Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Evaluation Criteria 4ºESO Scribd

    Uploaded by

    Lorena Moore
    15 views1 page
    This document outlines the evaluation criteria for different tasks and skills across four areas: information search, oral presentations, artistic skills, and social skills. For each area, criteria are defined at superior, good, and poor levels of achievement. Superior performance is marked by accuracy, relevance, fluency, correct grammar and pronunciation, broad vocabulary, creativity, and strong teamwork. Good performance has some mistakes but is still largely relevant, fluent, and accurate. Poor performance is incorrect, incomprehensible, has excessive errors, and shows little effort or contribution.

    Original Description:

    Evaluation Criteria 4º ESO_Create your own app

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document outlines the evaluation criteria for different tasks and skills across four areas: information search, oral presentations, artistic skills, and social skills. For each area, criteria are defined at superior, good, and poor levels of achievement. Superior performance is marked by accuracy, relevance, fluency, correct grammar and pronunciation, broad vocabulary, creativity, and strong teamwork. Good performance has some mistakes but is still largely relevant, fluent, and accurate. Poor performance is incorrect, incomprehensible, has excessive errors, and shows little effort or contribution.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    15 views1 page

    Evaluation Criteria 4ºESO Scribd

    Uploaded by

    Lorena Moore
    This document outlines the evaluation criteria for different tasks and skills across four areas: information search, oral presentations, artistic skills, and social skills. For each area, criteria are defined at superior, good, and poor levels of achievement. Superior performance is marked by accuracy, relevance, fluency, correct grammar and pronunciation, broad vocabulary, creativity, and strong teamwork. Good performance has some mistakes but is still largely relevant, fluent, and accurate. Poor performance is incorrect, incomprehensible, has excessive errors, and shows little effort or contribution.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    EVALUATION

    CRITERIA

    Levels of Achievement
    TASKS/SKILL
    S
    INFORMATION
    SEARCH (20%)

    Criteria
    Accuracy &
    Relevance
    Delivery

    Superior
    - The information is
    widely documented
    and highly pertinent.
    - Enthusiastic, poised,
    comprehensible, can
    be heard by all,
    interesting to
    audience

    Fluency
    - Gets the idea across
    fully with little
    hesitation; goes
    beyond the minimum.
    - Communicates with
    ease overall.
    ORAL
    PRESENTATIONS
    (40%)

    Correctnes
    s

    Pronunciati
    on

    Vocabulary

    ARTISTIC
    SKILLS (20%)
    SOCIAL
    SKILLS (20%)

    Application
    s creativity
    &
    usefulness
    Teamwork

    - Expression is as
    grammatically
    accurate as can be
    reasonably expected
    for this level
    Pronunciation is
    accurate throughout,
    with good rhythm and
    intonation for this
    level.
    - Demonstrates broad
    command of
    vocabulary; knows
    and uses precise
    words for the
    situation.

    Good

    Poor

    - The information is
    relevant and accurate
    despite some mistakes.
    - Moderately
    enthusiastic,
    comprehensible,
    generally can be heard,
    and moderately
    interesting
    - Communicates
    confidently using simple
    structures; some
    hesitation and false
    starts with more complex
    material.
    - Evidence of fluency
    outweighs moments of
    uncertainty or stumbling.
    - Consistent accuracy
    with simple structures,
    few errors with more
    complex structures.
    - Accuracy is in greater
    evidence than errors in
    grammar and usage.

    - The information is
    incorrect; little research
    has been done.
    - No interest in
    presentation, barely or
    incomprehensible

    - Use of simple
    structures is uncertain
    and hesitant.
    - Little evidence of
    fluency despite
    moments of ease.

    - Errors interfere with


    comprehensibility and
    force interpretation by
    the listener.

    - Accent is strong
    "foreign" but errors are
    rare.

    - Major errors are


    excessive for this level.
    - Mispronunciations
    force the listener to
    interpret.

    - Vocabulary is generally
    appropriate, despite
    limitations.
    - No major inaccuracies
    in word choice.

    - Vocabulary is
    inadequate for this
    level.

    The application is
    user friendly, really
    creative and
    enjoyable.

    The content is interesting


    and well organized.

    The application is very


    simple.
    The content is badly
    organized and not
    stimulating at all.

    The student has


    contributed to the
    highest degree;
    worked very hard

    The student has


    contributed well and
    regularly; worked hard

    The student has hardly


    contributed showed no
    effort at all

    You might also like