Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A Study On Effect of Welfare Measures On Employee Morale
A Study On Effect of Welfare Measures On Employee Morale
V.MAHESWARI
REGISTER NO: 27348322
Under The Guidance Of
MEASURES
ON
EMPLOYEE
MORALE
IN
HIDESIGN,
27348322] in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the award of Master of Business
Administration by Pondicherry University during the academic year 2007 2008.
GUIDE
HEAD OF DEPARTMENT
TABLE OF CONTENT
LIST OF TABLES
LIST OF CHARTS
CHAPTER
TITLE
PAGE
NO.
INTRODUCTION
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
16
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
17
21
42
CONCLUSION
44
45
ANNEXURES
1. QUESTIONNAIRE
2. BIBLIOGRAPHY
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
With the divine blessing of god, I take immense pleasure in stating the
acknowledgement for this project. I express my deep gratitude to Mr. N.KESAVAN,
Chairman, Mr.M.DHANASEKARAN, Managing Director and Mr.S.V.SUGUMARAN,
Vice Chairman, Sri Manakula Vinayagar Engineering College.
My special thanks to our college Mr.V.S.K.VENKATACHALAPATHY for extending
me morel support during the course of this work.
My special thanks to Mr.S.JAYAKUMAR, Head of the Department of Management
studies for his motivation and providing me the permission in doing this project.
I wish to thank my internal guide Mr. G.BALA SENDHIL KUMAR for being so
resource full from the beginning of this project and help to bring this project successfully.
I thank my external guide Mr.LUCAS, Advocate cum Personal Manager of
Hidesign, Puducherry for giving me this opportunity to do this project work in their
organization and for guiding me throughout the project duration
I wish to thank all other faculty members of the department for their co-operation
and encouragement throughout my project work.
I am also thankful to the all employee of Hidesign, Puducherry for providing me the
details about the company for the completion of the project.
Last but not least I thank my parents and friends who were very supportive to me
during this project.
ABSTRACT
The welfare measure is An effort to make life worth living for workmen. It
motivates employee to a great extent which leads to organizational growth. It is a major
factor which affects the employee morale.
The study on effect of welfare measure on employee morale in NCR, Puducherry
was done to evaluate the level of satisfaction of employees about welfare measures and its
effect on employee morale.
The main objective of the study is to measure the effect of welfare measure on
morale, level of satisfaction of employees regarding working condition and general attitude
of employee towards the organization.
Certain welfare measures provided by the company like medical facility, credit
facility, canteen facility, infrastructure facility, and certain factors of morale like
motivation. Job satisfaction interrelationships are considered in this study. This was a
descriptive research study.
sampling method. A questionnaire of 23 questions was prepared and data were collected
from the employees of NCR. Appropriate statistical tools were used to analyze the data.
From the study it is inferred that most of the employees were satisfied with the
welfare measures provided by the company. The employee morale was found to be good in
the company. The effect of welfare measure on employee morale was about 25%.
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE
NO.
TITLE
PAGE
NO.
5.1
EXPERIENCE OF RESPONDENT
21
5.2
22
5.3
23
5.6
BETWEEN WORKERS
26
5.7
27
5.8
28
30
32
5.13.1
5.13.2
34
5.13.3
34
5.14.1
5.14.2
35
5.4
5.5
5.9
5.10
5.11
5.12.1
5.12.2
5.12.3
24
25
29
31
32
32
34
35
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE
NO.
5.14.3
TITLE
PAGE
NO.
36
CORRELATION TABLE
ANALYSIS OF RANKING GIVEN BY RESPONDENTS
REGARDING SATISFACTION OF WELFARE
MEASURES (USING WEIGHTED AVERAGE
METHOD)
37
39
5.17.1
5.17.2
REGRESSION TABLE
40
5.15.1
5.15.2
5.16.1
5.16.2
37
39
40
LIST OF CHARTS
CHART
NO.
TITLE
PAGE
NO.
5.1
EXPERIENCE OF RESPONDENT
21
5.2
22
5.3
23
5.6
5.7
27
5.8
28
5.9
29
5.10
30
5.4
5.5
5.11
24
25
26
31
CHAPTER-1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 COMPANY PROFILE
10
1.2 INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY
The study was conducted in HIDESIGN in othiampet, puducherry to
find the effect of welfare measures on employee morale.
The study intends to see the satisfaction level of the employee on the
facilities provided by the company and how these welfare measures boost the employee
morale.
The study on effect of welfare measure on employee morale gives the
management an indication of the level of satisfaction among the employees regarding the
general working condition and the other facilities provided by the organization. This helps
the management to know the general morale of the employees.
11
CHAPTER -2
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Temperature
Ventilation
Lighting
Dust
Smoke
Noise
Humidity
Posture simple
Provision of spittoons
12
3) Welfare Amenities
Canteen services
Lunch
Rest room
Crches
Cloak rooms
Other amenities
2) Recreation
3) Workers education
Literacy
4) Economic Services
13
Housing co-operatives
14
6) Study of the working of welfare Acts
Factories Act
Family Planning
Employee counseling
the design of the organizations structure which facilities the flow of work and
15
Workers perception of the past awards and future opportunities for rewards
16
Second, others take an opposite view. For example, Lyman Porter and Lawler
say that satisfaction results from high performance, because most people experience
satisfaction by accomplishing more tasks, like building a radio, or clinching a sale.
Third, still others claim that there is no consistent relationship between morale
and performance. Vroom found significant relationship between morale and performance
in only 5 out of 22 studies undertaken by him.
2.1.8 WARNING SIGNS OF LOW MORALE
Among the more significant of the warning signals of low morale are
Tardiness
17
2.2 REVIEW OF LITERATURE FROM JOURNALS AND ARTICLES
Preserving Employee Morale during Downsizing
Karen E. Mishra, Gretchen M. Spreitzer and Aneil K. Mishra
Topic: Human Resource Management and Industrial Relations
Reprint 3927; winter 1998, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 8395
Mishra propose a four-stage approach to downsizing, gleaned from interviews and
surveys that will retain workers' trust and sense of empowerment. The company should
consider all stakeholders' needs survivors, laid-off employees, the community, local and
national press, and any affected government agencies.
above, is the most important. Management should communicate frequently and be open
and honest.
How to Boost Employee Morale
By Betsy Gallup
April 9, 2006
The following are the ways to boost the employee morale.
Allow your employees to gain ownership of their jobs by being part of the
decision-making process
18
19
CANTEEN
FACILITY
MEDICAL
FACILITY
MOTIVATION
JOB
SATISFACTION
Effect of
welfare
SAFETY
INFRA
STRUCTURE
WELFARE
MEASURES
CREDIT
FACILITY
measure on
morale
EMPLOYEE
MORALE
INTER
RELATIOSHIP
WORK
ENVIRONMENT
20
CHAPTER-3
OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
To study and analyze the safety and welfare measures of the employee.
To find the level of satisfaction of employee about the facilities given by the
company.
21
CHAPTER -4
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
4.1 RESEARCH MEANING
Research is an art of scientific investigation. According to Redmen and Mary
defines research as a systematic effort to gain knowledge.
Research methodology is way to systematically solve the research problem. It is a
plan of action for a research project and explains in detail how data are collected and
analyzed. This research study is a descriptive research study.
4.2 RESEARCH DESIGN
A research design is a plan that specifies the objectives of the study, method to be
adopted in the data collection, tools in data analysis and hypothesis to be framed.
A research design is an arrangement of condition for collection and analysis of
data in a manner that aims to combine relevance to research purpose with economy in
procedure.
4.3 NATURE OF DATA
4.3.1 Primary data
The primary data are collected from the employees of HIDESIGN through a direct
structured questionnaire.
4.3.2 Secondary data
Company profiles, websites, magazines, articles were used widely as a support to
primary data.
4.4 SAMPLING SIZE AND TECHNIQUE
4.4.1 Size of the sample
It refers to the number of items to be selected from the universe to constitute as a
sample. In this study 50 employees of HIDESIGN in Puducherry was selected as size of
sample.
22
4.4.2 Sample design
The sampling technique used in this study is simple random sampling method.
This method is also called as the method of chance selection. Each and every item of
population has equal chance to be included in the sample.
4.4.3 Population design
The population of this study is the total employee in the company. It is finite
population. There are four production centers for the organization for this study I have
taken only employees in one production centre.
4.4.3 Questionnaire
The questions are arranged logical sequence. The questionnaire consists of a
variety of questions presented to the employees for the response. Dichotomous questions,
multiple choice questions, rating scale questions were used in constructing questionnaire.
4.5 STATISTICAL TOOLS USED
To analyze and interpret collected data the following statistical tools were used.
1) Percentage method
2) Weighted average method
3) Chi-square analysis
4) Correlation
5) Regression
4.5.1 Percentage method
The percentage is used for making comparison between two or more series
of data. It is used to classify the opinion of the respondent for different factors. It is
calculated as
No. of respondents favorable
x 100
Percentage of respondent =
Total no of respondents
23
4.5.2 Weighted average method
The weighted average method can be calculated by the following formula. This tool
is used to find the rank given by the respondents to the welfare measures. It can be
calculated as
XW = WX / X
Here
XW represents the weighted average
X represents the value of variable
W represents the weight given to the variable.
4.5.3 Chi-square analysis
Chi-square analysis in statistics is to test the goodness of fit to verify the
distribution of observed data with assumed theoretical distribution. Therefore it is a
measure to study the divergence of actual and expected frequencies.
The formula for computing chi-square is as follows.
Chi-square = {(O-E)2 / E}
The calculated value of chi-square is compared with the table of chi-square for the
given degrees of freedom at the specified level of significance. If the calculated value is
greater than the tabulated value then the difference between the observed frequency and
the expected frequency are significant. The degrees of freedom is (n-2) where n is
number of observed frequencies and in case of contingency table the degrees of freedom is
(C-1)
satisfaction. It is used to find the relation between welfare satisfaction and work
satisfaction it is used to find the relation between experience of respondents and work
satisfaction
24
4.5.4 Correlation
The correlation analysis deals with association between two or more variables.
The correlation does not necessary imply causation or functional relationship though the
existence of causation always implies correlation. By itself it establishes only co- variance.
It is used to find the degree of relationship between motivation and work satisfaction.
Cov(x, y) = 1/n x y x y
x = 1/n x2 x 2
y = 1/n y2 y 2
Cov(x, y)
x X y
r=
Here,
r = co-efficient of correlation
4.5.5 Regression
The Regression analysis deals with the nature of association between two or
more variables. In regression analysis we are concerned with the estimation of one variable
for a given value of another variable on the basis of an average mathematical relationship
between the two variables.
Y= a + bX
25
CHAPTER- 5
DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
TABLE 5.1
EXPERIENCE OF RESPONDENT
Experience
Frequency
Percentage (%)
0-1
4.0
2-5
10.0
6-10
17
34.0
Above 10
26
52.0
Total
50
100.0
Inference:
From the table it infers that 52% of respondent are experienced above 10
years and 4% are less than one year.
CHART-5.1
EXPERIENCE OF RESPONDENT
60
50
Percentage
40
30
20
10
0
0-1
2-5
6-10
Experience
above 10
26
TABLE 5.2
LEVEL OF SATISFACTION OF SAFETY MEASURES
Opinion
Frequency
Percentage (%)
Highly satisfied
2.0
Satisfied
12
24.0
Neutral
12
24.0
Dissatisfied
19
38.0
Highly dissatisfied
12.0
Total
50
100.0
Inference:
From the table it infers that 38%of respondent are dissatisfied with the
safety measures and 24% of respondent are satisfied.
CHART-5.2
LEVEL OF SATISFACTION OF SAFETY MEASURES
27
50
Percentage
40
30
20
10
0
Highly Satisfied
neutral
Satisfied
Highly dissatisfied
Dissatisfied
Safety Measures
28
TABLE 5.3
LEVEL OF SATISFACTION OF MEDICAL FACILITY
Opinion
Frequency
Percentage (%)
Highly satisfied
10
20.0
Satisfied
28
56.0
Neutral
6.0
Dissatisfied
12.0
Highly dissatisfied
6.0
Total
50
100.0
Inference:
From the table it infers that 56%of respondent are satisfied with the medical
facility and 12% of respondent are dissatisfied.
CHART 5.3
LEVEL OF SATISFACTION OF MEDICAL FACILITY
60
50
Percentage
40
30
20
10
0
Highly satisfied
Neutral
Satisfied
Highly dissatisfied
Dissatisfied
29
TABLE 5.4
LEVEL OF SATISFACTION OF WORKING ENVIRONMENT
Opinion
Frequency
Percent
Satisfied
40
80.0
Neutral
16.0
Dissatisfied
4.0
50
100.0
Total
Inference:
From the table it infers that 80%of respondent are satisfied with the
working condition and 4% of respondent are dissatisfied.
CHART 5.4
LEVEL OF SATISFACTION OF WORKING ENVIRONMENT
100
Percentage
80
60
40
20
0
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
30
TABLE 5.5
LEVEL OF SATISFACTION OF RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SUPERVISOR AND
WORKER
Opinion
Frequency
Percentage (%)
Cordial
39
78.0
Moderate
10
20.0
Indifference
2.0
Total
50
100.0
Inference:
From the table it infers that 78%of respondent are satisfied with the
supervisor and 2% of respondent are dissatisfied.
CHART 5.5
LEVEL OF SATISFACTION OF RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SUPERVISOR AND
WORKER
100
Percentage
80
60
40
20
0
cordial
moderate
indifference
31
TABLE 5.6
LEVEL OF SATISFACTION OF RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN WORKERS
Opinion
Cordial
Moderate
Indifference
Total
Frequency
Percentage (%)
41
82.0
16.0
2.0
50
100.0
Inference:
From the table it infers that 82%of respondent are satisfied with the
workers and 2% of respondent are dissatisfied.
CHART 5.6
LEVEL OF SATISFACTION OF RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN WORKERS
100
Percentage
80
60
40
20
0
Cordial
Moderate
Indifference
32
TABLE 5.7
LEVEL OF MOTIVATION GIVEN TO EMPLOYEE
Opinion
Frequency
7
17
12
10
4
50
Very high
High
Moderate
Low
Very low
Total
Percentage (%)
14.0
34.0
24.0
20.0
8.0
100.0
Inference:
From the table it infers that 14%of respondent are highly motivated and 8%
of respondent are not motivated.
CHART 5.7
LEVEL OF MOTIVATION GIVEN TO EMPLOYEE
40
Percentage
30
20
10
0
very high
high
moderate
low
very low
33
TABLE 5.8
LEVEL OF FREEDOM GIVEN TO THE EMPLOYEES
Opinion
Very High
High
Moderate
Low
Very Low
Total
Frequency
2
11
15
18
4
50
Percentage (%)
4
22
30
36
8
100
Inference:
From the table it infers that 22% of the respondent feels that freedom given to them
to express their ideas is high and 36% of the feel as low.
CHART 5.8
LEVEL OF FREEDOM GIVEN TO THE EMPLOYEES
40
Percentage
30
20
10
0
Very high
High
Moderate
Low
Very low
34
TABLE 5.9
STATUS OF GRIEVANCE HANDLING IN THE COMPANY
Opinion
Always
Sometimes
Rarely
Never
Total
Frequency
10
20
13
7
Percentage
20
40
26
14
50
100
Inference:
From the table we infer that 40% of the respondents are satisfied with the
grievance handling and 14% of the respondents are dissatisfied.
CHART 5.9
STATUS OF GRIEVANCE HANDLING IN THE COMPANY
50
Percentage
40
30
20
10
0
alw ays
sometimes
rarely
never
35
TABLE 5.10
WORK SATISFACTION LEVELOF THE EMPLOYEE
Opinion
Frequency
Percent
Always
23
46.0
Sometimes
23
46.0
Rarely
8.0
Total
50
100.0
Inference:
From the table it infers that 46%of respondent are always satisfied with
work and 8% of respondent are rarely satisfied.
CHART 5.10
WORK SATISFACTION LEVEL OF THE EMPLOYEE
60
50
Percentage
40
30
20
10
0
alw ays
sometimes
rarely
36
TABLE 5.11
SATISFACTION OF EMPLOYEES ABOUT WELFARE MEASURES
Opinion
Yes
No
Total
Frequency
Percentage (%)
33
66.0
17
34.0
50
100.0
Inference:
From the table it infers that 33%of respondent are always satisfied with
welfare and 34% of respondent are not satisfied.
CHART 5.11
SATISFACTION OF EMPLOYEES ABOUT WELFARE MEASURES
70
60
Percentage
50
40
30
20
10
0
yes
no
37
ANALYSIS OF OPINION OF RESPONDENTS REGARDING COMMUNICATION
IN WORK PLACE AND WORK SATISFACTION
(USING CHI-SQUARE)
Observed count
TABLE 5.12.1
Opinion
Cordial
Moderate
Indifference
Total
Always
9
9
7
25
Sometimes
5
6
7
18
Rarely
0
6
1
7
Total
14
21
15
50
Expected count
TABLE 5.12.2
Opinion
Cordial
Moderate
Indifference
Total
Always
7
10.5
7.5
25
Sometimes
5
7.6
5.4
18
Rarely
2
2.9
2.1
7
Total
14
21
15
50
Null Hypothesis:
H0: There is no significant difference between communication in work place
and work satisfaction.
CHI-SQUARE TESTS
TABLE 5.12.3
O
9
5
0
9
6
6
7
7
1
E
7
5
2
10.5
7.6
2.9
7.5
5.4
2.1
(O-E)2
4
0
4
2.25
2.56
9.61
0.25
2.56
1.21
(O-E)2/E
0.57
0
2
0.21
0.34
3.31
0.03
0.47
0.58
38
Calculated value = (O-E) 2 / E = 7.51
Degrees of Freedom = (R -1) (C-1) = 4
Tabulated value for 4 degrees of freedom at 5% level of significance is
9.48
Inference:
The calculated value is less than the tabulated value. H0 is accepted.
Therefore there is no association between communication in work place and work
satisfaction.
39
ANALYSIS OF OPINION OF RESPONDENTS REGARDING WELFARE
SATISFACTION AND WORK SATISFACTION
(USING CHI-SQUARE)
Observed count:
TABLE 5.13.1
Opinion
Yes
No
Total
Always
20
7
27
Sometimes
12
6
18
Rarely
1
4
5
Total
33
17
50
Rarely
3.3
1.7
5
Total
33
17
50
Expected count:
TABLE 5.13.2
Opinion
Yes
No
Total
Always
17.8
9.2
27
Sometimes
11.9
6.1
18
Null Hypothesis:
H0: There is no significant difference between welfare satisfaction and work
satisfaction.
CHI-SQUARE TESTS
TABLE 5.13.3
O
20
12
1
7
6
4
E
17.8
11.9
3.3
9.2
6.1
1.7
(O-E)2
4.84
0.01
5.29
4.84
0.01
5.29
(O-E)2/E
0.27
0
1.60
0.53
0
3.11
40
ANALYSIS OF OPINION OF RESPONDENTS REGARDING EXPERIENCE OF
RESPONDENT AND WORK SATISFACTION
(USING CHI-SQUARE)
Observed count:
TABLE 5.14.1
Opinion
0-1
2-5
6-10
Above 10
Total
Always
1
2
6
14
23
Sometimes
1
2
10
10
23
Rarely
0
1
1
2
4
Total
2
5
17
26
50
Rarely
0.2
0.4
1.4
2.1
4
Total
2
5
17
26
50
Expected count:
TABLE 5.14.2
Opinion
0-1
2-5
6-10
Above 10
Total
Always
0.9
2.3
7.8
12
23
Sometimes
0.9
2.3
7.8
12
23
Null Hypothesis:
H0: There is no significant difference between experience of respondent and
work satisfaction.
41
CHI-SQUARE TESTS
TABLE 5.14.3
O
1
1
0
2
2
1
6
10
1
14
10
2
E
0.9
0.9
0.2
2.3
2.3
0.4
7.8
7.8
1.4
12
12
2.1
(O-E)2
0.01
0.01
0.04
0.09
0.09
0.36
3.24
4.8
0.16
4
4
0.01
(O-E)2/E
0.01
0.01
0.2
0.04
0.04
0.9
0.41
0.62
0.11
0.33
0.33
0.004
42
ANALYSIS OF OPINION OF RESPONDENTS REGARDING
MOTIVATION GIVEN TO EMPLOYEE AND WORK SATISFACTION
CORRELATION)
(USING
Observed Count
TABLE 5.15.1
OPINION
ALWAYS
SOMETIMES
NEVER
TOTAL
24
12
14
50
28
19
50
FACTORS
MOTIVATION(X)
WORK
SATISFACTION(Y)
CORRELATION TABLE
TABLE 5.15.2
X
X2
Y2
XY
24
28
576
784
672
12
19
144
361
228
14
196
42
Cov(x, y) = 1/n x y x y
= 1/3 (942-278)
= 35
x = 1/n x2 x 2
= 1/3(916-278)
= 5.14
y = 1/n y2 y 2
= 1/3(1154-278)
=10.28
43
Cov(x, y)
r=
x X y
= 0.66
Inference:
The motivation given to employees and work satisfaction are positively
correlated. The increase in motivation will increase the work satisfaction also.
44
TOTAL
35
11
50
27
14
50
21
14
50
26
10
14
50
Credit
Facility
X4
26
10
14
50
WX4
78
20
14
112
2.24
3
Inference:
From the table it is inferred that employees ranks medical facility followed
by infra structure with the canteen facility as last.
45
ANALYSIS OF OPINION GIVEN BY RESPONDENTS REGARDING
SATISFACTION OF WELFARE MEASURES AND EMPLOYEE MORALE
(USING REGRESSION METHOD)
NEUTRAL
DISSATISFIED
116
36
48
28
19
13
FACTORS
EMPLOYEE
MORALE(X)
WELFARE
MEASURES(Y)
REGRESSION TABLE
TABLE 5.17.2
X
X-X
X-X
116
28
49
36
48
13
Formula
bxy = ( x-x )( y-y )
( x-x )2
= 863/201
= 4.29
(X-X)
(Y-Y)
Y-Y
Y-Y
2440
11
130
563
-31
936
-8
58
233
-19
346
-4
13
67
46
Regression Equation
X-X = bxy (Y-Y)
X = 4.3Y -6.1
Inference:
Excluding the constant, from the above equation we can infer that effect of
welfare measure on morale is measure is found as1:4. Therefore we can conclude that the
effect of welfare measure on employee morale is about 25%.
47
CHAPTER -6
48
Since most of the employees are married the company can concentrate on
crche facility.
The company can improve the grievance handling system so that they can
increase the employee satisfaction.
The salary increment for employees will increase the employee satisfaction
and which in turn increase the employee morale.
49
CHAPTER - 7
CONCLUSION
The study on effect of welfare measure on employee morale helps
the management to know the satisfaction level of the employees about the welfare measure
provided by the company. From this study we can infer that the majority of the employees
are satisfied with the welfare measures. The company can concentrate on other facility like
crche facility, uniform, and safety measures to boost the employee morale. The employee
morale is good in the company. It is found that the effect of welfare measure on employee
morale in this study is about 25%.
50
CHAPTER -8
8.1 LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY
The time period of the study is very short, so elaborate study was not made.
Only certain factors are considered in this study to measure the effect of welfare
measure on employee morale.
The conclusions and suggestions were formed based on employees spot response.
51
The sample size taken for this study is only 50, it can be extended to a larger
sample
The study can be done by considering some other factors to measure the employee
morale
This study can also be extended to the other production centers of the company.
52
APPENDICES
ANNEXURE -1
A STUDY ON EFFECT OF WELFARE MEASURES ON EMPLOYEE
MORALE
QUESTIONNAIRE
PERSONAL DATA
1. Name
2. Age
(a) 18-25
(b) 26-35
3. Gender
(c) 36-45
(d) Above 45
(a) Male
(b) Female
4. Educational Qualification
(a) Below Hr Sec
5. Experience
(b) Hr Sec
(c) UG
(d) PG
6. Total Salary
7. Designation
8. Safety Measures
8.1.
9. Medical Facility
9.1 Specify the level of satisfaction
a) Highly satisfied b) Satisfied c) Neutral d) Dissatisfied
e) Highly Dissatisfied
9.2 Is there any periodical medical check up given to you
(a) Yes
10. ESI Benefits
(b) No
:
(b) No
(b) No
53
11. Canteen facility
Specify the level of satisfaction
Highly
Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Highly
Dissatisfied
Cleanliness
Hygienic
Serving
Price
12. Credit facility
12.1. Is any Advances and loan given to you are satisfied
(a) Very high b) high c) moderate d) low e) very low
Specify the level of satisfaction of other allowances
Highly
Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Highly
Dissatisfied
Transport allowance
Attendance allowance
Punctuality allowance
Education allowance
13. Infra-structural facility :
Specify the level of satisfaction
Highly
Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Rest room
Drinking water
Ventilation
Lighting
Toilets
Working
environment
Transportation
14. Inter-relationship:
14.1. Relationship between co-workers
(a) Cordial
(b) Moderate
(c) Indifferent
(b) Moderate
(c) Indifferent
Dissatisfied
Highly
Dissatisfied
54
14.3. Level of communication between supervisor and employee
(a) High (b) Very high (c) Low (d) Very low (e)Moderate
15. Level of motivation given to employee
(a) High
(b) Sometimes
(c) Rarely
(d) Never
(b) Sometimes
(c) Rarely
(d) Never
(b) Sometimes
(c) Rarely
(d) Never
20. In general are you satisfied with the welfare and safety measures given by
Management?
(a) Yes
21. Suggestion for Improvements
(b) No
55
ANNEXURE-2
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BOOKS
1. Kothari C.R., Research methodology, published by Tata Mc Graw-Hill Publishing
Company Ltd., 13th Edition, 1982.
2. Gupta, S.P., and Gupta, M.P., Business Statistics, Published by Sultan Chand & Sons, 7th
Edition, 1989.
3. Personnel Management by C.B.Mamoria & S.V.Gankar, Published by Himalaya
Publishing House.
WEBSITES
1. www.ncr.com