Commission on Teacher Credentialing 1900 Capitol Avenue Sacramento, CA 95811 (916)324-8002 Fax (016) 324-8927 wwwaclecagow Professional Services Division February 12, 2013 Ms. Darby Williams Sacramento County Office of Education (115) P.O. Box 269003 Sacramento, CA 95826 Dear Ms, Williams: Congratulations! After completing # review of your Program Assessment resubmissions for your General Education (Multiple and Single Subject) Induction and Clear Education Specialist Induction programs, readers have made a preliminary finding that your program appears to be preliminarily aligned with all program standards. Attached, you will find a copy of the feedback form from this review with revised standard status shown in green. Please note, as indicated on the form, that all Program Standard Findings are preliminary until the site visit team reviews evidence at the site visit. Within the next two months please submit a final electronic version of your document that incorporates any changes and additions made during the program assessment process. Please refer to PSA 10-12. Submit your document as an email attachment to ProgramAssessmenti@cte.cagov or on a flash drive, by mail, to our office as soon as possible. Please note that we cannot accept email attachments larger than 10MB or zipped files. As your program has been preliminarily determined to be in alignment with all standards, no additional program response is required at this time. However, you may see comments on the feedback form regarding information that needs to be reviewed on site by the site visit team, There is no need to send that information to the Commission, but have it available at the site Should you have questions about the information contained in this report, the Program Assessment process, or how to submit additional information, please send an e-mail to ProgramAssessment@cte.ca gov and a staff member will respond to you promptly. Sincerely, Oayes ‘Cheryl Hickey Administrator of Accreditation indy Gappa Lisa Danielson Ensuring Educator ExcellenceCommission on Teacher Credentialing Program Assessment Feedback Induction Program Standards 2008 Institution, Sacramento COE Induction PA Feedback Date of initial review December 2012 Subsequent dates of review January 29, 2013 General Comments: help utilizing primary language and proficiency level studi Although the standard is prefiminarily aligned it would b if 6a4 specified for the reader how the EL Resource Guide supports P in English considering the ceulturation, and prior schooling. jents? culture, level of a *Status ‘More Standard z I: Program, Rationale and Design information | Questions, Comments, Additional Information Needed: needed @ 1.6: Please provide information about how the program provides Preliminarily collaborative experiences with colleagues and resource personnel. Aligned | Evidence to be reviewed at the site z ee 2: Communication and Collaboration Preliminarily | Questions, Comments, Additional Information Neede Aligned Evidence to be reviewed at the site visit: More 3: Support Providers and Professional Development Providers information | Questions, Comments, Additional Information Needed; (3.3) Please provide needed | timeline/process for matching SPs with PTs in a timely manner Preliminarily | Evidence to be reviewed at the site visit: Aligned — | ei More | 4: Formative Assessment System information | Questions, Comments, Additional Information Needed: needed ‘* It would be helpful to link to the IIP, student work assessments, and other Preliminarity FACT documents referred to in this section. Aligned ‘© 84.2; Please provide specific information about how thie IP is developed with the BESA coordinator, and the Sacramento BISA Consortium staff Byidence to be reviewed at the site visit: More 5: Pedagogy information | Questions, Comments, Additional Information Needed: needed (6.7) Please provide information about your how your program helps teachers to Preliminarily | build student awareness around safety, Possibly linking to the site checklist would Aligned help. é Evidence to be reviewed at thes te visit: Program Assesoment for each approved edueator preparation program i required aspart of the Commission's accrediation activities. The Prelinvnaty Report of Findings doesnot ply that ny ofthe Commission's Program. “Standards are Met. The decision if each standard ix met or nots the responsiblity of teste vist eum. 1*Status Standard Preliminarily 6: Universal Access: Equity for all Students Aligned — | Questions, Comments, Additional Information Needed: _| Evidence to be reviewed at the site visit: Preliminarily | 6a: Teaching English Learners Aligned — | Questions, Comments, Additional Information Needed: Preliminarily Aligned More information needed “Evidence to be reviewed at the site visit: 6b: Teaching Special Populations Questions, Comments, Additional Information Needed: i viewed at the site ae i Development Options for Education Specialists Questions, Comments, Additional Information Needed: 7.6: Please provide evidence that your PTs are keeping up current research, trends, and legal issues. Preliminavily Aligned Evidence to be reviewed at the site visit: Handouts from Ed. Specialist Support Saturdays Program Assessment for each approved educator preparation program is required as part ofthe Commission's acreditation aetvitcs. The Preliminary Report of Findings does uot imply that any ofthe Commission's Prograns ‘Standards are Met. The decision ifeach standard is met or nots the respousblty ofthe te vst ean. 2