Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Fundamentals of Adaptive Protection of Large Capacitor Banks
Fundamentals of Adaptive Protection of Large Capacitor Banks
Joe Schaefer
Florida Power & Light Company
1. Introduction
Shunt Capacitor Banks (SCB) are installed to provide capacitive
reactive compensation and power factor correction. The use of
SCBs has increased because they are relatively inexpensive, easy
and quick to install, and can be deployed virtually anywhere in
the grid. SCB installations have other beneficial effects on the
system such as improvement of the voltage profile, better voltage
regulation (if they were adequately designed), reduction of losses
and reduction or postponement of investments in the transmission
and generation capacity.
Ed Clark
Florida Power & Light Company
The presented methods also facilitate auto-setting and selftuning applications. Auto-setting is an operation of calculating
new accurate relay constants to account for the inherent bank
unbalances following the bank repair, and is performed in response
to the users request and under user supervision. Self-tuning is an
operation of constantly self-adjusting the balancing constants in
order to maintain optimum sensitivity of protection when the bank
reactances change slowly in response to seasonal temperature
variations and other conditions. The self-tuning applications
require monitoring the total changes in the balancing constants
in order to detect slow failure modes, and account for a series of
small changes that do not trigger alarms on their own.
The SCBs are assembled out of individual cans that are highly
repairable. The need for advanced protection functions is
particularly visible when SCBs are operated under conditions
where one or more capacitor cans are temporarily removed but
the bank is returned to service pending completion of repairs.
However, continuous operation and repairs if needed can be done
only if the bank is protected by a reliable and sensitive relay. This in
turn, can be accomplished by deploying protection principles that
are developed assuming an inherent unbalance in the protected
bank.
2. Capacitors
Protection engineering for shunt capacitor banks requires
knowledge of the capabilities and limitations of the capacitor unit
and associated electrical equipment including individual capacitor
unit, bank switching devices, fuses, location and type of voltage
and current instrument transformers.
19
Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Capacitor unit.
20
Figure 3.
Figure 4.
21
V
( A)
VOP
OP ( A )
V
V11 AA
kk AA V
V22 AA
V
( A)
VOP
OP ( A )
V
V11 AA
kk AA V
V22 AA
V
VXX kk AA
11
(1a)
(1b)
n 2
V
V
kk A nVT
VT 2 V2 A
OP ( A )
1A
V
V
V2 A
OP ( A )k is a1division
A
A ratio
Where
nnVTfor
A
1 the A-phase of the bank.
VT 1
3.4 H-Configuration
nVTX
Note that equations (1) n
can
using either phasors
VT 2be implemented
V
V
kk A nno-fault
VT 2 V2 A V X nVTX k A 1
( A)
1 A During
or
magnitudes.
conditions
and
VOP
V
V
V
k A small
1 bank
OP ( A )
A n
X
1A
2A
nnVT 1under
VT 1
unbalances caused by ninternal
bank failures,
VT 1
VT 1the two voltages
will be almost in phase, suggesting the phasors and magnitude
versions would yield similar results. However, the function is set
nnVT 2 and given possible angular errors of the used VTs,
very
VT 2 | 1
kk A sensitive
|1
A will
there
nnVTbe
1 differences in performance between the two possible
VT
1
versions. The performance depends on the type of security
measures used to deal with errors of instrument transformers.
V
More
is provided in one of the following sections.
information
V1 A
kkA
1A
A
V
Typically,
A method is used on grounded banks and equation (1a)
V22the
A
is used. In theory, the algorithm could be applied on ungrounded
banks using equation (1b), but it requires both the neutral voltage
V
V
V
VX Such arrangements may
C
and
the
V
VAA
VXXtapvoltages
VBB
VXXtobeV
Vmeasured.
C VX
00
not Z
be practical (the
tap voltages
not measured
on ungrounded
Z
Z
A
B
C
Z A If the tap voltages
ZB
ZC
banks).
are measured,
one could apply multiple
overlapping protection zones to the ungrounded bank as long as
the applied
required
number
of inputs and
11 relay(s)
V
V
11 support
11 theV
A
B
C
V
V
V
associated
protection
functions.
Specifically,
equation
can be
V
A
B
C
voltage00(1b)
VX voltage
differential;
two neutral
usedXfor
unbalance
Z
Z AA Z
Z BB Z
Z CC andZ
Z AA Z
Z BB Z
Z CC
protection elements can be used one balancing the bus voltages
with the neutral voltage, and another balancing the tap voltages
against the
1neutral1voltage.
V
V
V
V
1 V
Figure 5.
ZC
V
X Z(1) apply
Equations
to
primary
voltages,
and
as
such
they
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z AA Z BB Z CC Z AA Z AA Z AA Z BB Z AA Z CC Z AA
incorporate
the voltage-dividing ratio of the capacitor, but ignore
the ratios of applied instrument transformers. In secondary
voltages, the
1
1 operating
1 voltage
1 is:1
1
1
1
VXX Z
V
Z
Z
V
A1 A ZkBA VZ
C
( A ) ZV
VOP
A1 A kBA V22 A
OP ( A ) V
AC
22
00
1 V V V V 1 11 V
C VB
Z for
VAAgrounded
VBB Vbanks
Z VCC
C
B (1c)
Z
B
Z AA
Z
B Z AA
A) V
Z
kk AA 111 ZZ AA V 1 ZZ AA 0
V
(
Z11AAAA
ZAAAA V
VOP
V
kkZ
V22 AA3
VV
V0XX V
A11)
X (
B 1
VCC 1 Z 0
VOP
V
V
3
X
B
0
B
Z
Z CC
Z
Z BB Z
Z CC
Z
B banks (1d)
for ungrounded
n 2
V
kk A nVT
VT 2 V2 A
( A) Z V
1A
VOP
V
VZ
X
( A) Z A 1 A X A A n
Z2 AA | X
XA
VT 1
A
A
kk OP
|
,
k
n
AB
AC
VT
1
|
,
k
| XA
AB
AC
Z
X
Z
Z BB Capacitor
X BB Banks Z CC X CC
Fundamentals of Adaptive Protection of Large
n 2
nVTX
V
V
kk A nVT
VT 2 V2 A V X nVTX k A 1
OP ( A ) 1
1A
V
V
V
V
1 V 1 k
1
( A)
11A k ABA nk AC
V2xA 3 VX 0 nnVTVVBB1 11kA kkAB
V
OP
C
AC
1
VOP
OP
AC1 V x 3 V0
AB VC 1 k AC
VT
VT 1
3 1 k AB nkVT
VOP ( A)
V k
V1 A k A
V
OP ( A )
VOP
( A)
VOP ( A)
V1 A k A V2 A VX k A 1
n
V VX VTX k A 1
nnVT 1
VT21
VT
V2 A VX VTX
k A 1
nVT 1
nVT 1
nVT 2
V1 A 1 Ak A V2AA n
VnX k A 21A
VOP ( A)n V1 A k A
nVT 2
V2 A
nVT 1
A
VkOP
V1 A|1k A V2 A Bank Neutral Voltage
( ACompensated
4.2
n)nVT
VT21
|1
kA
Unbalance
nVT 2
nVTX
V
V
k Vk (59NU)
n
VT
1
V
V
OP ( A )
X 1 k A 1
2 A V
VOP
V11AA kA A nV2 A VV
( A)
X k A
nVT 1 is applicable to ungrounded
VT 1 6 this function
V1 A to Figure
With reference
Normally the VT ratios are selected so that the secondary
Vk A
V k V V k 1
banks, and is based on the Kirchhoffs currents law for the neutral
nVTtap
VTX
2 voltages are n
voltages
bus and
V12AA
VOP ( A) forVthe
V2 A VX similar
under
k A 1nominal
nof
node
1A k A
VT 2the bank: nVT 2
system voltage. This leads
|11A nk A
A ( A )
V
V2 A
nVTto1 the effective matching
nVT 1 factor for the VVkkOP
A
V1 2
nVTV
A k n VnVT 1
secondary voltages being close to unity:
VA VX VB VX VC VX
(3a)
0
V1 A n
nVT 2
Z
n
k
Z
Z
V
V
V
V
V
V
V AA AV X k B VBnVTX2V C kC X1n
|1
kA
(1e)
VOP ( AV
V2nA VX VTX0 k A 1
A nk A
) 2 A V1
nVT 1
n
ZA
Z B VT 1
Z C nVT 1
Thenabove expression can be rearranged as follows:
VB VX1 VC 1VX V
kV A V X|1 1
V
V
Voltage-based capacitor protection functions are set sensitive.
nn
V
Z C 0 A B C 0
Z
ZB
V
X
AVT 2
1 Aformat of equations (1) both the bus and tap voltages
Given
the
|
1
k
Z1 Z1 Z1 VZ
VZBB VZCC
A
kA
(3b)
0
VVXnVT 1 A B C AA
shall
be
accurately in order to gain sensitivity of
V2measured
k
A
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
V 1 A 1
protection. As a result the VT ratios shall be selected so that the
V AV B
B1 V
C
C
A B C 0
VX
resultant secondary voltages fall in the region of maximum relay
V
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
BV
1 A A 1V B V 1CV 1 A
V
V
V
V
V
VkA Vfurther
A C VB
accuracy,
VTs
an
VXwithin their maximum class and
VA VX andVBthe Vtwo
VCwork
of:
C B B C C 0
ZVXV V Zto
0 form
equivalent
X
Z
0
2
A
accuracy under nominal system voltage. The latter is ensured for
Z1
Z1
Z1 VZ
VZ
VZ
VZ
VZ
VZ
VZ
Z C VT for the tap voltage shall be
VVX 1 A 1 B1 VCA VB AA VC BVA B VCBA VC BB VC BA0 CC CA 0
A voltage; Z
B
the Z
bus
selection
of the
X 1
Z BV ZVZCVV ZZ0 A Z Z AZ ZZA ZZ B Z Z A Z C Z A
Z Z1VA Z1 V
done carefully to minimize VT and relay errors for the tap voltage.
VVA
VX
A
A
B
A
C
A
B B XZ C V
C A X
0 A
Z
Z
Z
Z Z Z
Relay setting range for the ratio-matching factor is another
1
Z
Z
Z
1
1
1
1
1
A
B
C
that
VC
1 may1 limit selection
1 VofA thisVVT
VC
V
V
V
V
V
condition
(3c)
B ratio.
X
A
B
C
B
1 Z1
0
VX
1 V Z1
1 1V Z
1 1 Z
V
VV V
V
V 1 1 V Z
1 1 1
Z
1
1
1
1
0
V
V
V
V
B C A A
A
C B
C
B 0
V X A
Z B Z C apply
Z A toZ Bthe voltage
ZC
Z
which
VX Zis Zidentical
AZ VZ B ZV
Z A characteristics
The following
differential
Z AVB Z C Z A VC
Z
C1 ZZV
ZVBC
VCA Z VBZ
1AZ Z1ZB with:
A
B
0
VX Z A ZB ZC Z A
function [3]:
ZB Z A
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
A
B
C
A
B
C
1 1
1
1
1
1 1
1
Z
0A
V Z AZAZ A Z
V A
V V V ZV Z A Z
individual
Theelement
VB per-phase
VC Vsettings
VBto VCV
1
1shall support
1 V
V
ZC 0 Z1
VXX V
1ZC1
Z1
Z Z ZA3 V03VBV 01 VBA Z1V
A
B
C
Z C Z 0
the phases
Z BZ0 Z C Z
Vcope
unbalances
Z B
between
(repairs
X withdifferent
Z
B VB
VB V1
V VC AC 0
Z A Zunits).
Z C Z A Z A Z A Z B Z A Z CV
Z1A 1 AB 1 AC13V V
A
C VBA
B
andshorted
VC C1
V
XX
(3d) 0
Z
Z
Z
1 ZZ 0VZV B1 Z
Z
Z
V 1
Z
V
V
3
0
Z
Z
Z
Z
ZC ZZAC
B B
C C Z
B A
AZX
AX
A Z A
B
Z
Z
A
A | A
A , k
k AB
The element is capable of indicating the affected phase, and
AC
Z|Aboth
Xsides
X A the sum of the phase
Multiplying
byZ CandXZ
substituting
A
A
Z
X
B
B
C
1 the1 number
1 voltages
k 1 by
|V 1Z , kXAC
|
potentially
1 of faulted
1 capacitor elements, to aid
1
3, k1X
1
1
of the
1XV
1| 1 Z0AC
1
1
Vbank.
k AB Z
Vtroubleshooting
repairs
0
|Z
X
A VB VC VB
and
BC
BZ
A
A
VC
Z
X
X
V
V
VXB AC VC VB
X
A|
k
|
,
k
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
ABA 1
ACA Z
B
C
A
C
B yields:
3AVZ V X1 k V 1 Z kB Z A
A
ZX
Z C Z A
B k Z C
VOP Z
1AB k AB
V
Z
x
0C
B
C
AC
B AC
C AB
The function shall apply appropriate security measures for
13
1 1
V
k k V 3 V V 1 k V 1 k
VOPsensitive
V
k
V
but
secure
operation:
appropriate
restraint
signal
( A)
1A
A
2A
3
1 Zk AB k AC Vx 3ZV0 VB 1 Zk AB VC 1 k AC
OP V Z V
(1).Z A V
be
Z Adeveloped
Z A to accompany the operating
ZA
could
signal
VOP
A
X3 A
0
3 V0 VB 1 A VC 1 A 0
V
1 1
VX Setting
V
V
V
1
3
1
1
0
X
V
V
V
B
C
0
if desired
so. V
restraint
V
X
Z
X
OP ( A ) B 1 A B A
2CA
C
setable per phase. n
VT 1
Where
volts of the bus VT, and
VOP ( A)the operating
V1 A k Asignal
VT 2is inVsecondary
2A
the nVT1, nVT2 and nVTX stand
nVT 1for ratios of the bus, tap, and neutral
voltage transformers, respectively.
VT 2
OP ( A )
1A
2A
OP ( A )
1A
2A
OP ( A )
1A
VT 2
2A
VT 1
VT 2
OP ( A )
1A
VTX
2A
VT 1
VT 1
VT 2
VT 1
1A
2A
VOP
AC
OP
OP
AB
AB
AC
AB
AC
VOP
1
1 k AB k AC Vx 3 V0 VB 1 k AB VC 1 k AC
3
VOP
VX V0
1 k AC
VX V0
nVT 2
|1
k
A
The process
nVT 1 of finding the constant balancing a given phase of
protection is based on the following simple equation:
kA
V1 A
V2 A
(2)
The
VX differential
VA voltage
V V method
V Vcan be used in a number of
configurations
asB longX as theC relayX allows
0 wide range of ratio
Z A for the compared
ZB
Z C tap voltage can be compared
matching
voltages:
with the bus voltage; two taps can be compared on the same bank;
two taps can be compared between two parallel banks, etc.
Figure 6.
Compensated bank neutral overvoltage application.
1
1
1 VA VB VC
0
VX
Z B ZC
A
Z A Z B Z C Z Fundamentals
of Adaptive Protection of Large Capacitor Banks
1
1
1 VA VB VC VB VB VC VC
VX
23
1
1
1
1
1 1
1
1
0
VC
VA VB VC VB
VX V1 A
Z
Z
k VA 1Z A 1 ZB 1 ZCVA ZVBA VC VB VB VC VC Z B0 Z A
A
C
X V
Z2 AA Z B Z C Z A Z A Z A Z B Z A Z C Z A
Z
Z
Z
Z
VVXVA 1VX1 AV1B VA1X3V1CV0VVVXBV 1V AV V1C 11 AV 01 1 0
0
Introducing
matchingA k-values
the inherent C saturation of the relay input the function shall be blocked in this
X
B
B
Zthe following
Z
B Z B Z A Z C Z C
CtoZreflect
ZA
ZA Z A BZ B Z BZC C Z A Z C
bank unbalance:
Z ZXA
Z
ZZ
ZX
V
VAB VCV C1 A
A1A , 3k VAC
k XAB 1 A1A |
10 VB VA1A|
Z C ZXB C Z0C
VX ZZBB ZXC B
ZA
ZC
ZB
ZA
ZB
0 (4)
ZC
X the balance
Z A Xequation
allows Zre-writing
(3e) into the following
k AB
| A , k AC
| A
1A signal:
operating
Z 1X k k Z VX 3 V V 1 k
V
V
1 k ACV
OP
AC
B 1 B AB
1
1 C xVCA V0B BVC VBAB VB C V
C
C When
0
VX 3
measuring
the 3 V0 internally and expressing
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
B
C
A
A
A
B
A
C
A
operating
signal in secondary volts of the bus voltage:
1 A
1 k AB k AC Vx 3 V0 VB 1 k AB VC 1 k AC
VOP
V
OP 3V X V0
the
1
(5) 1 V 1 1 nVTX 1 k1 k 1 V 3 V V 1 k V 1 k
1
1 1
AB
C
AC
V
V
V
V
AB AC x 0 0 B
OP 3 nV
A
B
C
B
not magnitudes,
VTC
Equation
(5)
involves
phasors,
i.e.
the
vectorial
sum
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
B
C
A
A
A
B
C
A
VOPV V
X V0
X
Z
Z A the capacitor impedances
Z
Z
Note
3 V0 VB 1 A between
1 theAratios
VX that
1 A
VC phase
of
A and
the Z
two other
phases
are
close
to
unity,
and
therefore
ZC
B
ZB
ZC
the correcting factors for the B and C-phase voltages are small
numbers, while the coefficient in front of the VX voltage is close
to 3.
Z
X
Z
X
A
k AB
, k AC
VOP
VX V0
(6)
24
EquationZ(5)
while
relations
X B following Z
X C(4) is a proper neutral
B
C
overvoltage function compensated for both the system unbalance
(V0), and the bank unbalance (kAB, kAC). To understand it better
assume 1
the bank is perfectly balanced (kAB = 1, kAC = 1). If so, the
VOP operating
1 k AB
k ACtakes
Vx afamiliar
3 V0 simplified
VB 1 form
k AB [1]: VC
precise
equation
(7a)
1 nVTX
1 k AB k AC Vx 3 nVT 0 V0 VB 1 k AB VC 1 k AC
VOP
3 nVTmeasuring the 3 V0 nfrom
When
an open-delta VT and
VT
1 nVTX
expressing
the operating signal in secondary volts of the bus
0
1 k AB k AC Vx 3 V0 VB 1 k AB VC 1 k AC
VOP
3 knAB
Re ^1voltage:
0
VT k AC V X 3 V0 VB 1 k AB VC 1 k AC `
Z1 A Z 2 A
(7b)
IRe
VBANK
k AC
DIF^(1
A ) k AB
( A ) V X 3 V0 VB 1 k AB VC 1 k AC ` 0
Z1 A Z 2 A
The following characteristics apply to the compensated bank
V X 3 V0 function
Im ^1 kvoltage
VB 1 k[3]:
neutral
AB VC 1 k AC ` 0
1
k AC AB kZAC1unbalance
A Z 2A
I A V BANK ( A)
The singleZ 1element
ZA Z 2ZA2 A function does not indicate explicitly the
I DIF ( A) VBANK ( A) 1 A
effected phase.
Z1 A ZIt2 A could, however, aid troubleshooting and
repairs by reporting
and fault values).
Z Z the k-factors
Z (pre-fault
Z
VBANK ( A) I DIF ( A) 1 A 2 A I A 1 A 2 A
Z 1 A ZZ12AA Z 2 A
Z1 A Z 2 A
V BANKfunction
shall apply appropriate
security measures for
I A The
( A)
Z1A Z 2 A
sensitive but secure operation: appropriate restraint signal
Z1 A be
Z 2 Aused with
Z Z 2 A operating signal (5). Disabling the
Z I A Z 1 A the
0 Z
I DIF ( could
A)
1 A be
2A
ZI2 A Zif1 Adesired
Z1 AI Zshould
Z12AAallowed
so.
2
A
VBANKrestraint
( A)
DIF ( A )
A
Z1 A Z 2 A
Z1 A Z 2 A
SeveralZindependent
pickup
thresholds shall be provided for
1A Z 2 A
I DIF ( alarming
Z1IAA Z 2 Aand tripping.
Z1 A0 Z 2 A
A)
0
I DIF ( A)
Z ZI A2 A
Z1 A Z12AA
Z1 A Z 2 A
The inherent bank unbalance constants (k-values) shall be
Z1 A Z 2 A X 1 A X 2 A
Z1 A |Z 2 A
kI A settable.
0X
DIF ( A )Z I
A Z
X 1A
1A
2A
2A
Z
1A Z 2 A
1 nauto-setting
Both
are possible as
VTX
voltage
VOP
1 k AB and
k ACself-tuning
Vx 3 Vapplications
0 VB 1 k AB VC 1 k AC
long
as
the
neutral
point
is
non-zero
and
is measured
3 nZVT Xk I X
I OP ( A)Z1
DIF
A 2A
1A I
2(AA )
1AA
nadequate
VTX
with
accuracy.
Provision
could
be
made
k
|
A
1 X 1kAAB X 2kA AC Vx 3 V0 VB 1 k ABto calculate
VOP
VC 1 k AC
Z13A nZ 2kA automatically
factors
under manual supervision of the user,
VT
1
n
n
VTX
locally
in a
nCTk AC V(auto-setting),
1 korIABremotely
VI OP either
3 VT 0 V0 or
Vcontinuously
B 1 k AB VC 1 k AC
In
IA x
I OP
Aslow
DIF
(A
)k k
A loop
n
adjusting
(self-tuning).
OP (( A
)) 3 I DIF
(
A
)
A
A
nCT DIF
1 n VT
n VT
VTX
1 k AB k AC Vx 3 VT 0 V0 VB 1 k AB VC 1 k AC
VOP
3
n
nVT
Re ^1I k ABVT k AC VnCT
X 3 V0 VB 1 k AB VC 1 k AC ` 0
I ( A)
kOP
A
I DIF
( A) ( A)
DIF
kA
nCT DIF
IA
Re ^1 IkA AB k AC V X 3 V0 VB 1
k AB VC 1 k AC ` (8a)
VC 1 k AC ` 00
Im ^1 k AB k AC V X 3 V0 VB 1 k AB
k
I DIF ( A)
ImA ^1 I Ak AB k AC V X 3 V0 VB 1 k AB VC 1 k AC ` 0
Z Z2A
I DIF ( A) VBANK ( A) 1 A
(8b)
Z Z
Z11AA Z22AA
I
V
The VX voltage, in turn, is relatively small under internal failures that
DIF ( A )
BANK ( A )
Z1 A Z
The process ofZfinding
the
2 A two unknown constants is based on
require high protection sensitivity. Therefore either the relay shall
1A Z 2 A
the
following
principle.
When
the bank is healthy, equation (5) is
I
V
A
BANK ( A )
be equipped with a high-sensitivity voltage input, or the VT ratio
Z 1 A and
Z 2 Atherefore it can be zeroed out. Writing the
perfectly
balanced,
is selected to create this signal and improve measuring accuracy
Z1A Z 2 A
I A and
V BANK
real
imaginary
parts of the equation separately one obtains
( A)
of this signal, or both. In any case, the ratio must be selected such
Z 1 Atwo
ZZ 2unknowns.
A Z
two equations for
Z Z
as the input voltage does not exceed the conversion range of a
VBANK ( A) I DIF ( A) 1 A 2 A I A 1 A 2 A
given relay. Sometimes this requirement may be relaxed allowing
Z1 A Z 2 A
Z1 A Z 2 A
Z Z
Z Z
VBANK ( A) I DIF ( A) 1 A 2 A I A 1 A 2 A
Z1 A ZBanks
Z 2AZ
Z1 A Z 2 A
Z ZCapacitor
Fundamentals of Adaptive Protection of Large
I DIF ( A) 1 A 2 A I A 1 A 2 A 0
Z1 A Z 2 A
Z1 A Z 2 A
Z1 A Z 2 A
Z Z
I A 1A 2 A 0
I DIF ( A)
Z1 A ZZ 2 A Z Z1 A Z 2 A
Z Z
Z Z
V
I DIFZ( A1 )A Z1 A2 A 2 A I A 1 A 2 A
)
I ABANKV( ABANK
( A)
ZZ ZZ
ZZ ZZ
VBANK ( A) I DIF (ZA1) A Z11AA2 A 22AA I A 11AA 22AA
Z1 A Z 2 A
Z1 A Z 2 A
Z1 A Z 2 A Z ZZ1 A Z 2 A
Z Z2 A
1AA
2A
Icoefficient
DIF ( A ) both sides
The above is now solved for the two unknowns kAB and kAC while
Dividing
by the
next
current
VI BANK
IDIF
I Ato 0the1 Adifferential
( A )Z
( A)
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
treating the involved voltages as knowns (the k-values are treated
gives:
I DIF ( A) 11AA 22AA ZI1AA 11ZAA2 A 22AA 0Z1 A Z 2 A
as real numbers per equations (4)). The method works as long as
Z1 A Z 2 A
Z1 A Z 2 A
the Vx voltage is above the measuring error level. The procedure
Z1 A Z 2 A Z Z
(9e)
does not call for the system to be unbalanced (V0 can be zero) as
AA Z 2 A
I DIF ( A)1Zn1IVTX
I
I A k10A V2 A 30 V V 1 k V 1 k
DIF
(
A
)
VOP
1
k
Z
Z
the unknowns (k) do not appear as multipliers for the V0 value in
AB
AC
x
0
B
AB
C
AC
1
A
2
A
I DIF ( A) 3Z1InAAVT Z1 A2 A 2 A Z10A Z 2 A
equations1(8).nVTX
1 k AB k AC Vx 3 V0 VB 1 k AB VIntroducing
Z1 A Z 2unbalance
VOP
A
C 1 k AC
the inherent
compensating factor, k:
3 nVT
Z
Z
X
1
A
2
A
1
A X 2A
4.3. Phase Current Balance (60P)
Z
Z
1
A
2
A
k A 1 nIVTX |
nVT 0
( AZ
)
VI DIF
A ZZ22A1A kZXAB11AAk0X
V0 VB 1 k AB VC 1
1 nnVTX
11AA
OP
AC22AA Vx 3
VTXto Figure 7, this function is based on the balance
With
reference
n
(10)
VVOP
B V B11kABk AB
11kkABABk kACAC VxVx 33V0V0nVVT
VCV1CkA k1AC3k ACnVT 1 A | 2 A
1
n
OP
VT
VTX
0
between
currents
nnVT
VOP 3phase
1 kofABthetwo
Vx banks,
3 andVis0applicable
VB 1 k AB VZC1 A 1 Zk2 AAC X 1 A X 2 A
k ACparallel
VT
to both 3
grounded
and ungrounded arrangements.
Higher
nVT
nVT
I OP^(A)Z1 A IDIFZ(2AA) kXA 1AI A X 2 A
sensitivity can be achieved when using a window CT (compared
Re
1the
following
k AB k AC
3 V0 of the
VB phase
1 kcurrent
yields
operating
balance
AB V
C 1 k AC ` 0
k
| V X signal
A
nnVTX
nVTn0VT 0 With the two
with the1
two
individual CTs summated electrically).
I
I
k
I
1
protection:
Z
Z
X
X
OP
(
A
)
DIF
(
A
)
A
A
VTX
11kAC
VB1 C 1kbeAB
3 flows,
shall
kkABaVcirculating
k AC3V
VB
2A
1A
2A
C 1 1kA1ACk AC
OP ^slightly
xV
VVOP
V
13 nk ABdifferent,
Re
1V0kVAB
1k AB
kV
banks
and
AB X k
AC V
x V3Bn
0
0current
AC `VC 0
VTn
3 nVTVTfor in order
compensated
to increase sensitivity
VT of the function.
Im ^1 k AB k AC V X nCT
3 V0 VB 1 k AB VC 1 k AC ` 0
I OP ( A) I DIF ( A) k A
I A
This protection element is founded on the following theory.
(11)
I
I
k
I
n
n
OP
(
A
)
DIF
(
A
)
A
A
CT
^
`
Im
1
k
k
V
3
V
V
1
k
V
1
k
0
CT DIF
`
Re^^1
1
kkABABkkAC AC
V
V
1C 1
k AC
0OP
X 3 V0 0VB 1
B k AB
AB
AC
I
I
I
k
X
CV
`
(
A
)
DIF
(
A
)
A
A
Re
V
3
V
V
1
k
k
0
Both parallelABbanks AC
work under
identical
voltage,
and
X
0
B
AB therefore:
C
AC
Z1 A
nCTZ DIF
2A
I DIF ( A) relations
VBANK (apply
A)
Identical
to
phases
B and C.
Z1 A Z
Im ^1 k AB k AC VZX1 A3 ZV20A VB 1 k AB VC 1 k AC ` 0 I DIF ( A)
2A
nCT
(9a)
I DIF
^1( A) k ABVBANK
`
Im
k AC
V
3
V
V
1
k
V
1
k
0
k
I
I
k
VBANK ( A) I DIF ( A)
I A
(9c)
Note that Zequation
1 A Z 2 A(11) is a vectorial
theI Ak-factor
0
I DIF ( A) However,
Z1ZA1
Z1 AZ1 AZ2ZA 2 A
2A
signals.
as
A ZZ
2A
Z1 A Z 2 A
Z1 A Zis2 aA real number (very small
VBANK ( A) Z1IADIF
Z( A2 )A
Z1 A Z 2IAA
or zero imaginary part), the two currents are in phase and their
1IAA Zequation:
I DIF ( Athe
Z
Z01 A Z 2 A
)
2A
creating
following balance
magnitudes, not phasors, could be used as well.
Z
Z
ZZ1 A1 A Z2 Z
Z
Z
2
A
1
A
2
A
A
I A 1A 2 A 0
I DIF ( A)
Zmeasure
Z1 A to
2A
Typically
ZZ1 A Z
Z1ZA ZZ2 A
0 the total phase current and the
I DIF ( A) CTs
I Aused
2A
1A Z 2 A
1A
2A
(9
d
)
differential
current
would
Z1 A Z 2 A have drastically different ratios. The
0
I DIF ( A)
Z1 A ZI A2 A
I DIF ( A)Z1 AIA Z 2 A
differential CT might have much lower ratio in order to increase
Z 0 Z 2 A
Z1ZA 1A Z2ZA 2 A 1 A
magnitude of the secondary current under internal bank failures
0
I DIF ( A) I A
Z1 Ahigh
Z sensitivity
X of X
requiring
protection. During external fault
2A
Z1 A Z 2 A
kA
| 1 Acurrent2 Aremains low further promoting
Z1 A Z 2 A
conditions,
the differential
Z1 Aof low-ratio
Z 2 A XCT.
Xthe2 Arelay side, a sensitive ground
I DIF ( A) Z1IA A Z 2 A X 1 A 0 X 2 A
1 A On
the usage
k A Z ZZ1 A |XZ 2 A X
current input shall be used for better sensitivity and accuracy.
1A
2A
1X
A
2A
Z
1A Z 2|
A
1A X 2 A
kA
Z1 A Z 2 A X 1 A X 2 A
I OP ( A)written
I DIFin( Asecondary
When
) k A I A terms, the key equation (11) when
Z1 A Z 2 A X 1 A X 2 A
expressed
in
secondary
amperes of the differential CT becomes:
k AI
| k I
I DIF
OP ( A
)
( A) X
A AX
Z
Z
2A
I OP ( A) 1 AI DIF ( A2)A k A 1IAA
n
(12)
I OP ( A) I DIF ( A) k A CT I A
n
n
CT
DIF
I OP
k A I A CT I
I ( A) I DIF
I ( A()A
) k A nCT
I OPOP( A()A) I DIFDIF
IA A
nCT DIF
( A) k A
The following characteristics apply to the phase current balance
nCT DIF
functionI DIF
[3]:( A)
nCT
kA
I OP ( A) I I DIF ( A) k A
IA
IA
The element
shall support individual per-phase settings.
( A)
nCT DIF
I DIFDIF
( A)
k
kAA
The function indicates the effected phase, as well as reports
I AI A
kA
I DIF ( A)
Figure 7.
IA
25
Z1 A Z 2 A
I DIF ( A) I A
Z1 A Z 2 A
Z1 A Z 2 A
Z1 A Z 2 A
VB V X YB1 ; I B 2 VB VX YB 2
VVCB VVXX Y YC1B;1 ; I CI2 B 2 VCVBVX V XYC2YB 2
VC V X YC1 ; I C 2 VC V X YC 2
V Y ; I CV
IINC11 IV
YCA1 VVXB YVCX2 YB1 VC VX YC1
2 X V
A1C I B1 X I C1C1 V A
I
I
I
I
V
V
YA1phase
VBare
Vdriven
VC VX YC1
1 same
A1 time
B1the total
C1 currents
A
X each
X Yby
B1 the
AtNthe
in
total admittance of the two banks in each phase:
IINN21 IIAA21 IIBB21 IICC21 V
VAAVVX X YAY2A1 VBVB VXVX YB2YB1VCVCVX V XYC2 YC1
I N 2 I A 2 I B 2 I C 2 VA VX YA2 VB VX YB 2 VC VX YC 2
(15a)
I A I A1 I A2 V A V X YA1 YA 2
VVC XV XYC
IIDIF IIN 1 IIN 2 V
V
Y
Y
V
V
Y
B B XV X B
I CA2 XVA AV1 X AY2A2 V
Y1B2 YB2V C
N2
A2
B2
I DIF I N 1 I N 2 VA VX YA1 YA 2 VB VX (15b)
YB1 YB 2 VC V
I B I B1 I B 2 VB V X YB1 YB 2
IIA I A1I IA2 I V A VV XV
YA1 YYA 2 Y V V Y Y V
DIF
N1
N2
A
A1
B
X
B1
B2
C
II A IIA1 IIA2 VVA VVX XYY
YAY2 A2
A1
(15c)
C
C1
C2
C
X
C1
C2
IB IB1 IB2 VB VX YB1 YB2
I A I A1 I A2 V A V X YA1 YA 2
IB IB1 equations
IB2 VB(15)
Vinto
YB1 YB2 (14) allows eliminating the
Inserting
X equations
voltages
and
derive
the
all-current
I C I C1 I C 2 VC V X YC1 balance
YC 2 equation for the two
banks:
IIB IBI1 IB2I VBV VX V YB1Y YB2 Y
C
C1
C2
C
X
C1
C2
I B1
IICB11
I C1
kA
X(k)
Xindividually
TheZcurrent
set per phase.
1 A Z dividers
2A
1 Aare
2A
nCT
k
kA
I DIF ( A)
OPprocess
( A)
DIFfinding
( A)
A balancing constants
A
The
of
the
for each phase of
nCT DIF
protection is based on the following
simple equation:
(13)
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
(16)
IIDIF II A IA1 A2V IBV B1 Y B 2YI C C1 C 2
C
C1 YYAC
X
12
C 2 YCY
YY
YCY
Y 2C 2
1A12YY
AA
2 2C
B1B
1C
1 CY
1 B
B2
IB
IC
I DIF I A
YA1 YA2
YB1 YB 2
YC1 YC 2
Labeling:
YA1 YYA 2A1 YA 2 YB1 YYBB2 1 YB 2 YC1 YYCC21 YC 2
kI ADIF I A ; k B I B ; k C I C
YYAA11YYAA2A21 YA 2 YYB1B1YYY
YYC2C1 2 YC 2
BB
2B12 YB 2 YCY
1C
1 CY
(17)
; kB
; kC
kA
YA1 YA 2
YB1 YB 2
YC1 YC 2
I OP YIADIF
k I A kY
YBk2C I C YC1 YC 2
B B 1I B
1 YA 2 A
IA
; koperating
; kbalancing
k A gets the following
One
equation
the protected
C
B
YA 2k A I A Y
I OP YAI1DIF
k B 1
I BYB 2k C I C YC1 YC 2
bank:
With the two banks possibly slightly different, a circulating zerosequence current may be present and shall be compensated for
in order to increase sensitivity of the function.
I OP
I OP
OP
I OP
I DIF k 0 I 0 k1 I1 k 2 I 2
IIDIF
k I
DIF 1k 0 1 I 0 k1 I 1 k 2 I 2
I
DIF
When
k1 the banks are identical, i.e. phases A are equal, phases B
I1 and phases C are equal, the operating equation (18)
are equal
IkOP I DIF
I DIF
k1 I1 overcurrent condition for the measured
simplifies
to astraight
1
neutral differential
current.
I1
nCT
I OP I I DIF
k A I A k B I B kC I C
DIF
nCT DIF
k1
n
I OP II1 DIF CT k A I A k B I B kC I C
n DIF
VOP V1 k SET CT
V2
I OP
OP
(14a)
VVV AA VVV XX YYYAA11 ;;; III AA22 VVVAA VVVXX YYYAA22
A
X
A1
A2
A
X
A2
YBB11 ;; II BB 22 VVBB VVXX YYBB 22
II B1 V
V
(14b)
I BB11 V
VBBB
V
V XXX Y
YB1 ; I B 2 VB V X YB 2
V XX Y
YVCC
III C1 V V
V V
Y ; YI C1 ;; V II C V
n
(14c)
I CC11 V
VCCC
V
V XXX Y
YCC11 ; I CC 222 V
VC
V
VX Y
YCCC 222
I OP VI DIF
VCT k A I A k B I B kC I C
V
k
OP
1
SET
2
II
nCT DIF
VV VV YY ;; II VV VV YY
Vcurrents
II NN 11 sumII AAof11
II BB11two
IIneutral
V
Y
V
X can
YAA11be
derived
VBB
V
Vfrom
X Y
Ythe
B1
1
V
VCC
V
VXX Y
YCC11
The
X
X
B
I N 1 V IAV1
the
IYB1;
II CCC111 VV
VAAAV
V
V
X YA1 VB V X YB1 VC V X YC1
Iabove
Y
Vequations:
V V Y
I
V Y ; I
VOP V1 k SET V2
YCC 22
II BB 22;
II CC 22 V V
V
V
V
V
V
N 22 V I
I
AV22
V
A
V
X Y
Y
A 22
V
B
V
X Y
Y
B2
2
V
IIII N
Y
I
V
Y
A
A
X
A
B
X
B
Y A V
I N 2 I IAI2 I B 2 VI C2V V
VXV YA Y2 VVB VVX Y YB 2 VCCC
V
VXXX Y
YC 2
I
V V Y ; I
V V Y
II
I II I I VV VV Y Y VV V
Y Y VV V V Y(14d)
VY
II DIF
II NN 22 V
V
DIF I I
I
N 11
V
A
V
X Y
Y
A11
Y
A 22
V
VBB
V
VXX Y Y
YBB11
Y
YBB 22
V
VCC
V
VXX Y
YCC11
Y
YCC 22
N
A
X
A
II DIFV VI N 1Y ; I NI 2 VVAV V
Y X YA1 YA
A 2 VB V X YB1 YB 2 VC V X YC1 YC 2
II
II II I V V
Y V Y Y
V VY YY VV V V Y Y V
Y V V
II V I V
YI ; I
VVA
VV
VX Y Y
YA1
Y
YA 2
II AA II AA11
I
A
2
V
(14e)
A2
A
X Y A1 Y A 2
II A I I A
I I A 2V V
V A
YVX
Y A1V AV2 Y Y V V Y Y
1
Y
I
I I I I VV VV Y
VY V Y V V Y
The differential current is a vectorial difference between the two
VBBVVVV(14e)
YYYVBB11V(14d)
IIB IIB1
Y V obtains:
By
Icurrents.
I IIIBBsubtracting
V Y
22I V VV
IIIBB I II IBB11I I
VB Y VXXXYYY from
YB1 YY BBBY222 one
B2V V
Figure 8.
YY YY V V Y Y V V Y Y
IIII I II IIII VIVVVV V
V
V
Y
Y
XY Y
Neutral current balance application.
II CC II CC11
I
C
2
V
C
V
Y
C
1
Y
C
2
I C 2 VC V X YCC11 YCC 22
(14f)
I C I IC1 V C 2V Y C Y X
III AA11
A1
A1
A1
A2
A2
A1
B1
A
B
X
X
A1
B1
A2
B2
A
B
X
X
A2
B2
B1
C1
B
C
X
X
B1
C1
B2
C2
B
C
X
X
B2
C2
C1
N1
C
A1
X
B1
C1
C1
C2
A
C2
B
A1
N1
N2
A1
A2
B1
N2
DIF
A2
N
B
DIF
26
N1
N2
B2
N1
B2
C1
C2
C1
B1 A 2 C1
A21
A
B1
BA
22
C2
N2
C2
B2
B2
N2
AA
11
A2
C1
C2
B1
A2
N1
B1
A1
B1
B2
C1
DIF
NA1
A
X
C2
XX
A
AA
A1
B1
C1
A2
A1
A2
B2
C1
C2
B2
X
A1
A1A1
B1
A2
A2
B2
B1
B2
C2
C
C1
C2
C1
C2
C2
A1
X X
B1
AA12
B2
B1
X
A1
B2
C1
A2
A2 X
A
B2
A2
B1
B2
B1
B1
C1
B2
B2
C2
C1
C2
C2
I
I
I
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
IIIDIFDIF
I
I
I
B
C YC 1 Y
A
I C1 AI C 2 A VY
11V X Y
C
C A
1YCY
YYBBCAAA11222YBYY1CB22YB 2 Y
YBBB111CYC
Y1YBBBC222Y2 C 2
YCC11 Y
YCCC 222
YA1 YYAA12 YYAA12 Y
; kB
; kC
kA
YC1 YYCC21 YC 2
YBY2 B 2
YI A1 YA1YAY2 A2 I YYB1B1
IC
I DIF Y
A Y Y
B
Y
Y
A1Y
A
2Y AY
YA
YBY2B 2Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
YYYBBCC2221 ;YkC 2 Y
AA111
A2
2 YYBB1 1
B1
1kY
2 k
C1
;
;
kkA
A
B
Adaptive
YCCCof111
YCCC 222 Protection of Large Capacitor Banks
C
kk AA YA1YAY1 A2 YAB2 ;;; YkkkB1BB YB 2YB1 C YFundamentals
B 2 ; Yk C
Y
C1 ; k
C2
Y
Y
Y
Y
I OPA Y IY
k
I
k
I
k
I
C
A AY
YDIF
2A Y BB B YY
BC1
YC1 Y
YC 2
YCYB 2
YA1 Y
kA
I OP
I OP
A1
YA1 YAA12
B1
B2
Y Y
; kC
YBB11 YBB 22
C1
C2
Y Y
YCC11 YCC 22
(18)
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
B1B1 B1 B B
2on
1 C1 C 2 C 2
B
B1 A1 can
B2 AAbe
B A2 X
2 B 2several Cmeasurements
TheI Akey equations
capacitor bank protection
12 calculated
V A the
I A1 I A2defining
Voutlined
X Y A1 Y A 2
V
IIDIF under
I B based
I AI1Aunbalanced
IYA2 YV A conditions.
YA1 Y YA2 I C Y Y
taken
methods ((1), (5), (11) and (18)) allow not only proper compensation
A
X Y
I N1
YC1 YC 2
YA1 YA 2
YB1 YB 2
;
;
k
k
C
B
YA1k YAI2 Yk IYYB1 k YBI2 Y Y C1Y YC 2(19)
YAII1 DIF
Y
IBB11 1YB 2 2 Y2 I C C1 C 2
I C1A YI CA 22 0YVC0 V
X Y C
1 Y C2
Y Y
A1
A2
B1
B2
C1
C2
Y
Y
coordinates,
sequence
components:
2
B
X
B1
B2
kA
OP
IIIDIF
C
A1
A2
B1
B2
C1
C2
Y Y
YIA11 YA 2
Y Y
I OP
I DIF k;A k IB A kBB1 I BB2 k; CkCI C C1 C 2 (20)
k
A
I OP YI DIF Y
k1 I1
YB1 YB 2
YC1 YC 2
A1
A2
nCT
kC auto-setting
kbalancing
I kfactor
the
IC
I OP
IWith
kunknown
I2IB(k1)
OP
DIF one
DIF
0 I 0 k1A I 1 A k 2 B
I DIF
or
self-tuning
as:
Ik OP
I DIF procedures
nkCTA DIF
I A can
kbe
I B k C I C simply
B implemented
1
I1
(21)
I OP I DIF k1 I1 (under no-fault conditions)
V
VI1DIF
kSET
k 0 V I20 k1 I1 k 2 I 2
I OP
OP
n
Unlike in previous methods,
compensating coefficient may be
I
I DIF CT kthis
I DIF
A I A k B I B kC I C
akOP
complex
number.
I 1OP II DIF kn1CT IDIF
1
1
Operating signal (18) or (19) implements proper compensation
for the inherent unbalance of the bank. Equation (20) is a good
VOP I V
practical
approximation.
1 k SET V2
DIF
k1
n
I OP II(18)
CT k I A kwhen
kC to
Isecondary
B IB
C
Equation
applied
1 DIFholds for primaryAcurrents,
nCT following
DIF
amperes, it takes the
form:
VI OP
n
VI1DIF
kSET CT
V2 k A I A k B I B kC I C
nCT DIF
(22)
A1
A2
I
B1
B2
I
C1
C2
DIF
B
C
Second,
thatA the
the
YA2 unbalance
YA1 inherent
YB1 Ybetween
YCcapacitor
B2
1 YC 2
phases does not change.
k I k I k I
OP
DIF
A
B
B
C
C
A short
or open
in a Asingle
or several
cans
violates
the second
assumption, causes a minor unbalance in the operating equations,
and results in operation of protection set sensitive enough given
I size of the
I DIFinternal
k 0 failure.
I 0 k1 I1 k 2 I 2
the OP
k1
I1
5.1 Sensitivity
of the Voltage Differential
Function
nCT on the application to grounded banks.
ForI simplicity
I DIFletus focus
k A I A k B I B kC I C
OP
Neglecting the phase
the operating signal in this method is
nCTindex,
DIF
(equation (1a):
VOP
V1 k SET V2
k FAIL
1
Z BUS TAP
ZTAP GND
1
CTAPGND
C BUS TAP
Z
Z
Z
CTAPGND
k FAIL Z BUS TAP Z TAPGND 1 Z BUS TAP 1 C(23a)
BUS
TAP GND
TAP
GND
1 TAP
ZTAPGND
TAP GND
BUS TAP
1 ZBUS
1 CTAP
Vk2FAIL
V1voltage
The
tap
during
the failure is:
Z
Z
C
k FAIL TAPGND
TAP GND
BUS TAP
1
V2 V1 1
k
VOP
VV1 1 k1FAIL
V
SET
2
k FAILk FAIL
(23b)
(23c)
k SET
V
V
1
OP
1
VOP
k kk SET
1V1 1SET
FAIL %
VOP
100
V1
k FAIL k FAIL
V
k
VVOP
kkSET
1
1 FAIL 100%
V1 1 k FAIL
1 k AB k AC Vx 3 V0 VB 1 k AB VC 1 k AC
VOP
'VOP %3 'k FAIL
'C BUS TAP % 'CTAPGND %
%
'VOP % 'k FAIL % 'C BUS TAP % 'CTAPGND %
SET
As
aOP
percentage
of% the
bus voltage '
the
operating
signal is:
'VOP
'k FAIL
'full
C%
CTAP
100
% 1
BUS TAP %
GND %
27
1 1 k k Vx
VOP 31 1 kABAB AC
k AC Vx 3 V0 VB 1 k AB VC 1 k AC
3
1 k AB k AC Vx 3 V0 VB 1 k AB VC 1 k AC
VOP
3
VOP
V
1
3
k
OP
AB
AC
x
V2 V1
1 %k AB VC 1 k AC
VOP
k AB%100
k'%
VxTAP
%3 V0'CVTAP
3 '1kSET
'
V
CBUS
OPOP %1
AC
B GND
FAIL
k FAIL
As
both 1
the
k-values
are close
to unity,
the abovesimplifies
to:
3
V
k
1
VOP
k
VOP
k AB k AC Vx 3 V0 VB 1 k AB VC 1 k AC
1 1 FAIL
(24d)
1 SET 100%
V
3 1 k AB k AC Vx
(26b)
VOP
V1
k FAIL
11Vx
OP | 3
k SET
V
1
k
k
V
3
V
V
1
k
VC 1 k AC
V
1
k
k
V
'
V
'
k
'
C
'
C
OP
AB
AC
x
0
B
AB
OP
AC BUS xTAP %
OP %
FAILAB
%
TAP GND %
VOP V1 1
33(3e) helps
1
Equation
calculating
the
amount
of
the
neutral
point
k FAIL
Equation (24d) yields
a proportional relationship between kFAIL and
Vx
V
k system
k ACzero-sequence
OP | V
V
VBx11
'VOP % 'kvoltage:
C BUS TAP
'C k-value,
voltage.
Assuming
voltage nil, the equation
k AB
OP
FAIL % a '
GND % yields an
AB VC 1 k AC
3
the operating
change
by %
1% in theTAP
Vx be re-arranged
1
can
to calculate the value of Vx:
extra 1% of nominal in the operating signal.
VVOP
k kkAC
k VVxx 3 V0 VB 1 k AB VC 1 k AC
11kkAB
OP | Vx1
OP
AB AB
AC AC
3
VOP 1 k SET
What is more
is the relation between changes
1 1interesting,
100
%
V the bus-tap
and
k ABtap-ground
khowever,
1 increase
k AB VinC 1 V
VOP
k AC|VVBx1 k AB VC 1 k AC
AC Vcapacitances
x 3 V0 V
B the
(27a)
k
inVOP
and
2
0
x
1
3 FAIL
V
a
V
,
V
a
V
,
a
1
120
1
1
V
k
V
k
1
1
k
k
B
A
C
A
B
AB
C
AC
the operating voltage. Given equation (23a) one can write:
VVOP
| Vx1 k AB AB
V
k AC AC Vx
OP
x
1
k
1
V
k
VCk1AC k AC
3
B
AB AB
Vx
'VOP %1 '
kFAIL
'CTAPGND %
(25)
Assuming
bus voltage:
% k'CBUS
TAP %
2
2 a balanced
V
1
k
V
OP
AB
AC
x
0
1
a
kaABkAC
1
k
V
a
V
,
V
VA ,a a1 k1
AC120
AB
B
A
C
3
1
1
k
V
k
V
V
B
AB
C
AC
x | V
(27b)
VVOP
a 2Ax VA , VC1 ak AB
V
a 11200
The above signifies that a 1% change in either of the bus-to-tap
xB
A , k AC
1
1
k
k
AB
AC
or
tap-to-ground
capacitances
yield 1% of bus nominal in
0
V
k AB
k AC Vwould
x 3 V0 VB 1 k AB VC 1
VBk AC a 2 VAa,2 V
a VA a, 1a k1AC
120
1C k AB
VOP
| 3Vx1 voltage.
the
operating
OP
One
simplifies
further:
Vx V A 2
1 akkAC
V 1 ak 11kVkAB
AC13 k AC 0
C AB
Depending on the serial/parallel arrangement of the cans, it will
VVBxx aV21BAV 1A ,2kAB
V
a
V
,
a k1
120
k
j
C
A
AB
AC
AC k AB
V
1
1
k
k
take a certain
amount
of
shorted/opened
cans
to
cause
a
single
1
k
x
1
1
a
k
a
k
AB
AC
2
2
AC
k AB
xk AC
AB AB
AC
VVOP VB 1change
(27c)
AB kV
C 1 V
Vx V A
AC
percentage
in
the
capacitance
and
an
equivalent
increase
x
3
V
1
k
k
1
k
k
A
1a 2 1 k AB
k ACfinal assessment of sensitivity has to
k AB The
in the operating1voltage.
AB,aj ACa1AC3kk1
AC k0AB
AC V
AC
VVVBxx aV21AV 2A1,k AB
VC kaAB
120
take into account the actual arrangement of the capacitor bank.
A
3
2
1kare
kACABreal
kj AC k AC
Observing
the k-values
numbers
close
and using
1
k
ktoABunity
V
|
V
AB
OP
x
0
An
optimum
location
of the tap.
VVAx
1 k AB
kthe
23 following:
AC
properties
of12
the a-operand
yields
VB interesting
a 2 VA , question
VC ais Vthe
a 1120
A,
11 a 2k AB
aj k31 kk AC k AB
Regardless of the number of parallel cans, the longer the string,
VV
31 1kk1AB
ACk
the higher the impedance. If so a single can failure would cause a
k ABj 2AC
k AC
VVxxA VA 12 j
3
k 1
1
1
V
k
V
k
x
2
2
2
2
smaller percentage
B
C in the overall
1 k k
V
Vx
a 2 AB1change
a AC1 (bus-tap
kimpedance/capacitance.
k AB
portions
VAx 1 2 k AB 1kACkABAB j kAC2AC k AC k AB
AC
For
best
sensitivity
both
the
and
tap-ground)
(27d)
Vx VZ A 1 kZAB k AC Z
2k
VA
C GND
1
3 2 1 k
3
BUS TAP
TAPas
TAP
shall
as short
asBUSmeasured
the number of
1 GND
kpossible
k AC
1 in TAP
k FAIL be kept
j
k
j
k
V
1
k
k
AB 1
A
AB
AC
Vx
ZTAP
ZTAP
C BUS Within
k 1
cans. In reality,
the
number of cans
isnot
this
GND
GND a variable.
TAP
21 1 23 21
233
j
k
j
k
2 half of the total length is the smallest0possible length.
1
k
k
j
k
k
restriction,
VB a VA , VC a VA , a 1120
VVxAx 12 2 AB
k
23 2 12AC
232 AC2kk1AB
1 1
3 tap is optimum from the
operating
j
kk jequation
k (5)2compensates
Because
for the
Therefore
V2 V1 1the
VVxA 2the actual
21
1k
k
exact
k ABmiddle
k ACposition
j of the
k AC k AB
V
k
k
2
2
2
A
AB
AC
V
k
inherent
bank
unbalance,
it
is
further
justified
to
assume
the
ratios
point
FAIL2of sensitivity. Under the
x of view
1
3 1
3
2 mid-tap both the portions
2
2
2
V
k
k
j
k
j
k
),
and
treat
the
of
the
impedances
to
be
a
perfect
unity
(say
k
1
1
a
k
a
k
Z
Z
Z
C
(bus-tap and
tap-ground)
are
protected
with
the
same
sensitivity
A
AB
TAP 1
TAP
GND
Vx ratio
k 1AB
k AB
k AC1 AC BUS TAP 1 TAPGND other
V
VAinBUS
kVFAIL
2 as a variable
2 2(kAC correspondingly):
2
xA
measured
the number of cans.
k Z 1 k k AC
ZTAP GND
C BUS TAP V
2k
2k
VOP V1 1 SETTAP GND AB
A
Often, the tap kisFAIL
installed below the mid-point in order to apply
1
3 1
3
lower voltage VTs. This creates a classical trade-off between
j
k j
k
Vx
k 1
1
2
2
2
2
optimum 1
performance
and
low
cost
of
installation.
(27e)
1
3
VOP2 V11k SET k 3 k1 j 3 k k
V
AB
AC
AC
AB
j
k
j
k
2
2
V
k
k
V
k
1
100
%
A
Vx
FAIL
2 2 of the
k 1Bank
2k FAIL
2 Compensated
22
V1x Sensitivity
5.2
V
1kk AB k AC
2k
VAA
Neutral
Voltage2 Unbalance
Function
The above equations means that only 1/3rd of the percentage
'VOP % 'k FAIL % k SET
'C BUS TAP % 'CTAPGND %
VOPanalysis
V1 shall
1 start with
The
the full operating equation (5):
change in the ratio of impedances between any two phases will
k FAIL
be seen as a percentage of nominal bus voltage:
1
11 k AB 3k AC 1Vx 3 V03 VB 1 k AB VC 1 k AC
VOP
1
1
Vx 3 2 j 2 2 k j 2 k
k 1
(28)
'VOP %
'k%
'C%
VOP
k SET
3
3
1the following2100
%
inVwhich
assumptions
can
be
made:
1
2k
1 k k Vk
VVA
k FAIL
OP1
AB
FAIL
AC
-
zero-sequence
can
considered zero
V'OPVOP
|The%
Vxsystem
'k FAIL
'C BUS voltage
'Cbe
%
TAP %
TAP GND %
(the system is practically always strong enough to maintain
the balance at the bus despite few cans affected within the
VB11itself).
k AB VC 1 k AC
V bank
VOP
Vx
a2 1
VA , VC
3
VA
a VA , a 11200
1 k AB k AC Vx
a 1 k AB a 1 k AC
1 k AB k AC
2
VOP | Vx
28
Vx
Vx
V
A
SEC ( MIN )
11kk ABk k AC Vx 3 V0 VB 1 k AB VC
VxOP
AB
AC
3 to the following
This leads
relationship:
VB
(26a)
I DIF k SET I
I OP
'I OP
I
1
'k%
100
1
k AB k AC j 3 k ACFundamentals
k
of Adaptive Protection of Large Capacitor Banks
VB21 k AB VC 12 k AC AB
X1 X 2
1 k AB k AC
k
1
1 k AB k AC
X1 X 2
VBUS
I OP 0.'01
1C% 345
nn'VTX
'
k%1kV 1328
1
VTX
3
V
'VIOP % 3100
'k%SEC.5( MIN
V'C) %
3'C3% 0 V
3BUS
nVTX
3 3 VSEC ( MIN )
kV
X 1I0.01
'X
C%2345
k VSET
BUS I 1328
DIF
VTX
3above
.5V
X332V 0SEC
Again,Xthe
observation
may be used to select the ratio of
13
( MIN
0.01
345
kV)
the
split-phase
CT:
the target
accuracy allows calculating the
n'VTX
1328
I OP 3primary
1 3 0operating
minimum
signal;
the minimum relay sensitivity
.
5
V
I OP I0DIF
k'SET
1I
kkV
1.01 345
%
allows
determining
the
minimum
accurately
measured secondary
I
100
nVTX
'
k%
'X %
'1328
C%
signal;
the32ratio
3 dictates
0.5V2 the maximum CT ratio that can be applied
in
this
I'OP
I DIF
I OP case:
1 k SET I
X 1 X '2 k%
kI OPI I DIF
100
'
C k I I
X 1 X%2 SETNOM
n'DIF
(31)
I OP 2 1I
SEC
(kMIN )
'
%
X 1X 2
k'IIOP 1 100
'k% 1
1
X 1 100
X2
5.4
of '
the
'kI%Sensitivity
'XZ%
C%Neutral Current Balance
Z
A
A
1
2
2noticing
2 this
0
IXA 2 that
A )1
(X
ItI DIF
is worth
method
is a derivative of the phase
k
Z
Z
X
X
1
1
1
A
2
A
1
2
current
balance
approach
(60P),
and
as such it has identical
k
'k% X 1 'X %2
'C%
X 1 2'C
X 2% I NOM
sensitivity.
2
nDIF
)Zfor
Z1(BMIN
The balance
all three phases per the 60P protection
2 Iequations
are:
I DIF ( B ) '
1CI B SEC
1 2B 0
1
1
principle
I
%
NOM
'
k
'
X
'
C
Z
Z
k%%
'X % %1B 'C2%B %
n'DIF
222 I
22
SEC
)
Z(1MIN
(32a)
A Z2A
0
I DIF ( A) I A Z Z
1C Z 2 C
'
'CC
1IANOM
InDIF
I%C%Z ZI NOM
Z 2 A2 A 0
DIF ( C )
n
1 A
DIF
Z
I DIF ( A) 22IIAISEC ( MIN
1C ) Z 2 C 0
SEC ( MIN
Z)
Z
Z1 A1B Z2 A2 B
(32b)
0
I DIF ( B ) I BZ Z
II DIF ( A) I I A1Z1A I A22Z
,A I DIF
I B1 I B 2 , I DIF ( C ) I C1 I C 2
(
B
)
0
1B
DIF ( A )
A ZZ
ZZ 2 B
Z 1B1 A Z 22AB2 A 0 0
I DIF
DIF((BA)) IIBA 1 A
ZZ1B1 AZZ
2 B2 A
I DIF I N 1 Z1CI N2 Z 2CI A1 I B1 I C1 I A 2 I B 2 (32c)
IC 2
Z
Z
II DIF ( C ) I I C 1B 2 B 0 0
DIF ( B )
B ZZ
Z2C2C
1C1C
ZZ
ZZZ
IIDIF ( C) III
I1AB21BZ2BI B2 1B 0I0B 2 I C1 I C 2
DIF ( B ) A1 CB Z
1C Z
2C
1B
2 Bmethod:
Observing thatZ
in
the 60P
I DIF ( A) I AZ1 1C I AZ22,C I DIF ( B ) I B1 I B 2 , I DIF ( C ) I C1 I C 2
0
I DIF ( C ) I C
A 2IZ,DIF
IIDIF
I A1Z
Z
I
I B(1C) I B 2 , I DIF ( C ) I C1 I C 2
DIF( A ) I DIF
(A
( B )( B) I DIF
DIF
1)CI
2
C
1C Z 2 C
0
I DIF
( C ) II C I
I DIF
IC 2
I B 2 (33a)
N 1 Z N2 Z I A1 I B1 I C1 I A 2
1C
2C
nkInVTX
OP
1
1
''
Ck%% VBUS'C%
(29)
3
3
3 3 VSEC ( MIN )
C% V
Forn example,'with
the
BUStarget sensitivity of 1% of impedance
VTX
change
on30a.01
345kV
bus,
345
kVand the minimum relay voltage of 0.5V
3V
SEC ( MIN )
nVTX the maximum
1328
secondary,
VT ratio
is:
3 3 0.5V
0.01 345kV
nVTX
1328
I OP I3DIF 3 k 0SET
.5V I
1
1
'Vthis
'k% SLG fault
'C%on the bus, the secondary voltage
With
OP %ratio, under
3 k SETis Iwell
3 within the range of modern relays.
I'OPI OPbe I150V.
would
DIF1This
k%
Assuming a relay'
conversion
range of 260VRMS, the ratio can be
I
100
lowered to 1328*150/260
= 766, yielding the operating signal of
1
1
'
C
V
'V
I OP
1 'at%k%1%BUS
'C%in the capacitor impedance.
n'
0.87V
secondary
OP
%
VTX
k% change
3
3X 32'V
SEC ( MIN )
I X 1 3
100
k Sensitivity of the phase current balance
5.3
X1 X 2
'C %345
VkV
function
X
X
2
1BUS 1328
nnVTX 1 01.01
k
'
'
V
k
VTX
1 'Cthe
OP % 31Xphase
%
Neglecting
33'23k3%%V
0SEC
.index,
513V( MIN
'VOP %X 1 1the
'C) % operating signal of this method is
(equation
'k% (11)):
'
X
'
C
3 % 3 %
2
2
1
1
0
.
01
345
kV
'
C
V
% k BUS'I C%1328
'
k% I DIF
nI OP
nVTX
VTX
''CX%% VSETBUS
2
3
3 SEC
.5(2MIN
V)
'
C
I 0NOM
nVTX 3 3%V
I DIF
DIF 3 to 3
I A( B1) IIBB11IICB12,IDIF
I DIF
II A11 IImethod:
I A(2C
It isnjustified
assume
the
capacitor current does not change
V
( A)
AN22, I DIF
) I BI2C1IICC22
SEC ( MINtotal
)
While
in theN60N
2
I
'
I
1
SEC
(
MIN
)
OP
in response
to
the
internal
failure
of
limited
size,
therefore
the
'C%'kI kNOM
I A1 I A2 I ,I BI1 I B 2 I I C1 I I C,2 I
% I
nI OP
operating
as
a percentage of the total capacitor current
SET
I DIF
I C1 I C 2
.DIF
01
345
kV
I 0Icurrent
100
DIF
(AI) INI1IA1
( BB)1I CB11IIBA22 IDIF
(C )
I
I A 2 I ADIF
DIF
1 IB I
B2 IC 2
ISEC
nVTX the02.percentage
1328
A1
A 2 N2 I B1
2
C1
C2
01
345
kV
equals
in the k-value:
( MIN
)change
Z Z 2 A1328
nVTX
0
I DIF ( A)33 I A33 001..A55V
I DIF I I DIF
IIDIF( BI) IDIF
'I OPX 1 1X 2Z V
) IIC 2 I
Z
I A1 I (IA(1AA)2) II NDIF
IBAI21DIF
(ICIB)C(1C1
I
(30a)
2B1( B )
C1
A2 I B 2 I C 2
k
DIFDIF I DIF N
Z'11AkA% Z 22AA
0
I
I
I
100
X
X
I OPDIF ( AI) DIF
A k2 SET I
1
(33b)
Z
1 A I
I OP I DIF kZZSET
I DIF II DIF( AI) IDIF
( B ) I DIF ( C )
Z22AB in the k-factor yields 1% of the full
A1
A 2 I B1 I B 2 I C 1 I C 2
1B change
ForI example,
1%
of
0
I
allows one to insert (33a) into (33b) and obtain:
DIF (X
B )1
11 XB 2Z1B by
1Zthe
current
as
measured
split-phase CT.
''
kI OP
2B
Z
Z
k
'
X
'
C
%X
'2k%1B% 2 2 B % 0
'IIDIF
21to
I BXunderstand
(33c)
I DIF I DIF ( A) I DIF ( B ) I DIF ( C )
( B ) 1100
Next
is
IOPstep
'Zk1B% Z 2 Bthe impact of impedance/capacitance
changes
on
the
changes
in
the
k-factor.
From
equation
(10):
I
100 Z Z
I DIF ( C ) '
I C 1IC 1 2C 0
1XC
Now inserting (32a-c) into (33c) yields:
X
k%X 1 X'2%XZZ%11CCNOM
C
nDIF
ZZ'
k'
CC %
22
0
I
I
1
2
2
2
I
( MIN )
k DIFX(C1) XC2 SEC
Z Z2 A
Z Z2B
Z Z
I B 1B
I C 1C 2C (34a)
I DIF I A 1 A
X 1 X 2 Z1C Z 2C
I DIF ( A) thatI Athe
I A 2reactances
, I DIF ( B ) areI Bvery
I C1 I C 2
Z1 A Z 2 A
Z1B Z 2 B
Z1C Z 2C
1 I
B 2 , Ione
DIF ( C
)
Observing
similar,
obtains:
'C 1 Itwo
NOM
Z2A
1A 1
nI DIF 1 I % Z
I DIF ( B )0 I B1 I B 2 , I DIF ( C ) I C1 I C 2
( A )) 2
A 2 ,'C
'kDIF
'XAIA1% (IMIN
DIF
% ( A1
Z1 AI12')ZC2 A%%I I I I I (30b)
Y1 A Y2 A
Y Y
Y Y2C
'k%I DIF2 'IXN%SEC
1
A1
B1
C1
A2
B 2 I C 2 I I
I B 1B 2 B I C 1C
0
DIF
A
2
2N 2
Y1 A Y2 A
Y1B Y2 B
Y1C Y2C
I DIF I N 1 I N 2 I A1 I B1 I C1 I A 2 I B 2 I C 2
Z
Z
Equations'(30)
IZ
CI%mean
I NOM
Athat
A each % of change in the impedance/
11B
22 B
ZIfor
I Cthere
I
0B 2banks,
II DIF ( A'
AC
1 of
2 ofthe
Bparallel
1 I0
1 IC
2 be increase in
n
I%BAone
capacitance
will
IZANOM
DIF
DIF ( B ))
Z
n ACTUAL nIDEAL b, b 1 0.0050.30
2
I
A
A I of the
n
the
differential
current
total bank current.
I2A1 ISEC
) by
I AZ(2MIN
IZB0.5%
DIF
11B
221 B
B 2 I C 1 I C 2
SEC ( MIN )
I DIF I DIF ( A) I DIF ( B ) I DIF ( C )
Z1BZZ2Z(A2B2BC) I0DIF (C )
n
II DIF
IDIFII B(ZA1Z
VOP ( A) V1 A k A VT 2 V2 A
DIF (( C
B ))
0
0
I DIF
I A CZ1Z) AA1CIDIF
ZZ
DIF
( A)
nVT 1
I DIF ( A) I A Z1ZA11BC Z 22ZAA22BC 0
Z1 A Z 2 A
'VOP %
nVTX
29
Z1 A Z 2 A
Z1B Z 2 B
B
YZ11AAYZ2 A2 A
Y1ZB1
Y2ZB 2 B Y1CZ1CY2CZ 2C
YY11AA
YY2 A
Y1YB
Y2YB
Y Y
I Z
B IC IIC1CYZ1C1C 2CYZ2C2C0 0
IIIDIF
1 A Z22AAI BI Z11BB Z22B
I
DIF IIAAA Y Y
B
Y
Y
Y
Y.13C Y
DIF
B
YY1n1AA
YY2 A2 Ab, bY1YZB1B1
Y2Y0BZ2.005
YC1C0Y
B
nI DIF
Z1C1C02CYZ22CC2C 0
11IDEAL
A
22BB
IA Z
I
ACTUAL
A Z22A
A I B 11BB
C
Y1 A Y2 A
Y1B Y2 B
Y1C Y2C
Z1C Z 2C
IC
I DIF I A the relationbetween
IB
Observing
Z1 A Z 2 A
Z1B the
Z 2impedance
Z1C and
Z 2admittance
B
C
one can re-write
the above into:
Y1 A Y2 A
Y Y
Y Y2C
0
I B 1B 2 B I C 1C
Y1 A Y2 A
Y1B Y2 B
Y1C Y2C
b, b
1 0.0050.30
Ythe
YnIDEAL
Y10Cbalanced
nACTUAL
b,nequation
bY1B 1was
Y20B.perfectly
005
.
3 Y2C making
Now
assume
that
2A
ACTUAL
IDEAL
I A V1 Asignal
VT
Ibut
0
I DIF
I B2a perfect
C one of
V
k
V
the
operating
above
zero,
VTs, say
nOP
bY1B 21AY20B.005
30Y2the
( A)
1 AIDEAL
A b,
Y1n
Y10C .
ACTUAL
A Y2 A n
C
the tap VT (#2), works with
n VT2 1an error of b. If so, the operating signal
becomes
non-zero:
nVT 2 V
V
V k VT
OP ( A )
2A
V
V1n1AA kAAb,nnVT 1b V
( A)
12A 0.0050.30
n OP
ACTUAL
IDEAL
VT 2
n
VOP ( A) V1 A k A VTn1VT V
(35a)
VOP ( A) V1 A k A bnVT
1 2 2AV2 A
n
0 derived in section
Which
is
precisely
the
60N
balance
equation
as
VT
1
n
n
b, b 1 0.0050.3
n n2VT 2 V
V
V
4.4ACTUAL
(equationIDEAL
(18)).
nVTV2 A 2 A
VOP
V11AA kkAA b VT
OP (( A
A))
VOP ( A) aVperfect
nbVTn1VT
V2 A (1c) can be solved for the
Assuming
1 A k Abalance,
nnVT1 equation
2
The above proves, that neglecting CT and relay accuracy the 60P
VT 1 V
V
V
k
b
tap
voltage:
n
n
A)
1A
A2
n
VT
and
functions
k2AA VT 2 V2 A V1 A
0OP (V
V2nAVTo
VOP (60N
V1 A k A have
VT 2identical
V2 A sensitivity. Specifically, per each
1A k A
1
A)
percent of change innVT
the
nnVTVT2 1 nVT 2
nVTn2VT 1
1 impedance/capacitance of one of the
k
V
k
0OP (V
(35b)
banks, the differential CT would see an increase of 0.5% of the
V
V
k
b
V
1
A
A
2
A
A
nA
n 2V2 A V1 A
A)
1A
2A
1
0 V1 A k A nnVTVT1 2 Vn2VTA 1 o k A nVTnVT
V2 A V1 A
total bank current.
2
2
nVT 2
VT
1 1AV Vo
VT 1 V
V
V
1 nbVT
0OP (V
nbVT
V1 A
A )1 A Vk
1 AA
2 A 1A k A
2A
VOP (phase
Vvariant
bthe
method
V2 A(60P) is easier to compensate for
The
A)
1 A k Aof
Substituting (35b) n
into (35a) yields:
n
VT
1
VT
1
n
VOP ( A) V1 A nb V1 A V1 A 1 nb
VT 1
the inherent bank unbalance.
The neutral variant of the method
2
0V V1 A Vk A VT
V o k VTb2 V2 A V1 A
(60N) requires 1 CT and relay input, compared with 3 sets for the
(35c)
V
OP
((AA))
1 A nb V1 A2 A V1 A A 1
OP
nVT 1
phase version (60P). If applied concurrently on one relay, the two
VT
1 %
1
b
100
V
V b V1 A V1 A 1 b
n 2
nVT 2 redundant using different
VOP
OP
functions
as k
partially
V1((AAA)) 1 1 Athe
k A beVTtreated
0 V1 A may
V2 A o
V2 A V1 A
A
b 100
Or expressing
error%
as a proportion of the bus voltage:
nVT 1
nVT 1
CTs and relay inputs.
VOP1 A( A) V b V
VVOP
( A)
1 A % V1 A 1 b
11 A b 100
VV
OP ( A )
VOP1 A( A) 1 b 100%
(35d)
VOPSensitivity
V1 A b V1 to
V1 A 1 b
1 1 0.0050.030 100% 0.72%
( A)
A
6.
Instrumentation
Errors
V
V
1
A
OP
A
(
)
VOP
V1(AA) 1 1 0.0050.3 100% 0.72%
1 b 100%
V
This section analyses impact of finite accuracy of Instrument
V
A( A )
VOP11example,
For
0.5%
A
V
1 negative
1 with
0.005
0.30magnitude
100% error
0.72and
% 0.3 deg
OP ( A )
Transformers
and the relay on the four protection methods.
VV
1 (ITs)
b 100
%
angle
error,
the
spurious
operating
voltage
would
read:
OP ( A
)
0
11 1 0.0050.3 100% 0.72%
1A
It V
is1 Aimportant to notice that errors of instrument transformers
VOP
nVTX 1 k AB k AC Vx nVT VA k AB nVT VB k AC
1
V
VOP
V
OP1(AA ) 3 nVT nVTX 1 k AB 0k AC Vx nVT V A k AB nVT VB k AC nVT
and the relay can be accounted for when tuning the coefficients.
3 n1VT 1 0.0050.3 100% 0.72%
IfVthe tuning coefficients (k) are implemented as real numbers, the
1
V1 A
OP ( A )
0
VOP
nVTX 1 k AB k AC Vx nVT VA k AB nVT VB k AC
magnitude1errors
be
eliminated,
impact
1 0can
.005
0.3 100and
% the
0.72
% of angular
3is 11natVTthenlevelthat
V1 A could be reduced. If the coefficients are implemented as
errors
1Vencroaches
Vthenx VTtargeted
V
k AB n kAC
nVT Vsensitivity
The
error
on
1
OP
VTX 3
A k AB nVT VB k AC
VOP
VTX 3
x
3Note,
1nnVT however,
V
nnVTX
Vthat
nVTVTmethod
VAVA nVTwould
VBVaccommodate
B nVTnVTVC VC
complex numbers, both magnitude and angle errors can be
settings.
OP
x this
3
VOP of3the
nVTVT nVTX 1 k AB k AC Vx nVT VA k AB nVT VB k AC nVT
accounted for.
some
1
3 n1VTerror in the matching factor k, leaving only a small
VOP
n 1 k AB k AC Vx nVT VA k AB nVT VB variable
kVAC
n fraction
V nofVTXthis
Assuming 0.15%
3error
Vx unaccounted
nVT VA nfor.
OP VT 1C
VT VB nVT VC
However,
ITVTX
and relay errors will slightly change with the
3 nthe
3
n
VT
1
magnitude
error
for both
the
ITs
andthe
relay,
and
0.2deg angle
VT
V
n
V
n
V
n
V
1
magnitude of the signal and /or other factors such as residual flux
OP
VTX b 3 x V VTn
AV VTn VBV n
VOP
nVTX
VTVTnVT
V
n
V
n
V
n
V
VCCVC
OP gives
VTX
x
VT
A
VT
error
0.38%
of
bus
voltage
read
as
a
spurious
operating
1
3
n
x
VT
A
VT
B Bn
VT
or temperature. Even if tuned at one particular operating point,
3
n
VOP 3 nVTVT nVTX 3 Vx nVT VA nVT VB nVT VC
signal.
1 will show some errors at different operating point due
the method
3 n1VT
VOP
nVTX 3 Vx nVT VA nVT VB nVT VC
to the IT3and
nVTX
b 3 Vxthat
nVT
VB nVTtwo
VC
ItVOP
is important
to
understand
the Vmethod
nVTrelay inaccuracies. It is important to realize, though,
A nVTcompares
3VBoth
x1nx VTerrors
3
V
n
V
n
V
n
V
that these errors occur regardless of the protection principle. By
nVTX
3
n
V
n
V
n
V
voltages.
will
play
a
role.
They
may
cancel
mutually,
V
n
V
n
V
n
V
n
VTX
VT
A
VT
B
VT
C
VT
A
VT
B
VT
C
OP
VTX
x
VT
A
VT
B
VT VC
compensating for bank inherent unbalance, and partially for IT and
3 1nVT n b 3 V n V n V n V
or
add up.
V
OP
VTX
x
VT
A
VT
B
VT
C
1 the
relay errors,
methods
Z b2A3 presented
ZVC2Cless
Z nAVTX
Zn1VTB in
Z1Cnalready
31VnVT n V n V n V
VOP
VAZthis
2 Bnpaper
VBare
VT
VTfollows.
1
n
3
susceptible
to 1instrumentation
Detailed
VIx Berrors.
Ianalysis
I DIF 3I nAVT
VTXImpact
VT
C
6.2
bbx 1of
VOP
VVA AAVV
VCVCB b VT
bErrors
11VC0 V0on the
1nVTInstrumentation
B B
OP 3 V
Z1 A Z 2 A
Z1B Z 2 B
Z1C Z 2C
nVTX
3
x
VT V A nVT VB nVT VC
3
Magnitude and angle errors of ITs and the relay can be modeled as
Compensated
Voltage Unbalance
nVTX 3 Vx nVT Bank
VA nNeutral
VT VB nVT VC
ancomplex
multiplier
applied
for
the
analysis
purposes to the ideal
1
V
n
V
n
V
n
V
Function
VTX
x
VT
A
VT
B
VT
C
VOP 1 b 1 VA VB VC b 1 V0
transformation
Y2 Aof a given
Y2 B For example,
Y1 A ratio
Y1Bsignal.
Y1C Ya2Cnegative
3
0
I
I
I
I
VOPapproach
1 VA inVthe
VC subsection
b 1 V0applies to this
0.5%
error combined
with a 0.3 Cdeg angle error can
The
previous
DIF magnitude
A
B
B
1 b illustrated
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
3 method
1
1
A
2
A
1
B
2
B
1
C
2
C
V
b 1 as
VAwell.
VBExamining
VC the
b key
1 operating
V0
1
A
2
A
1
B
2
B
1
C
2
C
be
modeled
as:
protection
equation
OP
I
I
I
I
Ab 1 VA VB BVC b 1 V0 C
VOP
DIF
3
for
secondary
voltages
(7)
leads
to
a
conclusion
that during
Z1B Z 2 B
Z1C Z 2C
3 Z1 A Z 2 A
normal system conditions four voltage components, each of a
n ACTUAL nIDEAL b, b 1 0.0050.30
very small or zero magnitude, are added as vectors: neutral point
Y1 A Y2 A
Y1B Y2 B
Y1C Y2C
bank voltage, system neutral voltage and two phase voltages
IB
IC
0
I DIF I A
the latter two with very small multipliers.
YInstrumentation
Y1 Aof
Y1C
6.1 Impact
onY2the
2 A nVT 2 Y1B Y2 B Errors
C
VOP ( A) V1 A k A
V2 A
These four voltages are delivered by four VTs: (A,B,C,X) in case of
Voltage
Differential
nVT 1Function
implementation (7a) with internally derived system zero-sequence
0.30 banks. The voltage; and (0,X,B,C) in case of implementation (7b) with externally
n ACTUAL
b, applications
b 1 0.005
For
simplicitynIDEAL
consider
on grounded
I DIF I A
VOP ( A)
VOP ( A)
30
n
V1 A k A bn VT 2 V2 A
1 2A
V1 A k A VTn2VT V
nVT 1
(34b)
n
n
0 V1 A k A VT 2 V2nA o k A VT 2 V2 A V1 A
VOP ( A) V1 A nkVTA 1 b VT 2 V2 A nVT 1
nVT 1 Fundamentals of Adaptive Protection of Large Capacitor Banks
VOP ( A)
V1 A b V1 A
nVT 2
V1 A 1 b
nVT 2
VOP ( A)
VOP ( A)
Vn1VTA1 k A b nVTVT1
V2 A
1
nVT 1
V1 A b V1 A
V1 A 1 nb
VT 2
n V2 A V1 A
2A
A
n
V2 A o k A VT 1VT 2 V2 A V1 A
2 1A 1 b
V0OP ( A)V V1 Akb V1 AnVT V
V o k
n
1A
A
0 V1 A k A nVTVT1 2
nVT
nVT
VVOPOP
VT 12 V
VT 12 V
A ) 1
0 ( A)( V
V1 A
100
1 A b1k
Ab% 100%
2A o kA
2A
V1 A
n
n
VT
1
VT
1
V
When deriving the system zero-sequence voltage internally the
VOP1(AA)
V1 A b V1 A
V1 A 1 b
three
added
VOPOP( A)( Aphase
Vvoltages
b Vare
V1 A as
1vectors
b small errors could
V
1A
yield
a) 1 relatively
1 1 A0.005significant
0.30 100% spurious
0.72% system zero-sequence
V
Vfollowing
V1 Aof0 1equation
b (7a) is useful:
1A ( A
voltage.
OP
A ) The
1 A b Vderivative
1A
VVOP
( A ))
0.005
11 b1100
% 0.3 100%
0.72%
VOP1 A( A)1
VV
1 100
VOP 1 A
n1VTXb
k AB %
k AC Vx nVT VA k AB nVT VB k AC nVT VC
VV
OP (3A)nVT
1A
1 b 100%
VOP
V1(AA) 1 1 n 1 k 0 k V n V k (36a)
When using externally derived system zero-sequence voltage
V
AC n%xV 0.72
VT % A
AB nVT VB k AC nVT VC
1nnVTX
1 3ofVTX
.005VA AB
0.n3VT the
100
VOPOP
V0
V
x nVTanalysis,
B k-factors
VT
C
For
the
purpose
error
can
be
assumed
to
(equation (7b)), requirements for the bank and system neutral
3
n
VT
VVunity,
1 A( A ) VT
0
beOP
and
therefore:
voltage measurements are relaxed, and the accuracy of
1
1
0
.
005
0
.
3
100
%
0
.
72
%
VV
measurement of the two phase voltages becomes secondary
OP
( A )1
0
A
1
0n.VT3 VB100
VOP
n1VTXb1 3 V0x .005
nVT V
nVT%
VC 0.72%
1
A
of the low value of multipliers applied to the B and C
1
VOP
nVTk VA V nVTn VB V nVTk VC n V because
V 3 nVT
VTX 3
V
nnVTX
1 Vkx AB
k AC nVT VC
OP1 A 3 n
AC
x
VT
A
AB
VT
B voltages.
VT
3 nVT
nVTX 3 Vx n1VT VA nVT VB nVT VC
Generally speaking the method is most impacted by the accuracy
VOP
nVTX 1 k AB k AC Vx nVT VA k(36b)
AB nVT VB k AC nVT VC
1
3
n
measurement of the system neutral voltage. This quantity is
An Vand
VOP 1 the
nVTXis b perfectly
13 Vk AB nbalanced
k AC
VnA inkVAB
nVT of
Vthe
VCthe method applied (internally, externally to
11 VT
xn n
VT error
B k
AC nVT of
Assume
above
an
the
V
n
V
derived
regardless
V
b31n
VAn
VTX
VB 3VCV
bxn1 VVT
OP
VT
B
VT
C
V
V
V
n
V
OP
0
OP 3 3 n VT VTX
x
VT
A
VT
B
VT
C
measurement
the relay) out of three vectors each having significant magnitude
3 nVT
VT of the bank neutral voltage is added, represented
1 number b:
by the complex
compared with the target sensitivity. Small magnitude and angle
VOP
nVTX 3 Vx nVT VA nVT VB nVT VC
errors in sensing any of the three vectors would become significant
1
nVTX 33 V1xnVT nnVT VA3 V
nVT VnB nVVT
VC V n V
V
for this sensitive protection function.
OP
VTX b 3 Vx
VT V A nnVT V
B n VT
C
V
n
n
V
OP
VTX
x
VT
A
VT
B
VT
C
3
n
VT
3 nVT
6.3 Impact of Instrumentation Errors of the
1 1
b 1nVTX
VAb V 3B VVx CnVT bVA1 Vn0VT V B nVT(36b)
VOP
VC Phase Current Balance Function
OP
From
nVTX equation
333Vx1nVT (36b):
nVT
VA bn3VT V V
nVT V
VC n V n V
B
1
V
nVTX
nVT
OP
x
A
VT
B
VT
C
VOP using a window-type
nVTX 3 V
measure
nVT b Vthe
nVT VB current,
nVT VC
When
CTx to
differential
A
3 nVT
3 nisVTquite immune to instrumentation errors. From
this
method
1 Vx nVT VA nVT VB nVT VC
(36c)
VTX 3
equation (12) the method balances the differential current with
VnOP
b 1 VA VB VC b 1 V0
nVTX 33 Vx nVT VA nVT VB nVT VC
a small fraction of the total bank current. Both signals are low:
nformer
3 V
Vthe
nVT VC circulating
nVT VA current; the latter
x nVT of
B near-zero
the VTX
because
Substituting (36c) into (36b) gives:
1
because of the multiplier. As a result the errors are decimated
b 1 VA VB VC b 1 V0
VOP
13
when they1leak into the operating signal.
(36d)
b 1 VA VB VC b 1 V0
VOP
VOP
b 1 VA
3
Analysis
of3equation (12)
yields the following expression the error
In other words, the error in the operating signal is proportional to
the system unbalance, with a small multiplier. As a result, errors
in the measurement of the bank neutral voltage are of secondary
importance. For example, assume a system unbalance (V0) of 3%
of bus nominal voltage, and a 5% magnitude and 1 deg angle
error for the neutral point transformer. Using equation (36d) one
concludes that this error introduces about 0.16% of bus nominal
voltage as a spurious operating signal.
VOP
1
nVTX 3 Vx nVT b VA nVT VB nVT VC
3 nVT
(37a)
1
V
nVTX
nVTX
Vx n(36b):
V 3 n Vx V nVTnVTb V
VAA nVT VB nVT VC
OP 3
From
equation
3 nVT VT B VT C
(37b)
nVTX 3 Vx nVT VB nVT VC nVT VA
1
V
b 1 V
nOP
nVT VA
VTX 3 Vx nVT AVB nVT VC
3 (37b) into (37a) gives:
Substituting
I OP
V
OP
b1 b1 1I DIF
VA b 1 k I
3
' Vx V0 ! P
I OP b 1 I DIF
' I DIF ! P
' Vx V0 ! P
b 1 k I
(37c)
analysis:
I OP
b 1 I DIF
b 1 k I
' I DIF ! P
6.4 Impact of Instrumentation Errors of the
Neutral1Current Balance Function
1 k AB k AC Vx 3 V0 VB 1 k AB VC 1 k AC
VOP
As explained
3 in the previous section, the neutral and phase current
balance methods are equivalent. The differential neutral current
is compensated for inherent unbalance by all three currents (per
VOP (18)),
Vx but
V0similarly to the phase current balance method
equation
the multipliers for the phase currents are small. Therefore, equation
(38) applies to this method, and yields the same results as to the
VRESTof measurement
Vx V0 errors.
impact
Overall the relative insensitivity of the current balance methods to
instrumentation
by realizing only small
0.2 pu00 errors0can
.17be
puunderstood
50
portions of the phase currents are used for compensation, while
the differential currents if measured via window CTs are not
exposed
to0any
significant
V
.2 pu
00 0errors.
.17 pu50 0.034 pu
OP
VREST
V0
0.05 pu00 , Vx
0.37 pu
1
Protection of Large Capacitor 0Banks
1 k AB k AC Vx 3Fundamentals
V'OPI
V0 VB 1 ofkAdaptive
AB VC 1 k ACV
0.07 pu0 0.05 pu0 0
DIF 3! P
OP
VOP
1Vx V0
(38)
0.02 pu
0
0.07 pu00 .
31
VOP
3 nVT
3 nVT
VT
' I DIF ! P n 3 V n V n V n V
VTX
x
VT
B
VT
C
VT
A
nn
33
V1
VVTB V
V
nVT
x VbxnVT n
Vn
VC VA nVT VA
C VT nVT
VTX
B
VVTX
1
OP
A
nVTX 3 Vx nVT VB nVT VC nVT VA
13 VOP 1 b 1 VA
VOP 1 1 k AB 3 k AC Vx 3 V0 VB 1 k AB VC 1 k AC
VOP
13b 1 VA
3b
V
b111 1the
Voperating
In
other
words,
signal
difference of two
I
InDIF
k isIba vectorial
OP
A 3 bV 1
7. Comparison
with Traditional Methods V
OP
V and
n
V
VC
1
OP
VTX
x
VT
3
V
n
31VIcope
nnwith
nVT
VBB penalizing
n
nVT
voltages.
In
order
to bbetter
avoid
I
b 1berrors
kVAAI
VOP
b 1 VA
OP
xDIF
VT
VT
VT VC
33 nnVT OP VTX
IVTDIF
Voptimized
signal can be created as
Traditionally,
Isensitivity
1xan
I
3 either a given function is desensitized to account V
OP b V
0 b 1 krestraining
OP
follows:
for inherent bank unbalances and instrumentation errors. Or, a
I'OPVx bV0 1!'PIVDIF
b 1 k I
x V0 ! P
historical value of the non-zero operating quantity is subtracted
n
n
n V
n
VA
VTX
VT V
B
C
'
Vx 3
V0 V
!x P
n
3
V
n
V
nVT
I
b
1
I
b
1
I
(40b)
(D-changes)
before
comparing with a pickup threshold (P) resulting
x x VT
VT VC
VT VA
OP
DIF
VVTX
V
V0 B nVT
REST
in the rate-of-change mode of operation:
'
I
!
P
'IVI xDIF!1VP!0 P! P DIF
'
DIFthat1the above signal is not a classical restraint in the form of
Note
1 0b0n1 V3A0V.17
' Vx V0 ! P (neutral unbalance)
V
(39a)
VOP
npu
b 5
V0A nThis
VC sensitivity
OP
.OP
2 puor
x magnitudes.
VT
VT V
B nVTaffect
V
b VTX
1 VofA1the
a0
sum
would
33
3naverage
VT VOP
1
k
k
V
3
V
V
kthe
VC 1 k AC
AB
AC
x
0
B 1of
AB two
of
is a vectorial sum
1!1 Pk Instead
3 Vtherestraint
'OPthe
I DIF1function.
Vvoltages.
k
3
V
V
1
k
V
1
k
V
1
k
k
V
3
V
V
1
k
VC 1 k AC
AB
AC
x
0
B
AB
C
AC
OP 3
AB 0
AC
x
B
AB
0 0
(phase or neutral current unbalance) (39b)
' I DIF ! P
3
3
V
n
V
n
V
n
V
VInOP
0
.
2
pu
0
0
.
17
pu
5
0
.
034
pu
VTX
x
VT
B
VT
C
VT
A
b
1
I
b
1
I
OP
Vx bVthis
I OP
b 1 V better
I DIF
k I works, consider external
OP
0 1 approach
To
understand
DIF how
V
V
V
1
OP
x
0
The rate-of-change approach improves sensitivity to some extent
fault and
internal
bank
failure.
1 Vx1Vk0 AB k AC Vx 3 V0 VB 1 k AB VC 1 k AC
V
OP
OP
but has 1
limitations.
VOP
b 1 VVA
0V.017 pu50
RESTfault
.!
2P
pu
0V0 xproducing
0.37zero-sequence
pu
'
V
V
1 k AB k AC Vx 3 V0 VB 1 k AB VC 1 VVAssume
VOP
k
33
an00external
20% of system
REST
ACx
'
V
V
!
P
Vx0 V0
RESTx
First, it is3an approximation. As derived in section 4, the leaking
voltage.
Assume further, the bank neutral point voltage is
values are proportional to present values of some other signals
.20Vpu
measured
as
0V
010 while
.17system
pu50 zero-sequence voltage
V
V01xV
I OP
xI DIF
k I0the
REST b
00b
OP
0
0
related
to
the
bank
(example:
differential
current
in
the
phase
is
measured
as
due
to
finite
'
I
!
P
0
.
2
pu
0
0
.
17
pu
5
V
0
.
05
pu
0
,
V
0
.
05
pu
0accuracy
0.02ofpuinstrument
1800 0.07 pu00 .
VOP Vx V0
x
0 I DIF ! P
'
DIF
balance method proportional to the total bank current). When
transformers and the relay, transients,
etc. If so, the function even
0.2 pu00 00.17 pu50 0.034 pu
0P VOP
'perfectly
V2x pu
V
0 !
the currents do not change, the delta method works satisfactory.
if0
compensated
for
the
bank inherent unbalance would
0V
05
.
0
0
.
17
pu
V
V
VOP
pu5
0.034 pu
REST 0.2 pux0 0 0.17
But
when the
see an operating
of:0.05 pu0 0
110.07 pusignal
V
00k
0.02 pu
VREST
Vx currents
V0 change, such as during close-in external V
OP
0
1
k
V
V
VC 1 k AC
faults, subtracting an old value will not compensate correctly.
0
AB
0k.2AC
pu
0xx 03
.17
pu
V
50BB 1
V'OP
k AB
V
3
V
V
10.
37kkpu
I DIF !3P1 VREST
OP
AB
AC
0
AB VC 1 k AC
0
0
0
0
0 05.37 pu0.034 pu
Time delay or other inhibit method may be needed to ride through
300.02.20pupu
V0
00
0
0..
17
5pu
VREST
0pu
.pu
17
.OP
2 pu
17
5
0
0
such conditions.
0
0
0
0.2 pu0
0.17 pu5
VREST 1 0.07
pu0
00pu000.12
V
.050pu
00.05
, Vxpu0
.05
the
0.pu
02
pu180
0.07 pu00 .
0
IfOP
used to
trip
instantaneously
restraint
will
V
V
V
V
1
k
V
1
k
1
k
0 0 k AC V x 3 without
0 VB a
0VC function
0
OP
AB
0
AB
AC
x
1
V
Vpuxset
0Vabove
Second, the nrate-of-change
approach will not provide for a
V
.05
0 00 0level.
.017
pupu
5 5 0.0034
2 pu
.17
.37pu
pu
sustained
OP
3 nVToperating0 signal. When 0the delta-t window slides
REST 0.0
VOP 0.07 pu00 0.05 pu0 0 0.02 pu
VOP into
0.2the
pufault,
0 the
0operating
.17 pusignal
5 will
0.034
entirely
reset.pu
This creates a
Calculate
the
signal:
VOP 0V.07
V0proposed
x
V
pu0 0 0.02 pu
V
V
0V00 0.05restraining
x
problem when time-delayed operation is assumed.
VOPREST
Vpu
REST
x V0 0 0
nVTX 3 Vx nVT VB nVT VC nVT VA
0
0 0
0 pu
0.050.pu
00, 0V.07
0.05
000.037
.02pu
0.07 pu00 .
V
2
.
17
Vpu
0pu
0.5
050pu
0pu
.12
pu180
x 0pu
0
REST
REST
1
0
0
Methods
for
4
Vx V0 0
0
REST
VREST
0.inherent
2 pu
0bank
0compensation
.x17
5 Vpresented
0.n37
puinB section
0.07
0 pu0 0.05 pu0 0 0.12 pu
nVTX
of3the
V
npu
nVT VC V0VREST
OP
VT b and
A as
VT V
identify
true cause
unbalance,
such
are
accurate
0
0
.
2
pu
0
0
.
17
pu
5
1the
3
n
Note
that
restraint practically doubles
0.2 pu
the
0 applied0definition
.17 puof5the
V
b 1VT
balanced
VA
under
system
conditions, minor unbalances, and major
0
0
OP
0
0
0
V
0
.
07
pu
0
0
.
05
pu
.02
the
two
involved
signals.
Assuming
a0
slope
is00
used
for
0
.
2
pu
0
0
.
17
pu
5
3
0
.
05
pu
0
,
V
0
.
05
pu
0 0
.02pu
putripping,
1800 it 0.07 pu00 .
OP
x
0
system events such0 as close-in faults. Their
0 operating signals 0are
0
will
of slope to restrain the operation.
V0 0.05 pu
0 , Vx delayed
0.05 pu0 and
0.02
pu180
putake
00.034/0.37
. pu0=00 9.2%
sustainable
tripping
with no 0.07
V
0.17 pu500 0
n 3 V allowing
n Vtime
n V alarming
n V
VOP 0
0..2
2 pu
0..034
034 pu
pu
0 0 0.17 0pu5
I OPVTX b 1x I DIFVT b B 1 kVT I
restrictions.
VT
OP
VOP
0.2an
puinternal
0 0bank
.17 pufailure
5 under
0.0345%
pu of system unbalance
Consider
0
V
0.007
pupu
000
0.005
pu
0 000further,
0.002
pupu
.07
.05
pu
.12
OP
REST zero-sequence
(system
voltage).
Assume
the
bank failure
0
0
changes
the
neutral
point
voltage
by
2%
of
bus
voltage
at the
0
0
0
0
V
2
pu
0
VREST
0.0
5 pu
0.5
REST
V
02 ..pu
2
pu0
0
00.17
pu
0..17
17
pu
537 pu 0
0..37
37 pu
pu
Major
an pu
important
VOP system
0.07 unbalance
pu0 0is.05
0 condition
0.02 pu to consider.
1
' Vxexample,
For
VOP V0 !bPassume
1 VA a close in ground fault elevating both the
system zero-sequence
voltage and the bank neutral point voltage.
3
0 unbalance method
The
compensated
neutral
on equation
V
0
.
07
pu
0
0.05 pu00 is0based
.12 pu
' REST
I
!P
(5): DIF
0
I OP
VOP
b 1 I DIF
b 1 k I
0
The
operating signal is:
1
1 k AB k AC Vx 3 V0 VB 1 k AB VC 1 k AC
3
' Vx the
V0outlined
! P ground fault event, V
During
VOP
0.2 pu01
0.17 pu5
VOP
1 k AB k AC Vx 3 V0 VB 1 k AB VC
Simplifying
3 one can write the following balance equation for this
function:
0
0
0.2 pu0 0.17 pu5
VOP
VOP
Vx V0
VREST
VREST
V0
0.034 pu
Vx V0
0.05 pu00 , Vx
0.37 pu
(40a)
V
VREST
REST
32
VREST
0.12 pu
0
0..12
12 pu
pu
Change in the voltage at 180 degrees is the worst case. Under the
best case scenario one obtains 0.08pu of restraint, or 0.02/0.08 =
25% of the operate-to-restraint ratio.
0 5
2 pu
000 0.005.17
pu0
00..07
pu
pu
0.12 0
pu.034 pu
0.05 pu00 , V
00..02
02 pu
pu
0.2 pu0
00
0.17 pu50
.07 pu00 0.05 pu0 0 0.02 pu
0
0
00..07
07 pu
pu
00
00..05
05 pu
pu
000
0
0
VOP
VVREST
OP
0.02 pu
0
0
00..07
07 pu
pu
000
00..05
05 pu
pu
00 0
VRESTrestraining
0.07 pusignal
0 is:0.05 pu0
The
x
0
V
V
V0 balance perfectly as long
OP
x will
values
and
as the relay uses proper
V
VOP
OP
0.07 pu00 .
8. Summary
This paper derives correct balance equations for short circuit
protection of shunt capacitor banks taking into account inherent
unbalances in the protected bank. Four methods are derived:
voltage differential, compensated neutral voltage unbalance, phase
current balance, and neutral current balance.
As can be seen from key equations (1), (5), (11), and (18) the proper
way of balancing the bank (or banks) involves instantaneous
values of currents or voltages. Subtracting the residual unbalance
as a time-delayed signal (a historical, or a constant value), and
responding to the delta changes does not constitute a proper,
sensitive and secure operating equation for protective relaying
purposes.
The methods presented in this paper compensate for both bank
and system unbalances. Therefore they are insensitive to major
system events such as close-in faults. Presently used relaying
techniques might misoperate on such system conditions, as they
typically disregard system unbalances and compensate for the
bank unbalance assuming no, or minor system unbalances.
9. References
[1] IEEE Std. C37.99-2000: Guide for the Protection of Shunt
Capacitor Banks, June 2000.
[2] Kasztenny B., Brunello G., Wester C.: Capacitor Bank
Fundamentals and Protection, Proceedings of the 56th Annual
Conference for Protective Relay Engineers, College Station, TX,
April 8-11, 2003.
[3] Capacitor Bank Protection and Control Relay, Instruction
Manual, General Electric Publication, 2006.
0925-v4
33