Professional Documents
Culture Documents
History of 8D
History of 8D
The 8D Problem Solving (Eight Disciplines) approach can be used to identify, correct and
eliminate the recurrence of quality problems. It is a methodology for product and process
improvement which is structured into eight disciplines emphasizing team synergy. The team as
a whole is believed to be better and smarter than the quality sum of individuals. 8D is also
known as: Global 8D, Ford 8D or TOPS 8D.
1.1
History of 8D
The development of a team Oriented Problem Solving strategy, based on the use statistical
methods of data analysis, was done at Ford Motor Company. The executives of the Powertrain
Organization ( transmission, chassis, engines) wanted a methodology where teams (design
engineering, manufacturing engineering, and production) could work on recurring problems. In
1986, the assignment was given to develop a manual and a subsequent course that would
achieve a new approach to solving tough engineering design and manufacturing problems.
The manual for this methodology was documented and defined in Team Oriented Problem
Solving (TOPS), first published in 1987. The manual and subsequent course material was
piloted at world Headquarters in Dearborn, Michigan. Many changes and revisions were made
based on feedback from the pilot sessions. This has been Fords approach to problem solving
ever since. It was never based on any military standard or other existing problem solving
methodology. The material is extensive and the 8D titles are merely the chapter headings for
each step in the process. Ford also refers to their current variant as G8D (Global 8D)
1.1.1
The US Government first standardized a process during the second World War as Military
Standard 1520 Corrective Action and Disposition System for Nonconforming material and the
disposition of the material. The 8D Problem Solving Process is used to identify, correct and
eliminate recurring problems. The methodology is useful in product and process improvement. It
establishes a permanent corrective action based on statistical analysis of the problem. It
focuses on the origin of the problem by determining Root causes. This determine a root cause
step is a part of the military usage of the 8Ds problem solving methodology and is not
referenced or included in the tops manual or course.
1.2.1
1.2.2
1.2.3
1.2.4
1.2.4
1.3.2
The 8D report is a basic part of the 8D problem solving methodology and at the end of
each step must be brought up to date. Any documents completed as a result of actions
done then become part of the report.
1.3.3
Therefore the report mirrors the current status of the problem solving work and is
therefore to be seen as a living document.
1.3.4
1.3.5
1.4
1.3.1
Assemble a cross-functional team (with an effective team leader) that has the knowledge, time,
authority and skill to solve the problem and implement corrective actions and set the structure,
goals, roles, procedures and relationships to establish an effective team.
1.3.2
Define the problem in measurable terms. Specify the internal or external customers problem by
describing it in specific, quantifiable terms who, what, when, where, why, how, how many
(5W2H Analysis).
1.3.3
Discipline 3: Implement and verify Interim Containment Actions. Temporary fixes. Define
and implement these intermediate actions that will protect any customers from the problem until
permanent corrective action is implemented. Verify the effectiveness of the containment actions
with data.
1.3.4
Identify all potential causes that could explain why problem occurred. Cause and effect diagram.
Test each potential cause against the problem description and data. Identify alternative
corrective actions to eliminate root cause. Note that here parallel types of root cause exist. A
root cause of event (the system that allowed for the event to occur), and a root cause of escape/
escape point (the system that allowed for the event to escape without detection).
1.3.5
Confirm that the selected corrective action will resolve the problem for the customers and will
not cause undesirable side effect. Define contingency actions, if necessary based on potential
severity of side effects.
1.3.6
Choose ongoing controls to insure the rest cause is eliminated. Once in production, monitor the
long-term effect and implement additional controls and contingency actions as necessary.
1.3.7
Identify the implement steps that need to be taken to prevent the same or similar problem from
occurring in the future: modify specifications, update training, review workflow, and improve
management systems, practices and procedures.
1.3.8
Recognize the collective efforts of your team. Publicize your achievement. Share your
knowledge and learning throughout the organization.
1.4
1.4.1
Effective approach at finding a root cause, developing proper actions to eliminate root
causes, and implementing the permanent corrective action
1.4.2
Helps to explore the controls system that allowed the problem to escapes. The escape
point is studied for the purposes of improving the ability of the controls systems to detect
the failure or cause when and if it should occur again.
1.4.3
The prevention loop explores the systems that permitted the condition that allowed the
failure and cause mechanism to exist in the first place.
1.3.1
1.5.1
1.5.2