Professional Documents
Culture Documents
org/2550
This strategy appears to be based upon halves because children are confident with this
concept. This approach is more common among younger children, although in her
studies Grace has seen many children between the ages of 7 and 10 adopting it too.
Using this method, the child starts by splitting each region or composite unit into two
parts. So, sharing three chocolate bars between four children would be achieved by first
halving all the bars. In this case four of the halves can be shared with one whole bar
(two halves) remaining. The parts of the third bar are halved again and can now be
shared. If a fair share was not possible at this point further halving would take place. At
this point a teacher might ask the child "How much has each person got?" and in
offering a description the child might reply "Two" because they are counting fragments
rather than seeing the equal share as part of a whole.
Stuck on counting
In fragmenting the child treats the parts as individual unit items. So, when asked to
determine what share each child will receive if three chocolate bars are shared equally
among four children, some 7 year-olds would respond that a child receives two. No
conceptual distinction is being made between the 'two' as in number of pieces and the
'two' pieces as fractions of each unit, or the whole (three bars) that is being shared.
These children are aware of the fragments as only individual unit items. The complexity
here is also whether the 'whole' refers to the individual bars, in which case each child
gets three-quarters of the bar, or the 'whole' refers to the three bars. In this latter case
the answer would be "A quarter of the chocolate". Here a teacher would be trying to
emphasise that we cannot always successfully describe quantity by counting. It would
be necessary for portions to be equal in size for counting to offer a way forward.
Partitioning
Even young children can partition regions or composite units approximately equally
among two or three recipients. The older, more mathematically-mature child can
partition the region into x number of parts and then designate y of the parts to
indicate y/x where x is greater than 2.
For example: 8 year-old children were asked to divide a rectangle into eight pieces and
then colour two of the pieces red in a diagram similar to the one below.
The issue here becomes one of equivalence. Grace found that when learners are asked
what fraction is unshaded they would say 6/8. No children in the research identified the
coloured part as being 1/4 of the whole or the uncoloured part as 3/4. This highlights a
question for teachers about how they might raise awareness of those equivalences.
This might be achieved through questions inviting learners to describe the same fraction
in different ways or by identifying problems with equal answers. For example, in the
latter case, sharing 6 bars of chocolate between 8 will result in the same amount of
chocolate each as sharing 3 bars between 4. "Could you get the same answer in a
different way?"
In seeing the fraction as a partition and identifying what is the same and what is
different about 3/4 and 6/8 learners begin to see the fraction as a comparison between
the numerator and the denominator (what Grace calls one-to-many or many-to-many
comparison). This is based on a ratio concept and Grace argues it also indicates a
deeper understanding of fractions. As in the previous example, a child indicating that the
uncoloured fraction of the square is three-quarters, is simplifying the denominator and
numerator to give an equivalent fraction, without losing the value of the fraction, though
some information is lost.
What impact might this have on how we teach children to understand fractions better?
Indefinite wholes - where the extent of the whole is not clear, for example we do not
know how long the pattern extends in either direction in the image below:
Show the children some sweets; question them:- Do you think I have enough
sweets that each child will get one sweet?; What will happen if I cut each sweet
in half?; Will more or less children get sweets?
towards developing the fraction concept with the purpose of overcoming some of their
difficulties with fractions. By presenting the children with wholes, which are not explicitly
divided into equal parts, they are encouraged to analyse the part-whole relationship.
For example:
For each figure, write the fraction shown:
(a)What fraction is K?
(b)What fraction of the figure is not coloured?
(c)What fraction of the whole is missing?
Where there is an explicit division of a whole into equal parts, children are able to
determine the fraction of the part/parts indicated by counting the number of parts in the
whole and the number of parts indicated (double counting). In the figures presented
above, it is more difficult for the children to adopt this 'partitioning' approach. Children
are required to analyse the relationship of the particular part/parts indicated in relation to
the entire whole.
Fractions taught as a part-whole concept, in the manner indicated in this article, can
ensure that children have a sound foundation for conceptualising other concepts in
fractions. However, it must be noted that despite the wealth of possible examples, an
approach to fractions based solely on "part-whole" is too restricted - yielding proper
fractions only. Therefore other concepts of fractions need to be explored if children are
to have a fuller and better understanding of rational numbers.
Note 1: This article is based on research by Grace Lopez-Charles - Assessment of
Children's Understanding of Rational Numbers - PhD Thesis.
References:
1. Azis, N & Pa, N (1991), Primary school pupils' knowledge of fractions, Journal for
Research in Education, 45
2. Nunes, T., (1996), Understanding rational numbers, in T. Nunes and P.E. Bryant
(eds.): Children Doing Mathematics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
3. Streefland, L. (1996), Charming fractions or fractions being charmed? In T.
Nunes and P.E. Bryant (eds.): How Do Children Learn Mathematics? Hove:
Erlbaum.