. {AownA 18/03/2015} Hum & 10291-01-12 na 298 nwpr) ume see 2s mnt ‘he fae se”? Fax OF 31761 on WO USE i = .[T POS Vy TUYAWAyDYAMOp) Lsulations of the Courts — Inspection of Court Files (2003); Vorm 2 (Regulation 4(c)) I WPI? WYN? [NI NX? | 2 est to Inspect Court File 1 Requester's Details a) Full name: Joseph Zemik, PAD "2" cai °° b)IDNo: —_ 053625596 . ©) Address: PO Box 33407, Tel-Abfi-@3- 2015 4) Telephone: None 2. Court File Details a) Court File Number: Spa; ‘Tel-Aviv Distriet Cour, Fite ‘No 10291-01-12 ») Parties: ‘State of Israel v Hillel Elias Ernesto Tzerni et al (16 Defendants) ©) Records, which are subject of the request: i, Any lawfully executed court record, which includes Verdict for Defendant 8, Ehud Olmert Any lawfully executed court record, which includes Sentencing for Defendant 8, Ehud Olmert SQ i-Any lawtully exeentd court record, wi +h includes Verdict for Defendant 9, Shulamit Zaken a iv. Any lawfully executed court record, which includes Sentencing for Defendant 9, Shulamit Cc Zaken — y. Any lawfully executed court record, which includes Arrest Decree for Defendant 9, Shulamit a Zaken and served as the legal foundation for her confinement. 3. Purpose and Justification for the Inspection Instant Request is filed pursuant to the Regulations of the Courts, - Inspection of Court Files (2003) and Supreme Court decision in Association for Civil Rights in Israel v Minister of Justice et al (591797, . a) The records, inspection of which is requested herein, are public court records, and instant court file is not sealed. ») The court file records, inspection of which is requested in 2), above, were not found in routine inspection of instant court file recordsthrough Net-HaMishpat, IT system and public access system of the Israeli courts. Related court records, which were discovered in the public access system, were unsigned, truncated, or otherwise patently lacking force and effect. c) The Requester has been engaged for years in academic research regarding IT systems of the Israeli and US courts, and administration of public access to court records. His research on such subjects “has been published and presented in international academic conferences in the relevant fields, subject to anonymous, intemational peer-review. His reports on such subjects have been incorporated into UN Human Rights Council Reports pertaining to the United States (2010) and Israel (2013), following the Council's Professional Staff review. 4) Instant court file holds the highest public policy significance. Therefore, it should be deemed ‘essential to maintain public trust in the judicial system in particular, and the political system in general, by publicizing lawfully executed verdict and sentencing records in instant court file. €) Incase the Court finds it necessary for the parties in instant court file to respond on instant Request, the Court is requested to issue and serve a decision to that effect on the parties, together with instant Request. The Requester is unable to independently duly serve instant Request on the parties in instant court file, since the public access system does not provide access to the Certificates of Counsel (if ever filed). 4, Relationship of the Requester to the Court File (direct or indirect) ‘None, except for academic interést. V2WINNT oN? nt