AT1 Analysis of Practice Rubric
Strongly meets or exceeds requirements Soundly meets requirements
Criteria
80-100%
Innovative explanation of the key ideas that
Activity 1: underpin a unique graduate teacher
philosophy with informed reference to
Graduate Philosophy valuable approaches, considerations, and
influences.
Excellent use of academic writing conventions,
accurate spelling and grammar, and evidence
of proofreading and editing in all
documentation.
Word count is met.
10 10, 9, 8 marks
The translation from philosophy to practice is
Activity 2: exceptional and is enhanced with the support
Practice of practical experience, theory, research, and
curriculum.
Excellent use of academic writing conventions,
accurate spelling and grammar, and evidence
of proofreading and editing in all
documentation.
Word count is met.
10 10, 9, 8 marks
The intent of the provocation illustrates
Activity 3: expertise in engaging and supporting learners.
This provocation provides further evidence of
Provocation graduate teacher outstanding understandings
of pedagogy, research, and curriculum
guidance.
Excellent use of academic writing conventions,
accurate spelling and grammar, and evidence
of proofreading and editing in all
documentation.
Word count is met.
15 15, 14, 13, 12 marks
Meets requirements
70-79%
Thoughtful explanation of the key
ideas that underpin a graduate
teacher philosophy with informed
reference to valuable approaches,
considerations, and influences.
Good use of academic writing
conventions, mostly accurate
spelling and grammar, and
evidence of proofreading and
editing in all documentation.
Word count is met.
7 marks
The translation from philosophy
to practice is well developed and
is supported with practical
experience, theory, research, and
curriculum.
Good use of academic writing
conventions, mostly accurate
spelling and grammar, and
evidence of proofreading and
editing in all documentation.
Word count is met.
7 marks
The intent of the provocation
illustrates knowledge in engaging
and supporting learners. This
provocation provides further
evidence of graduate teacher
understandings of pedagogy,
research, and curriculum
guidance.
Good use of academic writing
conventions, mostly accurate
spelling and grammar, and
evidence of proofreading and
editing in all documentation.
Word count is met.
11 marks
Meets limited requirements
60-69%
A clear explanation of the key
ideas that underpin a graduate
teacher philosophy with
reference to valuable approaches,
considerations, and influences.
Academic writing conventions
followed with small errors, very
few spelling or grammar errors,
and evidence of proofreading and
editing in all documentation.
Word count is met.
6 marks
The translation from philosophy
to practice is relevant and is
supported with practical
experience, theory, research, and
curriculum.
Academic writing conventions
followed with small errors, very
few spelling or grammar errors,
and evidence of proofreading and
editing in all documentation.
Word count is met.
6 marks
The intent of the provocation
shows a developing ability to
engage and support learners.
This provocation provides some
evidence of graduate teacher
understandings of pedagogy,
research, and curriculum
guidance.
Academic writing conventions
followed with small errors, very
few spelling or grammar errors,
and evidence of proofreading and
editing in all documentation.
Word count is met.
10, 9 marks
Does not meet requirements
50-59%
A tenuous explanation of the key
ideas that underpin a graduate
teacher philosophy with little
relevant reference to approaches,
considerations, and influences.
Academic writing conventions are
inconsistent, some spelling and
grammar errors, and limited
proofreading and editing.
Word count has not been
observed.
5 marks
The translation from philosophy
to practice is difficult to ascertain
and supported with limited
evidence of practical experience,
theory, research, and curriculum.
Academic writing conventions are
inconsistent, some spelling and
grammar errors, and limited
proofreading and editing.
Word count has not been
observed.
5 marks
The intent of the provocation
shows a limited ability to engage
and support learners. This
provocation provides some
evidence of graduate teacher
understandings of pedagogy,
research, and curriculum
guidance.
Academic writing conventions are
inconsistent, some spelling and
grammar errors, and limited
proofreading and editing.
Word count has not been
observed.
8 marks
0-49%
Graduate philosophy does not
meet the expectations of the task.
Academic writing conventions not
followed and/or many errors
and/or many spelling and/or
grammar errors. Limited or no
evidence of proofreading/ editing
Word count is considerably over
or under expectation.
4-0 marks
Practice explanation does not
meet the expectations of the task.
Academic writing conventions not
followed and/or many errors
and/or many spelling and/or
grammar errors. Limited or no
evidence of proofreading/ editing
Word count is considerably over
or under expectation.
4-0 marks
The provocation does not meet
the expectations of the task.
Academic writing conventions not
followed and/or many errors
and/or many spelling and/or
grammar errors. Limited or no
evidence of proofreading/ editing
Word count is considerably over
or under expectation.
7-0 marks
Activity 4: A knowledgeable research perspective is
presented, showcasing the way that the
graduate teacher informs practice with
Research researched perspectives.
Excellent use of academic writing conventions,
accurate spelling and grammar, and evidence
of proofreading and editing in all
documentation including 4 peer reviewed
journal articles.
Word count is met.
15 15, 14, 13, 12 marks
An informed research perspective
is presented, illustrating the way
that the graduate teacher informs
practice with researched
perspectives.
Good use of academic writing
conventions, mostly accurate
spelling and grammar, and
evidence of proofreading and
editing in all documentation.
Word count is met.
11 marks
A relevant research perspective is
presented and supports the
graduate teachers practice with
researched perspectives.
Academic writing conventions
followed with small errors, very
few spelling or grammar errors,
and evidence of proofreading and
editing in all documentation
Word count is met.
10, 9 marks
The research perspective is
limited and tenuously supports
the graduate teachers practice
with researched perspectives.
Academic writing conventions are
inconsistent, some spelling and
grammar errors, and limited
proofreading and editing.
Word count has not been
observed.
8 marks
Research does not meet the
expectations of the task.
Academic writing conventions not
followed and/or many errors
and/or many spelling and/or
grammar errors. Limited or no
evidence of proofreading/ editing
Word count is considerably over
or under expectation.
7-0 marks

Total: /50