.

.
.

) (

232

.
-:

- -:

- -:

)(

.
- -: :
233

) ( .

) ( .

- -:

-:

)(Balanced Scorecard

-:

- -:

) (BSC
1992 ) (Robert Kaplan ) (David Norton

) (1

) (

. )

234

 (
.

) (2

) (Causal Model

) (3

) (4

))

((.

) (5

235


)( )( .

)( -:

) (6

- .

. -

- .

)(

)(Kaplan & Norton

-:

- -:
236

-:

) (7

-1

) (
.
.

-2

-3

-4

-5

-6

- -:

:
( (Financial Perspective) -:

237

) (3

( (Customer Perspective) -:

) Market
(Share .

( -:

) (4

)(Learning & Growth Perspective

.
( -:

) (6

)( Internal Business Perspective

:
-1 -:

) (4

)(The Innovation Process

.
-2 (The Operation Process) -:

-3 (Post sales Service) -:

238

. -:

) (1

(Atkinson, et.al,1997: 29) :

.
-:

) (2

)Drury, 2000: 930) :(8

239

-:
- -:

)):

((.

) (2

)):

((.

240

) (9

) (Hilton ))

(((3) .

-:

- .

- .

.
- -:

-:

)(10

.

.

.
- -:
:
-1 (Effectiveness) -:

241

)(11

-2 (Efficiency) -:

-3 (Economical) -:

- -:

-:
-:

-:

( (Rate of Return on Investment) -:

)(12

-:
=

( (Rate of Return on Sales) -:

-:

=
( (Residual Income) -:

242

) (4

= ) (

( (Financial Ratios) -:

)(13

.
.

.
.

-:

-:
( (Customer Satisfaction) -:

)(14

. . - .

- .

- .

( (Market Share Growth) -:

243

)(15

( (On time Delivery) -:

) (

)(12

( (Cost Reduction) -:

)(16

( (Quality of Product) -:

.
( (Flexibility & Innovation) -:

)(12

( (Work Efficiency &Turnover) -:

)( -:
244

- -:

) (4

-1 ).(Growth

-2 ).(Price Recovery

-3 ).(Productivity

-:
- -:

245

 1988

1999
2001
) (KUFA ) (PEPSI 2004

)(CORK

- -:

-:

-: .

) (3

- -:

246

)(

) (CO2

. )(KRONES PET

) (KHS CAN) (NOLL CAN) (R.B 2005

2.25 ) (PET 500000 6 .

) (1 ) (CAN 150000 24
.
) (2 ) (R.B 650000 24
.

) (4 -:

)(R.O

)(U.V

)(PET,CAN,R.B

)(CO2

-: .
) (4

- -:

247

2005 2006

) (PET -:

) (1 2005 2006

)(PET
6

2005

2006

4792950

5032630

360 /
6000000
87570000
15 /
375000000
62.5 /
165
27500000
166666.8/

376 /
6000000
91550000
16 /
385000000
64.16667/
162
27750000
171296.3/

: 2005.2006

) (

-:
- -:

(1 -:

( :
2005
) (%36.3 2006 ) (%43.2

2006 2005
.

( :

2005 ) (%38.7 2006 ) (%44.1

248

( :

2005

) (1.17 (1.7) 2006 .

( :
(%26.4) 2005 .(%27.3) 2006
2006 2005

. 2006

( :
(8.9) 2005 (4.1) 2006

2006 .2005

( :
) (%12.3 2005 ) (%15.9 .2006

- -:

: 2006 2005

) (1892268880 2006 ) (1725462000 . 2005

-:
.

. ) (%12.4 2005 ) (%25.8 . 2006

: .

249

 - -:

2005 2006 -:

) (2 20052006

2006
1892268880

2005
1725462000
1313550000
375000000
27500000
)(1716050000
9412000
5306880

1464800000
385000000
27750000
)(1877550000
14718880

-: .

-:
- = ) -2006

(2005 360 (4792950 5032630) = 2005

= 86284800 .

- =) 2006

-2006 2005
(2005 2005

=])15[(87570000) 5032630(4792950/87570000= )15 (87570000 91949094

= 65686410 .

= )62.5 (6000000 6000000

= .

= )166666.8 (165 165= .

= 65686410 + + = 65686410
-:

) (3

86284800
65686410
20598390

-: ).(1

-:

250

 - = ) - 2006

(2005 2006

= )5032630 (360 376

= 80522080 .

- =) -2006

(2005 2006
2006
= )5032630(4792950/87570000) (15-16
= 91949094 .

=)6000000 (62.5-64.16667

= 10000020 .

= )165 (166666.8-171296.3

= 763867 .

= 91949094 10000020+ 763867+

= 102712981 .

-:
)(4

80522080
102712981
22190901

-: ).(1

-:

- =) 2006

-2006
(2006 2006

= )16 (91949094-91550000

= 6385504 .

= )64.16667 (6000000 6000000

= .

= )171296.3 (165 -162= 513889 .

= 6385504 + 513889 +
251

= 6899393 .
2005 2006 -:

) (5 2005 2006


2006
80522080

2006
-

1892268880

6899393

1877550000

6899393

14718880

2005

2006

1725462000

86284800

1716050000

65686410

102712981

9412000

20598390

22190901

2006

5306880

-: )(1). (2

239680 )-5032630
(479290 ) (Market Size

Market
(
)Share

-:

- -:

-:

252

( 2006 ) (%43.2 2005 ) (%36.3

.2006

( 2006 ) (%44.1 2005

) (%38.7 .

( ) (1.7 2006 2006

) (1.17 .

( 2005 %26.4 2006

). (%27.3

( 2006 ) (4.1 2005

) (8.9 .

( 2006 ) (%15.9 2005

). (%12.3

-:

( 2006 2005
.

(
.

)(20598390

) (22190901

)(6899393

- -:
253

 ) (

.

(References) :

2005 . 2006
:
1- Rockville, "The Balanced Scorecard" 2005, p: 1 .http://www.balanced
scorecard.org/
2- Blocher, Edward J. and Chem. ,Kung H. and Lin, Thomas W. ,"Cost
Management :- A Strategic Emphasis", McGraw- Hill, Co. , 2002 , p: 17 ,
p: 723 .
3- Hilton , Ronald W. and Maher , Michael W. and Selto , Frank H. ,"Cost
Management Strategies for Business Decisions" McGraw-Hill , Co. ,2000 ,
p: 5 , p: 914 , p: 266 .

254

4- Horngren , Charles T. and Foster , George and Dater , Srikant M. , "

Cost Accounting :- A Managerial Emphasis " , 10th Ed. ,Prentice- Hall ,
Inc. ,New Jersey , U.S.A . , 2000, p: 463-465 , p: 825 , p: 472-474 .
5- Zimmerman, Jerold L., "Accounting for Decision Making and Control"
McGraw-Hill, U.S.A, 2000, p: 5 .
6- Atkinson, Anthony A. and Banker , Rajiv D. and Kaplan ,Robert S. and
Young Marks . ,"Management Accounting" 2nd Ed. ,1997 , p: 27 , p:533534 .
7- Kaplan, Roberts and Norton, David D., "The Balanced Scorecard
Measures that Drive Performance", Harvard Business Review, Jan. Ferd,
1992, p: 71-79 .
8- Drury, Colin, "Management and Cost Accounting" , 5th ed., Business
Press Thomson Learning, 2000, p: 930 .
" " -9
. 39 2001
10- Glautier, Michael and Under Down, Brian, "Accounting Theory and
Practice", 6th, Ed. , Pitman Publishing, London,1997, p:607-608.
" " -11
. 611-610 1991

- " " -12

.341334243-240 2000 -

" " -13

. 137-136 2002 -
14- Horngren, Charles, T., Foster, George and Srikant M. Dater, "Cost
Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis", 9th, ed., Prentice Hall ,Inc., New
Jersey, U.S.A, 1997, p: 691-692 .
15- Pringle, Charles D., Wright Peter, Kroll mark, J. Parnell, John A.,
"Management Tex and cases", Inc, U.S.A , 1994, p:250 .
16- Hilton , Ronald W. ,"Managerial Accounting" 4th Ed. ,McGraw-Hill ,
Inc. ,New York, U.S.A ,1999, p: 220 .

255