AL Amanda Wiel Animal Systems atural Resources Science Fair Score Sheet Division I! (Group 2, #2) AFNR Program: - Division:, Skill Definition of Skill [Points Knowledge Is there evidence that the student has acquired scientific skills and/or knowledge by | [2/15 Gained doing this project? Does the exhibitor recognize the scope and limitation of the problem he/she has selected? Scientific ‘Has the problem been clearly stated? Has the exhibitor solved the problem by using fojis Approach the scientific facts as a basis for new conclusions? Is the exhibitor aware of the basic scientific principles that lend support to the methods used and the conclusions | reached? [Experimental | Has the data been gathered from work done by the student, rather than the results Lapis | | Research from the work of others? Is the exhibitor’s equipment effective? Does it do what it was intended to do? Can the research be the basis for further experimentation? Is the project actually a model or demonstration? Have variables been clearly identified and controlled for in the research process? Individual or Has material been gathered and cited using an appropriate format? Is the logbook Lys Team Work | present for examination? Does the logbook contain detailed information about the | research process? If this was a team project, is there evidence of collaboration ___| present? Identify the portions of the presentation representing the work of others. Thoroughness | Is the exhibitor aware of the empirical method (the necessity of repeating trials) and | 715 the importance of controlling the variables in the experimentation in order to reach @ | valid conclusion? Has the analysis of the problem been orderly? Have procedures | been outlined in a step-by-step fashion? How successful was the original plan carried through to completion. L | [Information | Are known facts and principles stated correctly and used accurately? Have the results Jes | | of experiments been reported accurately even though faulty experimental methods or | conditions may have made the data unreliable? If so, have the- se errors been noted? | TResultsand | Has the exhibitor started with known facts and drawn their own conclusions? Are the | “70/15 | [conclusions _ | conclusions consistent with the data and/or observations? Is information provided as to what was learned as a result of research? _ Interview Js the exhibitor able to communicate their knowledge of the project? Sas Zaal DisplS) iias the data been presented in the best manner for the particular type of information | 72/15 involved? Are spelling errors present? Does the exhibit demonstrate 2 general neatness and attractiveness? Is the display presented in a logical and interesting manner? | TOTAL SCORE Tn the event of a Ue, winner will be determined based on the score of the written project report. If a tie still exists, the tie will be broken on scores received in the following sections in order: Interview, Thoroughness, Information and Results/Conclusions. 2135 Comments7 : See 5 Art tural Resources Science Fair Score Sheet Amanda Wiel ‘Animal Systems Stu Division Il (Group 2, #2) AENR Program: ¢ Division: Skill Definition of Skill Points Knowledge | Is there evidence that the student has acquired scientific skills and/or knowledge by | 14/15 Gained doing this project? Does the exhibitor recognize the scope and limitation of the problem he/she has selected? Scientific Has the problem been clearly stated? Has the exhibitor solved the problem by using | jens | Approach _| the scientific facts as a basis for new conclusions? Is the exhibitor aware of the basic | scientific principles that lend support to the methods used and the conclusions reached? Experimental | Has the data been gathered from work done by the student, rather than the results |B /15 | | Research from the work of others? Is the exhibitor’s equipment effective? Does it do what it ‘was intended to do? Can the research be the basis for further experimentation? Is the project actually a model or demonstration? Have variables been clearly identified and controlled for in the research process? Individual or | Has material been gathered and cited using an appropriate format? Is the logbook | (4/15 | |-ream Work | present for examination? Does the logbook contain detailed information about the Fesearch process? If this was a team project, is there evidence of collaboration present? Identify the portions of the presentation representing the work of others. _| Thoroughness | Is the exhibitor aware of the empirical method (the necessity of repeating trials) and | [B_/15 the importance of controlling the variables in the experimentation in order to reach a valid conclusion? Has the analysis of the problem been orderly? Have procedures been outlined in a step-by-step fashion? How successful was the original plan carried | through to completion. | [information | Are known facts and principles stated correctly and used ‘accurately? Have the results | T& /15 | of experiments been reported accurately even though faulty experimental methods or conditions may have made the data unreliable? If so, have the- se errors been noted? Results and | Has the exhibitor started with known facts and drawn their own conclusions? Are the | [3 /15 Conclusions _ | conclusions consistent with the data and/or observations? Is information provided as to what was learned as a result of research? Interview Is the exhibitor able to communicate their knowledge of the project? (Ess {sual Displa})| Has the data been presented in the best manner for the particular type of information | [3/15 involved? Are spelling errors present? Does the exhibit demonstrate a general neatness and attractiveness? Is the display presented in a logical and interesting TOTAL SCORE | In the event of a tie, winner will be determined based on the score of the written |] @O/135 project report. If a tie still exists, the tie will be broken on scores received in the following sections in order: Interview, Thoroughness, Information and Results/Conclusions. Comments Gneod— \Dizol THA Re an wpe oe work Site)bd Al amanda Wiel atural Resources Science Fair Score Sheet U Animal Systems St Division Il (Group 2, #2) | AFNR Program: ' f Division: Skill Definition of Skill Points Knowledge is there evidence that the student has acquired scientific skills and/or knowledge by | 14/15 Gained doing this project? Does the exhibitor recognize the scope and limitation of the | problem he/she has selected? Scientific Has the problem been clearly stated? Has the exhibitor solved the problem by using | 16/15 ‘Approach the scientific facts as a basis for new conclusions? Is the exhibitor aware of the basic scientific principles that lend support to the methods used and the conclusions : reached? Experimental | Has the data been gathered from work done by the student, rather than the results | 12/15 Research "| from the work of others? Is the exhibitor's equipment effective? Does it do what it ‘was intended to do? Can the research be the basis for further experimentation? Is the project actually a model or demonstration? Have variables been clearly identified and | controlled for in the research process? Individual or | Has material been gathered and cited using an appropriate format? Is the logbook | [% /15 Team Work __ | present for examination? Does the logbook contain detailed information about the | research process? If this was a team project, is there evidence of collaboration present? Identify the portions of the presentation representing the work of others. “Thoroughness | Is the exhibitor aware of the empirical method (the necessity of repeating trials) and | [ /15 the importance of controlling the variables in the experimentation in order to reach a valid conclusion? Has the analysis of the problem been orderly? Have procedures been outlined in a step-by-step fashion? How successful was the original plan carried through to completion. _ Information _ | Are known facts and principles stated correctly and used accurately? Have the results | [2/15 of experiments been reported accurately even though faulty experimental methods or conditions may have made the data unreliable? If so, have the- se errors been noted? Results and __| Has the exhibitor started with known facts and drawn their own conclusions? Are the | [3 /15 Conclusions | conclusions consistent with the data and/or observations? Is information provided as to what was learned as a result of research? Interview Is the exhibitor able to communicate their knowledge of the project? Ta/is Vnowledagalele- \gut porvons sk wed: Has the data been presented in the best manner for the particular type of information | [3/15 involved? Are spelling errors present? Does the exhibit demonstrate a general neatness and attractiveness? Is the display presented in a logical and interesting manner? 7 [TOTAL SCORE | In the event of a tie, winner will be determined based on the score of the written project report. If a tie still exists; the tie will be broken on scores received in the ay following sections in order: Interview, Thoroughness, Information and Results/Conclusions. Comments Dn ese re pars wee Kar $0 VeAT On Ere onark PoeKRy ound.