Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Each source is clearly related or relevant to the topic stated above? If yes, state
which is best: if no, state which arent
Yes all three are good, the one on thisibelieve.org is best because it touches
upon equal marriage
Yes, the one from Jstor and this ibelieve.org are most clearly stated.
Each sources owner/sponsor has clear credentials? If yes, state the best example of
this; if no, state which dont
Yes, thisibelieve.org has an opinion that makes sense, its recent and
relevant.
Each source is fairly recent? If yes, which is most recent; if no, state which is oldest
The one from Jstor doesnt have a date. The day book entries are very recent
and thisibelieve.org is from 2008.
Yes, the one from Jstor, it specifically talks about restrictions on marriage for
priests.
The Jstor article, its very clear and talks about a lot of different restrictions
priest have.
Which source is the pro viewpoint? What makes this source special/ standout?
Which source is the con viewpoint? What makes this source special/ standout?
I felt they were good sources because they gave basic information for the
topic but they couldve been more in-depth and had more information.
I think, solely on these sources, he/she would earn a grade of a 80, because
They dont have a very strong focus on the subject, theyre all broad. They
had good information but it was all similar.
Does your partner agree or disagree with this evaluation? Elaborate with the
response.
Yes my partner agreed. He thinks he should find sources that pin point to one
general idea that isnt so broad.