Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Project-Based Learning Rubric

    Uploaded by

    api-282536065
    13 views1 page
    This rubric evaluates student projects on creating a home and journal/poster for a worm. It assesses students on four criteria: content, organization, reflection of critical thinking, and presentation. For the highest score, the project must display well-thought-out content that creatively supports the worm's needs, be logically organized, reflect application of critical analysis, and include 4+ journal entries explaining steps taken. A lower score is given if any criteria are partially met or inconsistent. The lowest score is for projects with factual errors, lack of critical thinking, unfocused content, and poor presentation preparation.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    project-based learning rubric

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This rubric evaluates student projects on creating a home and journal/poster for a worm. It assesses students on four criteria: content, organization, reflection of critical thinking, and presentation. For the highest score, the project must display well-thought-out content that creatively supports the worm's needs, be logically organized, reflect application of critical analysis, and include 4+ journal entries explaining steps taken. A lower score is given if any criteria are partially met or inconsistent. The lowest score is for projects with factual errors, lack of critical thinking, unfocused content, and poor presentation preparation.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    13 views1 page

    Project-Based Learning Rubric

    Uploaded by

    api-282536065
    This rubric evaluates student projects on creating a home and journal/poster for a worm. It assesses students on four criteria: content, organization, reflection of critical thinking, and presentation. For the highest score, the project must display well-thought-out content that creatively supports the worm's needs, be logically organized, reflect application of critical analysis, and include 4+ journal entries explaining steps taken. A lower score is given if any criteria are partially met or inconsistent. The lowest score is for projects with factual errors, lack of critical thinking, unfocused content, and poor presentation preparation.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    Score

    A Place for Worm Project Rubric


    Content of Worm Home
    and Journal/Poster

    4
    Displays
    Evidence
    Beyond

    Organization or Worm Home


    and Journal/Poster

    Is well thought out and

    supports the solution to the


    challenge (worm home
    provides shelter, air, water,
    and food)

    Demonstrates creativity

    Information is organized in a
    thoughtful manner in
    journal/poster

    Class presentation

    Has all materials and is prepared

    Expresses knowledge in topics and


    project process

    Worm home is organized


    Expresses time and thought

    Reflects application of
    critical thinking
    Journal or poster has at
    least 4 entries or steps
    taken explained

    Is accurate

    Is well thought out ad


    supports the solution

    Demonstrates creativity

    Information supports the solution


    to the challenge or question

    Worm home is organized

    Has application of critical


    thinking that is apparent

    Expresses some time and thought

    Constant
    Evidence

    Is accurate

    Supports the solution(some


    components of living things
    may be missing)

    Has application of critical


    thinking that is apparent

    Some

    Evidence

    1
    Little

    Evidence

    Expresses some knowledge in


    topics and project process

    Journal or poster has at


    least 3 entries or steps
    taken explained

    Has all materials and is prepared

    Has some factual errors or


    inconsistencies

    Provides inconsistent

    information for solution

    (many missing components


    living things need)
    Has no apparent application
    of critical thinking
    Has significant factual
    errors, misconceptions, or
    misinterpretations

    Project has a focus but might


    stray from it at times
    Information appears to have a
    pattern, but the pattern is not
    consistent

    Is missing some materials

    Expresses little knowledge in


    topics and project process

    Presentation appears sloppy


    and/or unfinished

    Expresses little time and thought


    Content is unfocused

    Information does not support the

    solution to the challenge or


    question

    Expresses no time and thought

    Is missing most materials


    Communicates very little
    knowledge in topics and project
    process

    You might also like