You are on page 1of 2

LAW2211 2015 Winter

Final Project
I have been asked to give more details about the marking for the final project. I
do not know how much more I can say that is not in the rubric. I will put some
comments and additions below the rubric table.
Outcome

Mark
Assigned 0
Nothing
provided

Minimal C.V.,
no professional
qualifications,
no work history

C.V. includes
professional
qualifications
and some case
references

Choice of Tools

Not
explained

Minimal
information

Partial C.V.,
either
professional
qualifications or
work history
unrelated to
forensic
investigation
Partial
explanation

Purity of
Evidence

Not
explained

Chain of
Custody

Not
explained

Basic
Partial
description of
explanation of
action of
why evidence
investigative
not altered
tools
Partial documentation, gaps in
custody

Significance of
Findings

Not
explained

Expert Witness

Little
explanation,
only a
presentation of
findings.

Partial
explanation of
findings
including
probably
source,
importance,
why findings
are significant

Complete
explanation
identifying
tools, use in
previous cases,
applicability to
current case
Full
explanation of
why evidence
not altered
Full
documentation
of chain of
custody
Complete
explanation of
findings
including
probable
source,
importance,
why findings
are significant

LAW2211 2015 Winter


Expert Witness C.V.: Short section. Make up a C.V. using industry recognized
certifications.
Choice of Tools: What software and / or hardware was used to do the
investigation. Why were those tools chosen?
Purity of evidence: short section. How do investigative tools ensure evidence is
preserved.
Chain of custody should be self explanatory, should also be a short section.
Significance of Findings: This should be the largest section in your report.
Where did the suspicious information come from? What makes it suspicious?
Why is it significant? Is there a crime?

You might also like