SIOP Live lesson with Jack had two types of objectives: language and content. Language objectives focused on our student's writing and speaking skills. Content objectives included students will be able to recognize Milton Hershey, Compare Hershey Pennsylvania to archibald, and design a poster for a business idea.
SIOP Live lesson with Jack had two types of objectives: language and content. Language objectives focused on our student's writing and speaking skills. Content objectives included students will be able to recognize Milton Hershey, Compare Hershey Pennsylvania to archibald, and design a poster for a business idea.
SIOP Live lesson with Jack had two types of objectives: language and content. Language objectives focused on our student's writing and speaking skills. Content objectives included students will be able to recognize Milton Hershey, Compare Hershey Pennsylvania to archibald, and design a poster for a business idea.
Student: Jack Our SIOP Live lesson with Jack had two types of objectives. These include language objectives and content objectives. Our language objectives focused on our students writing and speaking skills. The language objectives are that students will be able to write up a poster proposal for a business, and that students will be able to explain to the class their business ideas using vocabulary from our lesson. The content objectives included students will be able to recognize Milton Hershey, summarize Milton Hersheys achievements, Compare Hershey Pennsylvania to Archibald, and design a poster for a business idea. After presenting our lesson, I feel that we achieved the majority of our objectives. I feel that we successfully achieved both of our language objectives, as Jack created his own business proposal on a small poster, and as he was able to explain his business to us using the vocabulary that we had just introduced. In terms of content objectives, the only objective that I felt we did not achieve was for Jack to be able to confidently compare Hershey Pennsylvania to Archibald. I believe that all other objectives were met as Jack produced a poster, and was able to orally recognize Milton Hershey and summarize his achievements.
I believe that this activity somewhat challenged Jacks
vocabulary and language development. Our vocabulary words for this lesson were business, design, and entrepreneur. At the onset of our lesson, Jack seemed to be familiar with design and its general meaning. While Jack mentioned that he had heard the word business in the past, and easily grasped the term once we explained it, but he was not able to produce a contextual definition for business until we discussed it with him. As for entrepreneur, Jack struggled to pronounce the word, but after some practice he was able to speak the word fluently. At the beginning of our lesson, Jack had no inclination as to what entrepreneur could mean. With support, he was able to recall a definition in his own words of what an entrepreneur is. After presenting our lesson, I realize that there are a few parts of our lesson that could have gone more smoothly. While I would consider our lesson a success, small mistakes on my part resulted in our being flexible and thinking on our feet. The one mistake in particular I am thinking of is that I accidentally used an incomplete version of the PowerPoint presentation that I had been preparing for the lesson. When I had emailed myself the PowerPoint, I did not realize that I must not have saved my progress, and as a result I sent myself an incomplete version. This version we ended up using during our presentation, we just had to adapt to work around the missing components. This mistake was my own, and my group should not be punished for it. I want to
commend both members of my group for seamlessly adapting when
we were surprised with the incorrect version. If I were to perform this lesson again, I would be very careful to ensure that I had all of the correct and updated materials. In addition, I would add more of a focus on a compare and contrast of Archibald and Hershey in order to better illustrate the similarities and differences between the two regions. As communication was not an issue during our lesson, I noticed we tended to be somewhat conversational with Jack throughout our presentation. As a result, we were naturally less inclined to use body gestures or to slow down our speech and enunciate each word. While we did perform these actions, I feel we did not emphasize them as much as we would have with an actual ELL/LEP student. In addition, we opened our lesson with a clip from an episode Spongebob Squarepants. While this opener was relevant and effective for getting Jacks attention, it is likely that an ELL student may not have been exposed to this program. As a result, I would change the opening of the lesson to try to make it relevant to the student (based on the students background, culture, etc.). Lastly, I would be sure to use less complicated vocabulary words for an actual ELL student. I am referring to both the language I use while speaking with the child, as well as the official vocabulary for the lesson. This adaptation would prove sensitive to the students BICS and CALPS.