Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Reddy-Jaiswal-Godbole-Wind and Earthquake Analysis of Tall RC Chimneys-2011
Reddy-Jaiswal-Godbole-Wind and Earthquake Analysis of Tall RC Chimneys-2011
O. R. Jaiswal
Professor, Department of Applied Mechanics, VNIT Nagpur (M.S.)
P. N. Godbole
Emeritus Professor, Department of Applied Mechanics, VNIT Nagpur (M.S.)
ABSTRACT: Chimneys are normally designed for critical loads produced by earthquake or wind. It is necessary to
analyse the dynamic response of chimney due to influence of earthquake and wind loads. Chimney being tall and
flexible structure, it is expected that wind loads will be more critical than earthquake loads. In this paper, two RC
chimneys are analysed for earthquake and wind loads. Earthquake analysis is done as per IS 1893 (Part 4): 20052 and
wind analysis is performed as per IS 4998 (Part 1): 19921. This paper presents the comparison of wind loads with that of
earthquake loads to decide the most critical loads for the design of the chimney shell. The design wind load is obtained
by combination of along and across-wind response of the chimney. The combination is performed as per the procedure
given in ACI 307-98 code3. It is seen that, the earthquake forces acting on the chimney in zone V are closely matching
with wind loads in a zone whose basic wind speed is 44 m/s.
KEYWORDS: RC chimneys, earthquake loads, wind loads, combined design loads, zone factor.
INTRODUCTION
Tall RC chimneys are commonly used to discharge
pollutants at higher elevation. The enforcement of stricter
air-pollution control standards has led to the construction of
increasingly tall RC chimneys worldwide. Further due to the
availability of advanced construction materials chimney
shell is being made with thinner wall. As a result, chimneys
have become more slender and sensitive to wind-induced
vibrations. The cross-section of the chimney is generally
hollow circular, from aerodynamic considerations, and
tapered, from considerations of structural economy and
aesthetics. The chimney is subject to gust buffeting in the
along-wind direction due to drag forces, and also to possible
vortex shedding in the across-wind direction. In the typical
case of slender, tapered RC chimneys, it is the along-wind
response which generally predominates and governs the
design.
Tall reinforced concrete (RC) chimneys form an important
component of major industries and power plants. Damage
to chimney due to wind or earthquake load may lead to shut
down of power plants and important industries. However, if
chimney is located in higher seismic zone and lower wind
speed zone, then, earthquake forces may become
comparable, if not more, than the wind loads.
In fact, the chimney is designed for the combined effect of
along-wind and across-wind loads. In the literature, various
approaches to combine along-wind and across-wind loads
are mentioned. In this paper a method given by ACI 307
code is being used to obtain the combined design loads.
Earlier many researchers4,6,7 have shown the results of
earthquake analysis using the simplified procedures given in
the codes. The objective of this paper is to analyze the
chimneys for design wind loads and earthquake loads and
compare them to decide the most critical loads for the design
of chimney shell.
WIND ANALYSIS
Wind load on structures, depends on gustiness of wind,
topography of terrain and also on the interaction of
wind with structures. Dynamic wind loads induces
along-wind loads and across-wind loads on tall
chimneys. Here the random response method is used
for the analysis as given in IS 4998:1992.
Along-wind analysis
The along wind load per unit height at any height z on
a chimney is given by
Fz = Fzm + Fzf
(1)
Fzm = Pz C D d z
(2)
F zf = 3 .( G 1) / h 2 .( z / h ) F zm . z .d z
(3)
G = 1+ g f r
{B + S E }
(4)
Vcri =
fi d
Sn
(5)
Fz0i = 4 2 f i oi m z zi dz
2
(6)
509
z0
M z0i = 4 f i oi m z zi ( z z 0 ) dz
2
(7)
z0
oi =
2
1.25C L d hi a d { (L ) / 2(I + 2)}
mei
2Sn2
1 h 2
zi dz
h 0
( k
2
a a d / m ei )
(8)
where, mei = equivalent mass per unit length in kg/m in the
mei = m z zi dz
2
2
zi
dz
(9)
EARTHQUAKE ANALYSIS
The earthquake loads are obtained as per IS 1893 (part 4):
2005. Time period of vibration, T of chimneys when fixed at
base is given by,
T = CT
Wt .h
E 2. A.g
(10)
Ah =
(Z 2 )(S a g )
(R I )
(11)
V = C v . Ah .Wt .Dv
(12)
M = Ah .Wt .h.Dm
(13)
510
EXAMPLE CHIMNEYS
Two chimneys are considered for the analysis purpose. The
217 m chimney as shown in Figure 1(a) consists of four
tapers and twenty one platforms. The platform details are
also shown in Figure 1(a). Where as the 220 m chimney as
shown in Figure 1(b) is of uniform taper whose outer
diameter and shell thickness at the top and bottom are
shown.
Modeling
For the analysis purpose Chimneys are modeled as vertical
cantilever fixed at the base having varying cross sections
using beam element (NKTP 12) of NISA (EMRC, 1998).
Chimneys are divided into elements of one meter length
along its height. The mass of each section is calculated by
averaging the mass of above and below it. Chimney is
idealized as mdf system with mass lumped at various levels.
Horizontal motion is considered. Natural frequency and
mode shapes required for the analysis are obtained from this
finite element model of chimney.
Material
The material used for chimney shell is M25 grade concrete
whose mass density () considered as 2.5 t/m3, weight
density as 25 KN / m3, Youngs modulus (E) as 3.2 x 107
kN/m2 and structural damping as a fraction of critical
damping () is considered as 0.016. Free vibration
characteristics such as natural frequency and time periods
are obtained from the dynamic analysis of chimneys and
shown in Table 1. Then critical wind speeds and mean
design wind speeds are calculated and presented in Table 2.
Natural Frequency
(Hz)
1st
2nd
3rd
mode mode mode
0.33
1.39
3.44
0.44
1.86
4.53
Time period
(sec.)
1st
2nd
3rd
mode mode mode
2.98
0.72
0.29
2.23
0.53
0.22
The critical wind velocity and the design wind velocity are
calculated by taking Vb = 44 m/s , k1 = 1.07 , k3 = 1.00, sn =
0.2 and d = average diameter over the top 1/3 height of
chimney
511
307-98) and
Institute, Detroit
[2] IS 4998(part-1):1992, Criteria for Design of
Reinforced Concrete Chimneys, 2nd revision,
Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
[3] IS 1893 (Part 4):2005, Criteria for earthquake
resistant design of structures, Bureau of Indian
Standards, New Delhi.
[4] Jain, S.K., Singh, B.P., Guptha, B.K., 1990, I.S.
code provisions for seismic design of tall
chimneys, International of structures, Vol. 10,
No. 2, pp 103-111
[5] Jaiswal, O.R., Srinivas, V., 2005, Effect of tuned
mass damper on across-wind response of tall RC
Chimneys, Journal of Wind & Engineering, India,
vol.2, No.1, pp.9-21
[6] Shivaji, M., Raju, V.S.N., Dynamic analysis of
R.C.C. chimneys