Assessment Task 1 Rubric
Student name: G6
• Wadley Jude ROSAIRO
• Madurachcharige Kaveendra Sandun FERNANDO
• Lithira Lithmin Thirimanne
Rating 4 3
Criteria
Concisely and clearly articulated the
important elements of an introduction
Introduction (introduced the team, outlined the
(5%) presentation, provided background
information and captured the
audience's attention).
Excellent facial expression, eye
Speaking and contact, speech volume, and visual
Presentation aids reflect a strong interest and
Style enthusiasm about the topic.
(20%) Overall effective, well-delivered,
balanced and well-paced presentation.
An excellent effort to make the
content interesting and to engage the
Engagement and audience. Excellent use of slides or
Format other communication tools. Excellent
(10%) organisation of ideas, consistent,
coherent and logical structure.
Excellent demonstration of deep and
Analysis of
complex analysis relevant to the topic.
Information
Excellent range of issues linked to the
(40%)
analysis presented constructively.
Time Presentation is within the time
Management allocation.
(5%)
Excellent use of references and
research, good variety of relevant
(including academic) references
sourced, correctly referenced with no
Referencing and
errors, 5 or more references
Research
appropriately applied within the
(5%)
presentation.
Reference list provided, listed in
alphabetical order
The student can answer all questions
Handling of
from his/her classmates/lecturer about
questions
the topic.
(15%)
Total mark: 21.25/100
Additional comments:
• No visual aids were presented.
• The presented references were not applied within the presentation slides.
• Lack of practice and preparations.
• Formatting requires attention.
Provided a good introduction, but
some aspects were not clearly
articulated.
Very good facial expression, eye
contact, speech volume and visual
aids show enthusiasm about the
topic. Overall well-delivered and
balanced presentation.
A very good effort to make the
content interesting and to engage
the audience. Very Good use of
slides or other communication
tools. Good organisation of ideas,
consistent, coherent and logical
structure.
A very good demonstration of deep
analysis relevant to the topic. A
very good range of issues linked to
the analysis is presented clearly.
Presentation is almost within the
time allocation (+/- 1 min)
Very Good use of references and
research, good variety of relevant
(including academic) references
sourced, correctly referenced with
no errors, 4 references appropriately
applied within the presentation.
Reference list provided, listed in
alphabetical order
The student can answer most
questions from his/her
classmates/lecturer about the topic.
2 1
Provided a basic introduction;
however, some changes (or the
inclusion of more information) are
required to make it more effective.
Good eye contact and speech
volume reflect some interest and
enthusiasm about the topic.
Overall satisfactory; however, it
included some pauses and reliance
on notes.
A good effort to make the content
interesting and to engage the
audience. Good use of slides or
other communication tools. Good
organisation of ideas, coherent and
logical structure. Small
inconsistencies in formatting.
Sound demonstration of deep
analysis relevant to the topic. Good
range of issues linked to the
analysis provided.
Presentation is slightly over or
under the time allocation (2 to 3
min)
Good use of references and
research, good variety of relevant
(including academic) references
sourced, correctly referenced with
no errors, 3 references appropriately
applied within the presentation.
Reference list provided, listed in
alphabetical order
The student can answer a few
questions from his/her
classmates/lecturer about the topic.
Did not cover key elements of an
effective introduction.
Adequate/ basic delivery, however
hesitant at times, with many pauses
and stumbles. Great reliance on notes
resulted in a lack of eye contact or
poor interest and enthusiasm about
the topic.
Adequate/basic effort to make the
content interesting and engage the
audience on a basic level. Basic use of
slides or other communication tools.
The basic organisation of ideas, with
a number of inconsistencies in
formatting.
Adequate/basic demonstration of
analysis, however, not in sufficient
depth. A basic range of issues was
provided.
Presentation is well over (by 5
minutes plus) the time allocation.
Basic use of references and research,
basic variety of relevant (including
academic) references sourced.
Mostly correctly referenced with
some errors, at least 2 references
appropriately applied within the
poster.
Reference list provided, listed in
alphabetical order
The student can answer hardly any
questions from his/her
classmates/lecturer about the topic.
0 Mark =
Rating/4 x
Criteria %
Did not have an introduction or did 1.25
not consider most of the key elements
of an introduction.
Presentation lacked clarity and a 5
logical progression of ideas. Over-
reliance on notes resulted in no eye
contact and reflected little interest or
enthusiasm about the topic.
No engagement with the audience. 0
Poor use of slides or other
communication tools Poor or no
organisation of ideas, coherent and
logical structure. Significant
inconsistencies in formatting.
Poor or superficial demonstration of 10
analysis. The issues identified were
not linked to the analysis provided.
Presentation is far too short (by 5 0
minutes plus) or far too long.
Less than 2 references provided 1.25
Over-reliance on one reference
The student cannot answer any 3.75
questions from his/her
classmates/lecturer about the topic.