Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Strength Conditioning Developing Teaching Technique
Strength Conditioning Developing Teaching Technique
Strength Conditioning:
Developing Your Teaching Technique
Mark Mullineaux, MA
School of Sciences
University of Sunderland
Keywords: safety; effectiveness; teaching points; primacy;
recency; chunking.
Introduction
The study of how people learn is
crucial to understanding how best
to teach them (1). For strength
conditioners, applying learning
principles to the improvement of
education and training can seem a
daunting task, because mystery
surrounds a good deal of the underpinning theory. This article
aims to consider first, some of
these key principles, and second,
how the practitioner can employ
them on the floor to develop his or
her teaching technique.
August 2001
18
Emphasizing Particular
Points: Primacy and Recency
In terms of safety and effectiveness, the concepts of primacy and
recency are especially valuable to
the strength conditioner. In general, the first information we receive
has the greatest impact on our
August 2001
overall impressions. This is referred to as the primacy effect. Interestingly, however, recall is particularly good for the most recently
presented items of information (recency) (3). This suggests that
clients are more likely to remember the first teaching points you
give (primacy) and the last teaching points you give (recency).
The implication of this fact is
that you could consider giving
your key safety teaching point first
and reiterate it as your last teaching point. Note the order of teaching points in our example: Telling
the client to keep the arches of the
feet under the bar comes first, a
main teaching point that, when
linked to shoulder in advance of
the bar, means the torque is reduced because the distance of the
force from the body is reduced.
The impact is that one of the main
safety points is emphasized first
(primacy), and you can then reiterate it later (recency).
Some Conclusions
References
1. Glaser, R., and M. Bassok.
Learning theory and the
study of instruction. Annu.
Rev. Psychol. 40:631666.
1989.
2. Graham, J.F. Exercise: Deadlift. Strength Cond. J. 22:18
20. 2000.
3. Luchins, A. Primacy-recency
in impression formulation.
In: The Order of Presentation
in Persuasion. C.I. Hovland,
ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1957.
4. Miller, G.A. The magical
number seven plus or minus
two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol. Rev. 63:81
97. 1956.
August 2001
MOVED
OR
MOVING?
Keep your Journals
and Bulletins
coming to you
in a timely
manner. Update
your address and
information on the
NSCA web site.
UPDATE
OR RENEW
YOUR NSCA
MEMBERSHIP
DIRECTLY!
ON LINE
www.nsca-lift.org
Advertisers Index
Mullineaux
Gatorade . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3
GNC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6
Hammer Strength . .back cover
Met-RX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4
M-F Athletic . . . . . . . . . . . .27
Safe USA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .72
Samson Equipment . . . . . . .1
UESAKA . . .inside back cover
Vertimax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .37
York Barbell . .inside front cover
19