You are on page 1of 9
Experiments on Distortional Buckling of I-Beams Tadeh Zirakian' and Hossein Showkati, Ph.D? ‘Abstract: This paper describes a est program on flscale fabricated simply supported -beams with cena concentrated load and an effective lateral brace at the midspan ofthe top compression ange that was performed mainly with the aim of experimental verification and investigation of distortion in doubly sytametre Fsecion beams. The experimental ulimate loads were compared with the buckling loads ofthe specimens determined by using the so-called Southwell, Modified, and Massey extrapolation techniques, and in most ofthe cases very lite discrepancy was found between the maximum test and extrapolated loads. Morcover, the experimental Beam strengths ‘were compared withthe design strengths predicted by the American AISCILRFD and the Australian AS4100specifiations. Generally, the ‘0 specifications provide unconservative predictions inthe inelastic range of structural response as the beam length decreases snd inelastic behavior becomes mare intense, However, the AS#100 specification provides conservative predictions in comparison with the AISCILRED specification DOI: 10.1061 ASCE}O733-9445(2007)133:7(1009) CE Database subject headings | beams; Buckling: Distortion; Experimental dat; Structural design Introduction ‘A wide range of Lbeams with different sizes and restrsint ar rangements is used in constriction nowadays. The us pes of tbkling of ste! section beams assumed indesign ae local and Tateral-torsional buckling modes, However in fabricated and i termediate length F-beams, particularly those with slender webs, the focal and lateral buckles may combine to produce a coupled mode called lateral-disortional buckling, or simply distorional >uekling (Fig, 1), for which there is simultaneous distortion and deflection of the cross section (Bradford 1986). On the other hand, another mode of distortional buckling know as restrained distortion buckling may occur whenever one of the flanges of an beam is rested against ig cross-sectional movements, fe, the [shaped steel joist of composite bridge pitders with a fully rescted top lange, whose unrestricted botom flange may be subjected to signifleant compressive stesses inthe negative bending moment region snd wlimately becomes unstable, vss, and deflects out of plane while pulling the web as it buckles (onagh and Bradford 2001) as show in Fig. 2a) or an -beam with a concentrated load applied on its restrained compression ‘ange, whose web may be subjected to signiicant compressive stresses and undergo lateral buckling (MeCormac 1995) as shown in Fig. 20). "Pasian Sade, Dep of Civ Raging, Urals Univ, 13 fm Soro Rd, PO.” Box 165759, Urmia, nn, Emil ‘akin yahoo.com Dept of Civil Engines, Unni Uni kn Ser Ral, PO. Box 16557159, Ui, rn (comespnding aor), Ema hho railarmiaacie "Na. Astle Ea: Benjamin W. Schafer. Diseuslon open wn December 1207 Sepure discussions mast be subsite for edu papers, To extn the losing dt by one ont writen request te fled wit be ASCE Managing Ector The maruscrpfr this paper was somite for seview and posable pubation oo Jly 18,2008: ‘pprovad on November 77,2006. Tis paper is prt of the Journal of| Strctral Engineering, Vo. 133, No.7, Sly 1.2007. OASCE, ISSN (or 84s/20077108101725 0. A proliferation of research work on distortional buckling of [beam hasbeen undertaken mainly over the last 25 yeas os, ‘mostly at the Universities of New South Wales and Sydney. A lucatment of I-section beams that included local, dstorional, and lateral modes of buckling was inally presented by Hancock (1978) and a few years later by Roberts and Shiva (1983). re- view paper cn the work undertaken prior tothe early 1990s was published by Bradford (1992). Generally systematic studies on Aistortional buckling of Lhcams were performed by Bradford and co-workers in different cass including monosymmetc, tapered, continuous, and resiained I-beams, cantilevers, beams on seat ‘Supports wid partial end restraints, ete. Experimental studies of | the phenomenon were also reported by Bradford (1990), Bradford and Wee (1994), and oer, In recent yeas, by resenting various ‘numerical mals researchers sch as Ng and Ronagh (2003), Poon and Ronagh (2004), and Sehafer and Adsiny (2005) have severally tried to analyze the distortionl buckling of Hbeams in fan efficient way Despite extensive theoretical studies of distortional buckling ‘of F-beams, lite experimental work is found inthe technical Ii results acqtired through theoretical stdies, more experimental distorted wob Fg. 1. Latera-dscorional buckling JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING © ASCE / JULY 2007 1000 o » Fig. 2. Restrined distortions buckling research has 10 be dane. Accordingly, the present experimental work has been undertaken mainly with the aim of expei- ‘mental verification and investigation of distortion in doubly sym- metic I-setion beams to overcome the sari of experiments some extent In ation wo the analysis of dhe experimental data, the ential loads of the west beams have been oblaned by vsing some extrapolation technigues and compared with the test Strengths. Furthermore, the test results have also been compared ‘with the American AISCALRFD and the Australian ASS100 code predictions Distortional Buckling Tests Test Specimens “The test program involved fll-scale testing of sx -beams fab cated from hotrolled IPEI2 and IPE14 profiles in accordance ‘with the German Estab! standard with a nominal yield stress of 238.44 MPa. The specimens were designed in thee diferent —h nla ae Fg. 8, Fabricated test beam and cross-sectional dimensions lengths and two types of eros-sectonal specifications and in cluded realistic levels of geometric imperfections and resid ‘tess. In Fig, 3, the fabricated tet specimen aod the cross ‘Sectional dimensions are shown, The basic testing setup is also shown in Fig. 4. Moreover, te standard, nominal and measured dimensions of the test beams are given in Table T, using the ‘nomenclature defined in Figs. 3 and 4, Considering the erors ais, taken from the hotolled Hea; = Mange width width of the substituted web plate; Young's modulus of elasticity: = yield ses; = Shear modulus of elasticity: ‘overall eros-setion height ofthe fabricated THbeam; span length of the test specimen: unbraced length of de beam transition length from plastic to inelastic behavior, specified in the ATSCILRED specification; 1, = wanstion length from inclastic to clastic behavior, specified in the AISCILRED specification; nominal flexural srength buckling lod: lateral buckling sength predicted by the AS100 specification Peay = expesimental timate load (test strength) Pugs ~ lateral buckling sirength predicted by the AISC/ ERED speciietion; Patou extrapolated critical load obtained from the Massey plot extrapolated critical load obtained from the Modifies pot: = plastic eolapse load ‘extrapolated critical load obtained from the Southwell pot 1 = radius of web-ange junction; 17, = radius of gyration about the centoidal axis yy (weak axis): = web thickness ofthe favicated tes beam: 1 = flange thickness; sey = coordinate axes; and '5 = Ineral deection References Arericsn Ininte of Stel Corton (AISC). (1986). Load and sistance fcr desig speciation for sacral ee ing, Chicago, Arte, MM. (1983), “Erapoltiontctngaes for baling loa” ‘race Eng. 10918), 9260938, Urallrd, MLA. (1986). “etane dsttonsl cling of team” ‘Comput Suc, 246), 923-933, ‘Brad, M.A. (199). "Design of beams with paral end restraint” ‘roc Int of Ci Eng. (UK), 892), 163-18 rar, M.A, (1992), “Tateai-

You might also like