You are on page 1of 3

Assessment of the growth experience: Poverty and Unemployment

Poverty and unemployment are closely related


High poverty has a multiplier effect on quality of life, deprivation,
malnutrition, illiteracy and low human resource development.

Poverty

Poverty lines
o Normative nutritional requirement per person per day at some base
point.
o This is debated
o 2400 cal (rural), 2100 cal (urban)
o Nutrient requirement then needs to be translated to monetary
terms.
Poverty has declined as per NSSO estimates.
However, recent committees like the Tendulkar committee have reviewed
the methodology of measuring poverty and concluded that poverty levels
are much higher than those presented through the NSSO estimates.
Data on poverty reduction <put>
Rural-urban and regional disparity
o Even when poverty has declined there has been a marked disparity
in its reduction in rural and urban areas as well as across different
regions in the country
o --- states have poverty ratio below the national average
o Significant reduction in Andhra, Gujarat, Haryana, Karnataka,
Kerala, Maharashtra, Punjab and WB
o Most poor states of Bihar, MP, Orissa and UP have shown little
progress in poverty reduction
o Over 54 pc of Indias poor lived in these states in 2004-05
o These states have more poor than 26 sub-Saharan African countries
according to the 2010 HDR
o North-western states (P, H, HP, J&K) comprise only 2.2 pc of Indias
poor. Rural urban disparity is minimal
o More than half of Indias urban poor live in the states of
Maharashtra, MP, UP and TN
o There is no evidence for convergence in the incidence of poverty
across the states of India
o Coeffcient of variation (CV) of poverty reveals widening inter-state
inequalities in poverty reduction. Between 1993-94 and 2004-2005
CV increased from 36 to 54.
Non-income dimensions of poverty
o NFHS-3 and District level Household Survey on Reproductive Health
46 pc children under 3 and 49 pc children under 6
malnourished
79 pc children anaemic
59 pc deliveries did not take place in institutional agencies
32 pc have no electricity, 55 no toilet
o Multidimensional Poverty Index
Economic Growth and Poverty

Necessary for poverty reduction, but not sufficient


This is because
Poverty is not only income poverty. There are various other
unfreedoms. The MDPI captures this well
Enabling role of basic education, good health, land reforms,
social security
The fruits of economic growth may not be automatically
utilised to expand basic social services
o Eliminating deprivation is as much a matter of public action as one
merely of economic growth.
o There has been no significant acceleration in the process of poverty
reduction during 1980-2005 despite an acceleration in the growth of
per capita GDP
Since public action is required, schemes such as NREGS and SGSY are
important
Chronic Poverty
o Higher among rural casual labour households than urban casual
labour households
o Varies significantly across social and occupational groups and is
highest for SCs
Poverty in India vs other developing countries
o China
Poverty in China declined from 53 pc in 1981 to 8 pc in 2001.
In the same period India reduced poverty by 17 pc
India fares badly even on non-income dimensions of poverty
like malnutrition, infant mortality
Concerns about equity and disparity remain in China too.
India has fared better than China in achieving lower
inequality
Poverty and Planning/inclusive growth <see poverty notes>
Strategy to deal with the problem
o Recognize that poor are hetrogenous. So strategies need to be
specifically designed to deal with chronic poor and other poor
o Design safety nets
o Strengthen livelihood and make them more productive
o
o

Obsession with economic growth? <Notes from Sens


article>

Economic growth helps in advancing living standards and in battling


poverty
Growth, however, should not be taken to be an end in itself
Sustainable economic growth
Focus on development
The good thing about economic growth is that it generates resources for
the government to spend according to its priorities

India-China comparision
Parameter
LE
IMR
U-5 MR
Literacy
Mean years of schooling

India
64.4
50
66
65
4.4

China
73.5
17
19
94
7.5

You might also like