Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Energy Audit of IIT Campus
Energy Audit of IIT Campus
Manoj Kumar
Mahendra Rane
Ms. Debasmita Panda
Ms. Ragini Agarwal
B. Kiran Kumar
Hrushikesh Patade
Hardik Patel
A. Senthil Kumar
Ms. Harathi Nanda
Deepak Yadav
Chinmay Kinjavdekar
Anand Upadhyay
Yajnavalkya K. Nookala
Ravindra Narkhede
S. Nagaraja Rao
Anoop S.
Prasad Wani
Kalpesh Karnik
Shiva Kumar
D. Surendranath
Vineet P.
Ms. Riddhi Panse
Vikrant Bhalerao
under the guidance of
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disclaimer
The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and may not represent or reflect the
views of IIT - Bombay.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PREFACE
An energy audit is a study of a plant or facility to determine how and where energy is
used and to identify methods for energy savings. There is now a universal recognition of the
fact that new technologies and much greater use of some that already exist provide the most
hopeful prospects for the future. The opportunities lie in the use of existing renewable energy
technologies, greater efforts at energy efficiency and the dissemination of these technologies
and options.
This energy audit of the IIT-B academic area and the hostels was carried out by the
students of the Department of Energy Science and Engineering as a part of the course work for
the project EN 607. This report is just one step, a mere mile marker towards our destination of
achieving energy efficiency and we would like to emphasise that an energy audit is a
continuous process. We have compiled a list of possible actions to conserve and efficiently
utilize our scarce resources and identified their savings potential. The next step would be to
prioritize their implementation. We look forward with optimism that the institute authorities,
staff and students shall ensure the maximum execution of the recommendations and the success
of this work.
To all of you, we hope that the ideas and pages that follow will give as much enjoyment
and challenge as they have given us in their development, synthesis and writing. Any
suggestions to further enhance the quality of this work are always welcome. Kindly email your
comments and suggestions to melgeorge@iitb.ac.in or melgeorge.v@gmail.com by 25th July,
2008.
- Authors
TABLE OF CONTENTS
List of figures
List of tables
1. Introduction
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
Segmentation
2. Energy Audit
2.1
Methodology
2.2
3.2
Hostels
3.3
3.4
Street lighting
3.5
Water pumping
3.6
3.7
4. Measurements performed
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
Computers/printers
4.5
Water pumping
5. Benchmarking
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.5
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure no.
1.1
3.1
3.2
Title
Recorded monthly peak demands at IIT-B during the year 2007
Distribution of connected load by end use in IIT-B
Room air conditioning load (ton per unit of total floor area) for different
3.3
departments
Room air conditioning load (ton/ air conditioned sq.m) for offices in Main
3.4
3.5
3.6
4.1
Building
Distribution of connected load in hostels (excluding computers)
Connection diagram of Main Pumping Station
Per capita consumption of energy (as LPG) for different hostels
AC Load curve for the day without the energy saver for ACs (on 12 th May,
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
5.1
5.2
2008)
AC Load curve for the day with the energy saver for ACs (on 7th May, 2008)
Power consumption in H5 washroom for 5 hrs. on 5th April 2008
Power consumption of 2 kW Bajaj geyser in Hostel 5 on 6th April 2008
Efficiency-discharge for various pumps at Main Pump House
Total annual energy consumption of different departments
Normalized per unit area energy consumption (kWh/sq.m/year) for
5.3
departments
Normalized per capita electrical energy consumption (kWh/person/yr.) for
5.4
5.5
departments
Annual electricity consumption in hostels over the years 2005-2007
Annual electricity bills for hostels: student and institute contributions
LIST OF TABLES
Table no.
1.1
Title
Time of Day Tariff as per MSEDCL Tariff Order for HT-I
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
3.8
category
AC loads in various departments
Computers and printers in departments and Main Building
Connected loads (excluding computers) in hostels
Connected Load in kW for Gulmohar and Guest Houses
Common area lighting loads
Ratings of pumps in IIT-B
Capacity of water storage tanks
Details of energy consumption and food wastage in hostel kitchens
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
1.5 ton AC
Measurements for lighting in hostels
Lux meter readings for departments
Lux level measurements for common area lighting
Sample measurements on fans in hostels
Measured power consumption for computers and printers in
4.7
4.8
5.1
5.2
6.1
IIT-Bombay
Implementation Measures
1. INTRODUCTION
The Indian Institute of Technology - Bombay (IIT-B), set up by an Act of Parliament,
was established in 1958, at Powai, a northern suburb of Mumbai. Today, the Institute is
recognised as one of the centres of academic excellence in the country. Over the years, there
has been significant progress at IIT Bombay in all academic and research activities, and a
parallel improvement in facilities and infrastructure, to keep it on par with the best institutions
in the world. Institutes in positions of excellence grow with time. As on date, it has 14
Departments, 10 Centers, 3 Schools and 4 Interdisciplinary programs. The student strength of
the institute is about 5300, with faculty strength of about 450 and supporting staff of about
1500 over an area of about 500 acres.
1.1 Energy audit objective
This energy audit assumes significance due to the fact that the IIT-B electricity bill had
crossed Rs. 10 crores during 2007, and it was aimed at obtaining a detailed idea about the
various end use energy consumption activities and identifying, enumerating and evaluating the
possible energy savings opportunities. The target is to achieve savings in the electrical energy
consumption to the extent of 20%. The audit was also aimed at giving the students a feel of the
practical problems and difficulties in carrying out energy audits. As energy engineers, the
students of the department enthusiastically participated in the endeavour.
1.2 IIT present energy scenario
The energy consumption on campus is mainly in the form of electricity, apart from the
use of LPG as cooking fuel in the hostels.
The campus had a connected electrical load of 5.3 MW as on April 2008 and a contract
demand of 4.5 MVA. The monthly recorded peak demand for the year 2007 is given in Fig.
1.1. The IITB energy bill for the year 2007 was Rs. 10.2 crores. The electricity bill comprises
two parts: one related to the energy consumed (per kWh or per unit energy consumed) and the
other is the maximum demand charge (per kVA of maximum demand during the month). There
also exists a penalty for low power factor. Furthermore, the energy charge includes a
component based on time of use. The Time of Day (TOD) tariff as per the MSEDCL
(Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd.) for category HT-I is as given in
Table 1.1. The existing tariff rate is Rs. 300/kVA for maximum demand and Rs. 4.3 /kWh on
an average.
The maximum demand in April 2008 was 4168 kVA and corresponding power factor
was 0.97. The energy charges during the month were Rs. 3.1 per unit for industrial use, Rs. 2.6
p.u. for residential users and Rs. 4.5 p.u. for commercial activities. The average power factor
for the year 2007 was 0.98 which was achieved by means of power factor correction units.
The contract demand in the year 2001-02 was 3000 kVA, which was increased to 3708
kVA and then finally to 4500 kVA in 2005-06. Before the last extension, the institute was
paying a penalty to MSEDCL (Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd.) for
drawing more than the contract demand. Recently, IIT-B had again applied for extension of
present contract demand to 5000 kVA, which was not granted by MSEDCL/ Tata Power
Supply Company.
4000
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Months
Fig. 1.1: Recorded monthly peak demands at IIT-B during the year 2007
10
Dec
Table 1.1 Time of Day Tariff as per MSEDCL Tariff Order for HT-I category
(since December 2003)
Consumption during following hours of the day
2200hrs-0600 hrs
0600hrs-0900 hrs
0900hrs-1200 hrs
1200hrs-1800 hrs
1800hrs-2200 hrs
11
2. ENERGY AUDIT
2.1 Energy audit methodology
The methodology adopted for this audit was
Observations on the general condition of the facility and equipment and quantification
Validation
Implementation
As a first step in this regard, 13 teams of total 27 students from the department were formed
and each group was assigned a particular area or application of energy in the campus. The
activity was organized as a Graded Course Project for the course EN 607 (Energy
Management) during January-April 2008.
2.2 Grouping and strategy
The following groups were formed with specific target areas and end uses assigned.
Group 1: Lighting and fans in Main building, Library and staff canteen
Group 2: Lighting and fans in Departments (all departments, offices, class rooms and
labs)
Group 3: Lighting common area Covering street lights, corridors, grounds
Group 4: Lighting and fans in Hostels (Hostel 1 to 7)
Group 5: Lighting and fans in Hostels (Hostel 8 to 13)
Group 6: Electric water heating and washroom/ironing loads in all Hostels (Hostel
1-13)
Group 7: Total energy audit of Gulmohar, old guest house and new guest house
12
13
Airconditioning
11%
4%
6%
40%
7%
6%
26%
14
1 ton
0
0
7
0
0
5
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
22
unaccounted areas
1020
1.5 ton
62
3
25
0
4
93
65
34
43
12
18
93
6
19
14
9
105
37
13
27
73
57
15
827
2 ton
2
1
0
12
0
0
2
0
10
0
0
3
0
0
0
6
0
21
3
4
1
2
1
68
3 ton
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
others
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
This is 44.3% of the contract demand at unity pf and 63.2% at 0.7 pf lag. But the whole
demand is not usually at one time due to a diversity factor. The kW/ton based on the rated
values was found to be 1.375. As air conditioning load is about 50% of the campus contract
demand, any savings achieved in this field would be significantly important.
The tonnage of AC per unit of total area for different departments is shown below in Fig.
3.2. A wide variation in the values can be seen in this plot, but the numbers of labs in the
department which are air conditioned have a clear influence on this.
15
0.03
0.025
0.02
0.015
0.01
0.005
0
.
e
E st ry ical si cs
ol ace rgy bldg nex i vil ica l iti es ti cs sc. es it V S E P M C C S c. SC ldg.
o
S
u
i
a p . kr D
c an a n
h
l
n
E m em h y
E O C ID rt h A n b
p
l
e
c
a
s
a
s r o e t nd n+
F C D S IR
e
p
ch um themcom
o
ai
C
i
o
e
i
e
Ea
ch ch
t
m ai
b a
M
m h ma
ma
g
l
l
ca ica
tr i ectr
c
el e el
departments
Fig. 3.2 Room air conditioning load (ton per unit of total floor area) for different
departments
A study of the AC tonnage per unit air conditioned area for the Main Building was done
and it was found that the average is about 0.08 T/m2 which is fine by the standards specified
[Please refer to Appendix C]. Few areas exceed the limits specified and resizing in future could
be an option. In many cases, the utilisation of the area has changed when compared with the
building plans.
16
0.16
0.14
AC tonnage ton/sq.m
0.12
0.1
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
JA HC
M U
G
AT offi
In
E ce
te
rn JE offi
al E ce
au O
di ffic
t
e
D Us
ea e Ca sec
r
n
sh tio
h
St al
n
ud l fo sec
As en r s tio
so ts C tud n
c.
o e
D un nts
ea se
D
n
l
y.
P lin
D
ire D lan g
ni
ct y.
or D ng
C ire
on ct
f. or
R
D
ea oo
m
n
D
ea A.I
n .R.
C Bo fac
on a
u
fe rd lty
D ren Ro
ir
c o
D
ea Dir ecto e R m
n ec
r's oo
t
R
es or's of m
ou c fice
rc ha
(
m *)
e
M be
ob r(
ilis *)
at
AR ion
A
D cd.
R
Ac
C
EP d.
Q
D
R
IP
AR Ad
m
in
a
AR dm
i
Ad n 1
m
R in.2
e
C gis
G Ac on tra
en co f.
r
er un Ro
al
o
t
ad s s m
m ec
in tio
C
is
hi
tra n
ef
tio
Ad
n
vi
se PR
r, O
C
iv
il
1
Fig. 3.3 Room air conditioning load (ton/ air conditioned sq.m) for offices in Main
Building
3.1.3 Computers/printers
Computers and monitors account for 30%-40% of the energy used by office equipment.
Their energy consumption is second only to office lighting. It is estimated that a power
managed computer consumes less than half the energy of a computer without power
management.
The total number of computers and printers in different departments in the campus is as
shown below. The computers in hostels and residential area are not included here.
17
S No
Computer
Department/Building CRT
Printer
LCD
DeskJet
Aerospace
CESE
41
Bio-school
38
SOM
104
11
Chemical/Chemistry
194
44
29
HSS
32
Metallurgy
63
24
11
Earth Science
39
IDC
42
33
10
KRESIT
160
81
15
11
Electrical
226
170
33
12
Civil
90
36
10
13
Main Building
171
92
83
14
Mechanical
76
36
13
15
CSRE
71
11
16
Physics
90
23
17
Energy Systems
24
18
Central Library
31
19
SYSCON
27
11
20
CFILT
21
CFDVS
18
17
22
CDEEP
20
22
23
Mathematics
39
24
24
CSE
20
126
25
IEOR
26
CTARA
27
Faculty
288
145
371
62
18
Monitor
12
Laser Jet
Monitor
77
S No
1
Computer
Department/Building CRT
Printer
LCD
Aerospace
Monitor
77
Monitor
12
Total
1992
963
Laser Jet
DeskJet
657
108
Thus there are a total of about 3,000 computers and about 800 printers in the departments.
3.2 Hostels
There are 14 hostels in IIT Bombay, having an aggregate connected load of 1.25MW.
The loads are analyzed after segregating them into lighting, fan, geyser and wash room loads.
Here, the personal computers or laptops of individual students in their rooms or in hostel
computer rooms are not included.
Table 3.3 Connected loads (excluding computers) in hostels
Hostel
H1
H2
H3
H4
H5
H6
H7
H8
H9
H10
H11
H12
H13
Tansa
Total
Connected
Connected
Load of
Load of
Geysers in
in kW
kW
42.5
46.6
46.3
52.1
40.3
49.8
34.9
37.64
38.47
19.74
38.4
97.28
97.28
15.72
657
18
24
28
24
12
16
40
19
39
36
42
108
108
32
546
Connected
Load of
Wash
Room in
kW
4.42
1.76
2.52
2.31
1.76
5.9
2.52
2.02
2.05
3.72
3.38
4
4.6
2.32
43
Total Connected
Average
Load of the
Hostel in
Room in kW
2007 in kW
64.92
72.36
76.82
78.41
54.06
71.7
77.42
58.66
79.52
59.46
83.78
209.28
209.88
50.04
1246
30.7
26.22
38.25
44.55
32.64
37.72
39.73
37.93
24.75
21.8
33.35
77.03
80.87
29.29
555
19
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Rating
Fitting
(W)
Filament Lamp
Compact Fluorescent Lamp
Fluorescent Lamp
Fluorescent Lamp
Sodium Vapour Lamp
Sodium Vapour Lamp
Sodium Vapour Lamp
Mercury Vapour Lamp
Metal Halide Lamp
20
100
18
40
80
70
150
250
150
400
Number
of
Fittings
16
10
33
52
511
99
14
146
2
B. Gymkhana Grounds
Rating
No
1
2
3
4
5
Ground/Court
Football
Hockey
Basketball
Volleyball
Badminton
Fitting
Metal Halide
Metal Halide
Metal Halide
Metal Halide
Metal Halide
(W)
2000
800
800
800
250
Nos.
24
16
24
32
16
Motor
Electrical
Flow rates
capacity
160 HP
75 HP (new)
75 HP (old)
60 HP
30 HP - 1
30 HP 2
loading
0.71
0.68
0.70
0.89
0.94
0.94
in m3 / hour
308.7
227.67
212.23
208.37
92.61
92.61
21
No.
Tank
1
Tank 1
2
Tank 2
3 Overhead
22
Kitchen
Connected Electrical
Load (kW)
LPG Usage
per day (kg)
Food Wastage
per day (kg)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
H1
H2
H3
H4
H5
H6
H8
H9
H 10
H 11
H 12 & 13
Staff Canteen
Total
11.49
8.5
6.58
7.75
10.7
10.9
10.7
10
5.3
10.7
10.7
3.2
106.5
67
57
43
50
36
50
43
57
28
50
133
57
671
20
20
20
20
25
20
20
20
10
15
128
10
328
Assuming the calorific value of LPG as 46.4 MJ/kg, the daily energy consumption in
LPG is 31 GJ. Thus the major energy consumption is from LPG only. LPG consumed per
student in different hostel kitchens is as shown below.
Fig. 3.6 Per capita per day consumption of energy (as LPG) for different hostels (red line
indicates Institute average)
23
24
4. MEASUREMENTS PERFORMED
Data obtained based on measurements are included in this chapter.
4.1 Room air conditioners
A commercially available energy saver for room ACs was procured * and measurements
were carried out for over 60 hrs, with and without the saver, for a typical 1.5 ton Voltas Vertis
AC in the DESE Urja Computational Lab from 7th- 12th May, 2008.
2500
Power (watts)
2000
1500
1000
500
0
900
1100
1300
1500
1700
Time (hrs.)
Fig. 4.1 AC Load curve for the day without the energy saver for ACs (on 12th May, 2008)
2500
power (watts)
2000
1500
1000
500
0
900
1100
1300
1500
1700
Time (hrs.)
Fig. 4.2 AC Load curve for the day with the energy saver for ACs (on 7th May, 2008)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------* The Aircosaver was procured from M/s Ecopower Ltd., Mumbai. These measurements are purely
from a study point of view and are applicable only in the specific context. They should not be
construed as an endorsement of the merits or deficiencies of the said product(s) by IIT-Bombay.
25
Table 4.1 Energy savings achieved by installation of energy saver for a 1.5 ton AC
Time hrs.
1000-1110
1140-1230
1250-1310
1340-1430
1530-1650
Whole working
46
42.4
10.2
44.7
41.7
40.3
#52-FTL
85
170
75
70
Hostel 5
#48-FTL #49-FTL
31
133
95
31
38
150.6
105
55
#49-14W CFL
Hostel 3
#289
64
52
10
87
107
78
98
The lux levels are found to be far less than the standard values in hostel rooms.
26
27
Only lights
135
155
101
90
100
102
395,400
140,150
170,175
155
140,160
170,180
220,200
221
282,234
379,300
Here:
Average Horizontal Illumination- AH
Variation in Horizontal Illumination- VH
Average Vertical Illumination- AV
4.2.4 Fans
From the power consumption of ceiling fans with resistance and electromagnetic
regulators, it was seen that the latter consumes less power at lower speeds of the fan.
Table 4.5 Sample measurements on fans in hostels
Sample reading [Room No 49, H5]
(4th April 2008)
Ceiling Fan
Resistance regulator
FanSpeed V(volts) I(Amp) P(W) P.F.
1
224.7
0.43
41
0.791
2
225.6
0.43
56
0.9
3
223.81
0.453
63
0.956
4
223.4
0.45
66
0.984
ON
223.3
0.452
70
0.996
Sample Reading [H5 Mess] (4th April 2008)
Electronic Regulator
Ceiling Fan
Fan Tab V(volts) I(Amp) P(W) P.F.
1
233.7
0.26
13
0.385
2
233.6
0.396
37
0.66
3
233.7
0.382
49
0.815
ON
233.18
0.405
68
0.997
28
Fig. 4.3 Power consumption in H5 washroom for 5 hrs. on 5th April 2008
The typical power consumption of geysers installed in Hostel 5 is shown below in Fig. 4.4.
Fig. 4.4 Power consumption of 2 kW Bajaj geyser in Hostel 5 on 6th April 2008
29
Jwala
CPU
Monitor
On
56.0
0.620
Jwala
Vayu
CPU
CPU
On
105.5
0.650
On
60.0
0.650
Prithvi
Monitor
On
53.4
0.620
Urja
CPU
On
48.0
0.560
Urja
System
Hibernate
2.5
0.200
Urja
Monitor
On
55.0
0.634
Urja
System
Sleep Mode
3.0
0.225
10
Laser Printer
On
3.0
0.360
&
4.5 Pumping
The power consumption and efficiency of the pumps used in the campus are as shown below.
4.5.1 Pumps for Department and Residential complexes
Table 4.7: Details of pumps for departments and residential complexes
Electrical Power
Hydraulic Power
Overall system
Pump
Consumption
(kW)
Efficiency
(kW)
160HP
37.0
78.6
0.47
75HP NEW
24.3
37.7
0.65
75HP OLD
22.2
38.6
0.58
60HP
21.7
33.2
0.65
30
Pump
30HP
13.5
21.2
0.64
30HP
13.5
21.2
0.64
31
5. BENCHMARKING
Energy benchmarking involves the development of quantitative and qualitative
indicators through the collection and analysis of energy-related data and energy management
practices. Benchmarking in simplistic terms is the process of comparing the performance of a
given process with that of the best possible process and to try to improve the standard of the
process to improve quality of the system, product, services etc. It allows organizations to
develop plans on how to adopt such best practices, usually with the aim of increasing some
aspect of performance. Benchmarking may be a one-off event, but is often treated as a
continuous process in which organizations continually seek to challenge their practices.
Benchmarking is a method which should be used on a continual basis as best practices are
always evolving.
Benchmarking of energy consumption is a powerful tool for performance assessment
and logical evolution of avenues for improvement. Historical data, well documented, helps to
bring out energy consumption and cost trends month-wise / daily. Trend analysis of energy
consumption, cost, relevant production features, specific energy consumption, help to
understand effects of capacity utilization on energy use efficiency and costs on a broader scale.
The basis for benchmarking the energy consumption at IIT-B is energy consumed per person
(includes teaching staff and students). The benchmarking parameters here are,
32
1400000
1200000
1000000
800000
600000
400000
200000
SO
M
H
um
an
iti
es
Ea
rth
Sc
.
C
ES
E
R
el
ia
bi
lit
y
ID
C
s
C
SR
E
il
si
c
C
iv
Ph
y
SJ
M
om
C
El
ec
pu
te
rs
c.
tri
ca
lE
ng
g.
C
he
m
is
try
C
he
m
ic
M
al
ec
ha
ni
Bi
ca
o
l
Sc
ie
nc
es
M
et
al
lu
M
rg
at
y
he
m
at
ic
Ae
s
ro
sp
ac
e
departments
33
Fig. 5.2 Normalized per unit area energy consumption (kWh/sq.m/year) for departments
From the above graph it can be observed that Chemistry, KReSIT, Electrical,
Mathematics, Mechanical and Bioscience departments are above the base line of per sq. m
energy consumption as their values are greater than one.
5.3 Per capita energy consumption for departments
The per capita (student + faculty) consumption for each department is determined and it
is normalized with respect to the average value of the per capita consumption for the institute.
Basis for 2007: 1384 kWh/person/year.
From the graph (Fig. 5.3) it can be observed that Chemistry, KReSIT, IDC,
Mathematics, Bio-science, CSRE are above the base line of the per capita consumption as their
values are greater than one.
34
Fig. 5.3 Normalized per capita electrical energy consumption (kWh/person/yr.) for
departments
35
A graph showing the present institute subsidy and the student fee contribution to the
annual hostel electricity bills in 2007 is shown below (Fig. 5.5). The institute subsidy is to the
extent of 85% of the bills. So, any savings achieved in the hostel bills is directly beneficial to
the institute and can be used for other works.
700000
600000
500000
2005
2006
2007
400000
300000
200000
100000
0
1
10
11
12
13
hostel no.
Fig. 5.4: Annual electricity consumption in hostels over the years 2005-2007
36
3500000
3000000
2500000
institute subsidy
student fee contribution
2000000
1500000
1000000
500000
0
1
10
11
12
13
hostel no.
Fig. 5.5: Annual electricity bills for hostels: student and institute contributions
during the year 2007
5.5 ECBC Standards and comparison
As per the Energy Conservation Building Code (ECBC) 2006, published by the
Bureau of Energy Efficiency (BEE), Govt. of India, the recommended levels of lighting power
density are as given below in Table 5.1.
Table 5.1: ECBC recommended levels for lighting power density
Space/ application
Enclosed offices
Offices-open plan
Conferences/meeting rooms/ multipurpose
Classrooms/ lecture theatres
Lounge
Dining area
Food preparation
Library stacks
Library reading area
Workshops
Cafeteria
37
It can be seen that the lighting power density values in the Institute are not higher than
the ECBC standards.
38
Savings in
Rs. Per
year
Capital
Investment
in Rs
Simple Pay
Back
Period
7400 kWh
38,000
10,000
4 months
6,95,500
kWh
1,18,800
34.8 lakhs
63 lakhs
19 months
kWh
1,11,000
2.7 lakhs
4.32 lakhs
17 months
kWh
5.4.lakhs
2.56 lakhs
6 months
2.8 lakhs
2.7 lakhs
1 year
3.4 lakhs
3.4 lakhs
1 year
79,300
1.57 lakhs
2 years
49.68 lakhs
182 lakhs
3.7 years
80,000
2.6 lakhs
3.3 years
6.41akhs
6.54 lakhs
13 months
cylinders of
3.1 lakhs
95,000
4 months
14.2 kg
4,38,000
21.9 lakhs
13 lakhs
8 months
No
Recommended Measure
Replacing Electromagnetic ballast by Electronic
2
3
4
8
9
biogas
plant
for
food
waste
processing(300 kg capacity)
11
72,100
kWh
15,600
kWh
10,35,000
kWh
1825 LPG
cylinders of
14.2 kg
OR
(b)ARTI
kWh
kWh
15,700
10
59,300
900 LPG
39
12
13
14
15
kWh
51,300
kWh
kWh
50,420
kWh
pumps,
16
6,20,000
49,100
kWh
1,07,300
kWh
2.5 lakhs
nil
nil
31.1 lakhs
nil
nil
2.42 lakhs
nil
nil
2.4 lakhs
1 lakh
4 months
5.3 lakhs
23 lakhs
4 .2 years
1.75 crores
3.05 crores
1.7 years
34,46,500
kWh and
Total savings
1825 / 900
LPG
cylinders
Implementation of all the above measures can bring about a total saving of around Rs.
1.75 crores per year, i.e. 17% of the present electricity bill. The total investment required
would be to the extent of Rs. 3.05 crores and an average simple payback period of around
1.75 years.
In addition to the above, a set of general recommendations is provided in Appendix
G.
40
I.
Appointment of an Energy Manager for the institute, with suitable experience and a
proven track record. The person shall be responsible for the day to day energy
conservation activities. New staff should be allotted to the Energy Manager or some
staff members from Electrical Maintenance Section be made responsible to him/her.
An annual review of the energy performance of the institute is to be performed and
a certain percentage of the quantified savings be shared with the Energy Manager.
II.
The Executive Engineer (Electrical) should himself take over the responsibility of
ensuring efficient energy use on the campus. This will ensure prompt
implementation of measures. This system may also require additional staff. A
performance related incentive in the form of a bonus can be provided to the
Electrical Maintenance staff based on savings achieved.
III.
Formation of an Institute level committee headed by the Dy. Director to review the
implementation of energy conservation measures. All departments and section
heads should submit a bi-annual report of compliance for review and action.
Sections/ departments not achieving savings to be penalized and suitable incentives
may be given to the performing departments.
An annual review of the implementation of the energy saving measures should be taken up
and performance should be monitored. A report of the same should be sent to the Director.
Electrical energy consumption should be made a subject in the Institute budget with
separate heads for departments and hostels. Energy performance can be a basis for providing
incentives to hostels and departments.
41
APPENDIX A
LIST OF MEASURING INSTRUMENTS USED
1. Power analyzer (measures active, reactive, apparent power, power factor, energy
consumed)
2. Lux meters (to measure lighting levels in lux or lumens per sq.m.)
3. Thermometers digital
4. Thermocouples
42
APPENDIX B
DISTRIBUTION OF ROOM ACs
The distribution of the room air conditioners by type and utilization location is as
shown below in Fig. B.1 and B.2 respectively.
29%
window
split
71%
24%
labs
rooms
offices
57%
19%
APPENDIX C
BEE THUMB RULES FOR AIR CONDITIONING LOADS
The recommended levels for comfort air conditioning loads as per the BEE (Bureau of
Energy Efficiency) thumb rules are as given below in Table C.1.
Table C.1: BEE thumb rules for comfort AC loads
Type of office
Heat load in ton rating per sq.m.
Small office cabins
0.10
Medium size offices (seating 10-30 people)
0.06
Large multi-storied office buildings with
0.04
centralized air conditioning
44
APPENDIX D
CALCULATIONS FOR SOLAR WATER HEATING SYSTEMS (SWHS)
FOR HOSTELS
A sample calculation for the storage tank volume, collector area requirement and
payback period for the hostel no. 5 has been done below.
Total no. of hot water users in hostel = 329
Assume that amount of hot water used per student = 20 litres / day.
Total amount of water used per day in the hostel = 6580 litres.
Now typically 2 m2 of collector gives 125 Litres per day of hot water output at 60 C
Normal tolerable hot water temperature by measurement we found to be 40 C.
However, assuming that the end user consumes hot water at 60 C (since piping losses are also
involved) the collector area required for the hostel is 106 m2.
The option is either to go for forced circulation or natural circulation. Forced circulation
requires various accessories and proper control of the pump. Hence selecting natural
circulation system and considering three wings in hostel, the collector area required on each
wing is 37 m2.
Cost of collector = Rs. 10,000 / m2.
Total capital cost required for installation of solar water heater in the hostel = 10,000*106
= Rs 10,60,000
The total energy consumption in the hostel considering 12 hours of geyser operation is found to
be 6*1.5*12=108 kWh/day
Total energy consumption in a year = 27,000 kWh (assuming 250 days operation)
Assuming the cost of electricity as Rs. 4.8 / kWh,
Total electricity bill due to geysers in the hostel = 27000*4.8
= Rs. 1, 29,600 /Simple Payback period (SPP) = (capital cost of SWHS / Electricity bill per year)
= 8 years.
This is a bit on the higher side due to the lower number of geysers in Hostel 5.
45
The same calculations are done for each hostel in which, capital required and payback
period are calculated and are listed below.
Table D.1: Calculations for SWHS in hostels
Sr.
no.
Hostel
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
H-1
H-2
H-3
H-4
H-5
H-6
H-7
H-8
H-9
H-10
H-11
H-12
H-13
Tansa
Numbers
of
geysers
9
12
12
12
6
8
18
8
18
18
21
36
36
16
Energy
consumed
(kWh)
40500
54000
54000
54000
27000
36000
81000
36000
81000
81000
94500
162000
162000
72000
Energy
Cost
(Rs.)
202500
270000
270000
270000
135000
180000
405000
180000
405000
405000
472500
810000
810000
360000
No. of
students
315
396
414
512
329
432
279
416
485
437
430
514
530
200
Water
requirement
per day
6300
7920
8280
10240
6580
8640
5580
8320
9700
8740
8600
10280
10600
4000
Collector
Area reqd.
Cost of
collectors
SPP in
years
100.8
126.72
132.48
163.84
105.28
138.24
89.28
133.12
155.2
139.84
137.6
164.48
169.6
64
1008000
1267200
1324800
1638400
1052800
1382400
892800
1331200
1552000
1398400
1376000
1644800
1696000
640000
5
4.7
5
6
8
7.6
2
7
3.8
3.5
2.9
2
2.1
1.8
Comments:
1. The pay back periods of the hostels are found to be in between 1.8 to 8 years.
2. The discrepancy in the payback period can be attributed to the variation in no. of
students per geyser as reported earlier.
3. Solar heater option is looking quite attractive but, some efforts are needed for
synchronization of output of solar heater system and geyser.
4. Natural circulation system is recommended.
46
APPENDIX E
CALCULATIONS FOR POWER SAVINGS IN COMPUTERS
Formula used:
Total energy consumed for each setting
= No of computers x Duty cycle x 24 x Average power x No of operating days in a year.
The table below shows the existing settings for monitors on the campus. There are 1992
CRT monitors and 963 LCD screens. The CRT monitor consumes 66 W and LCD monitors
consume 30 W. We have assumed 6.5 hrs of monitor ON (i.e. in use) and 17.5 hrs when it is
not being used and 300 days operation in a year.
Table E.1 Present annual energy consumption for computer monitors on campus
S No
1
2
3
4
Turn off
Monitor
Never
20 min
30 min
40 min
Percentage of
existing
monitors
16
54
16
14
Energy Consumed
(kWh)
184737
181551
55053
49274
In addition, the CPUs consume 40 W. Using a similar assumption as given above, the
annual energy consumption is as tabulated in Table E.2.
Table E.2: Present annual energy consumption for CPUs
S No
1
2
System Standby
Never
10 min
Percentage
83
17
Energy Consumed
(kWh)
706363
45255
Now, using the recommended settings for all the computers, the energy consumption
would be as per Table E.3.
47
Table E.3: Annual energy consumption for all computers with recommended power
settings
Item
Monitors
CPUs
Turn off
Monitor
10 min
20 min
Percentage
100
100
Energy Consumed
(kWh)
328796
271455
The annual energy savings thus obtained is about 6, 20,000 kWh, i.e. about Rs.31.1
lakhs (assuming Rs. 5 per kWh).
48
APPENDIX F
OPERATING SCHEDULE OF PUMPS AT MAIN PUMP HOUSE
160 HP:
This pump is operated in the peak hours, when water is required the most. On the
whole, this pump operates for 8 hrs every day.
75 HP AND 60 HP PUMPS:
The two 75 hp and the 60 hp pump are set into operation for four hours alternatively.
30 HP PUMPS
The 30 hp pumps are in operation from 0500 to 0100 hours everyday. Hence, the
pumps are in operation for 20 hours in a day and each pumps alternatively works for 4
hrs. There fore, each of these pumps is on for ten hours in a day.
The prevailing operating schedule and a new proposed schedule are shown in Fig. F.1.
Fig. F.1: Comparison of the existing and proposed loading of pumps at Main Pump
House
49
An annual saving of Rs. 2.42 Lakhs can be achieved using the modified schedule.
In order for this proposal to work, the pumps at various buildings have to run after 22:00 hrs so
that the water demand is lowered during peak hours. This will also bring in savings due to time
of usage tariff for those smaller pumps.
50
APPENDIX G
GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS
In addition to the recommendations given in section 6.1, a few more general ones are
presented here. The savings due to their implementation could not be easily quantified, but
their importance cannot be understated. Implementing all these measures, a total saving of
20-25% can be achieved without compromising much on the existing facilities and comforts.
G.1 Lighting
Currently 10 FTL are controlled with one switch. Since it is near to window, sufficient
day lighting is available. So if we use photo sensor to control this lights we can reduce
the duty cycle and energy consumption.
2)
Presently 5 FTL are controlled with one switch. By slight modification in the circuit we
can use photo sensor to control 5 lamps.
3)
Presently 5 FTL are controlled with one switch .photo sensor can be installed to control
lights in the alternate row.
Split switching: In the internal corridors of H13, the present arrangement is that
alternate lights are clubbed together in one switch. Yet, the distance of them is 7 m and
seems to be too close to each other. As such the tubes are at a distance of approx 3.5 m
51
So, the split switching may be such that far off ie., may be the first and fourth tubes
may be included in one switch. Alternatively, the alternate tubes may be removed
form the installation.
G.2 Geysers
It is advisable to have manual switching of the geyser in peak periods, as most of the
geysers were ON for 24 hours.
It was found that in many cases, the utility type of the area has changed and the AC
may no longer be required there. This can save expenses on procurement of new ACs.
Proper maintenance of ACs is not being done. Many of the older ACs could be
replaced. About 20-22 % of all installed ACs suffer from some or the other defect. In a
large number of cases, the filters were found to be dirty (3%), thermostats not working
(7%), ice formation/ water leakage (1%), rusting (3%), fans not working (4%), swing
problems (3%) etc. were observed.
The heating load can also be reduced by reducing the consumption by other sources
like lights, computers etc. and the occupancy needs to be considered. Explore the
possibility of occupancy sensors.
G.4 Pumping
52
APPENDIX H
SUMMARY OF HOSTEL ELECTRICITY BILLS
Table H.1 Hostels electricity consumption during 2007 and amounts paid in rupees
Mon
th
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Hostel 1
Units Amount
21223
95003
22235
129776
20342
117234
23221
113851
19745
111762
22330
108491
23312
99835
25260
134141
26122
129655
23960
127205
22526
113905
18968
91793
Month
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Hostel 2
Units Amount
22591
101114
23398
136558
18116
104418
16676
81803
12775
72350
5608
27364
9162
39351
33606
178421
30638
152046
10692
56838
24830
125540
21638
104692
Hostel 8
Units
Amount
27600
123692
31340
183071
28618
165083
32763
160773
21673
122864
22937
111635
21100
90580
30652
162948
32832
163124
31034
164922
30005
151874
21684
105114
Hostel 3
Units Amount
30025 134326
34762 202827
31399 180895
37105 181834
18700 105834
23816 115700
17698 75838
29356 155872
32337 160469
31343 166360
28529 144220
19977 96668
Hostel 9
Units
Amount
17047
76347
20005
116771
18377
105921
22407
109865
12862
72842
13522
65759
12703
54487
20537
109083
22403
111217
20986
111432
21621
109334
14340
69435
Hostel 4
Units Amount
33277
149254
37734
220558
34536
199356
40468
199773
25127
142594
26274
128025
24408
104920
35810
190514
36879
183389
35859
190711
34212
173319
25633
124392
Hostel 10
Units
Amount
15541
69594
17396
101532
16743
96488
20953
102721
11794
66778
12311
59858
10893
46725
18428
97869
19772
98147
18254
96918
17647
89241
11227
54371
53
Hostel 5
Units Amount
23106 103415
27064 157936
25474 146782
29364 143930
18382 104055
21161 102819
18123 77654
26145 138836
27519 136582
26597 141190
26512 134034
16489 79817
Hostel 11
Units Amount
22078
98798
24913
145367
23452
135115
27094
132790
21508
121706
25485
123772
24512
104939
26287
139565
27214
135044
27505
145981
22391
113198
19690
95256
Hostel 6
Units Amount
26613
119083
29601
172730
28106
161935
29013
142211
28391
160651
27932
135669
27042
115779
28896
153432
26828
133156
29354
155812
27757
140321
20912
101185
Hostel 12
Units
Amount
49154
220385
48990
286397
46299
261282
55314
271594
47395
268709
43894
213708
47526
203938
47412
252268
46705
232306
47757
254012
40644
206001
41432
200917
Hostel 7
Units
30576
38112
33209
41076
22057
24575
21256
35164
39668
27385
20736
14259
Amount
1369897
222562
191516
201478
125035
119582
91246
186887
197076
145569
105065
69244
Hostel 13
Units Amount
57995
259882
62446
364866
56947
328587
71551
351099
44981
255059
40381
202017
38988
167442
55301
294123
57864
287632
58700
312048
49809
252284
41534
201410
APPENDIX I
DETAILS OF LIBRARY CENTRAL AIR CONDITIONING
The schematic is as shown in the following figure.
54
(set
of
four
books,
available
at
http://www.energymanagertraining.com/new_course.php)
5. J.C. Andreas, Energy Efficient Motors, Marcel Dekker Publ., New York, 1992.
6. Nisarguna Biogas Plant by Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, details available at
www.barc.ernet.in/webpages/technologies/kitchen/kitchen_br
7. Compact biogas plant by Appropriate Rural Technology Institute, Pune, details
available at http://www.arti-india.org/content/view/46/43/
8. US
Governments
Energy
Star
page
for
fluorescent
bulbs,
http://www.energystar.gov/index.cfm
9. Explanatory video on various types of lamps, www.commoncraft.com/cfl
10. Typical
lumen
outputs
and
energy
costs
for
outdoor
lighting,
www.nofs.navy.mil/about_NoFs/staff/cbl/lumentab.html
11. General
Electric
and
lighting
products,
www.gelighting.com/na/home_lighting/products/energy_smart
12. Information on energy saver for room air conditioners, www.aircosaver.com
13. Official website of the Bureau of Energy Efficiency, Govt. of India, www.beeindia.nic.in
14. Detailed
information
and
case
studies
on
energy
audits,
www.energymanagertraining.com
15. www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_audit
16. Website of the Ministry of Power, http://powermin.nic.in/distribution/energy_audit
17. The
Energy
Conservation
Act,
http://powermin.nic.in/acts_notification/energy_conservation_act/index.htm
55
2001,
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We would like to express our heartfelt gratitude to the following persons for the support
and cooperation they rendered during the course of this energy audit.
The Dean and Associate Dean (Planning) and other Institute functionaries
Mr. B.K. Sahoo (Executive Engineer), Ms. Y. Naik, Mr. Yadav, Mr. Mohandas, Mr.
Adhare, Mr. Kishor Mali and other staff members of Electrical Maintenance Section
Prof. B.G. Fernandes, Prof. K. Chatterjee (Dept. of Electrical Engg.), Prof. C.S. Solanki
(Energy Science) and Prof. Anand B. Rao (CTARA)
Mr. K.G. Kale, Mr. Kharte, Mr. Ajay, Mr. V. Chaudhari (all of DESE)
56