NSG2EHP Education in Health Professional Practice.
Assessment 3 – Microteaching session critique and evaluation (1,000 words - 30% of overall mark). Individual grading and feedback sheet
Criteria Excellent
(80-100%)
1. Critical self- Excellent summary & discussion of
evaluation effective facilitation techniques.
Excellent overview of areas for
improvement. Clear and detailed
identification and discussion of two areas
of strength and two areas of
improvement. Excellent support with
ample credible, current and peer
reviewed sources (>5). Demonstrated
clear and consistent evidence of critical
appraisal of reference material. Excellent
analysis and integration of evidence from
the literature. Key ideas from the
literature were effectively paraphrased
and cited.
(20-25 marks)
2. Critical peer- Clear identification of a peer’s health
evaluation education topic. Comprehensive and
succinct evaluation of a peer’s video
with focus to the teaching and
learning strategies applied. Excellent
justification as to why the teaching
and learning activities are relevant to
their education topic, client and
teaching environment.
(16-20 marks)
4. Written Excellent introduction outlining the
expression purpose of the essay.
Writing was fluent and in an
appropriate academic style with very
minimal spelling, typing or grammatical
errors.
Utilized correct APA 7th style for
citations and reference list (5 marks)
Very good
(70-80%)
Very good summary & discussion of
effective facilitation techniques. Very
good overview of areas for
improvement. Clear identification and
discussion of two areas of strength and
two areas of improvement. Very well
supported with sufficient current and
peer reviewed sources (>5).
Demonstrated mostly consistent
evidence of critical appraisal of
reference material. Excellent analysis
and integration of evidence from the
literature. Key ideas from the literature
were effectively paraphrased and cited.
(18-19 marks)
Clear identification of a peer’s
health education topic. Very good
evaluation of a peer’s video with
focus to the teaching and learning
strategies applied. Very good
justification as to why the teaching
and learning theory and strategies
is relevant to their education topic,
client and teaching environment.
(14-15 marks)
Very good introduction outlining the
purpose of the essay.
Writing was fluent and in an
appropriate academic style with very
minimal spelling, typing or
grammatical errors. Utilized correct
APA 7th style for citations most (>70%)
of the time.
(4 marks)
Good
(60-70%)
Some good discussion of some
effective facilitation techniques. Some
areas for improvement summarised.
Identification of some areas of strength
and some areas of improvement.
Supported with sufficient references
some inappropriate material and/or
poor quality sources (>5).
Inconsistently demonstrated evidence
of critical appraisal of reference
material. Excellent analysis and
integration of evidence from the
literature. Key ideas from the literature
were not always effectively
paraphrased or cited. (15-17 marks)
Clear identification of a peer’s
health education topic. Good
evaluation of a peer’s video with
focus to the teaching and learning
strategies applied. Good
justification as to why the teaching
and learning theory and strategies
is relevant to their education topic,
client and teaching environment.
(12-13 marks)
Good introduction outlining the
purpose of the essay. Writing was not
always fluent or in an appropriate
academic style Spelling, typing or
grammatical errors did not interfere
with understanding. Utilised correct
APA 7th style for citations and reference
list most (>60%) of the time.
(3 marks)
Fair
(50-60%)
Limited discussion of effective
facilitation techniques. Limited
overview of areas for improvement.
Identification of limited areas of
strength and limited areas of
improvement. Poorly supported with
references and with much
inappropriate material and/or poor
quality sources (=5). Limited evidence
of critical appraisal of reference
material. Limited analysis and
integration of evidence from the
literature. Direct quotations were
poorly integrated with an
overreliance on original wording in
paraphrasing
(13-14 marks)
Clear identification of a peer’s
health education topic. Fair
evaluation of a peer’s video with
focus to the teaching and learning
strategies applied. Fair justification
as to why the teaching and
learning theory and strategies is
relevant to their education topic,
client and teaching environment.
(10-11 marks)
Fair introduction outlining the
purpose of the essay Writing may not
be fluent or in an appropriate
academic style. Spelling, typing or
grammatical errors sometimes
interfered with understanding Utilized
correct APA 7th style for citations and
reference list >50% of the time. (2.5
marks)
Poor Mark
(<50%)
No or poor discussion of effective
facilitation techniques or summary of /25
areas for improvement. Unable to
identify areas of strength and areas of
improvement. Poorly supported with
references and with much
inappropriate material and/or from
poor quality sources. No evidence of
critical appraisal of reference
materials.
Excellent analysis and integration of
evidence from the literature.
Substantial use of direct quotations
&/or limited evidence of ability to
paraphrase/summarize
(0-12 marks)
Clear identification of a peer’s
health education topic. Poor /20
evaluation of a peer’s video with
focus to the teaching and learning
strategies applied. Poor
justification as to why the teaching
and learning theory and strategies
is relevant to their education topic,
client and teaching environment.
(0-9 marks)
Poor introduction outlining the
purpose of the essay. /5
Writing was not fluent with many
spelling, typing or grammatical errors.
. Incorrect style for citations and
reference list more than 50% of the
time. (0-2 marks)