W@™ 6b27940 COONSSS 823 mm ‘SSPO Guide 9 July 15, 1994 Steel Structures Painting Council GUIDE NO. 9 Guide for Atmospheric Testing of Coatings in the Field Scope 1.1. This guide covers the procedures for planing, per forming, and documenting field evaluations of atmospheric test ing of coatings applied to steel panels or steel structures 1.2 It is intended for coating systems applied to new or previously coated structures. 1.3. It is intended for use by coatings specifiers, end us- ets, manufacturers, formulators, and test laboratories. 2. Description 21 USE OF GUIDE: Coating field evaluation data devet ‘oped in accordance with this guide may be used to document ‘ield performance requirements of SSPC specifications, facility ‘owner specifications, or other purchaser documents. SSPC specications with field performance requirements include Paint 28, Paint 29, and Painting System 24 22 CONTENT OF GUIDE: The procedures for planning performing, and documenting field evaluations are organized into the following steps, as outlined in Appendix A: Paint 29 Zine Dust Saccifcial Primer, Performance: Based PS24 Latex Painting System for Industrial and Marine Almospheres, Performance-Based SP Solvent Cleaning sP2 Hand Too! Cleaning SP 3 Power Tool Cleaning SPs White Metal Blast Cleaning sP6 Commercia! Blast Cleaning sP7 Brush Off Blast Cleaning SP 10 Near White Blast Cleaning Pt Power Too! Cleaning to Bare Metal vis 1-89 Visual Standard for Abrasive Blast Cleaned Steel vis 2 Standard Method of Evaluating Degree of Rusting on Painted Stee! Surfaces (identi cal to ASTM D 610) 33 AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERI- ALS (ASTM) STANDARDS: A36 Speciation for Structural Stee! + Establish Scope and Objectives of Field Testing Pro: 0523 Standard Method for Specular Gloss ram (Section 4) Dero Standard Method of Evaluating Degree of + Select and Identiyng Coating Systems (Section 8) Rusting on Painted Steel Surfaces (cert: + Select and Characterize Test Structure (Section 6) cal to SSPC-VIS 2) «Apply Coatings (Section 7) 0660 Standard Method for Evaluating Degree of + Design Periodic Rating and inspection Procedure (Sec. eerie nea ton8) oma Standard Method of Evaluating Degree of ‘+ Perform Field Inspection and Rating (Section 9) ane ena pares see Svpstals standard Method for Evaluaton of Painted + Assess and Analyze Data (Section 10) or Coated Specimens Subjected to Corro- pee sive Envionments D 1729 Standard Practice for Viual Evaluation of 3.1 The standards referenced in tis guide are listed in Color Diferences of Opaque Materials Sections 82 through 3.4 and form a pat of his guide 03359 Standard Mothads for Measuring Adhosion 32 STEEL STRUCTURES PAINTING COUNCIL (SSPC) by Tape Test SPECIFICATIONS: Daas Standard Method for Evaluating Degree of Chalking o Exterior Paints lo rae ae os ace ee aD aaT7 Standard Test Methods for Field Measure Paz Measurement of Dry Paint Thickness with ment of Surlace Profile of Blast Cleaned Magnetic Gages el PA Guide 3 ‘Guide to Safty in Paint Applicaion asat Standard Method for Determining PulLOt Paint 28 Wealer-Bomne Epoxy Primer for Steel Sur Strength of Coatngs Using Portable Adhe- faces sion Testers 461 iat by te SSP: Te Soi for Pe Tus Fb 22 E19tit by us Fb 2) Te MH 8627940 COO4SSE 7bT a $8PC,Guide 9 uly 19, 1984 0 4940 Standard Method for Conductimetric Analy- sis of Water Soluble lonic Contamination of Blasting Abrasive Standard Guide for Assessing the Condi- tion of Aged Coatings on Stee! Suriaces Standard Practice for Inspecting the Coat- ing System of a Ship's Underwater Hull and Boottop During Drycocking Standard Practice for Characterization of Atmospheric Test Sites NACE INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS: 5065 F 1193 ee a4 P0287 Standard Recommended Practice for Field Measurement of Surface Profile of Abra- sive Blast Cleaned Stee! Surfaces Using a Replica Tepe Visual Comparator for Surface of New Steel Alblast Cleaned with Sand Abrasive Visuat Comparator for Surtace of New Steel Airblast Cleaned with Steel Grit and Shot 1M0170 7Mo175 4, Establish Scope and Objectives of Field Testing Program 4.1 ESTABLISH OBJECTIVES: The evaluator should prepare a short writen statement on the objectives of the field evaluation. Examples of objectives are as follows ‘+ To compare new coatings with standard (reference) coatings used by a facility + To evaluate the merits of a variety of new coatings for field practicality and performance. + To evaluate the influence of surtace preparation and coating application variations on coating performance, Specific items to be addressed in the statement include: +The intended exposure environment, + The approximate or desired service life (e.9., compari= son with standard) + The type of structure +The condition ofthe steel + The primary functions of coatings (e.g, 10 provide cor- rosion protection, good appearance, and identification (or safety related information), lis recommended that the objective statement be sicned (or authorized by appropriate supervisory or management per- sonnel 4.2. DETERMINE SCOPE OF TESTING PROGRAM: The evaluator should identily the general nature of the test program, including the ype of candidate and contral coatings, the in. {ended exposure environment, and the type of structure. 42.1. Coating Systems 42.1.1 Candidate Coating: Identiy the types of coatings: to be evaluated (0.g,, low-VOC alternatives or one-coat epoxy ‘mastics), including type and thickness of primer, inlermediate ‘coat and topcoat (as appropriate), and total film build. Also Identily the sources of the candidate coatings (e.g. submis sions to a Qualified Product List [QPLI), new proprietary prod: ucts, or newly developed laboratory formulations). Adequate data to support special performance requirements, such as ‘chemical resistance, should be available prior to Feld testing, 421.2 Control Coating: Include a control coating inthe test to help account for the affect of the local enviranment on the coating performance. The specific contfol coating materials should be identiied (e.9,, standard coating in use at facilly should be identitied by brand and generic name or by Federal (or SSPC spesification). in addition, include a short explanation (of why this particular control coating has been selected 42.13. Surface Preparation: An important part of the coating system is the type of surface preparation to be evalu- ated in the program (e.g., blast cleaning or hand- or power-tool Cleaning} and the specific degree of cleaning 42.1.4 Regulations: Ensure that the materials and pro cedures selected comply wih all local regulations. In addition, consider the impact of tests upon surrounding facies and the local environment, 42.15 Exposure Environment: Identify the types of ex- posures for which the coatings are intended. An SSPC classifi- calion procedure may be used. If the environmental exposure Zone is not one that is listed in Note 13.1, identity the specstic type of chemical or conditon (e.g, fumes, de-icing salts, or waste treatment plant peroxide fumes) 42.1.6 Surface Condition of Steel: Identity the surface condition of the steel to which each coating is to be applied, eg, whether itis a new or existing surface and the degree of pitting and salt contamination. If the surface is coated, measure the dry film thickness and adhesion of the coating. 42.1.7 Structure Type: dently he structure type (0.9 bridge, tloor, or tank) or structural details desired (e.9., latice work, crevices, 0” floating tank roof), including the type of steel whether itis new or has been previously painted, and the area tobe painted 5. Select and Identify Coating Systems 5.1. This step is to identily, describe, and determine the sources of the candidate coating materials and the controls. In addition, the specific surface preparation and application de- tails are to be established, along with any other special requir ments, 5.2 COATING SYSTEM: The test will normally include candidate coating systems and control or reference coating systems, Together, the surface preparation procedure, coating materials, and application method make up @ coating system. For each of the candidate and control coating systems, provide the following information: 5.2.1 Surface Preparation. The surface preparation for the test should be that expected to be done for a full-scale job application. Applicable SSPC standards include SSPC-SP 1 462 Me Society fo FreWer W™ 8627540 OO04S8? bTb (Solvent Cleaning), SSPC-SP 2 (Hand Tool Cleaning), SSPC- SP 3 (Power Too! Cleaning), SSPC-SP 6 (Commercial Blast Cleaning) (NACE 3], SSPC-SP 7 (Grush-Off Blast Cleaning) [NAGE 4], SSPC-SP 10 (Near-White Blast Cleaning) (NACE 2], ‘and SSPC-SP 5 (White Metal Blast Cleaning) [NACE 1]. NACE designations are described in NACE TM-01-70 or TM 01-75 Certain preparation methods may require additional infor mation such as the surface profile and method of measuring profile, the type and qualification of abrasive, and specific equipment or components such as nozzles, compressors, f= ters, and pressure for water jetting 5.22 Coating Materials. The minimum information re ‘uired for all coatings s the generic (chemical) type, number of components, volatile organic compound (VOC) content, recom. mended dry film thickness (OFT), number of coats, and the spe. cific source of the product (e.9., brand name, or government or ‘SSPC paint specication). Other physical properties that may be uselul are the volume percent solids, theoretical spreading rate, active pigments (eg, corrosion.nnibiting or sacrificial, ry time, and flexiilty. Prior 0 the application of the coating, {he evaluator must obtain product data sheets for application Instructions and an MSOS for handling and safety instructions 5.23 Application. The application procedure that would be used for full-scale application of the coating should be se lected. !t another procedure is used, consideration must be Given to ils effect on coating performance. Any application pro cedure must be approved by the coating manufacturer. Deter- ‘mine what information is to be monitored and recorded. The ‘minimum information cequired is the application procedure, am bent weather conditions when the coating wes applied, includ ing air and surtace temperatures, humidity and dew point, and time intervals after surface preparation and belore painting, as well as between coats. Other information, such as the manufac- turer of the spray equipment, may be desirable, 6. Select and Characterize Test Structure 6.1 SELECT STRUCTURE AND APPROPRIATE ENVI- RONMENT: Based on tne requirements set out in the planning slage, select a structure or structures in the aparopriate expo- ‘sure environment. Because of the limited availabilty of sites land access to structures, itis not always possible to match the ‘exposure conditions propesed in the planning stage, Docurnent the structure, test locations, and other lacal conditions that may afect the test with photographs and writen records. A mode! report form is found in Appendix B. When selecting a structure, the following points should be considered + Authorization to use for testing + Clearances and access for application + Access for inspection = Securiy ‘+ Condition of steel and contiguration + Environmental impact + Expected duration of test site SSPC Guide 9 July 15, 1994 + Direction of exposure for gloss retention studies 62 SELECT STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS FOR TEST- ING 6.2.1 Select a portion of the structure for the coating test ing program. The partion should be readily dvidable into a mini mum of two locations. The oifferent locations should be rela- tively similar in surface condition, exposure, cortosivty (e.g. ‘exposure to chemicals, water runoff, and saltwater runoff), and structural configuration, The test location for each coating sys tem should be picked at random. Test each coating system, including candidates and cantvols, in more than one location since the reliability of the results increases as the number of replicates increases. This will also permit compatisons of can- didate coatings with control coatings and with one another Document the selection with photographs. 622 Three levels of field site evaluations have been es- tablished: Level A - Production Scalo Structure Evaluation: Each test ‘rea should be a minimum of 40 square feet (4 mé). The area should include a variety of configurations representative of the actual structural surface, such as planar areas, edges. and welded or bolted connections Level 8 - Patch Scalo Structure Evaluation: Each test area should be a minimum of 6 square feet (0.6 m®). I possible, at least two linear feet (0.6 m} of edge should be included in the test. Where early results are sought, scribes may be placed in three to five locations on the flat areas. With small areas, itis important that each candidate and each control system be ap- plied on the most uniform area that can be found. Level C - Test Panel Evaluation: Where suitable structural surfaces are not available, or where there are a relatively large number of systems to be evaluated, test panels may be used. Test panels should be a minimum of 4 by 6 inches (100 by 150 Imm) in area, at least 1/8 inch (6.4 mm) thick. They should be made of hotolled steel meeting the requirements of ASTM A, 36 unless otnerwise agreed upon. Alternatively, use hotrolled steel similar to the steel in structures to be coated. A minimum of four replicate test panels for each coating system or control system is recommended. The panels may be placed on test racks on the ground, on test racks suspended trom the struc- ‘ure, or indivdually suspended from structures, The location of ‘each pane! on the rack or elsewhere should be chosen at ran- ‘dom, Electrical insulation ofthe panels from a sttucture or other ‘support must be assured 6.3 CHARACTERIZE EXPOSURE ENVIRONMENT: Expo- sure environments can be characterzed by the environmental parameters or by the performance of standard materials in that environment. The SSPC zones provide a broad classification of ‘exposure environments (see Note 13.1), 63.1 Environmental Parameters. These include relative humidity, rainfall, temperature averages and ranges, acidity of rainfall, and the presence of contaminants such as chemicals Or salts. The time of wetness, which is an important factor in 463 rit by the SSPC: Me Society for P us Fb 22 ATI) 200gt by Ts Bb 2 MATT M™ 8627940 0004588 532 mw SSPO Guide 9 ly 18,1984 determining corrosion rates, can be measured. The total ultavi: let raciation can be measured or the number of hours of sun- light can be estimated based on the direction of the exposure ‘and weather data. Additional information on the weather and local environment ean be oblained from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the National Oceanic Atmosphere ‘Administration (NOAA), the U.S. Meteorological Sociaty, or by specialized monitoring equipment 622 Performance of Standard Materials. The most common indicator of corrasion rates is the corrosion of bare steel coupons, A minimum corrosion cate of 1.0 mil (25 mix ‘erons} per year is recommended for classification as a moder. ‘ate exposure environment. ASTM G 92 pravides a method for site calibration. Other parameters used are the corrosion rate of bare zinc and the lifetimes of certain standard reference paints Another potentially useful parameter is the scribe undercuting rate of vinyl paints or systems with well-defined characterises, 6.4 CHARACTERIZE CONDITION OF STRUCTURE AND COATING: 6.4.1. Rust, Ptting, and Contaminants. The test surface ‘should be examined to determine the extent of corrosion and rust scale (SSPC-VIS 2/ASTM D 610), and pitting of the stect. The presence of any visible salts, other contaminants and de- {ects on the surface should be noted. (See Section 6.4.4 for identitving soluble salts.) 8.4.2 General Condition of Existing Coating. Types of existing coatings (ie., primer, intermediate, topcoat) should be recorded. A visual rating of the coating condition should be ob- tained, The physical condition of the existing coating (e.g, ad- hesion, britleness) should be examined, 64.3. Detailed Condition of Existing Coating. A pre-char- acterization inspection is more critical for coatings that are to be applied over intact rust, pitted steel, or existing coatings, than ‘over clean bare steel. Detailed descriptions for assessing the ‘condition of painted steel can be found in ASTM D 5065 or ASTM F 1133 (see 8.2.1 and 8.2.6), An abbreviated form for reporting the condition of the existing surface is found in Appen- dix B, Photographs should be used to help document these conditions. When adhesion is measured, both the test method Used and the results obtained should be recorded, 6.4.4 Soluble Salts. For surfaces thought to be contami- rated with salts, the concentration of salts can be measured Using commercially available flelc testing kits. The type of kit sea and the concentration measured should be recorded. For ‘coatings to be applied over blast cleaned steel, recommended procedures are available for inspection atter blasting. (See Ap- pendix F from Report FHWA RD-91-011 [SSPC 91-01), 7. Apply Coatings As summary of documentation requirements is provided in Section 76, Each ofthe requirements is described in the appro priate section, A model application form is illustrated in Appen: ax. 7.1. PREPARE JOB SPECIFICATION: As with any other field application, it is essential to prepare wrilen requirements, (or specifications for the application. These include general in. structions for contractors or other applicators, identiication and location of the structure and test area, surface preparation and ‘coating application requirements, limitations due to weather conditions, and inspection requirements and responsibilities. 7.2 OBTAIN AND TEST COATING MATERIALS: The evaluator must stipulate who will supply the coatings, and who will verfy that the coatings meet the requirements established earlier, The supplier should be required to provide results of quality control tests on viscosity, density, gloss, and dry time. In addition, an infrared spectroscopic fingerprint of the coating applied could be required to verify that the correct resin system was used. These requirements are necessary to help ensure that a coating applied at a later time is the same formulation as the one used in the field test. The evaluator should also ensure that the application data sheel and the MSDS, along with the required thinners and the clean-up solvents, are available 7.3 PERFORM PRELIMINARY INSPECTION: Assess the condition of the stucture and areas to be used for testing. In ‘some cases, the final selection of the areas to be coated will be ‘made at the time of application. f coating and rust are no! to be ‘completely removed, document tne condition with photographs. Identity and mark the areas for each system to be tested. Record the environmental conditions, including air temper: ature, steel temperature, relative humidity, dew point, wind, ec. 7.4 PREPARE SURFACE: The surface shall be pre- pared in accordance with the job specication and inspected for conformance. Record the type of abrasive used, contamina: tion level of abrasive (ASTM D 4940 can be used to assess ionic content), and the surface profile of the steel (ASTM D 4417 of NACE P0287). Document the appearance of the sur face using SSPO-MIS 188. 7.8 APPLY COATING: 7.5.1 The coating should be applied in accordance with SSPC-PA 1, the manufacturer's instructions, and the job speciti- cations. Observe and record the following aspects of the coating: ‘+ the condition of the coating inthe container + the mixing method + the induction time + the pot ie, if two or mote components are being mixed + the amount and type of thinning + the dry time + the recommended time between coats + general application techniques Following the application of each coal, inspect the film for dry spray, sagging, running, or other application film defects. It is essential that the film thickness of the coatings conform to the specification and thatthe coatings are applied uniformly, 464 Me Society for Fremm 4627940 Measure and record the dry film thickness of each coat in accordance with SSPC-PA 2, Document ambient conditions and parameters of the application equipment, if appropriate. 7.8.2 Seribing a coating to expose the substrate is fre- ‘quently done on test panels, but it is not commonly done on ‘existing structures. Although there is reluctance to create an area on the structure that will require subsequent repair, signif cant benefits are obtained by scribing. Performing scribing on the structure will provide information on the coating’s abily to resist further breakdown at a damaged area and will produce ‘coating system degradation faster than in an undamaged area, Seriting may be done in accordance with ASTM D 1654. 75.3 The manufacturer should be invited to observe the ‘ield apptication and coating inspection, 7.6 DOCUMENTATION SUMMARY: An evaluator should ensure that the following records have been obtained: ‘a. Description of the surface coated, including the type land condition of the stee!, the extent of corresion and pitting, the presence of salts or other surface contaminants, the size of the test patch or the size and number of test panels, and the ‘ype and condition of the existing coating, it any b. Description of the surface preparation procedure, in- cluding abrasive type, profile, and other parameters, as «e- auired. c. Weather conditions during surface preparation, coating application, flim drying, and curing 4. Product IDs, batch numbers, manufacturers’ names on all paints and other materials used, fe. Records of coating condition in container, thinning, application procedures, parameters, and equipment, and any film application defects, such as sagaing or dry spray, 1. Records of DFTs (single coat and system), @. Sampies of paint, abrasives, and replica tapes, as re- quired. Photographs of intial conditions, operations, and com- pleted test areas, i. Names, atfitatons, and phone numbers of observers, representatives, and inspector. i. After an appropriate cure time, adnesion should be as: ‘sessed, using methods such as ASTM D 3359 or ASTM D. 4541. (See Note 13.2.) 8. Design Periodic Rating and Inspection Procedure 8.1 SCHEDULING: Prepare @ schedule for rating and inspection. Suggested intervals are 6 months, 12 months, 18 ‘months, 24 months, and yearly thereatter. For especialy severe ‘environments or where early degradation analysis is required, the first inspection may be scheduled ater 2 to 3 months, The program should be scheduled to run for a fixed period of time, ‘or until the coating reaches a defined level of performance, 82 EVALUATION PARAMETERS: The evaluator should establish test parameters to rate the coating. These are ctten oo04s89 479, ™ SSPC Guide 9 July 15, 1894 tied into the test objectves. Coating performance is usually ‘evaluated in terms of corrosion protection and appearance 82.1. Rusting on Flat Surfaces: is important o provide ‘quantitative assessment for comparison with subsequent rat ings or alternate systems. The most common method is SSPC- VIS 2 (ASTM D 610), which provides a numerical scale based ‘on the percent ol the surface rusted. Ths testis mast useful tor ‘small sreas (up to 1 square foot [0.09 m‘). Larger areas ‘should be aivided into small uniformly sized areas to determine the rating of each small square, ASTM F 11 evaluation procedure, using a series of ilustraions as reler tence, to determine the extent and level of deterioration. Another simple approach is to estimate the total percentage of the area that has deteriorated to a condition worse than a defined ASTM level e.g. rust grade 8) 8.22 Edge Rusting. Edge rusting is usually reported as ‘a percentage of the linear feet rusted 823. Undercutting at Breaks or Scribes. The average or maximum distance of undercuting at breaks or scribes is usu: ally reported in milimeters or fractions of an inch (e.g., 1/32 ine. 8.24 Blistering, This occurs most frequently in SSPC ‘Atmospheric Zones 2A (hequently wel with fresh water) and 2B, (frequently wet with salt water). The standard method for evalu: ating blisters is ASTM D 714, which rates both the size and the frequency of the blisters. It may be necessary to subdivide large: ‘areas into smaller, more uniform areas, or to devise a scheme similar to those described in Section 8.2.1 for surface rusting (See Note 13.5 for special requirements regarding thick film coatings.) 825 Appearance 82.5.1. The most important appearance parameters are Color and gloss retention. These are best measured using spe- Gif field-compatioe instruments. Information on these parame- ters can also be oblained by retaining unexposed samples in the lab and visually comparing the appearance of the Wo sur faces using ASTM D 523 and D 1729, 8252 Olher appearance defects to be evaluated are chalking (ASTM D 4214) and bleeding, 826 Film Deterioration. Fim deterioration modes in Clude checking, cracking, erosion, tlaking, peeling, and loss of adhesion, Standard procedures using photographie standards and field measurements are described in ASTM D 5065. How: fever, the adhesion measurement pracedues described (ASTM 9359 and D 4541) are destructive tests and may necessitate repair of the coating system. 89. ESTABLISH PERFORMANCE AND FAILURE CRITE- RIA:_In many cases itis important to determine @ time-to-fall- Ure, This would require 2 definition of coating system failure, Which may depend on the service exposure. Examples of failure criteria are listed below. describes an ‘+ Average rust rating of 7, based on SS Der) VIS 2 (ASTM 465 Me Society for Fre gt by Tw Fb 22 MATZgt by Tw Bb 2 MAT mm 6627940 0004590 190 mm $9PC Guide 9 uly 15,4896 + 20% of the surface showing signs of degradation of topcoat or needing surface preparation, ‘+ Average scribe undercutting of 4/32 inches (3.2 mm) (8/32 inches (6.4 mm). + Average adhesion rating less than 3B (ASTM D 3359). + Average gloss retention of 50% or less of the original gloss reading + Average blister rating less than 8M (ASTM D 714) + Poorer performance than the control at some predeter: mined service time, (Performance parameters should bbe stated exolicily.) 8.4 DESIGN RATING FORMS FOR FIELD: The evalua tor should prepare a set of instructions for the field evaluation, including the parameters to be measured, the methods to be Used, photographs to be taken, and the standards to be used In addition, the evaluator should prepare pre-printed rating {forms for field inspection. A model inspection and rating form is shown in Appendix C. 9. Perform Field Inspection and Rating 98:1. Identity the structure, ts location, and date of inspec: tion. This should be done far enough in advance of the field in spection to ensure that all interested parties can attend, 92 Assemble an Inspection team, including an owner's representative and 2 manufacturer's representative. 9.3 Arrange for the necessary access, clearance permits, safety equipment, and inspection equipment 9.4 Prepare and distribute ratings forms for field evalua: tion 9.5. Conduct inspection in accordance with plans. 9.6 Record data on appropriate forms. Obtain signatures of participants and observers, Take pholographs, as required 9.7. Record environmental conditions and other damaging factors that might affect the performance of the coatings (@.9., sall dipping, abrasion, wind, and vandalism), 10. Assess and Analyze Data 10.1. Tebulate and evaluate the data from each inspec: tion, Data should be organized to show: ‘+ Ratings of each coating system's performance at each inspection. “+ Other performance evaluation information at each in- spection. 10.2 Identity the types of degradation or failures that have occurred for the systems tested 10.3 Plot the various performance levels over time 10.4 Compare candidates to defined performance levels Inthe following ways ‘+ Compare with control coating performance. 1+ Assess whether the candidate coating meets, exceeds, oF falls short of the minimum performance criteria es- tablished. + Determine whether insufficient time has elapsed * evaluate the acceptability of candidate coatings. + Provide explanations for certain field data not consid ‘ered valid 10.5 Based on the data above, determine it adsitional Inspection and rating is required. I so, estimate the time for the ext planned rating 11. Safety This guide may involve hazardous materials, operations ‘and equipment. Proper safety precautions must be observed. Follow all applicable Federal, State, anc local regulations. Han- dle materials safely i accordance wih the manuiacturer’s Ma: terial Safety Data Sheets (MSOS), Product Data Sheet and la- bel. Refer lo SSPC-PA Guide 3 12. Disclaimer While every precaution is taken to ensure that all informa- tion furnished in SSPC guides is as accurate, complete, and useful as possible, SSPG cannot assume responsibilty nor in- ‘cur any obligation resuiting from the use of any materials paints, or methods specifed therein, or ofthe guide tse 13. Notes 13.1. The SSPC Environmental Exposure Zones include: 14 (interior, normally dry), 18 (exterior, normally dry). 2A (wet by fresh water), 2B (wel by salt water), 3A (chemical exposure ~ acid), 96 (chemical exposure ~ neutral), 3C (chemical expo- sure ~ basie), 3D (chemical ~ mild solvent), and 3E (chemical «strong solvent) 12.2 Results from diferent adhesion tests may not be comparable, because different properties are being measured. Refer to ASTM D 3359 and ASTM D 4541 regarding interpreta: tion of results and precision 19.3. For thick film coatings (> 10 mils [250 microns), inspection procedures using ASTM D 610 and ASTM D 714 may be inadequate. Blisters, film delamination, and undertilm rusting may net be detected. Hence, probing with a knife or 1¢- moval of coatings may be required upon the completion of the test to inspect for delamination and underfilm rusting, Adhesion testing may also be applicable upon completion ofthe test APPENDIX A. CHECKLIST FOR PLANNING AND CONDUCTING FIELD EVALUATION OF A COATING SYSTEM 1, Establish program objectives, 2, Establish program scope, including ‘+ number and generic types of coating systems + surface condition of steel + type and location of structure 466 Me Society for Fr+ exposure environment sought ‘evaluation frequency Select structure, considering ‘ype location type and surface condition of stee! new or repaint (if repaint, describe existing coating) accessibiliy location and size of test area Select surtace preparation, including + type (abrasive blasting, water jeting, etc.) description (in accordance with SSPC surtace prepara tion standards) abrasve and profile. other requirements (type of equipment, pressures, ete.) entity test and control coatings (primer, intermediate, top coal), including generic ype \escription (brand name and specification number) recommended DFT application method VOC content weather requirements for application 467 yg by tte SSPC: Te Sei for Pr Tus Fb 2D (A729 200 6627940 OOONSSS O27 mm PC Guide 9 july 15, 1994 + recoal/service tine review MSDS and product data sheets other Prepare writen specifications and obtain contractor. Obtain and conduct quality control tests of coating mater. als. Conduct preliminary inspection of structure. ‘Arrange for appropriate people to be present for application and inspection 10. Observe and record surface preparation and application arameters and weather conditions, Dacument with photo- ‘raps, 11. Inspect and rate condition of coating systems: + Assemble inspection team Obiain necessary access, permits, inspection equip- mer. Prepare inspection forms. Record data Take and idently photographs. Obtain signatures of participants and observers 12. Evaluate cata: Tabulate and organize inspection data, Compare level of performance to efiteria. Determine f additional testing is needed.4 ser WH 8627540 GOO4SS2 Th3 mm uly APPENDIX B. DESCRIPTION OF TEST STRUCTURE (One form: needed for each test patch) Inspector: Date “Type of Structure Identification Facility/Route No. Location (cty/state): - Exposure (SSPC Zone}: leel Gorrosion Rate: Other (industrial, marine, urban, specific chemicals): Location of fest patch on structure; Description of test patch surface. ‘Size of test patch: Extent of corrosion and piting: Vis 1-89 rating general condition” Presence of salts: Type of test: Unit Existing coating type: ‘Condition: Rust, is 2 ) Peeling - Other: Thickness (mils): Average: Range Adhesion: Type of est/unit average: Range: Remarks: *See SSPC 91-01, Appendix F for Information on characterizing surfaces contaminated with soluble salts. SSPC 91-01 is, available from Steel Structures Painting Counell, 40 24th Street, 6th Floor, Pittsburgh, PA 15222. 468, gt by ue Fb 2) TAL Me Society fo FrMo ab27940 0004593 STT mm SSPC Guide 9 ‘uly 18, 1994 APPENDIX C. APPLICATION Applicator. Name ‘Company Phone Inspector: Name Company Phone Owner Representative: Name Company Phone Position Responsibility Coating Supplier: Name Company Phone Surface Preparation: Date: Method/Degree of Cleaning Abrasive: Profile ‘as measured by: Comment: ‘Ambient Conditions: Airtemp,_________Surtace temp, Humiaty Other Coating Application Primer Intermediate Topcoat Product Name and No. Generic Type: Batch Number/Date: Environmental Conditions: Air Temperature Surface Temperature ——— Humidity ra Dew Point Wind Conditions: Condition in Container Number of Components Method of Mixing | Induction Time Pot Time Thinning, Type and Amour Equipment Used air pressure (psi) int ttuid pressure (ps!) atomization pressure nnozzle/tp size ‘brush or roller ype Date Applied Time Applieg 469 Coptigh by te SSPC: he Society for Potectne Coatings Tus Fb 2) MATAT 2009WM ab27540 OOO4SdY 836 mm SPC ,Guige 9 Sly 15,1984 Primer Intermediate Topeoat ‘Time Between Coats, ee ‘Cumulative Dry Film Thickness (DFT) (mils or microns) Appearance Defects ieee ce ‘Samples Taken: abrasive replica tape coatings. Method of Scribe: Photographs: original condition: operations ______, completed test areas —_____ (cecord details of time, place and situation for each photograph taken) 470 ptt by tte SSPC: Me Society for Pe Tus Fb 22 (4793 2009