The document summarizes a study that investigated the "lack of control theory" of stress. The study examined how perceived control over an aversive situation impacts stress levels. It split 60 students into three groups with varying levels of control when viewing graphic photographs. Group 1 had full control and information, Group 2 had partial information, and Group 3 had no control or information. Physiological measures found Group 1 had the lowest stress levels while Group 3 had the highest, supporting that lack of control increases stress while having control decreases stress.
The document summarizes a study that investigated the "lack of control theory" of stress. The study examined how perceived control over an aversive situation impacts stress levels. It split 60 students into three groups with varying levels of control when viewing graphic photographs. Group 1 had full control and information, Group 2 had partial information, and Group 3 had no control or information. Physiological measures found Group 1 had the lowest stress levels while Group 3 had the highest, supporting that lack of control increases stress while having control decreases stress.
The document summarizes a study that investigated the "lack of control theory" of stress. The study examined how perceived control over an aversive situation impacts stress levels. It split 60 students into three groups with varying levels of control when viewing graphic photographs. Group 1 had full control and information, Group 2 had partial information, and Group 3 had no control or information. Physiological measures found Group 1 had the lowest stress levels while Group 3 had the highest, supporting that lack of control increases stress while having control decreases stress.
Stress can be defined as the negative emotional state which has
been brought about by a stressor, which can be either an internal or external factor. The lack of control theory is centered on the idea that a perceived lack of control over a situation is a strong reason for people to feel stress. A piece of research that investigated this was the study done by Geer and Maisel. The two set up a laboratory experiment to see if perceived control over something aversive lessens stress, or conversely, lack of control over a situation increases stress. The study by Geer and Maisel consisted of 60 psychology undergraduates from NYU who were made to look at photographs of dead car crash victims. The sample was split into three conditions, each with a varying amount of control. Group 1 were told the timings of the photographs so they knew when they'd appear and they were also told how to get rid of the photographs from the screen (actual control over the situation). Group 2 knew the timings only; they were warned on how long the photos were shown for and that a 10 second noise would precede them (actual predictability of the situation). Meanwhile, Group 3 were unaware of timings and were told that from time to time they would see photographs and hear tones (no control and predictability of the situation). Two physiological measures were used to assess stress response: an ECG (electrocardiogram) machine that examined heart rate though later discarded - and through galvanic skin response, which measured the change in the skins electrical activity due to emotional arousal, such as fear or stress. It was found that Group 1 had the lowest stress according to the GSR, and Group 3 had the highest. In conclusion, lack of control can increase stress, and that control over your environment could help to reduce stress.