Professional Documents
Culture Documents
عوامل تعزيز مستوى الاداء
عوامل تعزيز مستوى الاداء
( )
.. . / /
.. . / /
. / /
,
,
,
, ,
,
( )1 (2011 )2
in creating capable virtuous governmental stuff .In this study the above
idea was applied to a sample of instructors taken from Baghdad, Kirkuk
and Al-Torath natives university college, for this purposes
the
questionnaire designed containing some factors by following up may keep
instructor's virtuous. The most important results of the study is that in spite
of exceptional circumstance, Iraqi instructors still keeping their
performance , and this may be forwarding through out following up
concerning officials and applying special criteria concerning with scientific
performance and encouraging field of activity in addition to providing
some standard living requirements that may keeping sociality status for the
Iraqi university instructors.
(.)2
(.)5
(.)4
206
( )1 (2011 )2
.
150 50 ,
, ,
.
. MINITAB
. Excel
": : .
, ,
,
, .
,
, : (.)5
,
.
,
,
,
.
,
.
207
( )1 (2011 )2
, ,
, ,
.
,
,
.
(.)6
,
,
,
, .
, .
208
( )1 (2011 )2
": :
150 50
.
, 50 ,
50
chi-square
Minitab
Excel
(.)1
( )1
Chi-square .
( )1
. "
%50.
209
( )1 (2011 )2
Chi-square 15,360
12 .%5
( )1
,
.
(:)1
10
18
10
24
15
11
30
72
10-6
16
11
33
15-11
10
17
20-16
13
25-21
30-26
-31
22
14
14
50
24
11
15
50
28
15
150 50
5-
210
( )1 (2011 )2
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
31--
26--30
16--20
21--25
11--15
6--10
-5
( :)1
( )2
%78
.
Chi-square %5
12,792 .12
( )2
,
.
211
( )1 (2011 )2
( )2
. .
. . . .. . . .
2
. .
11 1 1
10
16 0 2
30
%20
13
2 10 25 2 3
14 0
18 2 1
57
%38
1 2
13 0
0 1
30
%20
0 1
15 0
0 2
26
%17.3
0 0
0 0
%4.7
50 2 6 11 31 50 0 11 9 30 50 4 7 16 23
Chi-sq.= 12,792
d.f.=12
150
35
30
25
20
15
10
(:)2
( )3
212
%37
( )1 (2011 )2
%21 % 20 ,
Chi-square
" ,
%5
2,818 .4
( )3
, ()4
.
(:)3
()%
11
15
16
30
%20
16
25
10
14
13
16
55
%37
13
10
32
%21
10
15
26
%17
-5
%5
13
37
50
19
31
50
41
50
150
d.f.=4
%74 %26
%82 %18
%62 %38
Chi-sq.= 2,818
213
( )1 (2011 )2
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
(:)3
( )4
10
11
13
20
42
( )5
%78
214
( )1 (2011 )2
% 22
%11,3
%10,7
Chi-square %5
2,030
.1 ( )4
.
( )5
%
21
17
0
38
3
25
7
13
3
38
10
27
3
14
0
41
3
117
16
%78
%10.7
d.f.=1
50 19
31
Chi-sq.= 2,030
17
34
16
50
33
17
50
150
215
%11.3
( )1 (2011 )2
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
( :)4
( )6
%65
%35
%35
Chi-square
%5
3,424 . 1
216
( )1 (2011 )2
()6
10
18
13
14
32
%64
11
12
18
%36
11
13
24
24
26
50
13
17
20
33
%66
10
12
17
%34
10
18
27
32
50
10
13
16
21
34
%68
10
16
%32
13
19
25
31
50
34
27
61
13
76
89
150
()%
d.f.=1
Chi-sq.= 3,424
( )7
%77
%23 %80
%15
%5
. . Chi-square
%5
6,574
.2 ( )5
217
( )1 (2011 )2
( )7
()%
45
50
()%
d.f.=2
7
2
9
35
37
30
34
31
116
%77
13
10
16
10
34
%23
38
50
40
50
41
150
%10
%80
%10
%12
%82
%6
%76 %18
Chi-sq.= 6,574
%6
100
90
80
70
50
40
30
20
10
0
( :)5
218
60
( )1 (2011 )2
( )8 ,
%85
%86
15
Chi-square
%5
1,852 0,103
6 1 . ( )6 ( )7
.
....
%97 ,
%3
219
( )1 (2011 )2
- ,
%90
...
,
.
220
( )1 (2011 )2
( )8
5-
14
18
18
%36
10-6
16
%32
15-11
%18
20-16
%8
25-21
%4
30-26
%2
-31
%0
28
33
17
17
50
5-
18
22
24
%48
10-6
11
%22
15-11
%8
20-16
%16
25-21
%0
30-26
%4
-31
%2
24
10
34
13
16
50
5-
26
27
29
%58
10-6
%14
15-11
%8
20-16
%2
25-21
%4
30-26
%10
-31
%4
32
33
13
17
50
84
16
100
43
50
150
()%
%11 %56
221
%4 %29
( )1 (2011 )2
70
60
50
30
20
10
31-
26--30
21--25
11--15
16--20
5--10
-5
( :)6
90
80
70
60
40
30
20
10
( :)7
222
50
40
( )1 (2011 )2
" : .
.
-1:
.1 %50
. %35
.
.2 %78
%22
.
.3 % 73
.4 %22
.
.5
%77
.6
, %85
223
( )1 (2011 )2
.
.
.7
.
.8
.
.9
.
.
-2
.
.
. .
.6 , ,
.
224
( )1 (2011 )2
-1 , . ( ",)2007 "
, ,.
-2 ,. " ,)2010(,
" , , 25,.
-4 , ",)2009(,
.
" , ,
225