Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Effects of Alloying Elements On The Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of Heavy Section Ductile Cast Iron
Effects of Alloying Elements On The Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of Heavy Section Ductile Cast Iron
1, 2007
97
The effects of alloying elements on the as-cast microstructures and mechanical properties of heavy section
ductile cast iron were investigated to develop press die material having high strength and high ductility.
Measurements of ultimate tensile strength, 0.2% proof strength, elongation and unnotched Charpy impact
energy are presented as a function of alloy amounts within 0.25 to 0.75 wt pct range. Hardness is measured
on the broken tensile specimens. The small additions of Mo, Cu, Ni and Cr changed the as-cast mechanical
properties owing to the different as-cast matrix microstructures. The ferrite matrix of Mo and Ni alloyed cast
iron exhibits low strength and hardness as well as high elongation and impact energy. The increase in Mo and
Ni contents developed some fractions of pearlite structures near the austenite eutectic cell boundaries, which
caused the elongation and impact energy to drop in a small range. Adding Cu and Cr elements rapidly changed
the ferrite matrix into pearlite matrix, so strength and hardness were significantly increased. As more Mo and
Cr were added, the size and fraction of primary carbides in the eutectic cell boundaries increased through the
segregation of these elements into the intercellular boundaries.
KEY WORDS: Heavy section ductile cast iron; Alloying elements; As-cast microstructures;
As-cast mechanical properties
1. Introduction
2. Experimental
98
C
3.61
3.57
3.60
3.64
3.66
Si
2.36
2.37
2.40
2.35
2.31
Mn
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.30
0.33
P
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
S
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
Mo
0.19/0.38/0.58
Cu
0.24/0.47/0.70
Ni
0.24/0.48/0.70
Cr
0.26/0.49
Mg
0.06
0.06
0.06
0.06
0.06
Area fraction/%
10.2
13.1
13.0
12.2
11.4
Nodule count/(Nmm2 )
141.0
153.3
154.6
152.6
148.0
Nodularity/(%)
90.4
88.5
87.5
87.3
86.0
Ave. diameter/m
30.3
33.0
32.8
31.8
31.5
99
Fig.3 Microstructures of the as-cast melt B ductile cast iron with different Mo contents: (a) 0.25 wt pct Mo,
(b) 0.5 wt pct Mo, (c) 0.75 wt pct Mo
Fig.4 Microstructures of the as-cast melt C ductile cast iron with different Cu contents: (a) 0.25 wt pct Cu,
(b) 0.5 wt pct Cu, (c) 0.75 wt pct Cu
Fig.5 Microstructures of the as-cast ductile cast irons with different alloying elements: (a) 0.75 wt pct Mo
(b) 0.75 wt pct Cu, (c) 0.75 wt pct Ni, (d) 0.5 wt pct Cr
with a bull0 s-eye ferrite rim around the nodules. Figure 4 presents the ability of Cu to hinder the diffusion of carbon into graphite at the graphite-austenite
interface during the solid state transformation after
solidification. The Cu will increase as-cast strength
and hardness through increased pearlite formation[8] .
Figure 5 shows the as-cast microstructures of ductile cast iron with different alloying elements. While
100
Fig.6 EDX line scan profiles measured on as-cast ductile cast irons: (a) 0.75 wt pct Mo, (b) 0.5 wt pct Cr
Fig.7 Variation in tensile strength and elongation of as-cast ductile cast irons having different alloying contents:
(a) tensile strength, (b) elongation
resemble that of Cu added ductile cast iron. Addition of up to 0.5 wt pct Cr could not reach a maximum of 700 MPa because of the formation of a large
bull0 s-eye ferrite structure. It is confirmed that the
tensile strength of as-cast ductile cast iron is strongly
dependent on the area fraction of pearlite, while elongation is inversely proportional to the pearlite fraction in the as-cast microstructure[1618] . Figure 8
presents the SEM micrographs of the fractured surface of tensile specimens for comparing two typical
fracture modes. Figure 8(a) shows the brittle fracture
surface of 0.75 wt pct Cu alloyed iron having pearlite
matrix with cleavage river patterns. The ductile fracture surface of 0.75 wt pct Ni alloyed iron is shown
in Fig.8(b). Plastic deformation of ferrite around the
boundary of graphite nodule is observed. Some cleavage brittle fracture area having a pearlite phase near
the intercellular region is also shown.
Figure 9 shows the variation in hardness and impact energy with different alloying additions. As more
alloying contents are added, the Brinell hardness of
Mo and Ni alloyed ductile cast iron is linearly increased, but that of Cu and Cr alloyed ductile cast
iron increased very steeply. The Brinell hardness of
ductile cast iron refers to the resistance of the matrix
and graphite to plastic deformation. The variation
in hardness with the alloying element is strongly determined by the as-cast microstructures. Generally,
the hardness of cast iron is increased by the volume
fraction of pearlite structure[19,20] . In this study, the
addition of Mo and Ni slightly increased the matrix
hardness via solid solution hardening. As more Cu
and Cr element is added, the hardness increased significantly owing to the high fraction of pearlite. The
Charpy impact energy of Mo and Ni alloyed iron is
gradually decreased, but that of the Cu and Cr
101
Fig.8 SEM micrographs showing the fractured surface of tensile specimens: (a) 0.75 wt pct Cu, (b) 0.75 wt pct Ni
Fig.9 Variation in hardness and impact energy of as-cast ductile cast irons having different alloying contents:
(a) Brinell hardness, (b) Charpy impact energy