Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Christian Mission On The Romanian Teritory PDF
The Christian Mission On The Romanian Teritory PDF
Pontica Christiana
Collection
(No 1)
Constana
2009
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Teodosie, Archbishop of Tomis,
Forward....7
Alexandru Ioni, St. Theotim I of Tomis and St. John
Chrysostom. Their Attitude towards the Truth
of Faith and towards the Civil Authorities ..........................9
Aleksander Minchev, The Mosaics of the Early Christian
Church at Djanavara by Varna ..........................................18
Georgi Atanasov, Sept martyrs de Dorostol qui ont
brl en lanne 304 .............................................................37
Doina Benea, A Christian Rush Light from
Tibiscum ................................................................................53
Victor H. Baumann, Old Christian Testimonies
at the Danube Rivers Mouths.....64
Mihail Zahariade, A Historical Commentary to a
Hagiographic Text: Passio Epicteti Presbyteri
et Astionis Monachi ..83
Dan Elefterescu, Marin Neagu, Little Crosses from
Dobruja Found in the Collections of Lower
Danube Museum ....112
Zaharia Covacef, Tiberiu Potrniche, Christian
Symbols on the Pottery Found in the Eastern
Sector of Capidava Fortress .121
Mitrea Ioan, The First Christian Communities from
the Central Area of Moldavia .......133
Pontica Christiana
FORWARD
Pontica Christiana
PT
by Alexandru M. Ioni
The Dobrujas regions, and of the Romanian southeast sides in
general, are a land loaded with history belonging to all the
centuries. A lot of worlds have met here, each one with its color
and perfume, each one with its pains and beauties.
From the golden time of the Hamangias thinker, to the
glorious times of the Daco-Getae, to the refined Hellenist world of
the colonies found on the shores of the Black Sea, to the Romans
who were all the time thirsty of conquering, to Scythian, to
Sarmatians, Turks, Tartars, and Lippovans, the entire zone of the
Romanian southeast is full of history, breathes history, and makes
history.
It is in this fabulous realm of culture and civilization that the
marvellous cave of the first called to apostleship by our Savior
Jesus Christ St. Andrew are found, as well as the caves from
the Dobrujas Keyes, and the cave of St. John Cassian. In this area
are, also, the amazing rupestral little churches from Basarabi
Murfatlar, in these places are palpable proofs about the existence of
some great basilicas with impressive architecture: Histria, Piatra
Frecei, Mangalia, and Constana, and here, also, is found the cave
La Movile for which the Americans from NASA came quite beside
themselves to see the first place uncovered so far on the blue planet
where life was discovered in an environment without oxygen, an
environment similar to the one which is found on the Mars planet.
Less spectacular than the mountain caves which are full of
stalactite and stalagmite the caves of Dobruja are equally
prominent and attractive, warmer, and more favorable to the living.
TP
*
PT
10
Pontica Christiana
11
TP
TP
PT
TP
PT
PT
Pr. Prof. Dr. Ioan G. Coman, Scriitori bisericeti din epoca strromn,
Bucureti, 1979, p. 186.
2
Ibidem.
3 H. Honigmann, Le synekdemos dHierokles et lOpuscule geographique de
Georges de Chypre, Bruxelles, 1939, p. 13-14.
TP
PT
TP
PT
12
PT
PT
Pontica Christiana
13
the only one of all the opponents; however, the acts of the synod
quote only him, the one who was listened to as long as it was
coming from a man very bright through his devotion and the
holiness of his life.
Saint Theotim I has not disarmed neither has he fled while
having to face the migratory Huns, a tribe more brutal than any
savage beast5, and defended his shepherded ones through
kindness, through diplomacy and through wonder working. Despite
the fact that the Huns were wild by nature, he reasoned them out of
savagery to gentleness, by receiving them hospitably and offering
them gifts6. Theotim I even carried on a missionary activity among
them, and to this end he enjoyed the precious help given by St. John
Chrysostom; it is this activity that Blessed Hieronymus makes a
report on while he expresses himself in these terms: The Huns
learn the Psalter, and the Scythias colds are warmed up by the
warmth of the faith7. The Huns have admired and respected him,
and have not been shy to call him the Romans god for his
virtues8.
Through St. Theotim I, venerated and respected from the very
beginning on the days of twentieth of the month of April, the
Romanian Orthodoxy, the beginnings of which are closely and
fundamentally related to the places inhabited by us, revealed herself
in front of history, of culture, and of Christian civilization as loving
the truth and righteousness by defending the brightest hierarch of
the Byzantine Emperors capital.
TP
TP
PT
PT
TP
TP
PT
PT
*
*
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
14
Pontica Christiana
15
The Empress Aelia Eudoxia was for a while very close to St.
John Chrysostom, by participating in the processions organized by
him, displaying faith and humility, even going long distances on
foot, and displaying a great magnanimity towards the Church. Yet,
being ambitious and poorly advised, she carried out some
scandalous deeds for which it was a normal thing not to have the
approval of the hierarch. Despite his kindness and gentleness, St.
John Chrysostom proved himself to be adamantly opposed to the
sins which were destructive to the souls and were yielding social
suffering, sins which were committed by the Byzantine imperial
Court.
As the great defender of Christianity, and censor of the
superstitions and of immorality, St. John Chrysostom could not
have been convenient to the followers of the heathenism either; a
heathenism which was still influent and strong, despite the fact that
it was dying. By eulogizing the Christendom while comparing it
with heathendom, he brought about pain to the followers of the
latter one much more than the imperial laws promulgated against
them.
If we add to these things, also, the dissatisfaction of the
Alexandrian hierarchs as far as the advancement of Constantinople
to the rank of first See of the Orient and equal to Rome is
concerned through the Second Ecumenical Synods canons
(Constantinople, 381) the things become much more delicate for
the one who had the courage to criticize kingly sins.
St. John Chrysostom was not a courtier bishop as,
unfortunately, were a lot in his time; suffice it to mention
Theophilus of Alexandria and Epiphanius of Salamina. Despite his
talent and his worth, St. John Chrysostom was not gifted with
political manners and he was not obliging, complaisant. He did not
know anything beyond the right and the duty. Had he not loved so
much his shepherded ones, whom he spared from arrests and from
every kind of persecutions at the cost of his quietness, and even at
the price of his life, St. John Chrysostom could have quaked the
imperial Court and the capital, maybe even the Empire.
16
PT
PT
Pontica Christiana
17
18
PT
TP
TP
PT
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
19
th
th
TP
PT
4
PT
20
The few available general photos of the church taken during the
excavation do not provide more information either because they did
not show the pavements in details. Nevertheless, due to the
publication of V. Ivanova and because of its unusual planning and
structure, the church has been mentioned permanently ever since
1925 in various publications on Early Christian architecture and art
in both Bulgaria and abroad5.
Between 1997 and 2007, the author of this article re-excavated
the church including the three premises with mosaic pavements
discovered by H. Shkorpil, which were later deliberately covered
by soil never seen after. Apart from undertaking some in situ
conservation of the mosaics, another aim of the research was to
obtain up-to date information about the plan of the church, its
construction and dating, as well as taking general and detailed
photos of the mosaics of which design nothing was known before6.
The Djanavara church has a very unusual plan (fig. 2). It is a
single-nave edifice with four rectangular two-storied premises
projecting north and south of it, which served as defense towers as
well. It has also a short narthex and a colonnaded atrium, partially
preserved at the time of Shkorpils excavation, but now covered by
a fifty years - old forest and thus impossible to be cleared up again.
The church itself measures 31 by 28 m and has very thick walls
built in opus mixtum.
The most attractive architectural part is the semicircular apse,
which is not projecting out of the church as it is typical for all other
churches on the Balkans. On the contrary, it is but incorporated
within its solid made and very wide east wall i.e. the apse became
part of the presbytery. The presbytery itself has had a marble
TP
PT
TP
PT
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
21
chancel screen and there are also traces of a marble plated floor in.
The base of a large marble ambo was found by H. Shkorpil in situ
west of the chancel, which of only a little fragment is still available.
Fig. 2 - Plan of the Djanavara Early Christian church with the location
of the discovered mosaic floors
22
PT
TP
TP
PT
PT
PT
8
TP
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
23
They are much smaller (from 0.3 x 0.4 to 0.6 x 0.6 cm) and some of
them are made of coloured glass, which suggested that within the
edifice there were also some wall mosaics.
24
Pontica Christiana
25
TP
PT
TP
PT
10
PT
TP
PT
TP
TP
PT
PT
PT
11
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
26
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
TP
16
PT
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
27
28
Pontica Christiana
29
PT
TP
TP
21
PT
PT
TP
PT
PT
22
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
30
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
TP
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
25
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
31
32
PT
Al. Minev (=Al. Minchev), Die westliche Schwarzmeerkste und der Osten in
der Sptantike, in R. Pillinger (Hrsg.), Sptantike und frhbyzantinische Kultur
Bulgariens zwischen Orient und Okzident, Wien, 1986, p. 105-113 and bibl.
32
Idem, Das frhe Christentum, p. 58; N. Chaneva-Dechevska, op.cit., p. 175176 and the discussion there.
TP
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
33
PT
Fig. 9 - Detail of the mosaic border showing ivy tendrils and a chalice
34
Pontica Christiana
35
36
Pontica Christiana
37
TP
33
PT
PT
PT
TP
PT
38
TP
PT
PT
TP
35
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
39
PT
TP
PT
TP
38
PT
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
40
TP
42
PT
Pontica Christiana
41
certain Saint Jules mais il nest pas trs sr que ce soit un martyr de
Durostorum. Dans la hagiographie de Saint Jules, il est question
dun Valentinian qui
videmment est connu par Isihii et
probablement est dcd de la mort de martyr peu avant la
dcapitation de Saint Jules, cest--dire avant le 27 mai. Vraiment,
dans le Synaxare du sige de patriarche de Tsarigrad et dans la
Mnologie de Vasilii II, on mentionne Saint Valentinian de
Durostorum43, qui est dcapit le 24 avril, a veut dire un mois
plutt que Saint Jules et Saint Isihii.
TP
PT
TP
43
PT
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
42
Cappadoce est une erreur ennuyeuse et, en plus, la source plus sre,
qui est le Synaxare, lie correctement la ville la province de Mysie.
Cela est confirm aussi par le fait que les auteurs savent bien quau
IV s. Durostorum a camp une lgion romaine.
5, 6, 7. Saint Marcian, Saint Nikandar, Saint Kalinik
Nombreuses sont les sources propos de la vie et de la mort de
martyr, de Saint Marcian et Saint Nikandar mais en mme temps
les chercheurs sont confronts beaucoup de contradictions,
inexactitudes et imprcisions ce qui empche la restauration de la
ralit historique46. En se basant sur les hagiographies et les autres
documents, on peut gnraliser que Marcian et Nikandar sont des
soldats de la XI-e lgion Claudia. Lors dune certaine fte paenne
ils refusent dhonorer les idoles, cause de quoi sont arrts,
torturs et condamns tre dcapits. Daprs la version grecque
et latine de lhagiographie, cela est arriv Durostorum, le 27
juin47. Dans lhistoire des martyrs, de Hironym, ils sont de
nouveau lis Durostorum (Dorostoli Martiani, Necandri), mais
leur fte est indique le 26 dcembre48. Toujours l, la date du 8
juin, Durostorum, est mentionn un Marcian (Dorostoro civitate
natale Sancti Marci), et le 17 juin est indiqu Nikandr avec le
Saint Isihii. Dans le Synaxare du sige du patriarche de
Constantinopolis ils sont inscrits de nouveau ensemble, le 8 juin
mais sans mentionner le nom de Durostorum49. Il suit le calendrier
syrien dEdesa mais on y a mis Marcian Tomis et les 8 et 10
juillet il est mentionn avec un grand groupe de martyrs parmi
TP
TP
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
46
PT
. Delehaye, Saints de Thrace..., p. 268-271; R. Constantinesco, op. cit., p. 810; G. Atanasov, 304 ., vol.
, 5, 2004, p. 7-8.
47
Bibliographia hageographica Graeca, Mnchen, col. 1194, 1330; BHL, col.
5260, 6070- 6073 daprs . Delehaye, Les origines du culte, p. 248-249; .
Delehaye, Saints de Thrace, . 268-270.
48
H. Delehaye, H. Quintin, op. cit., p. 265, 335; . Delehaye, op.cit., . 269-270.
49
Syn.Eccl.Const., col. 739
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
43
50
TP
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
50
PT
51
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
PT
44
TP
54
PT
PT
Pontica Christiana
45
TP
55
TP
PT
TP
56
PT
V. Velkov, . ., p. 29.
A. Harnack, op. cit., p. 51-52.
PT
PT
46
TP
PT
PT
TP
PT
57
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
47
60
PT
TP
TP
PT
PT
TP
60
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
48
des pitaphes qui datent des III-e IV-e s.64. Cette scne est
prsente le plus souvent sur des gemmes et des cames des III-e
IV-e s.65. Il sagit de centaines de monuments du Proche Orient, de
lEurope du Sud et de lAfrique du Nord et leur numration est
inutile. Je vais mentionner seulement quelques des analogues les
plus proches de la trouvaille de Silistra, comme des anneaux des
III-e IV-e s. qui se trouvent dans des collections du Muse
Britannique, du Cabinet des mdailles Paris, du Muse de Tourin,
du Crime et des exemplaires dEgypte dans la collection de
Garucci66. Comme sur le came de Silistra, souvent sous les ancres
des monuments numrs il existe des textes grecs et latins des
noms, des formules gnostiques etc. On ne peut pas facilement
dchiffrer le texte ZIGAW qui accompagne lancre et les poissons
du came de Silistra. Dans sa premire moiti peut tre se cache le
mot ZIG/EC/ - ZHGEC forme de la conjonction du verbe Z67
(vivre, deuxime personne du singulier) et on peut le traduire
comme Je vais vivre, Que tu vives!, Vis!. Le plus souvent
nous voyons cette forme dans lexpression (Vis en
/avec Dieu). On peut supposer que sur les places limites des
gemmes et des cames, les textes de cette sorte sont abrgs. Et si
nous ajoutons au texte sous lancre, la smantique des poissons et
de lancre, nous pouvons proposer le dchiffrement suivant Vis
avec espoir, foi et esprance en Jsus Christ le fils de Dieu et
notre Sauveur68. Il est remarquable qu une tape donne, on
commence remplacer lancre par la croix et cela peut tre la
TP
TP
PT
TP
PT
PT
TP
TP
64
PT
PT
PT
65
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
49
priode aprs la fin du IV-e s.. Aux II-e III-e s. et mme vers la
premire moiti du IV-e s. les chrtiens ignorent la croix dans les
arts plastiques lacceptant comme larbre des tortures69. Vu cela, je
pense que la date la plus convaincante de lanneau avec le came de
Silistra est vers la fin du III-e s. le dbut du IV-e s. Le fait que
lanneau tait dcouvert dans la tombe de personnes tues, brles
et enterres la hte, suppose quil sagit de la mort violente des
premiers chrtiens. Ceux sont des chrtiens parce quun deux porte
sa main un anneau avec un symbole chrtien incontestable.
Malgr que ces personnes soient tues, elles sont enterres dans la
ncropole de la ville. Cela signifie qu Durostorum on observait la
loi romaine qui garantissait le droit de tombe et de funrailles
mme aux criminels70.
Il est difficile davoir une ide exacte de la priode de
lexcution des quatre martyrs mais en tout cas a devait tre avant
lan 311, quand Galre publie ldit de tolrance envers les
chrtiens. Mais il manque tout quipement martyrial ou
commmoratif, ce qui laisse entendre que la tombe de ces chrtiens
reste inconnue pour leurs descendants. Dans le cas contraire, aprs
le triomphe du christianisme en 313, au cours de la construction en
masse de martyriums au-dessus des tombes des martyrs, ce lieu ne
serait pas omis. Cela suppose que la dcapitation des quatre martyrs
a eu lieu au moins une dcennie avant lan 313. Mais leur
identification ne peut tre quhypothtique. Lors de lexamen des
hagiographies des martyrs de Dorostol, nous constatons que trois
parmi eux sont dcapits, un un (Saint Dasii, Saint milian, Saint
Jules, Saint Isihii et Saint Kalinik), trois ensemble (Saint Maxime,
Saint Dada et Saint Kvintilian) et quatre par couples Saint
Marcian avec Saint Nikandar et Saint Valentinian avec Saint
Passicrite.71 Ci-dessus il a t question que daprs les sources
TP
TP
TP
69
PT
PT
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
50
Pontica Christiana
51
52
Pontica Christiana
53
PT
by Doina Benea
On the occasion of the archaeological researches done at the
west of the great Roman camp from Tibiscum in the S II/1996
section, at the 1,25-1,50 m in depth, a clay rush-light was
uncovered1. That section was drawn from north to south, close to
the west side of the Roman camp principia; at that time, it was
identified via decumana of the Roman camp as well as a small
portion of the first wooden barrack placed at the north side of its
headquarters. However, only a limited portion of the barrack was
uncovered, 2,75 m in length. The edifice was built of wooden
beams, made even with adobes covered with tiles. Inside the
barrack, in the debris layer, there was uncovered, also, among other
materials a rush-light which constitutes the subject of this paper.
The residing level belongs to the great Roman camp and can be
dated between the second half of the second century (the year 165
post quem, respectively)2, and the beginning of the third century
(Septimius Severus reign), that is, in the first level of destruction
of the great Roman camp from Tibiscum3.
The rush-light is made of a fine brick-colored paste,
containing a fine degreasing substance. On the whole surface of the
rush-light there are groove traces of red color, grooves which can
actually be seen on a few spots. Before being burned, the piece was
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
PT
1
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
54
TP
PT
PT
Pontica Christiana
55
PT
TP
TP
PT
PT
TP
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
56
PT
TP
9
PT
Pontica Christiana
57
PT
TP
PT
TP
TP
10
PT
PT
PT
11
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
58
the third century had three times depicted, on the bottom of the
basin, the sign of a crux monogrammatica; well, the writing on the
same line of the signs is another way of representing the Holy
Trinity: God Father, Son, and Holy Ghost14. The three crosses
represent the Holy Trinity whose dogma took shape in the first
century, and whose final consecration was done at the first synod in
Nicaea, and reconfirmed at the second synod of Constantinople
(381).
The presence of the oriental elements in the Roman camp is
due to the troops stationed here cohors I Sagittariorum but they
are due particularly to a unit of Palmireni sagitari. The latter ones
have been brought to Dacia by Hadrian during the 117/118 year
events; they have been actually from Syria, the city of Palmyra, but
ethnically they were Arameans. Later on, during the reign of
Antoninus Pius or Marcus Aurelius, their nationes unit was made
into a numeri, that is, irregular auxiliary units. Organized in this
way, they made three distinct military bodies, one of which was
permanently stationed until this province was abandoned by the
Romans. The two other units remained at Porolissum and Optatiana
(Sutor)15.
At Tibiscum, they behaved as worshippers of their own
traditional cults such as: Malachel, Bel, Sol Ierhabolus, as well as
of I.O.M., which indicates their integration into the provincial
environment16. It is, also, possible, that the new religious Christian
faith, as any other oriental religion, to have reached this land very
early, much earlier than any other areas of the province17.
TP
TP
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
14
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
59
TP
18
PT
60
Pontica Christiana
Fig. 2 a, b Tibiscum
The rush-light with Christian signs
61
62
Fig. 3 Tibiscum
Fragment of a small caolin mug having the sign of the Cross incised inside a
triangle, uncovered in the military vicus.
Pontica Christiana
63
64
PT
by Victor H. Baumann
0.0 The north of Dobruja is considered as a huge depot of
archaeological testimonies which point out the most diverse aspects
of the Danubian Roman world. Numerous fortresses and
strongholds, rural settlements and necropolises, represent a
remarkable cultural patrimony. A special category of archaeological
discoveries moots the phenomenon of early penetration of early
Christianity at Lower Danube. The commercial relationships of the
Greek cities from the Dobrujas shore of the Black Sea, with both
the Aegean and the Asia Minor inhabitants, as well as the great
number of Roman soldiers at the Lower Danube a lot of them
proceeding from regions of the Near Orient, who have been
converted early to Christianity justify the assertion which claims
that the new Christian religion was known in the Danubian area as
far back as the first centuries of the Christian era. With this
meaning, the archaeological discoveries from Noviodunum a
Roman center renowned for the flourishing transit commerce which
was carried on at the crossing of the right side of the fortress, as
well as from the Noviodunum territory enrich the Christian
archaeology with new proofs of the Christian beginnings at the
north-east border of the Roman Empire.
1.0 The oldest Christian presence at Noviodunum is presently
rendered evident by a rushlight, type 18 Kuzmanov, from the end of
the first century and the beginning of the second century A.D.1
(MIA Tl. inv. 43.274). The importance of this discovery derives
from the symbolism of the decoration found on the concave disc of
the rush-light, on which we find two stylized dolphins brought into
opposition and which are supported by a crux commissa, cross like
TP
*
TP
PT
TP
1
PT
PT
Pontica Christiana
65
PT
TP
TP
PT
TP
TP
PT
PT
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
66
PT
TP
TP
PT
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
67
In the lay-out scope of the gem there are three elements which
are perfectly individualized: the snake, coiled up three times on the
tree in the center, which is flanked at the right by the cock and by
the billy goat at the left; consequently, there are two elements
joined edge to edge to a central element. The tree seems to be an
olive tree, whose top crown is made up of three branches. In the
first Christian centuries, the artistic description of the olive, and of
the olive branch as expression of the cosmic tree partial totem,
respectively10, belongs to the series of the most frequent messianic
symbols of the non-Semitic Christians, besides the vine with
grapes, the fish and the dolphin11. In this case, the symbology of
sacred numbers by the presence of figure three is relevant to the
Paleo-Christian mytho-philosophy. In the process of transforming
the early Church into a universal Church, the oldest tendency of it
consisted in the assimilation and revalorization of symbolism as
well as of scenarios which were biblically, orientally or heathenly
originated12. In this context takes place, also, the assimilation of
the Worlds Trees symbolism an archaic symbol that was widely
disseminated in all ancient religions. It has to be pointed out that, in
the Gnostic soteriology, a part of the divine soul, that is, of Light, is
imprisoned in the body of the living beings and in the vegetable
species. The trees contain particularly a great amount of divine soul
= Light and they served as Christs cross during his passion13. The
snake is an archetypal and totalizing symbol14, truly a symbolic
model, an embodiment of primordial matter made up of water and
earth as the Cosmos itself. In this ideational context, the snake is
consubstantial with the cosmic tree, with the earth and the water.
TP
PT
TP
TP
PT
PT
TP
TP
10
PT
PT
PT
11
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
68
PT
TP
TP
PT
TP
TP
TP
15
PT
PT
PT
PT
PT
16
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
69
Light, (the divine soul), of its part imprisoned in the body of living
beings and in the vegetable matter.
1.2 The presence of Gnostic gems in the Danubian Roman
centers is one more proof of the oriental cults spreading by the
agency of those who came from the oriental provinces of the
Empire21. Among them, there are, also, the bearers of the Christian
religion, under all aspects known by the new religion inside or
outside of the early Church22. The truth of this assertion can be
exemplified with the aid of an older discovery, made at the
southern border of the Noviodunum territory in the Alba locality,
where there is a center of Roman settlement, archaeologically
certified23. In the numismatic collections of the Museum of History
and Archaeology from Tulcea, there is a hoard of Roman imperial
denarii, uncovered in the Alba locality four decades ago, which
remained unpublished24. The hoard was formed in the first half of
the third century A.D. and contains monetary issues from Septimius
Severus, Caracalla, Macrinus, Elagabal, and Severus Alexander, the
TP
PT
TP
TP
PT
TP
21
PT
PT
PT
22
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
70
PT
TP
PT
TP
TP
25
PT
PT
These determinations are done by Cristina Opai, before 1990. Inv. nr: 10.83510.877; 11.206-11.241; 11.406-11.449; 39.502-39.507. Most pieces come from
Severus Alexanders reign, pointing out that the burial of the hoard took place
immediately after his death, during the reign of Maximinus Thrax.
26
Inv. nr. 11.217.
27
V. Kernbach, op. cit., p. 1 (s.v. Achamoth) cf. Irenaeus, Contra ereticilor, I,
2-4.
28
Gnostic sect founded by Valentinus, native of Egypt, who died in the year 161
A.D. (apud V. Kernbach, op.cit., p. 11).
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
71
29
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
TP
29
PT
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
72
TP
PT
TP
34
PT
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
73
precautions at the end of the third century and the first half of the
fourth century A.D.
2.1 Who are these Christians, owners of the objects uncovered
by our archaeological researches? From Clement the Romans
accounts from the end of the first century A.D., and from the
Epistle to Diognet37, we learn that, together with the other
inhabitants, the Christians live as everyones fate came,
following the indigenous residents habits both in clothing and in
foods and in other way of living, but display a wonderful life which
is recognized by all as unheard-of,... participate in as citizens, but
enduring everything as strangers. During the first centuries after
Christ, the Christians do not confess their faith, and cannot be
distinguished from the other segments of the population, but
sometimes they could be identified. An example, to this meaning, is
offered by the inhumation tomb from Barbosi (M-7) uncovered in
1978, dated with coins from Claudius the Goth (a. 268-270 A.D.),
in which it was found a gold chaplet with the inscription Innocens,
name which, in accordance with some well-informed researches38,
express the moral qualities of the defunct, justifying the hypothesis
of his Christian affiliation. While accepting the veracity of this
hypothesis, we bring back for discussion a funeral inscription from
the second century A.D., uncovered in the year 1956 at
Noviodunum39 which sounds as follows:
TP
PT
TP
TP
37
PT
PT
Clement Romanul, Omilie numit a doua epistol ctre Corinteni, II, 3, p. 95;
Epistola ctre Diognet, V, 4-5, in coll. Prini i Scriitori Bisericeti, vol. 1,
Bucureti, 1979, p. 340.
38
S. Sanie, Civilizaia roman la est de Carpai i romanitatea pe teritoriul
Moldovei (sec. II i.e.n. III e.n.), Iai, 1981, p. 220-221. See, H. I. Marrou, in
Actes du colloque Ineternational sur lonomastique latine, Paris, 1977, p. 433434.
39
The inscription was initially published by I. Barnea and B. Mitrea in
Materiale, 5, 1959, p. 469-470, fig. 8 and after that taken over on the occasion
of realization of the corpus with inscriptions from Dobruja, by Emilia DoruiuBoil, Inscripiile din Scythia Minor, vol. 5, Bucureti, 1980, pp. 288-289, nr.
278, without commentary.
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
74
PT
TP
TP
TP
PT
PT
TP
40
PT
PT
PT
41
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
75
funeral hillock of the family, placed close to the farm, contained ten
tombs, with interments done sometime from the middle of the
second century A.D.45. The archaeological researches of 1971
showed a micro-necropolis of early Roman era, with incineration
tombs from the second century, arranged in accordance with a
certain ritual, together with a sarcophagus, in the western half of the
hillock, and with interment tombs from the first half of the third
century A.D., placed at the eastern half. Our attention is drawn by
two of the four inhumation tombs, namely those with the defunct
put directly in the grave with the body stretched and the arms close
to it46. One of these tombs belongs to a woman, buried with some
personal objects: a bone comb, a silver filigree bracelet, and a
chaplet of the type with the foot turned under. which dates the
tomb in the middle of the third century A.D.. The second tomb,
similar to the preceding one, belongs to a man and the inventory
was missing. The archaeological researches made on the Valea
Capaclia set down that villa rustica from this valley was destroyed
at the middle of the third century by the devastating invasion of the
Goths and Carps led by Kniva47. from the years 249-250 A.D., and
this is an indication on the post quem moment of the inhumation of
the two defuncts. In the third century, the inhumation is spread and
in the following century is noticed a higher weight of the
inhumations with the arms close to the body, a phenomenon which
is brought about probably by the custom of covering the corpses
with shrouds, and burying them with the mummies such as,
otherwise, they are depicted in the Christian representations from
the third and fourth century of the Lazarus Resurrection48. In the
TP
TP
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
45
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
76
PT
TP
TP
49
50
TP
PT
PT
Pontica Christiana
77
78
Pontica Christiana
79
80
Fig. 3 Gnostic gem of orange onyx in silver setting the ring of the monetary
treasure from Alba from the first half of the third century A.D.
Pontica Christiana
81
Fig. 4 Censer lid of bronze, from the end of the third century and the beginning
of the fourth century A.D.
82
Fig. 5 Niculiel-Badil. The plan of the funeral hillock researched in the years
1970-1971
Pontica Christiana
83
A HISTORICAL
COMMENTARY TO A HAGIOGRAPHIC TEXT:
PASSIO EPICTETI PRESBYTERI ET ASTIONIS MONACHI*
TP
PT
by Mihail Zahariade
After the enthusiasm and the abnegation hardly describable in
words for those who have not witnessed the birth of the project
aiming at systematic and long range research at the Murighiol site,
(Tulcea county), re-identified and certified in the meantime by a
thorough demonstration to have been the ancient city of Halmyris51,
TP
PT
PT
TP
51
PT
84
in the year 2000, and again in 2001, we got the stroke of luck to
uncover such a wanted and predicted basilica by Hypolite
Delhaye52; this happened exactly in the presbyterys area of a
bicameral crypt, which, following the archaeological, epigraphic,
and anthropologic expertise, was proved to have belonged to some
Christian martyrs53. Keeping in mind that the Christian martyrs
known in Halmyris from the only hagiographic text of a significant
dimension were named Epictetus and Astion54, the discovery
proved to have been, at that that time, so much more surprising, as
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
85
TP
PT
55
PT
The first to cast doubts on the authenticity and value of the text was even H.
Delehaye in Saints de Thrace et de Msie, in Analecta Bolandiana (=An.
Boll.), XXXI, 1912, p. 273-274: [] La Vie de ces deux solitaires venus
dOrient jusqueen Mesie nest quun tissue de prodiges et pisodes singuliers
[]. Nulle part on ne decouvre la moindre attach historique, et lagencement
comme le ton sont ceux des romans dimagination []. J. Zeiller, Les origines
chrtiennes dans les provinces danubiennes de lEmpire romain, Paris 1918, p.
119; idem, Die altchristliche Kirchenprovinz Skythien (Tomis), in Strena
Buliciana, Zagreb-Split, 1924, although H. Delehaye, Les martyres, p. 4-5
makes an honourable revision of his previous pessimistic view on the text; see
also R. Netzhammer, Epiktet und Astion. diokletianische Mrtyrer am
Donaudelta, Zug, 1937, p. 3-22.
56
C. Vilu, N. Amihulesei, Monument martiric paleocretin scos la lumin din
cetatea Halmyris, in Romnia Liber of August 22-nd, 2001; Cretinismul
timpuriu pe meleagurile romneti - Descoperire arheologic de importan
major, in Dimineaa of August 23-rd, 2001; D. Arhire, Senzaional
descoperire la Murighiol, in Acum of August 20-th, 2001; D. M., Mormintele
a doi martiri gsite la Murighiol, in Ziua of August 23-rd, 2001; L. Budin,
Cripta cu martiri de la Murighiol - ameninat de ploi i de hoii de vestigii, in
Adevrul of August 31-st, 2001.
TP
PT
TP
PT
86
TP
57
PT
Pontica Christiana
87
Epictetus: I III 30
Astion: I 5-III 30; IV 44-46
Latronianus: III 19-31; IV 32
Vigilantius: III 22; IV 32-49
Alexander & Marcellina: I 5; 10-11; III 25-26; IV 33-49
Evangelicus: IV 47
Bonosus: IV 48
88
PT
Astion
Under the form mentioned in the hagiographic text, this name
appears in a quite exceptional way. There are some diverse
different readings of the name mentioned just in inscriptions:
Derveni: > 59.
Limoghardi (Narthacium) (Thessalia-Achaia Ftiotis): A list with
names inscribed on three columns: ACTIWN: 60.
TP
PT
TP
58
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
89
TP
TP
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
TP
PT
TP
TP
TP
PT
PT
PT
PT
Latronianus
The name is quite known but not widespread. Latronianus
ancestors could be identified in one of the two branches of
important characters of the military and administrative life of the
Empire.
*The Variant #1:
Flavius Iulius Gemellus Latronianus: between clarissimi pueri
who has sung at the secular games (204)69; cos. suff., ()
TP
61
PT
PT
62
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
90
TP
TP
PT
PT
PT
TP
TP
PT
PT
PT
TP
PT
70
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
91
III 19-31: He leads the trial against Epictetus and Astion and he
sentences them to death;
IV 32: he dies at Halmyris: violenter spiritum exhalavit. (!?)
Subsequent mentions, possibly about the same character:
Sicily: [Res]titutori libertatis [et] fundatori public[cae se]curitatis
d(omino) n(ostro) L[icin]iano Licin[io] pio felici invicto Aug[usto],
Domitius Latronianus, v[ir clarissimus], corr(ector) p[rovinciae
Siciliae d]evotus n(umini) maiestatiqu(e) eius77.
-Panhormus:
] / /
/ /
/ /
/.../...78.
Eusebius:
79.
-Carthago (year 319): D(omino) n(ostro) Constantino Fl(avio)
maximo, pio, felici, invicto, Augusto, Domitius Latronianus, v(ir)
c(larissimus), proco(n)sul p(rovinciae) A(fricae) et Vettius Piso
Severus,
v(ir)
c(larissimus),
cur(ator)
reip(ublicae)
80
Kart(aginensium) numini eius semper dicatissimi .
TP
TP
TP
PT
PT
PT
TP
PT
Vigilantius
From an ephemeral initial role, and with a late appearance as the
events unfolded, Vigilantius acquires an absolute importance in the
77
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
92
second part of the text and becomes the main character. Acta E&A:
III 22; IV 32: IV 33: IV 34; IV 35; IV 36: IV 37: IV 38: IV 39: IV
40: IV 42; IV 43: IV 44: IV 46: IV 47:
In Acta E&A, (III 22), Vigilantius appears with the office of
quaestionarius (unus ex quaestionariis) at Halmyris. He is
probably one of the official persons who have arrested E&A at the
order of Latronianus: imperat aliquos ex quaestionariis ut post solis
occasum pergerent ad habitaculum Sanctorum et comprehensos
eos, ferro vinctos, perducerent in custodiam carceris.
- Possibly, he participates in the trial of E&A in its initial
phase
- Interrogates E&A: III 22.
- He becomes converted to Christianity: III 22: ego
Christianus sum, o tyranne Latroniane []
- He buries the bodies of E&A
- He gives hospitality to Astions parents, Alexander and
Marcellina
- He gives hospitality to the bishop Evangelicus
- He leaves off for Asia Minor (?) together with Astions
parents.
The name is known in the Empire being born by other
important personages soon after the events from Halmyris:
- comes domesticorum (equitum?)81 and magister equitum (409) in
Occidens82;
-metropolitan bishop in Larissa (Thessaly) (446), he participated in
the synod from Ephesus (449)83;
TP
TP
TP
81
PT
PT
PT
PT
82
TP
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
93
84
TP
PT
PT
TP
PT
188 A; 681A; 724C; 729A; 731D; W. Ensslin Real Encyclopdie , VIII A, 1958,
2132 nr. 2.
84
Hieronymus, Contra. Vigiliantii. 1.
85
Hieronymus, Contra. Vigilantii. 11; W. Ensslin, Real Encyclopdie VIII A,
1958, 2132 nr. 3 s.v. Vigilantius.
86
PCBE 2, 2296.
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
94
PT
G. Lanata, Processi contro cristiani negli atti dei martiri, Torino, 1989, 2nd
ed; J. Zeiller, Lgalit et arbitraire dans les perscutions contre les chrtiens,
An. Boll., LXVII, 1949 , p. 49-54; H. Musurillo, The Acts of the Christian
Martyrs. Early Christian Texts, Oxford 1972, passim; H. Gregoire, Les
perscutions dans 1'Empire romain, in Mmoires de lAcadmie royale de
Belgique, 46, Brussels, 1950; V. Monachino, Il fondo giuridico delle
persecuzioni nei primi due secoli, Roma, 1955; repr. from La scuola
cattolica, 8, 1951-1953; For particular cases see: Passio beati Philae episcopi
de civitates Thmui, 2-5; H. Musurillo, op.cit., p. 345-349 (Phileas);
, 8-10; see also F. Cumont, Les Actes de
Saint Dasius, An. Boll., XVI, 1897, p. 369-372; T. M. Popescu, Martiriul
Sfntului Dasius, I Textul, in vol. Prinos I.P.S. Nicodim, Bucureti, 1946, p.
224-230 (Dasius).
TP
87
PT
Pontica Christiana
95
high commandant and by the fact that he and Epictetus will have to
suffer:
II 18: [...] Confesso tua, Astion,magnas meas contrivit hodie vires,
et una oratio vestra me inermem in omnibus reddidit ac desolatum.
Ideoque egressus hinc, intrabo in cor Latroniani ducis, et
excitaboeum adversum vos celeriter [...].
It is a wondrous figure of speech which on one hand becomes
the echo of an announced visit and on the other hand adds a new
episode to the consistent dossier of the so-called <<anti-black
sentiment>> in the patristic writings as it was noticed by Ph.
Mayerson some time ago88. Thanks to the conditions of an
announced and expected visit, the adverb subito, employed by the
redactor in the next chapter which is concerned with the arrival of
Latronianus at Halmyris, can not mean anything else but the fact
that he will have arrived before the announced date:
III 19: [...] subito advenit Latronianus dux in Almyridensium
civitatem [...].
TP
PT
TP
88
96
III 19
multos per sua veneficia averterent iam a sacrificiis deorum
There are, therefore, four important charges:
1. they entered the province illegally, as bandits
2. they are malefactors
3. they are sorcerers
4. they turned people from the faith in the pagan gods and from the
sacrifices brought to them to the benefit of their God.
The initial appearance of the two at Halmyris obviously would
have not gone unnoticed to the local authorities, but it was
permitted, and this fact by itself proves that they resided for 17
years in Halmyris, in accordance with a passage from the text,
without having to suffer, apparently, any consequence for their
faith. In fact, in the moment of their arrival at Halmyris, the
Christians were still under the incidence of the decree of tolerance
of Gallienus from 262, which secured the ideological peace for
forty years, otherwise highly praised by Eusebius as a period of
glory for the Christians89.
The illegal entry in the province seems to be certified by one
of the early passages of the text I 9: [] They arrived at Halmyris
where no one was able to identify them or their country [] (in
Almyridensium civitatem devenerunt, ubi nullus erat, qui eos vel
eorum patriam posset agnoscere).
TP
TP
89
PT
Euseb. Hist. Eccl., I, 1-6 praises explicitly a period of glory and liberty for the
Christianity. The original edict has not survived, but Eusebius (Hist. Eccl., VII,
13) preserves a letter Gallienus sent to some bishops who, presumably in order to
overcome bureaucratic reluctance, requested confirmation that they could built
churches without any hindrance, preach to the barbarians and Greeks, while the
Christians could hold the highest positions in the state; see also P. McKechnie,
The First Christian Centuries. Perspectives on the Early Church, Downers
Grove, Illinois, 1995, p. 134.
PT
Pontica Christiana
97
TP
90
PT
PT
Passio Iulio Veterani 1, 3; Iulius veteranus has been arrested by the prefects
officials (officiales); H. Musurillo, op.cit., p. 262; Dasius was kept in custody in
the dungeon by his own comrades in arms () and brought before
the civilian governor by a detachment () (
, 5. 3; 6.1); H. Musurillo, op.cit., p. 277.
91
A. Berger, Encyclopedic Dictionary of Roman Law, Transactions of the
American Philosophical Society N. S. vol. 43, part 2, Philadelphia 1953, s. v.
quaestionarius.
TP
PT
TP
PT
98
PT
92
PT
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
99
PT
TP
94
PT
100
PT
TP
95
Pontica Christiana
101
PT
TP
PT
PT
TP
96
PT
Euseb. Hist. Eccl., IX, 11, 4. (6); Passio beati Philae episcopi de civitate
Thmui, 1.1 (Culcianus); Passio sancti Irenaei episcopi Sirmiensis 2.1 (Probus);
, 6 (Bassus); Passio Iuli Veterani 2.1
(Maximus); Acta Marcelli 2. 2 (Fortunatus).
97
Ch. Rouech, op.cit., p. 35; J. M. Carri, op.cit., p. 20-22.
98
S. Corcoran, The Empire of the Tetrarchs, Oxford, 1996, p. 234-253; J. M.
Carri, op.cit., p. 22-25.
99
J. M. Carri, op.cit., p. 22.
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
102
PT
TP
TP
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
TP
100
PT
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
103
Delehaye. The same scholar who in 1912 had asserted that the text
on E &A nest quun tissu de prodiges et dpisodes singuliers [...]
nulle part on ne decouvre la moindre attache historique, et
lagencement comme le ton sont ceux des romans
dimagination[...] and that [...] Halmyris, ville assez peu designe
par elle-mme lattention des lettres dallors106, had the power in
1928 to recognize his previous committed mistake of doubting the
authenticity of an account of a special value, and to restore the true
value of the text in light of the Syriac breviary107. A thorough
introspection into the structure of the text reveals clear elements of
the main source of information which became later the basis of the
original manuscript.
An initial manuscript, which we conventionally named it A,
must have existed more than certainly. It mirrors in later
manuscripts a series of astonishingly accurate information of
administrative, geographic, topographical and historical nature.
Such real details could have been hardly if not impossible
conceived by a possible external and much later redactor who
presumably would have invented the entire story. The only initial
sources that could have provided so many elements from different
fields of social life must have been an eye witness. The
topographical and architectural elements narrated in the text have
been archaeologically identified. Below there is the list of the terms
used in the text that found archaeological, topographical, or late 3rd
century confirmation in the sources:
TP
PT
TP
PT
PT
TP
107
PT
Cf. note 5.
H. Delehaye, Les martyres , p. 4-5.
104
108
PT
PT
Pontica Christiana
105
PT
doctrines you prefer?; 3.1: where do you meet together?; 4. 7: where are your
parents (addressed to Euelpistus)?
109
Latronianus addressed the following inquires (III 21): [] Quae sunt
vocabula vestra, quod genus, seu de quali provincia vos estis oriundi, nobis in
conspectus huius multitudinis explanate [].
TP
PT
106
PT
TP
TP
110
PT
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
107
TP
113
PT
PT
108
A
Manuscript a: official court report of the trial resulted from the
dukes offices.
Manuscript b: the sketch of the events written by Vigilantius based
on the testimonies of the two and of his own notes.
A = the basic manuscript finally written up very most likely at the
end of the 4th century.
P
Pontica Christiana
109
PT
TP
114
PT
PT
TP
PT
110
UN COMENTARIU ISTORIC
LA UN TEXT HAGIOGRAPHIC:
Passio Epicteti presbyteri et Astionis monachi
- rezumat Studiul este un comentariu asupra ctorva probleme istorice,
juridice i de transmisie a manuscriselor ridicate de textul
martirologic referitor la cei doi cretini venii din Asia Mic i
prezeni timp de 17 ani, n deceniile opt i nou la sfritul
secolului III la Halmyris, preotul Epictetus i discipolul su Astion.
Comentariul se concentreaz pe urmtoarele aspecte desprinse din
textul martirologic:
-identificarea istoric a personajelor cu rol cheie n desfurarea
evenimentelor;
-structura pasajelor referitoare la procesul intentat de autoritile
imperiale romane celor doi martiri;
- mprejurarile n care s-a putut coagula forma final a textului
care mai apoi a stat la baza viitorului manuscris care, recopiat, a
ajuns n mprejurri neclare pn astzi n arhivele bisericii
Mntuitorului din Utrecht.
Pontica Christiana
111
112
PT
TP
PT
PT
TP
PT
PT
1
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
113
Complete.
Lead little cross, obtained by pouring. The horizontal arms are very
short. The ring was made on the same mould; it is very thick and
strongly egg-shaped. The only ornamental element is represented
by a simple frame.
H act. = 23,1 mm; l = 12,3 mm.
Inv. 27753. Prjoaia, passim fortuitous discovery by Tnase Florea.
Bibliography: Unpublished.
Analogies: From the 5th-7th century settlement of Botoana, district
of Suceava, comes to us a mould for the casting of small objects.
On the preserved object we have the negative of a little cross with
even arms (crux quadrata), widened at the ends, and the ring is
identical with the one of our piece4. Some little crosses made with
the mould from Straulesti were thickened with a ring, also5.
P
TP
PT
TP
PT
Taking into consideration the fact that, for the little crosses
from Izvoarele there was the suggestion to be dated in the 5th and
6th centuries the last term being stressed by the circumstance that,
at the beginning of the 7th century the settlement was incontestably
forsaken6 - following the strong Avar invasion of 587 A.D.7, and
the analogy with the moulds from Botoana and Struleti, we
suggest the same chronologic framing for our piece.
The next six pieces come from Durostorum, from the Danube
shore, more exactly, from the Roman settlement of Ostrovit, Farm 4
(code 62547.01). That area is particularly known in the 2nd and 3rd
P
TP
PT
TP
PT
Dan Gh. Teodor, Cele mai vechi urme cretine din Moldova, in Mitropolia
Moldovei i Sucevei, L (1974), 7-8, fig. 2 and 4, 3; I. Barnea, Arta cretin n
Romnia. t. I (Secolele III-VI), Editura Institutului Biblic i de Misiune al
Bisericii Ortodoxe Romne, Bucureti, 1979, fig. III, 2; Silvia Teodor, Dan G.
Teodor, Botoana, in Enciclopedia Arheologiei i Istoriei Vechi a Romniei,
vol. I, Bucureti, 1994, p. 199, fig. 51.
5
C. tirbulescu, Tipar, in Paleocretinism i cretinism pe teritoriul Romniei
secolele III-XI, Expoziie organizat de Muzeul Naional de Istorie a Romniei,
Bucureti, 2002, nr. 67, VI-th century, p. 57.
6
V. Culic, op.cit., p. 12.
7
Idem, Plumburi comerciale din cetatea romano-bizantin de la Izvoarele
(Dobrogea) I, in Pontica, VIII, 1975, p. 217.
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
114
PT
TP
TP
PT
TP
PT
PT
For bibliography see: Dan Elefterescu, Two gnostic pieces from Durostorum,
from this volume.
9
Paul Damian (responsible), Adela Bltc, Christina tirbulescu, Ionu Bocan,
Virgil Apostol, Nicoleta Nedelcu, Ani Ologu, Valentin Bottez, Dan Elefterescu,
George Dumitru, Ostrov, com. Ostrov, Jud. Constana (Durostorum). Point:
Farm 4, in Cronica cercetrilor arheologice din Romnia, Campania 2004,
2005, p. 249-251.
10
C. Mueeanu (responsable), P. Damian, M. Simion, R. Crjan, D. Elefterescu,
A. Bltc, Ostrov, com. Ostrov, Jud. Constana, (Durostorum). Point: Farm 4,
in Cronica cercetrilor arheologice din Romnia, Campania 1996, 1997 and C.
Mueeanu (responsible), P. Damian, A. Bltc, C. tirbulescu, R. Crjan, I.
Achim, M. Simion, D. Elefterescu, Ostrov, com. Ostrov, Jud. Constanta
(Durostorum). Point: Farm 4, in Cronica cercetrilor arheologice din Romnia,
Campania 1998, 1999.
11
D. Elefterescu, Un capac de teriac descoperit la Durostorum, manuscript.
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
th
115
th
TP
TP
PT
PT
TP
PT
12
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
116
Plain little cross, cut out of an ancient bronze sheet, the arms
slightly triangular, with no ornaments; the supporting system was
acquired by the bending of an extension of the upper arm.
H act. = 32,2 mm; l = 19 mm.
Inv. 21738. Durostorum, passim, open ground research by Dan
Elefterescu.
Dating: 10th-11th century A.D.
Unpublished.
Analogies: We can make a relative assimilation with two little
crosses from the small treasure uncovered during the 1953
campaign of Histria (dated in the 6th century A.D)15. But much
more similar, both typologically and chronologically, is the piece
from Czar Asen16.
P
TP
TP
PT
PT
TP
15
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
117
18
region) , we have a piece of the same type. For the Greek cross in
the middle, but with the arms more visibly rounded, we have
numerous analogies on the small canteens of clay, very often found
in the 4th-6th centuries, so called (blessings) of St. Mena
(ampoules a eulogie or eulogies de St. Mena) of Egypt19 and Asia
Minor20.
TP
PT
TP
TP
PT
PT
PT
18
PT
19
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
118
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
22
TP
PT
P. Diaconu, S. Baraschi, op.cit., fig. 101. 13; G. Atanasov, op.cit., pl. LXXII.
345.
23
G. Atanasov, op.cit., fig. 101 and pl. LXXII. 350.
24
Ibidem, fig. 102 and pl. LXXII. 348.
25
D. Elefterescu, Calimari romane de la Durostorum, paper, Pontica 2006.
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
119
120
Fig. I
Pontica Christiana
121
PT
TP
PT
TP
TP
PT
PT
PT
PT
1
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
122
3045, when numerous martyrs were executed for their faith6, did not
stop the propagation of the Christianity. Constantine the Great
realized that the new religion could become an important ally of the
State and granted unrestrained freedom to this movement through
the Mediolanum (Milan) Edict enforced in 312-313 A.D.7. As soon
as the imperial authorities have officialy accepted it, the
Christianity quickly spread out. The Christian symbols and images
placed on various objects (official, personal, or household items)
are the most obvious representations known so far. The cross sign
is an outstanding one.
In the pages below we are going to take into discussion a
number of items selected from the findings identified in the eastern
sector of the fortress of Capidava. The items are quite different in
terms of their utility (even with regards to the material they are
made of), i.e. lamps, bronze or bone vesture accessories, personal
items, stamped decoration common pottery.
As for the lamps the cross sign is placed as decoration either
on the handle on the groove in front of the burner, or on the disc, or
much more interestingly as trademark of the producer in this
TP
PT
TP
TP
PT
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
123
8
TP
PT
PT
TP
PT
PT
PT
TP
TP
PT
124
PT
TP
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
11
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
125
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
TP
PT
PT
TP
TP
PT
PT
TP
TP
TP
18
PT
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
PT
PT
19
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
126
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
PT
PT
31
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
127
128
TP
TP
PT
TP
TP
35
PT
PT
PT
PT
J. W. Hayes, op.cit., p. 160-169, fig. 30/2 (Forms 104 A), fig. 31/7, 13 (Form
105).
36
C. Mueeanu, Adela Bltc, Cramique, in Al. Suceveanu, Histria XIII. La
basilique piscopale, Bucarest, 2007, p. 209, nr. 36, 37 (Form Hayes 105)
37
Ioan C. Opri, loc.cit.
38
George F. Bass, The Pottery, in George F.Bass and Frederick H. van
Deorninck, Jr., Yassi Ada. I. A Seventh-Century Byzantine Shipwreck, Texas,
1982, p. 167, P.5 (Form Hayes 105).
39
J. W. Hayes, op.cit, p. 265-267.
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
129
TP
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
TP
TP
TP
PT
PT
PT
TP
TP
40
PT
PT
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
130
From the point of view of shape and technique, the plate found
in the room C.11 of the Edifice discovered in the eastern sector of
Capidava belongs to African Red Slip Ware type 104 or perhaps
105. The decoration belongs to the style E (ii). Thus, a saint
representation identical to the representation found on this plate has
also been identified on a plate exhibited in Saint Sophia Museum
in Istanbul and discovered in the proximity of rengeri locality
(Cilicia)49. The saint type 234 is quite common for the pottery
belonging to 103 B and 104 Forms. The cross belongs to the type
323, and the style E (ii), described as 9 cm high and decorated with
two large circles on both arms, is present on pottery items
belonging to 104 A, C Forms. The complete image is identical to
that found on the plate discovered in Capidava: the saint dressed in
dalmatica with the episcopal sceptre in his right hand and placed
TP
TP
49
PT
PT
Pontica Christiana
131
TP
PT
PT
Ibidem, p. 265-266, type 234, with the bibliographic analogies for the Saints
and p. 278, type 323, fig. 57 f for the cross.
51
Ibidem, p. 229.
TP
PT
TP
PT
132
Pontica Christiana
133
PT
by Ioan Mitrea
The central area of Moldavia containing, broadly speaking, the
geographical unity of the sub-Carpathian mountains of Moldavia,
and the contact area of the middle basin of the Siret River with the
Central Moldavian Plateau and the Totowas Hillocks, over which
was superposed in great part, as far back as its founding, the
authority of the Episcopate of Roman, proved to be one in which
the most ancient Christian communities of the Carpatho-Dniester
space have been built with great pains and have been made
manifest.
More than one decade ago, facing a rich corpus of the
archaeological discoveries regarding the beginnings and the
evolution of Christianity at the east side of the Carpathians
Mountains, His Eminence Daniel, then-Metropolitan of Moldavia
and Bucovina, who is now the Patriarch of the Romanian Orthodox
Church, concluded that the propagation of Christianity at the east
the Carpathians has spread out as far back as the early dawns of
the first millennium after Christ1. In line with this important
assertion, a few years later, the regretted Metropolitan, His
Eminence Nestor Vornicescu, in one of his articles published
posthumously, rendered manifest that Christianity, the new
religion, took hold of our ancestors as far back as the apostolic
epoch, and that for the Dacian-Roman population, the
Christianity constituted from its first centuries not only an ordinary
fact of faith, it was a fact with deep spiritual, social, and historical
implications, a decisive historic and cultural phenomenon, thus
proving the capacity of this population to maintain an intense
TP
TP
1
TP
PT
PT
134
spiritual life2. In full agreement with the results of the historicarchaeological researches from the last decades regarding the
dissemination of Christianity to the Dacian-Roman world, whose
members started to be called Romanians in the course of the 8th-9th
centuries3, the learned hierarch asserted that unlike some other
neighboring nations, in the history of whom is recorded an accurate
date of their official Christianization, we received the Christian
faith on the space of time comprising the first centuries of the
Christian era, a process which took place both through individual
conversions and through the missionary work, and this course was
carried out simultaneously with the process of Romanian nations
ethnogeny4. Indeed, there is no certain date on the Christianization
in droves of the Romanian nation, as was the case with all of our
neighbors, through a decision made by a political power, but the
new religion was spread gradually, from one individual to the next,
from one family to the next, and from one community to the next.
The thesis of the popular Christianity of the autochtonous people,
called first Dacian-Romans and later Romanians, is found on a
solid scholarly argumentation5.
In the Dacian worlds space, the Dacian-Roman worlds space,
and then in the space of the ancient Romanian worlds space, the
Christianity found a favorable soil in order for it to be able to take
roots. These favourable conditions can be explained on one hand by
the affiliation of this world to the area of the Roman and later
the Roman-Byzantine civilization, and on the other hand, by the
psychological state of this world, which was always in danger,
especially during the time of great migrations. Inside the ranks of a
population which was always disturbed by the migratory peoples,
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
135
6
TP
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
PT
7
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
136
PT
TP
PT
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
137
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
12
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
138
TP
TP
PT
16
Pontica Christiana
139
140
TP
PT
TP
PT
17
TP
PT
TP
18
PT
Pontica Christiana
141
th
TP
19
PT
PT
142
Pontica Christiana
143
Fig.1 Davideni
Paleo-Christian objects uncovered in the settlement from the 5th-6th centuries.
P
144
Fig. 2 A fragment from the Roman-Byzantine fibula, from the 6th century, with
the representation of Christs portrait (increased about 5 times).
P
Pontica Christiana
145
PT
by Dan Elefterescu
The subject under discussion consists of two small Gnostic
pieces made of lead, recovered by chance on the Danube River
shore in the area of the Roman settlement from Ostrov Farm 4.
The settlement (code 62547.01) is found on the territory of Ostrovit
Society, S. A. at the km 132, N.R. 3A (Bucuresti-Constanta) at
approximately 3.5 km far from the Ancient city of Durostorum1,
and reflects a large amount of archaeological material that proves
an intense clay, bronze, lead, gold, bones, and very likely glass
processing2.
CATALOGUE
TP
TP
PT
PT
PT
PT
TP
TP
PT
146
PT
N. Markov, In the tracks of the ancient magic. (55 late antiquity amulets from
several private collections), Sofia, 2005, B4, an almost identical piece, whose
chaton was preserved and regarded as an amulet in the shape of the eye, had on
its back, quite similar to our piece, a thin casting line which was thought to
represent a vulva, late dating (3rd-4th centuries), p. 54.
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
147
4
PT
TP
PT
Fig. 1a
Ibidem, B7, even if they do not come from the same pattern, they certainly have
the same prototype, the 2nd-4th centuries, p. 58.
5
T. Dimitrijevi, A Gnostic amulet Abraxas, in Viminacium, 10, 1988, p. 1720, fig. 1-3, even if they do not come from the same pattern, they certainly have
the same prototype.
TP
PT
TP
PT
148
TP
PT
PT
TP
TP
PT
PT
TP
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
149
they didnt have the time to be used, the discovery area being quite
far from the necropolises as well as from the tomb groups from that
area.
Fig. 1b
Taking into consideration that the magic gems are dated in the
2nd-3rd cent.11, a period of time during which the settlement from
Durostorum-Ostrov (Farm 4) reaches the upper limit of growth, we
en-frame our pieces inside these historical limits, most probably in
P
TP
11
TP
PT
150
the first half of the third century, when the faith of the Gnostics
reached remarkable proportions, touching all the provinces. This is
the period when, as pointed out by D. Benea, the Gnostic religion
brings to bear a visible influence on the early Christianity, on its
ideology12.
We assert this regardless of whether or not these pieces have
been permanently or occasionally worn, or whether they had
funeral destinations; moreover, if we admit to the utmost a
negative, even derogatory goal (see, by the way, the maleficent
significance of the material)13, these pieces clearly and undoubtedly
certify the presence of Gnostics in the area. We assert this bearing
in mind that pieces modestly made on a stand without an inherent
value could not be taken over and passed on outside of experts
circle, of those who know, or at least recognize the message. We
cannot agree with the assertion of the late Nicolae Vlassa made in
one of his articles of 198014 with regards to a gem found in the
Constanta museum, and we quote, Otherwise, the obviously magic
character of the object is defining it, par excellence, as a talisman
acting for the bearer, with magical virtues, working for the one
(and not only for the one) for whom it had been conceived from the
moment of manufacturing, adding also that the assertion was used
for the chronological en-framing of the pieces; on the contrary, we
consider that it is exactly this magic character that could have
constituted sometimes the reason for the passing on to an endeared
TP
PT
TP
TP
12
PT
PT
PT
13
TP
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
151
PT
TP
15
PT
152
Fig. 2
Pontica Christiana
153
UTILIZING A FLASK
AS A PIECE FOR CHRISTIAN RITUAL*
TP
PT
TP
*
PT
154
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
155
barracks from on the west side of the defense wall lies in next to the
Episcopate basilica, of which it is separated by a narrow street.
156
PT
TP
PT
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
Fig. 2 The nr. 2 barrack where the ceramic pieces have been retrieved
157
158
PT
Information received from the author of the digging, for which I am fully
indebted.
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
Fig. 4 The piece that was completed again with traces of burning
incense
159
160
PT
by Nechita Runcan
I. Biobibliographical details
St. Nicetas of Remesiana carried on a rich missionary activity
in the second half of the fourth century and the beginning of the
fifth century among the Daco-Romans from the right and the left
side of the Danube River, in a region found at the borders that
separate two cultures Greek and Latin revealing himself as a
genuinely erudite hierarch as well as a true shepherd who displayed
warm love to his spiritual children.
Precious information on the life and activity of St. Nicetas is
offered by the priest Gennadius of Marseille1 (492-505), Flavius
Magnus Aurelius Cassiodorus2 (c.490-c.583) and particularly by
Saint Paulinus of Nola3 (353-431). The name of Nicetas is derived
TP
TP
TP
PT
PT
PT
PT
1
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
161
TP
TP
PT
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
TP
PT
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
162
PT
TP
PT
TP
TP
10
PT
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
163
his heart to talk. Paulinus feelings are sincere, and this truth points
out that Poem XVII was not a courtesy letter,14 as a follow-up to
Nicetas first visit to Nola, and the things which are recounted are
known from the long conversations between the two friends15.
As accurate historic events from the life of the great
missionary, who was Niceta, we keep in our minds the two visits
made by him to Nola in the years 398 and 402,16 as well as the
mentioning of his name by the pope Innocent I, in the years 409
and 414.
The critique of specialty17 holds that Nicetas was born in the
year 338 A.D., and that he lived approximately 80 years, until about
the year 414; even before the year 367 he was the bishop of
Remesiana. St. Nicetas was contemporaneous with the most
important Fathers of the Church from the second patristic period,
such as: St. Basil the Great, St. Athanasius, St. Ephraim the Syrian
(373), St. Cyril of Jerusalem, St. Gregory the Theologian, St.
TP
PT
TP
TP
TP
14
PT
PT
PT
Ibidem.
The phrase Romanis merito admirandus shows that Nicetas traveled to
Rome, where he made a beautiful impression. We believe that in that place he
knew St. Paulinus, who invited him to Nola on St. Felix feast day (January 14).
During his first journey, St. Nicetas remained at Nola, to the summer. S. Paulini
Nolani, Carmen XVII..., v. 26-28, p. 81-96, apud t. C. Alexe, op.cit., p. 468.
16
Concerning the dating of the two visits to Nola, the opinions are divided. Thus,
P. Fabre, in his work Essais, p. 138-139, considers that Nicetas first visit to
Nola took place in the year 400, and the second one, in the year 403; while
Joannes Baptista Le Brun, in Vita Sancti Paulini Nolani Episcopi, Prolegomena,
PL, LXI, 80 AB, 90 and Antonio Pagi, in Critica historico-chronologica in
universos Annales ecclesiasticos... Caesaris Cardinalis Baronii, Tomus
Secundus, Antverpiae, MDCCXXVII, p. 13, 53, considers that the two visits took
place in the year 398, and 402, respectively. The opinion of the last two ones is
shared, also, by A. E. Burn, op.cit., p. XXXV, and by Ubaldo Mannucci,
Instituzioni di Patrologia ad uso delle Scuole Teologiche, Parte II (Epoca post
Niceta), Terza edizione riveduta, Roma, 1932, p. 198. We adopt the opinion of
the last four researchers mentioned in this note.
17
See, in this sense, A. E. Burn, op.cit., p. XXXV; J. Zeiller, op.cit., p. 550; D.
M. Pippidi, Niceta din Remesiana i originile cretinismului daco-roman, in
Contribuii la istoria veche a Romniei, ed. a II-a revzut i adaugit,
Bucureti, 1967, p. 502-553; t. C. Alexe, op.cit., p. 469; I. G. Coman, op.cit., p.
235-236.
TP
PT
15
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
164
PT
TP
TP
18
PT
PT
Sancti Pontii Paulini Nolani, Carmen XVII, v. 55-56, p. 187-188, 195, 319-320.
The historian Constantin C. Giurescu, in Istoria Romnilor, vol. II, ed. a II-a,
Bucureti, 1935, p. 197, asserts that Nicetas was a Daco-Roman by birth. The
same thing is emphasized by Vasile Prvan in his work Contribuii epigrafice la
istoria cretinismului dacoroman, Bucureti, 1911, p. 171 and note 769; as well
as A. L. Tutu, Izvoarele de mna nti despre Sf. Nichita Remezianul, in
Cultura Cretin, anul XIV, Blaj, 1925, nr. 9, p. 324.
19
See: A. E. Burn, op.cit., p. 31-32; and Wilhem August Patin, Nicetas bischof
von Remesiana als Schriftsteller und Theologe, Mnchen, 1909, p. 29, 48-65,
apud t. C. Alexe, op.cit., p. 470, note 72.
20
For this matter, can be consulted Eugen Lazovans study, Aux origines du
christianisme Daco-Scythique, published by Franz Altheim in Geschichte her
Hunnen, vol. IV, Berlin, 1962, p. 146-165, apud t. C. Alexe, op.cit., p. 470, note
73.
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
165
TP
PT
PT
21
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
166
TP
PT
TP
24
PT
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
167
PT
TP
PT
TP
TP
26
PT
PT
PT
27
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
168
testimony about St. Nicetas work on that side (on the left side of
Danube). However, St. Paulinus of Nolas indication, corroborated
with other literary and archaeological documents mentioned above,
justifies, to a great extent, the hypothesis of the Dacian bishops
activity at the north of Danube, also30.
Some other archaeologists, historians, and researchers, such as:
Ion Barnea,31 Ioan Rmureanu32, D. M. Pippidi33 etc., have been
busy themselves with St. Nicetas missionary works problem on
the Danubes banks. In fact, the archaeological discoveries made
later,34 do not contradict, on the contrary, they confirm the
TP
TP
TP
PT
TP
PT
PT
TP
PT
PT
30
I. G. Coman, op.cit., p. 356; Idem, Patrologie, p. 237; In the same sense see,
also, S. Berger, Nictas, aptre des Daces, in Encyclopdie des Sciences
Religieuses, publie par Lichtenberger, t. IX, Paris, 1880, p. 621: it fit de
nombreuses missions au dela du Danube, et reussit y a repandre lEvangile; J.
Zeiller, op.cit., p. 557; P. de Labriolle, LEglise et les Barbares, in Augustin
Fliche et Victor Martin, Histoire de lEglise, vol. IV, part II, Paris, 1930, p. 370;
E. Lozovan, Unit et dislocation de la Romanie orientale, in Orbis, Bulletin
International de Documentation Linguistique, t. III, nr. 1, Paris, 1954, p. 137: Le
christianisme daco-roman est dorigine missionnaire; sa priode de diffusion
stend entre 375-450. Laptre dace St. Nictas de Rmsiana reprsente la
liaison traditionnelle entre lItalie, lIllyricum et la Dacie.
31
Ion Barnea, Vasile Prvan i problemele cretinismului n Dacia Traian, ST,
X (1958), 1-2, p. 93-105.
32
I. Rmureanu, Sinodul de la Sardica din anul 343. Importana lui pentru
istoria ptrunderii cretinismului la geto-daco-romani, ST, XIV (1962), 3-4, p.
179.
33
D. M. Pippidi, Nicetas di Remesiana e le origini del crestianesimo dacoroman, in Revue Historique du Sud-Est Europen, XXIII, 1946, p. 113, 115;
Cf. M. Macrea, Rspndirea cretinismului la daco-romani, in Istoria
Romniei, vol. I, Bucureti, 1960, p. 633; Emilian Vasilescu, Noi dovezi ale
continuitii elementului autohton n Dacia, BOR, LXXXIV (1966), 9-10, p.
1009.
34
Concerning the origins of Christianity in the Trajans Dacia, in the light of the
archaeological discoveries in the middle of the 20th century, one may consult: I.
Barnea, Contribuii la studiul cretinismului n Dacia, in Revista Istoric
Romn (=RIR), XIII, 1943, p. 32-42; Idem, Opaie cretine din Scythia Minor,
RIR, XIV, fasc. II, 1944, p. 166-177; D. Tudor, Prima basilic descoperit n
Dacia Traian, Iai, 1948; C. Daicoviciu, n jurul cretinismului din Dacia, in
Studii, revist de tiin, filosofie, arte, I, Bucureti, 1984, p. 122-127; I. I.
Rusu, Materiale arheologice paleo-cretine din Transilvania, ST, X (1958), 5-6,
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
169
TP
TP
PT
PT
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
170
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
38
PT
V. Prvan, op.cit., p. 201: The Danube was never a heinous enemy, which
would have separated the brothers; it was a good friend, which united them.
39
P. Fabre, Saint Paulin , p. 226
40
S. Paulini Nolani, Carmen XVII, v. 149-160, p. 88-89.
41
Ibidem, v. 357 and the following, p. 278.
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
171
42
TP
PT
PT
TP
TP
PT
TP
42
PT
PT
PT
43
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
172
to determine the removal of the Latin name of the bird which sings
by night luscinia from the Romanian language and the replacing
of it by the word privighetoarea (nightingale)47.
Thus, we may conclude that St. Nicetas lives in the second half
of the 4th century and the first quarter of the 5th century, in a region
which was connecting the eastern world to the western world.
Ethnically speaking, he was a Daco-Roman who used Latin tongue
both in his missionary and literary-theological work.
The two journeys to Italy, his friendship with Paulinus of Nola,
his exceptional missionary work, doubled by a rich cultural activity
among many un-Christianized populations from the Danubian area,
as well as the holiness of his life, are placing St. Nicetas among the
great holy Fathers of Patristics, known for their ecumenical activity.
TP
PT
TP
47
PT
Pontica Christiana
173
hearts of the faithful and the heathens, who held an alien honor,
destroyed by the Lord, was scattered48.
Missionary and apostolic soul, St. Nicetas was, also, a great
theologians and man of letters, enjoying a remarkable prestige, as
follows from a manuscript codex from the 9th century: Then it has
to be briefly said how could be understood the Symbol of Faith
itself, as it was expounded by the teachers of the Holy Church of
God, that is, the Blessed Athanasius, Hilary, Nicetas, Hieronymus,
Ambrose, Augustine, Gennadius, Fulgentius, Isidore and others, or
as we have been taught by our venerable teachers and
forebears49.
The work which made St. Nicetas an illustrious theologian was
a catechism, elaborated for those who were preparing themselves to
receive the holy Mystery of Baptism, called either Libelli
instructionis50 (The teaching booklets), or Instructio ad
competentes51 (Teaching for catechumens). Gennadius of Marseille
kept a copy of this catechism in his hand, leaving inside it a written
note by which he summarized its content52.
By content and by the goal of writing, St. Nicetas works can
be classified in two categories: some are catechetical and some
others are practical. Here are the works which belong to the first
category: De diversis appellationibus; The Catechism described by
Gennadius; De ratione fidei; De Spiritus Sanctus potentia; De
Symbolo and De agni paschalis victima. To the second category
belong the following works: Ad lapsam virginem libellus; De
vigiliis servorum Dei; De psalmodiae bono; and the hymn Te Deum
laudamus53.
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
TP
PT
PT
TP
TP
PT
PT
48
PT
49
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
174
PT
TP
PT
TP
54
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
Ibidem, p. 220.
A. E. Burn, op.cit., p. 8.
56
See: Ambrozie de Milan, Des sacraments, Des Mysteres, lexplication du
Symbole, texte tabli, traduit et annot par Dom Bernard Botte, in Sources
Chretiennes, nr. 25 bis, Paris, 1961, p. 56.
57
Fer. Augustin, De Symbolo, Sermo ad catechumenos, I, 1, PL, vol. XL, col.
627.
58
Petrus Chrysologus, Sermo LVIII, PL, vol. LII, col. 361B.
TP
PT
55
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
175
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
59
PT
PT
PT
60
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
176
the bishop of Remesiana, makes secure the hypothesis that the work
belongs to St. Niceta.
Among the practical writings, by which St. Niceta, as a true
spiritual shepherd and skilful missionary, was taking care of his
spiritual flock, we mention:
7. Ad lapsam virginem libellus (To a fallen virgin), which was
moved about under more titles: Liber de lapsu virginis
consacratae, Epistula Nicetae episcopi de lapsu Susannae
devotae et sacratae, Epistula ad virginem lapsam, De lapsu
virginis63.
In this work, St. Nicetas writes about a nun, called Susana,
who fell into sin with a reader, thus breaking the vow of chastity.
While commiserating her condition, the author reminds her of the
diligence from which she had fallen off and the gravity of sin. The
tone, even if it is restrained, becomes rhetorical. From the text of
the work, the idea of communion of the saints can be easily
recognized. We may recognize, also, in its author, St. Niceta, the
hymnologist and the animator of singing the Psalms in Church, and
at vigils. Both the similarity of style and the tone of explanation,
are reminding us, doubtlessly, of St. Nicetas works De diversis
appellationibus and De psalmodiae bono64.
8. De vigiliis servorum Dei (On the vigil of Gods servants) is
a sermon, which shows St. Nicetas as a keeper of the cultic
tradition in Church. In the nine chapters of the work, the author
talks about the nightly religious vigil, recently introduced as an
ecclesiastical service on Friday night and Saturday night65. While
concluding the talk On the vigil..., Nicetas makes known the next
work: But on the piety of the hymns and the Psalms, how much
God loves them and how He receives them, I would talk a little
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
63
PT
PT
64
TP
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
177
now, if a specific reason would not ask for another volume; I will
deal with these issues, God helping, in the next book66.
9. De psalmodiae bono (On the good psalmodizing) was
preserved in two versions, an original one and a later one, with
some appendices and omissions. Even if it was edited in the year
1723, under the name of Nicetius of Treves, the later Patristics
scholars reached the conclusion that its author is St. Nicetas of
Remesiana. Both the ecclesiastical practice in the East and the
West, as well as the references of some Fathers and ecclesiastical
writers as St. Basil the Great, Blessed Augustine and John Cassian
as far as the celebration of vigils and the public singing of Psalms
in church are concerned place the work at the end of the 4th
century67.
The two talks: De vigiliis servorum Dei and De psalmodiae
bono inspired always and everywhere by the advices and the
ideas they are made up of both the monastic circles and all the
Christians who give glory to God through religious hymns. They
represent, also, a source of inspiration for the behavior of the
faithful inside the Church.
10. Te Deum laudamus (We praise You, God) is an illustrious
hymn for Gods glorification, written in the Latin tongue. It
embellished the ecclesiastical services throughout the centuries. It
should not be confused with the well-known service called TeDeum which is offered today in churches on the occasion of some
solemn ceremonies.
The oldest known mentioning of the hymn Te Deum is found
in The guiding rules for monks from the year 512, written by
Caesar of Arelate (+542), then in the letter of the bishop Cyprian of
TP
PT
TP
TP
66
Ibidem, p. 67-68.
See, in this sense, A. L. Tutu, Ritul Sfntului Niceta episcop al Remesianei, in
Buna Vestire, III, 1964, nr. 1, p. 32; A. E. Burn, op.cit., p. 55-82; C. H. Tuner,
Nicetas of Remesiana, De vigiliis, in Journal of Theological Studies (=JThS),
Published Quarterly, London-Oxford, 1921, vol. XXII, nr. 88, p. 305-320; Idem,
Nicetas of Remesiana, II: Introduction and text of De psalmodiae bono, JThS,
1923, vol. XXIV, nr. 95, p. 225-252.
PT
67
TP
PT
PT
178
PT
TP
68
PT
PT
TP
69
PT
Pontica Christiana
179
70
TP
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
TP
PT
70
PT
PT
71
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
180
St. Nicetas writings, even if they are short, are clear, as was
required by his catechetical activity. The topics he treated are based
on evidences from the Holy Scripture, Holy Tradition, reason, and
life. The writings of the great Christian missionary from the
Danube River are penetrated by the warmth of the fatherly love of
the spiritual shepherd, who calls his spiritual sons brothers, and
dearly beloved. The literary-theological heritage acquired by the
Church from the indefatigable missionary who was Nicetas of
Remesiana, is considered even today as a real source of inspiration
for priests and catechists.
V. Ecumenical meaning of St. Nicetas of Remesianas
missionary work
The missionary work of St. Nicetas of Remesiana, carried on
both the right and the left side of the Danube River, included on the
same footing all the faithful from among all nations found along
the Danubian limes, thus contributing to their spiritual unification.
St. Nicetas lived and shepherded in a region which was
connecting the two worlds Greek and Latin with distinct
spiritual profiles, but on their way of drawing near to each other
and even of unification due to the historical conditions created at
the balance between the 4th and the 5th centuries. The Christianity
contributed to this work of unification, also, since it was preached
with zeal to the nations, as a fulfillment of the commandment
given by our Savior Jesus Christ: Go you, therefore, and make
disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father
and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit (Matthew 28: 19).
The great missionary hierarch of Remesiana was anchored in
the ecumenical realities of his time, dedicating his whole being to
the work of evangelization. His missionary work, of a broad
ecumenical breathing, led by St. John Chrysostom from
Constantinople, and sustained by St. Theotim I from Tomis on the
banks of the Lower Danube and in the Pontic Dacia, was
accomplished with great apostolic fervor by St. Niceta, also, both in
Dacia Ripensis and Mediterranea as well as at the north side of
P
Pontica Christiana
181
TP
TP
PT
PT
TP
75
PT
PT
76
TP
PT
TP
PT
182
Even if St. Nicetas has not left behind him any written
commentary on the Holy Scripture, as was the case with St. Basil
the Great, St. John Chrysostom, St. Ambrose, Blessed Augustine,
and others, he treasured as much as they did both the Old and the
New Testament.
St. Nicetas exegesis of the biblical texts is purely Orthodox;
he chose the most appropriate quotations for arguing the truths of
faith against the heresies for the building up of his faithful78.
Practically speaking, the teaching shared with his catechumens, was
presented as a summary of the Holy Scripture. Besides the biblical
word, the Apostolic Tradition is the second source of inspiration for
the truths of faith with a binding character for the listeners. In
accordance with St. Nicetas vision in order for one to be able to
share in an ecumenical consensus, one has to be well informed on
the teaching of the Church Fathers and to be in agreement with
them. In St. Nicetas view, the deviation from the line of tradition
brings about aberration, as was the case with the Macedonians who,
at the beginning, have believed as it was taught79. The keeping
of the Apostolic Tradition is the visible sign of belonging to the true
Church.
An essential characteristic of St. Nicetas of Remesiana was his
missionary zeal. In this respect, he is counted among the great
missionaries of his time, by making his activitys way to other
populations on the right and the left side of the Danube, not only to
the Daco-Romans who were inhabiting his eparchy.
In order for him to realize the pastoral-missionary success,
Nicetas organized the monastic life. Inside the monasteries, he
found numerous disciples and collaborators who sustained him in
his mission. There is no other way to explain the Christianization of
some populations settled among Daco-Romans, on the whole
region struck by Boreas, in the lower Danube region, as St.
Paulinus of Nola made it clear. Nicetas has not expected all these
TP
TP
PT
PT
23-24 (republished, ed. Deisis, Sibiu, 2001, p. 111-112); Ionel Ene, Sinoade i
Sinodali (I), Buzu, 2001.
78
t. C. Alexe, op.cit., p. 503.
79
Ibidem, p. 504.
TP
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
183
PT
TP
PT
TP
80
PT
Ibidem.
Ibidem. See, also, the work: t. C. Alexe, Foloasele cntrii bisericeti n
comun dup Santul Niceta de Remesiana, BOR, LXXV (1957), 1-2, p. 165-182.
82
S. Paulini Nolani, Carmen XVII, v. 261-264, p. 93: the barbarians were
learning to sing to Christ with a Roman heart and to live in the serene peace of
virtue, in an unknown region of the world.
TP
PT
81
TP
PT
TP
PT
184
TP
83
PT
PT
PT
TP
84
PT
Pontica Christiana
185
186
LE CHRISTIANISME AU BAS-DANUBE
A LA VEILLE DE LA GRANDE PERSECUTION*
TP
PT
PT
TP
PT
PT
1
TP
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
187
3
TP
PT
PT
TP
TP
PT
TP
PT
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
188
TP
PT
TP
TP
PT
PT
PT
TP
PT
PT
TP
9
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
189
TP
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
13
PT
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
190
PT
TP
TP
17
18
TP
PT
PT
Pontica Christiana
191
TP
TP
PT
TP
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
PT
PT
19
PT
20
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
HT
TH
192
PT
TP
TP
TP
PT
PT
TP
TP
PT
PT
PT
disseram. Usus vivendi eidem hic fuit: primum ut, si facultas esset, id est s<i>
non cum uxore cubuisset, matutinis horis in larario suo, in quo et divos principes
sed optimos electos et animas sanctiores, in quis Apollonium et, quantum
scriptor suorum temporum dicit, Christum, Abraham et Orfeum et huiusmodi
ceteros habebat ac maiorum effigies, rem divinam faciebat.
25
Ibidem, 22;Iudaeis privilegia reservavit. Christianos esse passus est.
26
Ibidem, 43; Christo templum facere voluit eumque inter deos recipere.
27
Eusbe, op.cit., VI, XVIII ; p. 251.
28
Ibidem, VI, XXXIV; p. 255; Jean Chrysostome, Cuvnt la Fericitul Vavila i
mpotriva lui Iulian i ctre elini, VI-VII, vol. Predici la srbtori mprteti i
Cuvntri de laud la sfini , Bucureti, 2002, p. 311-315. A remarquer que S.
Jean nvoque que le moment o a lieu la rencontre des deux et ne dit rien de
laffinit suppose de lempereur pour la foi chrtienne; Jrme, De Viris
Illustribus, LIV, Bucureti, 1997, p. 50. Lanalyse dtaille de toutes les sources
littraires antiques concernant ce sujet, ainsi que des principales interprtations
modernes pro et contra, voir Irfan Shahd, Rome and the Arabs. A prolegomenon
to the study of Byzantium and the Arabs, Washington D.C.; Dumbarton Oaks,
1984, p. 65-93.
29
Les dits de perscution de la VIe dcennie du IIIe sicle.
30
A remarquer que cet empereur aussi dclencha la perscution contre lEglise
cause de la haine quil portait Philippe, cf. Eusbe, op.cit., VI. XXXIX, 1;
p. 257.
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
193
31
TP
PT
TP
31
PT
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
194
TP
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
34
PT
PT
35
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
195
TP
PT
38
PT
PT
TP
PT
196
TP
PT
PT
TP
TP
PT
PT
TP
PT
40
PT
41
TP
PT
HT
HT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TH
HT
TH
HT
TH
TH
Pontica Christiana
197
45
46
PT
TP
TP
PT
PT
TP
TP
TP
PT
PT
TP
PT
PT
45
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
198
TP
PT
TP
52
PT
L. Pietri, H.Ch., II, p. 177 : les provinces qui se trouvaient places sous le
contrle du Csar Galre ne semblent pas avoir connu un dchanement plus
particulier de violence. Il est vrai que dans les rgions danubiennes, le
christianisme navait encore fait que peu dadeptes. Aprs avoir fait une liste
des martyrs attests avec certitude tant par passio que par des dcouvertes
archologiques, savoir: Poetovio, lvque Victorinus, Salona, lvque
Domnio, le diacre Septimus, les laics Anastasius et Asterius, Sirmium, lvque
Irne, le diacre Dmtrios et le laic Sinerotas, le chercheur ajoute seulement
que: On pourrait certainement allonger encore la liste de quelques noms fournis
par dautre passions ou par des martyrologes.
53
Parmi les chercheurs qui se sont occups de ce sujet, on peut rappeler: H.
Delehaye, op.cit., p. 161-300; J. Zeiller, op.cit.; Ion Barnea, O inscripie cretin
de la Axiopolis, ST, VI, 1954, 3-4, p. 219-228; Idem, Un martyrium descoperit la
Niculiel, Studii i Cercetri de Istorie Veche , 24, 1973, 1, p. 123-126; Idem,
Arta Cretin n Romnia, vol. I, Bucureti, 1979, p. 6-12; Radu Vulpe, Ion
Barnea, Din Istoria Dobrogei, vol. II, Romanii la Dunrea de Jos, Bucureti,
1968, p. 378-381; Ene Branite, Martiri i Sfini pe pmntul Dobrogei de azi,
DDM, p. 34-62; Ioan Gh. Coman, Scriitori bisericeti din epoca strromn,
Bucureti, 1979; Em. Popescu, Martiri i sfini n Dobrogea (I), ST, 41, 3, 1989,
p. 39-65; Idem, Martiri... (II), p. 64-77; Nestor Vornicescu, Una din primele
scrieri ale literaturii romne vechi. Ptimirea Sfinilor Epictet i Astion de la
cumpna secolelor III-IV, Craiova, 1990; Idem, Primele scrieri patristice n
literatura romn. Secolele IV-XVI, Craiova, 1992; Mircea Pcurariu, Istoria
Bisericii Ortodoxe Romne, vol. I, Bucureti, 1992, p. 83-91; Em. Popescu,
Christianitas daco-romana. Florilegium studiorum, Bucureti, 1994, p. 92-99;
100-106; 107-110; Ioan Rmureanu, Actele Martirice, PSB, vol. 11, Bucureti,
1997; Nicolae Dnil, Martyrologium Daco-Romanum2, Bucureti, 2002.
Toujours ici on peut rappeler lapparition du volume Sfini romni i aprtori ai
legii strmoeti (=SR), Bucureti, 1987, ainsi quune rcente approche du sujet
: Victor Henrich Baumann, Sngele Martirilor, Constana, 2004, p. 41-63.
TP
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
199
54
PT
TP
TP
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
TP
PT
PT
TP
54
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
HT
TH
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
200
PT
TP
TP
TP
PT
TP
61
TP
PT
PT
PT
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
201
rvle un organisme mri, avec des membres qui assument leur foi
de manire intgrale, sans tenir compte des consquences.
Un autre dtail sur lequel nous voulons nous arrter concerne
la situation des soldats martyriss dans les cits proches du Danube.
Eusbe nous dit que la perscution commena dabord parmi les
frres qui taient dans larme 67. Son rcit et celui de Lactance
concordent sur ce point : Eusbe affirme que de nombreux soldats
ont quitt larme et quil tait bien rare que ceux qui appliquaient
lordre aillent jusqu des mesures radicales, par crainte de
provoquer tout coup une guerre contre tous 68. Lactance note
que lors des discussions qui ont prcd la perscution, Diocltien a
longuement insiste quil suffisait dinterdire cette religion aux
gens de la cour et aux soldats seulement 69. Selon le tmoignage
dEusbe, les militaires chrtiens furent mis dans la situation soit de
renier la foi chrtienne, soit de quitter larme, en perdant ainsi les
avantages matriaux obtenus pendant le service militaire ou ceux
que leur confrait le grade. Lintention est claire de ne pas
dstabiliser lempire par des mesures radicales et lpuration des
chrtiens des structures administratives et militaires tait une
mesure de protection.
Si lon analyse de manire comparative la mise en pratique de
ces dcisions dans les diffrentes rgions de lEmpire, on observe
que Diocltien recommandait une application assez prudente et
progressive des mesures rpressives contre les chrtiens, en
commenant par larme et lentourage de la cour, et que seulement
ensuite elles soient tendues tous. On comprend que ce fut le
grand nombre de chrtiens des provinces orientales qui le dtermina
prendre cette attitude, car il est dangereux de troubler la paix de
tout le monde et de verser le sang dune multitude 70. Tandis quen
Occident, trs cordial et bienveillant lgard de tous, Constance
TP
PT
TP
TP
PT
PT
TP
67
PT
PT
68
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
202
ne prit nullement part la guerre qui tait mene contre nous 71.
Tout de mme, pour ne pas avoir lair de dsapprouver les ordres
des suprieurs, il admit que lon dmolisse les petites glises, cest-dire des murs (conventicula, id est parietes) que lon peut refaire
tout moment, tandis que le vritable temple de Dieu, celui qui se
trouve en lhomme, il le garda intact72. Au-del de loption
personnelle du csar, sur laquelle tant Lactance quEusbe insistent
pour des raisons faciles deviner (Constance Chlore est le pre de
Constantin le Grand), il est remarquer nanmoins que le nombre
plus rduit des chrtiens en Occident tempra lintensit des
mesures rpressives, qui se limitrent des actions dordre gnral.
Si dans louvrage dEusbe apparaissent de nombreuses
et dmolies au dbut de la perscution
en Orient, Lactance dit quen Gaule les mesures ne visrent que la
dmolition des murs de quelques conventicula (lieux de
rassemblement de petits groupes).
Dans les rgions administres par Galre, la situation prsente
certaines particularits qui doivent tre consignes. Avant tout, les
historiens ecclsiastiques Eusbe et Lactance ne parlent pas de
, ou conventicula qui auraient t
dmolies et ne consignent ni mme en passant des martyrs au
Danube. Les Martyrologes, en change, mentionnent, comme nous
lavons dj montr plus haut, un nombre relativement grand de
chrtiens qui ont souffert dans presque toutes les cits danubiennes.
De mme, les sources nous laissent comprendre que lon peut
parler dune purification pralable de larme de ses lments
chrtiens, le cas d Aurlius Gaius qui achve sa carrire militaire
comme optio comitum imperatoris dans la Lgion I Iovia
Scythica73, cre et tablie par Diocltien Noviodunum, tant
suggestif ce sens. Nanmoins, nont pas quitt larme tous les
soldats chrtiens. Nous voulons voquer ce sujet le cas de Pierre
TP
TP
TP
71
PT
PT
PT
PT
72
TP
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
203
74
TP
TP
74
PT
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
TP
PT
PT
PT
75
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
204
PT
TP
TP
PT
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
205
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
TP
PT
PT
TP
TP
TP
83
TP
TP
PT
PT
PT
PT
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
206
TP
PT
TP
TP
PT
TP
PT
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
207
96
97
PT
TP
PT
TP
TP
PT
PT
96
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
208
TP
PT
PT
TP
100
PT
Voir ce sens le grand nombre de martyrs laics vnrs dans les cits du Bas
Danube: Tomis, Noviodunum, Dinogeia, Axiopolis, Durostorum, etc.
Evidemment, le culte de certains dentre eux provenait dautres cits du monde
romain, mais il sagit galement de martyrs locaux. Voir N. Dnil, op.cit.
101
Lactance, op.cit., XXXIV, 5, p. 182.
102
G. Popa-Liseanu, op.cit., p. 179.
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
209
TP
TP
103
PT
PT
PT
PT
104
TP
PT
TP
PT
210
Pontica Christiana
211
106
PT
TP
106
212
Pontica Christiana
213
214
Pontica Christiana
215
216
PT
by Adriana-Claudia Cteia
In the Christian spirituality the art of the word has an ultimate
role; it conditions the perpetual missionary, the spreading of the
Word to all the nations. The message of the Gospel must be
transmitted, heard, assimilated. The role of teaching, of preaching,
and of directing the conscience is incumbent upon the ecclesiastical
institution, in a context conditioned by the tradition (paradosis) and
oriented to the acquiring of salvation. Between the speaker and the
listener a psichagogical relation is born. The function of the
transmitted truth consists not in the endowing of the topic with any
aptitudes (as in the relation of pedagogical type), but in the
modifying of the manner of being of the subject. This is the object
of the director of conscience: missionary, priest, bishop. In the
Christian psychagogy, the weight of the truth and the genuine way
of speaking does not stress on the conscience of the director of
conscience; it does stress on the conscience of the one who lives
metanoia. From this point of view, the Christian psychagogy is
fundamentally opposed to the Greco-Roman one, which acts
conjointly with the pedagogy. The psycagogized soul expounds a
truth by which its manner of being is transformed. The Christian
community reflects the totality of individual transformations, in
accordance with the doctrine. In the Hegelian conception1, in the
subsistent community, the Church is the form of organizing which
allows the subjects to reach the Truth and to appropriate it. The
organizing stage is followed by the ecumenical stage in which the
Truth is transformed in doctrine. But the decisive stage in the
evolution of Christianity is the one of guarding and transmitting the
TP
*
TP
PT
TP
1
PT
PT
Pontica Christiana
217
TP
1. 4
TP
PT
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
PT
3
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
218
to Adamclisi and dated from the 5th and 6th centuries. The coming
out from the darkness of death and the full entering into the light of
eternal life becomes possible through Christs sacrifice and
resurrection. It is a resurrection which must be collectively
understood and which is correlated with Parousia, a resurrection
which gives forever to the Christian communitys history a new
meaning.
The Nativity from the Holy Virgin (the epigraphic
conventional phrase )7 and the Resurrection, the two moments
that prove Christs theanthropy, represent the premise of a general
resurrection. The Christian acquires everlasting life (
), through Christs Resurrection and through a life lived in
accordance with Christs model. The coordinates of the Christian
life both at the individual level and at the community level must
have been brought about by the everlasting lifes perspective,
perspective which can explain at the local level, as well as at the
Empires level, the relationship with the political authority and the
acceptance of martyrdom. Christs Resurrection offered to the
community of the first centuries the certainty in the eternal
happiness expressed also in the inscription uncovered in Callatis.
The faith in resurrection and the blessedness of life after death have
been the foundation of the Apostles missionary activity and
implicitly of the ecumenism of the first centuries after Christ. It is
not a matter of resurrection to earthly life (as was the case of
Lazarus or of the son of the widow from Nain); it is a matter about
the perspective of eternal life which brings about and explains the
Christians attitude towards the historical reality, and which clears
away the tragedy of irrevocably final death or the privileges of the
initiates in the mystery religions.
P
TP
PT
Ecclesiological valences
The conscience of Christs presence in Church, conscience
which defines the community of believers, regardless of the spatialTP
7
PT
IGLR, 139-144; 187, 243, 316, 321, 323, 324, 332, 341.
Pontica Christiana
219
PT
TP
TP
PT
PT
TP
PT
PT
PT
TP
9
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
220
Pontica Christiana
221
TP
TP
13
PT
PT
I. N. Floca, Drept Canonic Ortodox (=DCO), vol. II, Bucureti, 1990, p. 156.
222
Catechetical Importance
In his Introduction to the Gospel14 Eusebius of Caesarea
analyzes the effects of the Gospel on the human behavior, proving
the changes in the way of life of the society by the agency of faith.
In his conception, the ecclesiology and the soteriology are two
facets of the spiritual ascension, the context in which this is realized
being the parish the local ecclesial community. Thus, the salvific
work of the Church was realized in small Eucharistic centers. The
parish, in its hypostasis of missionary field presupposes the
cooperation between the clergy and the laity. The epigraphic
Christian vocabulary points out exactly the solidity of this
connection; it is the proof of assimilating the biblical word at the
laitys level; he acknowledges in the 5th 6th centuries the existence
of a spirit of the Church which is present in each and every
Christians aspirations, as well as the affiliation to a single clerical
body. The Old and Universal Church is one as far as her being is
concerned, as far as her beginning is concerned and as far as her
superiority is concerned15. In a different manner, the affiliation to
the Holy Universal Church is expressed epigraphically, also, in the
epitaph of the cantor Heraclidis16.
Consequently, the inscription of the Syrian jurist proves the
affiliation to a Christian community whose local values and ideals
coincide with those of the Universal Church, which are expressed
TP
TP
PT
TP
14
PT
PT
.
TP
PT
15
TP
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
223
TP
PT
PT
TP
17
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
224
TP
2. 21, .22
TP
PT
TP
PT
PT
connection,
proximity
() in a prosopon of the unity (
, which does not belong exclusively either to the Logos or
to the man, it belongs to the compound24.
As in the case of the Trinity, the discussion can be reduced to
the relationship between nature () and hypostasis. The
TP
PT
TP
20
PT
Ibidem, p. 20-26.
IGLR, 139-144, 187, 243, 316 B, 321, 323, 324, 332, 349.
22
IGLR, 74, 308, 309, 329, 331, 358, 385, 386.
23
Matthew 1, 18; 2, 11; 13, 55; = Mark 6, 3; Acts 1, 14:
.
24
A. Kniaziev, Maica Domnului n Biserica Ortodox, Bucureti, 2000.
TP
PT
21
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
225
TP
PT
PT
TP
25
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
226
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
28
PT
29
TP
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
227
PT
TP
31
PT
228
Pontica Christiana
229
PT
by Claudiu Cotan
In the first centuries of Christianity, the feminine monasticism
occupied a secondary aspect as far as the asceticism and the history
of monachism in general is concerned. We may say that in the
ancient Christianity the monasticism is pre-eminently of masculine
structure. The organizing of monasticism by Pachomius in Egypt
and the display of the coenobitic monasticism have contributed to
the spreading of the feminine monasticism both in Orient and
Occident, at the beginning, particularly, as an aristocratic
phenomenon. The feminine monasticism emerges in cities as
Constantinople where St. John Chrysostom advises spiritually the
community of Olympias1, or Rome where Blessed Hieronymus
organizes the group of pious women gathered in Marcelas house,
on the Aventio street, and, also, in Bethlehem, where with the help
of Paula and of her daughter Eustachia, he erected a monastery for
monks and another one for women. The monastic feminine
experience coordinated by St. John Chrysostom and Olympias
constituted a distinct example for the future of the feminine
monasticism. Theodoret of Cyr in the Ecclesiastical History
dedicates the last chapter to the feminine ascetical experience,
pointing out that the women are able to display the same piety and
religious fervor as the men. Certainly, Theodoret of Cyr was
inspired by the Egerias Itinerary2 and by the Lausiac History of
TP
PT
TP
PT
PT
1
TP
PT
TP
PT
230
PT
TP
PT
TP
TP
PT
PT
PT
TP
PT
HT
TH
TP
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
231
TP
PT
PT
TP
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
HT
TH
232
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
233
11
PT
TP
11
PT
Jos Cebrin Cebrin, Javier Gil Lascorz, Ramn Panach Rosat, Alicia Soler
Merenciano, La figura de la mujer en las "Homilas sobre San Mateo" de Juan
Crisstomo, in vol. Giovanni Crisostomo , pp. 335-353.
12
See: J. N. D. Kelly, Golden Month, the Story of John Chrysostom Ascetic,
Preacher, Bishop, New York, 1995; See: Wendy Mayer, Paulin Allen, John
Chrysostom, London, 2000.
TP
PT
HT
TP
TH
PT
234
PT
TP
13
PT
Ioan Gur de Aur, Comentarii la Epistola ctre Efeseni, Omilia XIII, pp. 133134.
14
Idem, Tratat despre preoie, III, 13, in vol. Despre preoie, Bucureti, 1987,
pp. 83-84.
TP
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
235
15
monastic life , even from his native places and he learned in his
family what means to be pious16. His culture is justified by an
education received in the urban centers of Histria, Tomis or Callatis
where, together with his friend Germanus came into contact with
the universal didactic curriculum of his time. Due to the
geographical and historical conjuncture, Cassian knows the Latin
language spoken by the people as well as the Greek language used
in the Pontic cities17. Interestingly enough, in the pilgrimage carried
on with Germanus, he is accompanied, also, by one of his sisters.
This pilgrimage contains Bethlehem, Skete, Kelia, and the desert of
Nitria, as well as Constantinople, Rome, and, after Marseille in
Gaul, almost the entire Mediterranean basin. As it seems, in
Bethlehem they have not known the renowned monastery
established there by Blessed Hieronymus in 386. In Bethlehem,
Palladius spends one year, also, probably in the same monastery
where St. John Cassian had arrived. It is worthy of noticing that
after the experience acquired in seven years spent among the monks
of Egypt, St. John Cassian returns to Palestine in 392 where he
certainly heard of the feminine ascetical community founded by
Blessed Hieronymus and Paula. I consider that he preserved this
example of monastic community, took it over, and applied it to
Marseille, where he erected the monastery for nuns led by his sister.
In Constantinople, where he arrives probably in the year 400,
he becomes an intimate of St. John Chrysostom, participating in the
great hierarchs drama, the one who ordained him a deacon.
Together with Theotim I of Tomis, he is a defender of the bishop of
TP
PT
TP
TP
15
PT
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
236
PT
TP
18
PT
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
237
But they are, also, the defenders of the monastic life, which they
certainly know from Scythia, where the monks, who were Audius
disciples, were still active20.
After his settling in West, St. John Cassian, at the request of
some friend hierarchs, creates two reference works on the monastic
life: De institutis cenobiorum et de octo principalium vitiorum
remediis, and Conlationes Sanctorum Patrum XXIV, as well as a
dogmatic work, De incarnatione Domini contra Nestorium. Libri
VII21. In the two works dedicated to monasticism, he takes over the
Egyptian ascetic life elements, and places them in the climate and
the social environment of his time. Cassian is representing a new
type of monasticism. He finds out that the Christian life of his time
was degraded, and states that its remedy can be realized through
monastic life. Thus Cassian transfers to the occidental world
Pachomius conception with regards to an organized monachism
and considers his contemporaries, Hieronymus, Augustine, and
Martin of Tours to be mediocre ascetics. In his works Cassian starts
from the external posture of the monk and touches on the spiritual
TP
TP
PT
PT
PT
TP
PT
238
TP
22
PT
PT
Pontica Christiana
239
PT
TP
23
TP
PT
TP
24
PT
Ibidem, p. 98.
Ibidem, p. 112.
PT
240
Pontica Christiana
241
TP
PT
by Ionu Holubeanu
Many of the documents referring to the lives of the saints are
crammed with erroneous historic information, which raised
problems to the researchers who kept busy with studying them.
There are multiple things that brought about this situation.
Sometimes we may deal with late insertions in the ancient Christian
documents; at other times, the erroneous historic information is due
to the old distortion, during the process of copying the old
manuscripts of the proper name or of the toponym that are
mentioned in documents; yet, in other cases, because of the lack of
authentic information, the lives of some saints have been redacted
late, following the pattern of other contemporary saints. These are
just some of the causes which brought about the distortion of the
historic truth for many of the Christian saints of the earliest Church.
But the scholars who are concerned about the Christian
hagiography made some progress in this realm, by elucidating some
of the historic untruths that penetrated into the lives of the saints
throughout the centuries.
This study is dedicated to the holy Martyr Bishop Aetherius of
Cherson. We will have in view first the problem of his martyrdoms
context, and particularly of the place in which he laid down his life
for Christ. We deem that this scientific step is necessary because, in
the Romanian ecclesial historiography, the place where this holy
martyr has suffered torture was expounded differently by some
research workers.
The richest information about the holy Bishop and Martyr
Aetherius
are
found
in
the
Synaxarium
Ecclesiae
TP
*
PT
242
TP
TP
PT
PT
Synaxarium
Ecclesiae
Constantinopolitanae
(=Syn.Eccl.Const.),
in
Propylaeum ad Acta Sanctorum Novembris, opera et studio Hippolyti
Delehaye, Bruxellis, 1902, col. 513-518.
2
Constantin Erbiceanu, Ulfila, viaa i doctrina sa, in Biserica Ortodox
Romn (=BOR), XXII (1898-1899), nr. 3, p. 290.
TP
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
243
TP
PT
PT
TP
PT
Ibidem.
It is the matter of the Menaion in the Romanian language (Minei), the month of
March, the 7th day, ed. IV, Bucureti, 1967, pp. 48-49.
5
Ene Branite, Martiri i sfini pe pmntul Dobrogei de azi, in vol. De la
Dunre la Mare. Mrturii istorice i monumente de art cretin2 (=DDM),
Galai, 1979, p. 39, nr. 6; Idem, Sfini mrturisitori i martiri cinstii de
strmoii notri pe pmntul romnesc dintre Dunre i Mare, n lumina
mrturiilor istorice, epigrafice i arheologice, in vol. Arhiepiscopia
Tomisului i Dunrii de Jos n trecut i astzi (=ATDJ), Galai, 1981, p. 121.
TP
PT
4
TP
PT
TP
PT
244
PT
TP
TP
PT
PT
In the second study on the Christian martyrs from the place which is between
the Danube and the Sea, E. Branite makes, however, some big confusions. In
identifying Aetherius who was murdered by the barbarians with the Aetherius
who participated in the Second Ecumenical Council of Constantinople (381), he
maintains that this one was, in fact, Bishop of Tomis, and not of Chersonesos.
But his opinion is totally wrong, since the see of Tomis was represented at the
Second Ecumenical Council of 381 by Bishop Gerontius. See E. Branite, op.cit.,
p. 121.
7
Nechita Runcan, Dou milenii de via cretin nentrerupt n Dobrogea,
Constana, 2003, p. 68.
8
Among those who kept busy with the Christian martyrs from the Lower Danube
during the great persecutions, the following are making themselves conspicuous:
Vasile Prvan, Contribuii epigrafice la istoria cretinismului daco-roman,
Bucureti, 1911; Radu Vulpe, Histoire ancienne de la Dobroudja, Bucarest,
1938; Gheorghe I. Moisescu, tefan Lupa, Alexandru Filipacu, Istoria Bisericii
Romne, vol. I, Bucureti, 1957; Niculae erbnescu, 1600 de ani de la prima
mrturie documentar despre existena Episcopiei Tomisului, BOR, LXXXVII
(1969), 9-10, 966-1026; idem, Ptrunderea i dezvoltarea cretinismului n
Scythia Minor, DDM, p. 23-33; Epifanie Norocel, Pagini din istoria veche a
cretinismului la romni, Buzu, 1986; Ioan Rmureanu, Sfini i Martiri la
Tomis-Constana, BOR, XCII (1974), 7-8, p. 975-1011; idem, Noi consideraii
privind ptrunderea cretinismului la traco-daco-gei, in Ortodoxia, XXVI
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
245
TP
TP
PT
PT
TP
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
246
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
TP
PT
TP
PT
PT
PT
13
V. Latyshev, The Lives of the Sainted Bishops of Cherson, Study and Texts, in
Zapiski Imperatorskoi Akademii Nauk, VIII, 3, (1906).
14
Jacques Zeiller, Les origines chrtiennes dans les provinces danubiennes de
lempire romain, Paris, 1918.
15
A. A. Vasiliev, The Goths in the Crimea, Cambridge, 1936.
16
C. Zuckerman, The Early Byzantine Strongholds in Eastern Pontus, in
Travaux et Mmoires, 11, (1991), 527-553.
17
L. G. Khrushkova, Tauric Chersonesus (Crimea) in the 4th-5th centuries:
suburban martyria, in 21st International Congress of Byzantine Studies,
London, 2006.
18
J. Zeiller, op.cit., p. 411.
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
247
,
,
.
,
.
19 (=And after
[all] of these, Aetherius was sent from Jerusalem. And seeing the
savageness of the people, he went to Constantine the Great, who
was reigning in Byzantium at the time, and asked for his help, and
so the idolaters have been chased away from the region of
Chersonesos. Then, the saint established a Church, and went again
to the Emperor to give him thanks. And after his bidding farewell to
the Emperor, he took the holy ones, and went again to Chersonesos.
But while he was going back he was thrown in the Danapris River
by a contrary wind and he died at that place).
In Codex Bibliothecae Nationalis Parisiensis 1587, a
manuscript which is signed by a certain priest named John and
which is dated in the 12th century, the following different reading is
found:
,
TP
TP
19
PT
PT
248
,
20 (= And later, it was sent again from Jerusalem the Bishop
Aetherius, who, after seeing the savageness and ruthlessness of the
people, has left for Byzantium, asking for the [help] of the Emperor
against them; because at the time it was Constantine the Great who
was leading the Roman Empire. His request was answered in
accordance with his desire, and with the help of the Emperors
power, the unbelievers have been driven away from the city, and in
their stead some true believers have been brought and settled in that
place; and the blessed Aetherius was sent afterwards to Byzantium
to give thanks and, while he was going back, was thrown in the
Danapris River, and he ended his journey, martyrly, in that very
place, on the sixth day of the month of March).
Finally, in a different manuscript of the 12th century Codex
Bibliothecae Universitatis Messanensis 103 , the following
clarification comes out:
,
21 (=it was thrown in the Danapris River towards
the island called Alsos, where he died, also, in the month of March,
the 6th day).
TP
PT
TP
PT
20
TP
PT
TP
21
PT
Pontica Christiana
249
TP
22
PT
250
TP
PT
TP
23
PT
PT
TP
24
PT
Pontica Christiana
251
TP
TP
25
PT
For a long time, it was believed about the Bishops John I and John II from
Tomis to be one and the same person. It was Florian Du who, recently proved
that, in reality it is a matter of two different hierarchs, who shepherded one
century away from each other. See: Florian Du, Noi consideraii asupra
identitii teologilor scii: Ioan, episcop de Tomis, ICR, p. 245-267.
PT
252
Pontica Christiana
253
PT
TP
*
PT
254
(...) We have met with him (the reigning Prince) and offered him
four gifts, namely: a pair of embroidered cushions, a little bottle
with Chrism, a carpet and two kinds of soap (...) and after the
Liturgy of St. Michaels feast, the Lord of the Police gave a banquet
to our Lord Patriarch26.
In Roman, the Patriarch Macarius has delayed for
approximately three weeks. On the day of November 13, 1653, on
St. John Chrysostoms feast, he was in the Eparchial Cathedral of
Roman. Paul of Aleppo offers some details with regards to the
religious ceremony celebrated on that day:
We participated here in the feast of Chrysostom, at which a
lot of people have gathered together. The Bishop (Anastasie, 16441658, our note), was vested with the felonion of John Chrysostom,
as was the custom all the years, on the day of this saint. That
vestment was sent as a gift by a Patriarch of Constantinople to
Stephen the Older (reigning Prince of Moldavia, 1394-1399), who
gave it to the said Episcopate with the right of heredity, to be
preserved in the great monastery of Parascheva27. Consequently,
in the year 1653 the felonion was found at the Episcopate of
Roman. Indubitably, Paul of Aleppo will have asked for
information in regards to this vestment, that is, since what time was
it kept there, where does it come from, who donated it, under what
kind of circumstances it got here, and particularly the fact that St.
John Chrysostom was born in Antioch.
The answers would have been unclear, excepting some oral
testimonies that were kept by way of oral tradition, such as: that it
proceeds from Constantinople, and belonged to St. John
Chrysostom, and that it was donated by one of the patriarchs to the
capital city of the reigning Prince of Moldavia, Stephen the Older28.
Some historians, who were concerned about the history of
the Episcopate of Roman (Rev. Scarlat Popescu), believe that the
vestment would have been dedicated to Stephen the Great, since
TP
PT
TP
PT
TP
26
PT
27
TP
PT
TP
PT
PT
Pontica Christiana
255
256
Unfortunately for the cultic objects which belong to the socalled minor arts, as was, for instance, the epitaph from St.
Nicholas church of Jassy, admired in the year 1653 by the same
foreign traveler, Paul of Aleppo, who left the indication that the
precious woven material was a gift from John Cantacuzino for
Athos, probably for the Vatoped Monastery we do not have any
accompanying documents to attest their origin, as happened to the
felonion attributed to St. John Chrysostom from the Episcopate of
Roman29.
The byzantinist Al. Elian considers possible and real the
bringing to Moldavia, in the 15th century of some icons and some
other cultic objects by the monks from South30.
In accordance with the tradition, the icon of the Mother of our
Lord from the Neam Monastery and the icon of St. Ana from the
Bistria Monastery have been sent to the reigning Prince Alexander
the Good and to his wife by the Byzantine Emperor John the VIIIth
the Paleologus and by the Empress Ana.
At the same time, under unclear circumstances, the felonion of
St. John Chrysostom could have arrived at Roman, also.
If this vestment would have been received a few decades prior
to being seen by Paul of Aleppo, the ministers from the Episcopal
Cathedral of Roman would have known by all means under what
kind of circumstances it came to be here.
Consequently, there are reasons which lead to the conclusion
that the felonion had been sent to Roman at a much earlier time at
the time of its coming being accompanied by the tradition which
was saying that it belonged to St. John Chrysostom.
TP
PT
TP
PT
29
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
257
258
Pontica Christiana
259
260
PT
INSTEAD OF CONCLUSIONS
The felonion attributed to St. John Chrysostom aroused, if not
controversial opinions on its origin, at any rate, the admiration of
those whose attention was drawn by it throughout the centuries.
The local tradition has it that this vestment would have been
one of the gifts sent to Alexander the Good and to the Metropolitan
Joseph by one of the Constantinoples Emperors belonging to the
Paleologus family; and Alexander would have donated it to his
monastery, St. Parascheva, of the Episcopate of Roman (where his
mother, the princess Anastasia, was interred).
During the journey of the Patriarch of Antioch, Macarius,
through Moldavia, (1653), his archdeacon, Paul of Aleppo, wrote
down about the existence of this liturgical vestment from Roman in
his journal, by gathering documentary evidence from the
information taken from the local tradition of the Episcopate32.
Preserved with piety along the time, with a pious respect
continuously fed by its noble legend St. John Chrysostoms
felonion is a polistavrion to which was applied later, in the
middle of the backbone, on the top, a small embroidered medallion
which represents Jesus the Great High Priest, while He is blessing.
This piece is of inestimable historic and artistic value,
stylistically being similar to the Moldavian pieces of embroidery
from the most prollific period, the 15th- 16th centuries33.
TP
31
TP
PT
PT
PT
TP
PT
TP
PT
Pontica Christiana
261
262