour interval (h) plus values for the base of each area,
using the following formula (Dahlberg, 1979):
(10)
Or
(11)
where:
V
h
A0
A1
A2
An etc
=
=
=
=
=
=
Recoverable oil
Only a small volume of the area calculated is actual pore volume, therefore, V must be reduced to accurately represent
the pore volume of the reservoir. This is achieved by multiplying the calculated volume by a porosity value in decimal
form (e.g., 0.17). Porosity is typically derived from core analysis or estimated from petrophysical logs. Furthermore,
the volume of the reservoir that holds oil or gas must be further reduced because of varying amounts of water and oil.
The amount of water present within a reservoir is expressed as the water saturation (Sw) and, therefore, must be
factored into such calculations, e.g., V = [1.0 - Sw]. Furthermore, the amount of hydrocarbon that can be produced
from a reservoir maybe less than 100% due to the volumetric shrinkage of oil, because dissolved gas will come out of
solution, leading to an effective volumetric shrinkage in oil. The shrinkage factor is calculated from the temperature,
pressure and GOR (gas-to-oil ratio) of the oil and can be as much as 10 to 30 percent. Therefore, the formation volume
factor (FVF) will range from 1.1 for gas-free oil to 2.0 for a high gas-oil. Hence, the equation for estimating
recoverable oil is (Dahlberg, 1979):
Recoverable oil
V (1 - Sw) R
FVF
where:
Sw
R
FVF
=
=
=
=
=
97
(12)
Exploration
If it is required to express the results as barrels of oil, the reserves should be converted from cubic meters by
dividing V by 0.159, or dividing V by 5.615 when working in cubic feet.
Utilizing the pore volume equation
(STB)
where:
V
N/G
6.29
Shc
R
FVF
STB
(13)
Short-cuts
Spherical or ellipsoidal reservoir
Many short-cuts and quick-look methods exist, depending upon the approximate geometry of the trap; we will
examine one method that assumes a hemispherical (dome) shape. The volume of the top of a sphere can be
approximated by the following quick method.
area of the base max. thickness (i.e., height of reservoir)
(14)
For a hemispherical or near hemispherical reservoir this 'approximation' will be within 6%. The error will increase, as
the shape becomes more ellipsoidal, such as a fault-bounded trap. The volume can be approximated by determining the
area corresponding to the mid-distance between the reservoir base and top.
Reference
Arthur, K. R., D. R. Cole, G. G. L. Henderson, and D.W. Kushnir, 1982, Geology of the Hibernia discovery, in: The
deliberate search for the subtle trap (M.T. Halbouty, Ed.) AAPG Memoir 32, American Association of Petroleum
Geologists, Tulsa, p.p.181-195.
Brown, A. R., 1988, Interpretation of three-dimensional seismic data, Second edition, AAPG Memoir 42, American
Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, 253p.
Boak, J. M., 1992, Geological cross sections: in: Development Geology Reference Manual (Morton-Thompson, M and
A.M. Woods, Eds.), AAPG Methods in Exploration Series, No. 10, American Association of Petroleum
Geologists, Tulsa, p.p. 300-302.
Dahlberg, E.C., 1979, Geological Note: Hydrocarbon reserves estimation from contour maps: A do-it-yourself
exercise, Bull Can Petrol Geol, v. 27 no 1, March, p.p. 94-99.
Curry, W. H. and A. H. Curry III, 1972, South Glenrock oil field, Wyoming: prediscovery thinking and postdiscovery
description, in: Stratigraphic oil and gas fields-classification, exploration methods and case histories (King, R.E.,
Ed.) AAPG Memoir 16, American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, p.p. 415-427.
Department of Trade and Industry, 2005, Department of Trade and Industry well numbering system, Petroleum
Operational Notice 12, Department of Trade and Industry, HM Government, UK,
http://www.og.dti.gov.uk/regulation/pons/pon_12.htm
Dessler, J. F., 1992, Marine seismic data acquisition, in: Development Geology Reference Manual (Morton-Thompson,
M and A.M. Woods, Eds.), AAPG Methods in Exploration Series, No. 10, American Association of Petroleum
Geologists, Tulsa, p.p. 361-363.
Duncan, P. M., 1992, Basic seismic processing, in: Development Geology Reference Manual (Morton-Thompson, M
and A. M. Woods, Eds.), AAPG Methods in Exploration Series, No. 10, American Association of Petroleum
Geologists, Tulsa, p.p.364-371.
98
Exploration
Forest, M. (2000), Bright investment pays off, AAPG Explorer, July, American Association of Petroleum Geologists,
Tulsa, p.p.13-14.
Hart, B., 2000, 3-D Seismic interpretations: a primer for geologists, SEPM Short course No. 48, Society for
Sedimentary Geology, Tulsa, 123p.
Jorgensen, L. N., 1992, Dan Field-Denmark, in: Structural Traps VI, Treatise of petroleum geology, atlas of oil and gas
fields, (Foster, N. H. and E. A. Beaumont, Eds.), AAPG Treatise of petroleum geology, American Association of
Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, p.p.199-218.
Keary, P, and M. Brooks, 1991, An introduction to geophysical exploration, 2nd Edition, Blackwell Science Ltd,
Oxford, 254p.
Larner, K. and D. Hale, 1992, Seismic migration, in: Development geology reference manual (Morton-Thompson, M
and A.M. Woods, Eds.), AAPG Methods in Exploration Series, No. 10, American Association of Petroleum
Geologists, Tulsa, p.p. 372-376.
Link, W. K., 1952, Significance of oil and gas seeps in world oil exploration. AAPG Bulletin., v. 36, p.p.1505-1540
Mineral Management Services, 1984, Oil and gas leasing procedures guidelines, Gulf of Mexico Region:MMS,
Department of the Interior, US Government, 188p.
North, F. K., 1985, Petroleum Geology, Chapman and Hall, London, p.p. 405-506.
Price, L. C., 1976, Aqueous solubility of petroleum as applied to its origins and primary migration: AAPG Bulletin,
v.60, p.p. 231-244.
Schlumberger, 1996, The Making of Oil, Schlumberger Wireline and Testing, Sugarland, Texas.
Schlumberger, 2006, On-line Glossary: http://www.glossary.oilfield.slb.com/
Short, D. M. 1992, Seismic data acquisition on land, in: Development Geology Reference Manual (Morton-Thompson,
M and A.M. Woods, Eds.), AAPG Methods in Exploration Series, No. 10, American Association of Petroleum
Geologists, Tulsa, p.p. 358-360.
Tinkler, J. C., 1992, Part1. Land and Leasing, in: Development Geology Reference Manual (Morton-Thompson, M and
A.M. Woods Eds.), AAPG Methods in Exploration Series, No. 10, American Association of Petroleum Geologists,
Tulsa, p.p. 1-20.
Vail, P. R., R. M. Mitchum, Jr, R. G. Todd, J. M. Widmier, S. Thompson, J. B. Sangree, J. N. Bubb, and W. G.
Hatlelid, 1977, Seismic stratigraphy and global changes of sea level, in: Seismic Stratigraphy-Applications to
Hydrocarbon Exploration, (Payton, C. E., Ed.), Memoir 26, American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa,
p.p. 49-205.
Weissenburger, K. W., 1992, Subsurface maps: in: Development Geology Reference Manual (Morton-Thompson, M
and A.M. Woods, Eds.), AAPG Methods in Exploration Series, No. 10, American Association of Petroleum
Geologists, Tulsa, p.p. 294-299.
Yilmaz, z. 1992, Three-dimensional seismic method, in: Development Geology Reference Manual (MortonThompson, M and A.M. Woods, Eds.), AAPG Methods in Exploration Series, No. 10, American Association of
Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, p.p. 385-387.
99