Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Margarita Isaza
December 12, 2014
Table of Contents
1.0 - Introduction...............................................................1
2.0 Methods....................................................................1
3.0 - Discussion/Analysis....................................................4
3.1 - 1934 Aerial Images..........................................................4
Page 1 of 16
1.0 - Introduction
This project undertakes a change analysis over time. It is conducted
after providing georeferences to old imagery on top of more recent imagery
in the same location, and then analyzing the changes by performing change
detection analysis between the different photos.
Purpose:
2.0 Methods
Situate photos into a folder and made connection to this folder via
ArcGIS.
Drop 2003 IKONOS multispectral image (Figure 1) to ArcMap, this image has
geographic coordinates, system of NAD83 UTM Zone 17N.
Page 2 of 16
Drop each one of the historic photos, they dont have projection but the idea
is that they get the same coordinated system that the 2003 IKONOS image
after being georeferenced. Some photos require to rotate them and to
change color band to facilitate (visually) to compare them with the IKONOS
image.
To georeference this photos, select georeference and then select the tool
that permits to select a point on the photo to georeferenced and then, select
the same point in the same in location on the correctly projected IKONOS
image. Three or more distant points are required to georeference each photo.
The precision of the correspondence between the points selected in the two
photos make the georeference to be more precise.
The number of points selected (the more the better) and the space between
them affect the accuracy of the georeferencing as well, which means that
the photo will be positioned in the correct place.
Page 3 of 16
Figure 2:
images
3.0 - Discussion/Analysis
3.1 - 1934 Aerial Images
a What was the operational status of each of the canals in 1934? Why do
you draw this conclusion?
Page 4 of 16
There is a dark line at the left side along the canal, this represent
low level of water
Dirt can be seen on the left side of the canal
For the canal to be operational require enough amount of water on
the lock for the ships to be able to pass through
Page 5 of 16
Figure B
c Again, referring to A4873-20 Welland Canals 1934 (JPEG), why do you
suppose the pond at C existed? Support your hypothesis thoroughly.
The pond at location C possibly was created to prevent inundation due to
the construction of the canal.
Page 6 of 16
What was the operational status of each of the canals in 1921? Why do you
draw this conclusion?
Page 7 of 16
e What was the operational status of each of the canals in 2003? Why do
you draw this conclusion?
The operational status of canals in 2003 was the same as in 1934. Canal 3
was not operational and canal 4 was in use (figure 9).
Canal 4 is operational corroborated by the boat present on the image (blue
arrow). It is moving through the locks. Canal 3 is no longer in use do to the
large dense vegetation and deficit of water (red arrows).
Page 8 of 16
Page 9 of 16
Figure 1 above as well as H22-25 Welland Canal Locks 1921 (JPEG) and
H22-91 Welland Canal Locks 1921 (JPEG) show the lock numbering
system in 1921 for the 3rd canal. Create a table that shows how locks
11 through 24 are/are-not visible to our remote sensing platforms in
1934 and 2003. For each year, note whether the lock is visible, partly
visible, not visible or not shown on the imagery. For non-visible locks,
add a comment column to your table detailing why the lock is no
longer visible.
Lock
Numb
1934
2003
er
Visibility
11
12
13
Visible
Visible
Visible
Commen
ts
Visibili Comments
ty
Partially
Visible
Partially
Visible
Not Visible
14
Visible
15
Visible
16
Visible
17
Visible
Page 10 of 16
Not Visible
Partially
vegetation.
Basin is no visible but the
Visible
Partially
Visible
Partially
Visible
18
Partially
Visible
Visible
Completely gone
19
Not Visible
due construction
Not Visible
of canal 4
Completely gone
20
Not Visible
due construction
Not Visible
of canal 4
21
Visible
22
Visible
23
Not Shown
24
Not Shown
Partially
Visible
Not Visible
Not included in
the imagery
Not included in
the imagery
Not Visible
Not Visible
Describe the changes within the lands of the Fuller Plan from 1921 through
1934 to 2003. Speculate why these changes occurred.
The Fuller Plan from 1921 through 1934 to 2003 after analyzing the three
periods on time, it is observable that the Fuller Plan was a proposed area for
development of a subdivision.
In the 1921 image there are some crop fields and a barn. It also shows the
railway probably operational, as there was no overgrowth of vegetation at
that moment.
from 1921
from 1934
from 2003
Page 11 of 16
In 1934 image, most of the area seems empty the crop fields and barn are no
longer there. Probably due to the development proposal. The railroad seems
to be out of operation at this time overgrowth of vegetation is seeing. Roads
are less visible.
In 2003 it is evident that the development plan wasnt implemented and
vegetation is dense as a forest. There is a road that remains on the three
images, the railroad completely disappears under the vegetation.
g What happened to the wedge shaped landform at Location A of to
A4873-20 Welland Canals 1934 (JPEG) that was visible in 1921 and
1934? Support your hypothesis.
In 1921, the striations seems to be new and there are some elevation
changes. In 1934, when the canal 4 is visible, the striations are more
pronounce as a result of excavations. Excavation (different elevations) can
be observed from the shadowing. In 2003, the vegetation became
overgrown. Road to the south and two roads to the west can be observed. A
new development is also visible at northeast.
Figure
13:
- Location
A,A,
Figure
14:
-- Location
Figure
15:
Location
A,
1921
2003
1934
Page 12 of 16
h Create two figures for your report that show (via screen save of formal
ArcGIS layout) the georeferenced imagery overlaid atop the IKONOS
satellite image. One figure for the
4.0 - Conclusions
This project is a good example of implementing georeference on aerial
old imaginary on top of a most recent one using ESRIs ArcGIS. This project
also makes a significant change detection analysis.
Bibliography
Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation, 6th Edition, Lillesand, Kiefer
and Chipman
ArcGIS for Desktop, Third edition, Michael Law, Amy Collins.
Terms of Reference for Deliverable 9231-D3, GISC9231 Introduction to
Remote Sensing, Georeferencing of Scanned Aerial Imagery and Change
Detection, Janet Finlay, Niagara College.
Page 13 of 16
Appendices
Table 2: List of Figures and Tables
Section
Figure/Table
Page
Numb
er
2.0 Methods
Page 3
2003
Figure 19:
Four 1921 Aerial Images
Figure 20: Three 1934 aerial images
Page 4
Page 4
Page 6
Page 6
1934 (JPEG)
Figure B
Figure 23: A4873-20 Welland Canals
Page 6
Page 7
1934 (JPEG)
Figure 24: A4873-20 Welland Canals
Page 8
3.0 Discussion/Analysis
3.1 - 1934 Aerial Images
Page 14 of 16
1934 (JPEG),
Figure 25: Operational Status, Canals 3 &
Page 8
4, 1921
3.2 - 1921 Aerial Images
Figure 26: Operational Status, Canals 3 &
Page 8
4, 1921
Figure 27: Operational Status - Canal 3
Page 9
Page 15 of 16
Page 10
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
12
12
12
13
13
13
13
15