Campbell STRUCTURAL Robert L. Campbell Structural Engineer, P.C. 200 E. 16° Street, Suite 100 Robert L Campbel, PE. S.E. Yurna, Arizona 85384 Consulting Structural Engineer hone a8 Tez Fae ga 72825 et structural com BET-KO HANGAR 3681 BURCH WAY, YUMA, AZ ‘STRUCTURAL EVALUATION FOR YUMA COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY 2191 E.32"° ST, STE 218 YUMA, AZ 85365, Propared by: Robert L. Campbell Structural Engineer, P.C. 200. 18" Street, Suite 100 ‘Yuma, AZ 85364 & Expires 6/90/2011‘TABLE OF CONTENTS me PAGE ‘SCOPEISTATEMENT OF PURPOSE, LUMTATIONS, ASSUMPTIONS, DESCRIPTION OF BUILOING,, FIELD OBSERVATIONS, ANALYSIS CRITERI,, [RESULTS OF ANALYSIS AND CODE REVIEW, [RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS, [APPENDIX A FRAMING KEYPLAN [APPENDIX 8: MATERIAL PROPERTIES AS TESTED BY WESTERN TECHNOLOGIES INC. [APPENDIX C: STRUCTURA. CALCULATIONS. Page 2 0f6‘SCOPE/STATEMENT OF PURPOSE “Te intnt ofthis rept i to evaluat the sng preaicaled metal buldng hangar forthe proposed ‘Yuma Pict Center renovation projec. Ths evasion was inated by Crag Wilkens wity Yume County Aiport Autry, Investigetry ste vits were performed by Rober L. Campbel, PE, SE, Keven Burge, PE and Emmanuel Jimenez on November 13, 2008 and on November 16, 2008 by Rober L, Campbel, PE. SE and Kevn Burge PE. “The scope of serves for this epost fo he folowing: sere the existing bulding (Oban kd measurements onthe existing rigid frame and purins Perfo srutralcalculaons on the capaciy ofthe exis igi kame and puts Prepare a wren report bated 9 ou stuctural calculations and te 2003 Iteration ‘Existing Bung Code (EBC) LIMITATIONS “This report ete toa stu evew only Issues such as bultng function aesthetics, eto, nave not been addressed nor have acter, elarcal, mechanical er plumbirg ems been reviewed It shoud be noted that ceran assumptions have been made regarding existing condtions. Because ‘some of thess arsumptions may nat be verfabie wiheut expanding adatoral sums of money, oF ‘esvoying etheriss adequate or eereable ports ofthe bulking, shoud be clearly understood that be conclusions and recommendations made in this repo are based solely on the avalable Infomation tis possible that aditoal deficiencies may exst which were nol dscovered dung Our ASSUMPTIONS ‘The concusions and recommendations dscussed in this report are based on the folbweg assumpions: 1. The existing oundaton system ie assumed to be adequately designed forthe bulding reaclons Foundation crawings ae nol avalable and ony destuctve demoiton wil prove the inormaton requred t perform a foundation analy, We di nol obsene any sgrfeart foundation cracks hat would neat flerental seternent 2. Testspecmens were ct lm the web of th ig fame and rom he web ofa wal git. These speomene were tested by Westam Technolog In. for yeld stengh, tense sengh and fengation, These test ruts were used nthe stucral evaluation of the bulking and are ‘ezumed to be represerave ofthe soe used throughout the balding 4 The bulngalleraton. 38 proposed, i assumed o not crease the relatve seismic hszard perlEBC Table 812-1, Th assumpons based on a new occupancy cassfcaton of 8 4. Trour understancng, based on information fom the Cy af Yuna, construction of this bulding 115 cuentlocaton was complete inate 1887 Page 30t6DESCRIPTION OF BUILDING ‘Tha existing hangar parton ofthe bug sa single story, prefabricsted metal ulngconsstng of a <0 by 80M balding weh'a 20 by 80 leanto. The overal dmonsions ae 80 by 80. Appendix ‘shows akey plan of the bung layout “The roof constuction consists of metal of shesting on light gage metal Z purns supported by ight frames, The rigid ramos are spaces 20. 0c. and span nofh-souh The leo porn of th bung focus along the not ede wal ofthe ri frames. The oth side wall of be lero ozcuss along the South wal of he existing ofice prion ofthe complex. ‘The south, east and wast eercr wats typleay consst of metal val sheeting on ight gage metal Z \Wal gits supeered by the ngid ramos. The east and west exeror wall aso have large roling Sectional hangar doers, There 90 wl taming along the nor” wal which abuts the sing oes bln Its assumed the foundation system const of ast place concrete spread footings, Allareas ofthe bling havea concrete sab on grade, ‘The main wind and selemic force resstng stem cons of structural ste! moment frames in the rnortvsouth drecion, Castes! recon lara oes are feasted by roof cass baci rd, wall (poss bracing ree song the cout do wal and aK race sie pal ame along the north se wal FIELD “The folowing ems wore observed while we were onsite: Review o he overal bul layout (Say spacing, column layout, quanty of tame). laid rame fange and web pat icknes and wich wore Fld measured Light gage sta fot puns were eld measured Light gape see! wal gis were eld measured. Wig apparent Dated on our feld dbsewvatons) tis hanger bulking had previously been ‘erated ata iterent cabo, er ANALYSIS CRITERIA {sutra analysis on the metal buldng was modeled ubizing tho fll measurements and testing reauls, The analyes evaliaed the stueual capac of the exsing buling to determine f any ‘otal bed allowance ex for supporing atonal lads such as fre spirker piping nsulaton fnd celing Tre seuctural anaes was permed i accordance wih the 2003 Intentional Bulg {Code (8G) and the. Amorca? insite of Stoel Canstucten (AISC) ASD 9” Ed Of tho “Soa! Constneton Manat for vera oaang and the 1985 Une Euiling Code (UBC) for wind and seismicloadng using the folowing design cei 1. Roof dead oad 2.1 pst pus frame weight 2 Roof colatealload ‘Analy to datermine allowable coisteral load. 3. Root lveload Do ptiess wenaary area eductons (12 psn gk ‘rame) 4. Material StrengtvProperios: Sucka soe! y= 60 sl Per Testing) 1B Ughtgage putin and gts Fy = 60 ksi (Per Testing) © Bats at haunch ASTM A325 H88 (Observed) Page sof6RESULTS OF ANALYSIS AND CODE REVIEW “The proposed renovatons to he exising hangar bung ae clasied as Level 3 Alterations in the EBC. The IEBC breaks doun the structural requirements in four categories. 1. te atonal iad is added the builing, ro evaluation is equ. ‘2 Ths option fequres no new leading. No new materls or equipment may be suppotod tom the buldng 2, any new verteal loads ace added to the stuctur, the components supertng these new loads sal met the requirement nthe 2003 nerationat Bulg Code (BC) ‘2 The extng puns have no addtional capacity to support loads beyond what they ‘xe caenty supporting i Any new mara or equpment supported fram the rt parins wil requte now sructiral purins. The existing rg rame rales have enough capacty to suport an adational 15 pt. ‘Ay lds beyond ths amount wil requ the structural aleratons on the i frame ‘ators. eThves of the existing gd fame cons requte structural ateraions regardless of ‘he ameunt cf seatonalvercal loa. These columns are located at grids 2-C, .C ‘ad 48 Refer to append: Afr alocatton key plan. 3. the seismic base shears reased by more than 8 peoent because of the aterton, the tevaliaton and anaes shal demersate that he atered bulking comples wih the wind and ‘Sekmictads appicable at the te te bung was conetructed 1 The foloving mawmum seucral aerators are required, {New or alered puri are requred Io suppor the sprinker piping. No more ‘han 30% ofthe prins canbe alered or adie, | Three of he exsing ga tame columns require stuctural atrsions. These columns are cated at gids 20, 3.C ad 8 1k The existing cross brag tho south walls inadequate. This wit equre the aon of another braced bay along the south wal or he replacement at {he existing coss bracing wth ager ameter eds v. The ‘ecstng,K braced ‘portal tame. inadequate TNS val requre replacement wih new portal Fame or cross braced bay at gi B \. Twobays of roof plane coss bracing rs wil be required the lean rot 1% Botom flange braces spaced at 10-0" oc. shal be added al he leant ste! beam. These are the see ams spanning fom gtd Ato gd B, An example of his tease would be new sprinkler ping supported fom the root tithe nar area of alles or new prin les than 20% of the Oss foot area, 2. Anather allowable ineease would be to replace the existing exterior was wha ight ‘weight EIFS wal eytor. 4 Ifthe sleme base shaarieneeased by mee han S pernt and more than 30 percent of be toa oot area ofthe ulling rvolved im srucral ateraton, the evasion and analysis Shall domonetat thatthe ated bulling comple wih the wind lad and reduced IEBC ‘sobmicove foes in accordance wih te IBC ‘2. Ths category in our canon, wil fequre more stctual strengthening than Sconemcaly feat for hs project. Bulking replacement our ecamnmendaton {he ateratons moet hese cai ‘The stuctural calculations are atachod this reprtin Append C. Page Sof6RECOMMENt CONCLUSIONS ‘The folowing recommendations are he result four ld observations and results of anaes 1. The seta aeration werk tote oo raming members chal involve les than 30% ofthe ross roof rea 2 I spree system is insted and supported from the root, new or atered rot purine are requred. The quanay ofthese new or aired purins shal be less than 50% ofthe aa root purins 2. Adstonal vertcal loads, beyond the sprinkler system, shall ot be supported fom the oot Shichre, Ths incudes, but sot Imted fo, sulaten, celina, sffis, mechanical equipment, ae 4. Rlght weight EIFS system may be intake provid the framing suppor fr this wal sym fe designed per the IBC. The wal system shall not create any parapets on the exising Sricure, New’ parapes Wil eure he buldng tobe commpance wi te IBC. 4. The flowing minimum stucturalstenghhenng recommendations shal be incorporated ino the bling |. New or alters purins ae required to support the sprinkler piping. No more than 30% of he exsng puri canbe ated or added Thee of the exsing rg rame cols require structural aleratons. This is antpated to be the addon of soe plates on the exsing column flanges. ‘These columns ae heated a gids 2-C, $C and 4. Tho exeing rss bracng in he south wal is inadequate, This wil require the ation of anaher braced bay along the south wall or he replacement of the exstng Coss brag wth lxger diameter os. The exising K braced poral fame ss inadequate, Ths, wil requre replacement wih anew potal fame) orcs braced bays) along gr. Two bays oreo! lane cross bracrg fos wil be requted athe leant rot, i Botom flange braces spaced at 10°" 0 shal be added tthe lean ste! beams, These ae the soe beams spanning from gd Ato gd B ‘We thankyou forthe opprtanty to provide this structural ants and report The erations and renghenng ofthe exstng bug wl require constucton docuertspropared by a registred Sirchiral engines Please contact ds # you have any questonsregarang Dis pot Page 6 of6‘APPENDIX A FRAMING KEYPLANN wo 9 9 9 @ NVidAay | eae ee Tr Ce eee a ‘au '90o-8 =<} AY SNTNd—~7 aan a ee OY a ee s ee “ po ees eee | H lAPPENDIX B MATERIAL PROPERTIES AS TESTED BY WESTERN TECHNOLOGIES INC.Western 3797 En Broa Road Technologies Mien. tns (0.9271 Ine. (eogrei svar nate ‘The Gal eke TENSION & BEND TESTS ON STEEL Senelaty CENT ne 11698 esr para cae i i oe 1 mt — [ 7 E |APPENDIX. ‘STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS. Fontes (7/1Campbell co STRUCTURAL] 5 apo ania LOADING CaITERIA: DEADLOAD Roof, Shakin: LS PSE Putin Sell MWeight 08 PF Live. Loa (poor), 20 PSE Creatuccble Lod Cag, = DL+CL +L"ROE Ta Grant Sale Tams Aralea = Wer ADE OO RTE,Wiv SE01 18 6002 pz 00N | ‘ur ownage 82160) ao [Be eran meena Tw 510) syns “Wi 2.078 87807ce Sp Wanber 09123 ‘Checked By. Member Section Forces (By Combination) es See Avail a Stua 2 gee 5 28 O5T 7 FIGAGD Version 8111 TOL WA UseriDocumonalobeWZ000 ProjscisWoelZWomeniFrameCampbell STRUCTURALCFS Version 6.0.0 Page 1 Secton: Purin Pi sct, Robert L Camptel, PES E Zee bxox0 5-14 Gage RLCSE 185 € 24th Stoo Ste. 7 Rev. Date: 11/182000 1247-54 PM. Yuma, AZ” 85264 fy. Rober. Campbell, PE, SE Ph 036-726-2040, Fax 928-726-2629 rob@campbetstuctiralcom 4 4BAI elect BF = Section Inputsel CFS Version 6.0.0 Pave: ‘Section: Purin Pls Robert. Campbell, PE, SE Yee 8205-14 Cage RLCSE, 185 240 Steet Ste. 7 Rev Date 11/562000 124754 EM Yoma, AZ 85354 By Robert Campesl PE, SE Ph 628-726-2646, Fax: 928-726-2629 rob@eampbalsructral com We'Sttdtaehtactoase fram cole work of forming HG BAL Modulus of Elasticity, © 23500" kat oe ‘eid strength, FY 60 ket onsite serength, Fu 30 ksi Warping Constant’ Overside, oH inns Stittened tee, Thickness 0.0719 in (24 Gage! ito center of gravity oan Y te Genter of gravity oan Sutsiae imensions, Open shape Length Angle Radius eb kK Hole Size Distance Gm taagy fet cose lial sy 2 0.4080, =90-000 0.25600 None 0-000 0.0000 9.2500 5 Sooo "00043600 Single 2000 bcone0 1.0000 3 Hoos 902000 Bsa3e00 zee” 02000 b.o000 4.0000 Foose "o0a0 123600 Single 0.000 0.0000 0000, $ 18000-90000 123600 tone 0.000 0.0000 0.2800, Fully Braced Strength - 2001 North American Specification - US (ASD) Material Type: AGS2 HSLAS Grade 60, Fy=60 ksi Compression Positive Moment Poritive Moment Pac 36.420 k Hawa 68-097 k-in Mayo. 3-667 in ae onti261 Sez Tee W803 tant Tye ovdasi inna ‘Tension Sxelb) 1l83da inna Shel) 0,242 ane t 30.996 Negative Moment Negative Moment, Hex "66,057 Kein Mayo B86) kein shear . 5a35 take Tye sist ind vay 4.252 Getty 1934E ined Sye(a) 0.242 Ines vee Ger k —Seetb) 116397 dnd Sye(r) 0.2808 inns Full Section Properties Area 0.88555 in"2 Ht. 0,0090109 k/ee © With 12.420 in Ix 2736 ands 2.9818 in bxy 14073 inv Beit) 2.9684 ine3 vit) 0000 in -10.780 eg) Sete) 219684 in-3 yb) 10000 in weight 6.0000 In ty o.sa76 inna ry Dit86a tn x0 9.0090 in syn) 0.2788 ars x0, 363 in Yo 0000 sn St) alevee inna kez] 13643 in St 0.0000 in wisth M087 ny bioo00 tn n e-1gg2 inne “et 310435 in 2 012921 ine 22 a%8583 in Ie 808213 in Fe ine 6.4776 ine Ie S021) inst Fo in 9,00i5006 SnnaCe CFS Version 6.0.0 Secion Pain P2 sc Rober. Camptell PE, SE Zee 92 9001514 Gage Ricee eSe 24h Sueet se 7 fev, Date 11182009 116.00 PM Yima, Az esse Sy Roven Compbet, PES SE PR aR 26 846, Fax 628-728-2629 reoacampoeietral sn No'strength increase fam cold work of formin Pores AT Nodulue af Elasticity, © 23500 kat E, ° (ela'Serengthy Fy 60 kai __LEAN TO fenaite serengty, So fst Setping Consent orerrie, Ge a fare TOrBISE Sonstane Oversice, 8 aie Stiffoned Zee, Thickness 0.0713 in (24 cage) Placenent of fart from origin: xt center of gravity o in Outside dinensions, Open shape tength "Angle Radius Web Hole Size Distance eet Gdagh iin) coor. ay Gar 20,4800 -90:080 0.23600 tone 0-000. 9.00009, $780. 2 215000 "0.000 0.13600 Single 0.000 9.0000 1.2300, 3 510000 90:00 0113600 Zee" 0-000 G.0n00 375000, & — 2'3000 “90000123600 Singte 8.000 o.0000 1 as00, 017500 -s0:000 0113600 None 0.000 0.0000 0.3750, Full Section Properties Area 0.92120 in". We. -0.0031321 w/e Width 12.920 in Ix 6.865¢ inn x 2.7300 1a xy 2.1368 Ina seit) 1.9626 in3 yey 3.8000 1a -14.560 deg ty L.2ag0 inva ry 11803 fsx, 0.0000 in Syqqy 014846 ind xt) 24K nD 20000 in Syic} 014846 Sn} Ir) 24043 in Ge :0000 in wath Wy 20000 in n 7.9829 snva“t 2 2 bis0is ined 2 o Blade invade 2 om 10,360 4nv6 is Blapds inva fo 2 3 o.00ise: int Fully Braced Strength - 2001 North American Specification - US (ASD) Material Type: A653 HSLAS Grade 60, Fy=60 kei Soupression Fonitive Manca Positive Moment Be ty aco ek Maeo etsayO tein tage MTSTES6 kein fe ov94del inva Tew 6.364 Suna Tye” gs 11 Save Skee) 103290 ine Gye) 014212 aad Tension Sretb] 119083 in-3 Syste) 913898 dnd n 22.082 k Degative Moment Negative Moment Mato NeneT0 kein Mayon S3¢826 kin snoar Tee S.3ee dave Tye doi date ‘ay 4.08 x Saecey—Vigoes Seed Seu) 823040 ind = S161 E Shetb] Alazma Sa Syele} Slang ined Poe Aliow = Jo.6= see | co 2160] 5 id 652% 6002 72 HON omnia Di as “yBUa Tenis ieadueD 7 veqrE|cis company i cat Sa Fo — Designer big 249M Seow _tilos cerkon cha Load Combinations gn bon_ Pom GPF A as ERR rca e Resco Fi Bet Poet | Le feces veeB eact t This Evaluation TISKSD Version B17 [C11 \Documenisvoes 2009 Projesion Za\GnaT-SokarSprnkierOnly aa) PagesClo epny «feb caret sre Ee eyag00 Fihoer 06123 CTH Ae Checked By. Member AISC ASD Steel Code Checks (By Combination) ag Ora yo btiad So APs =e oop yond ap Prem [-5-SIMS— rane Top Cong ange < resin ire pea t 4 12 wal 0-578) 30 fs a S087 2 30-378 the iar a Tag ena age BA 033-0000, 0 ateaazr al 27 lar & ft bog 2 ghswad ir % aa sa 30 eo cm i rsa ot Tapa Cano. an « Yrs age pr r “8t a ele ra os a6 a art aes) Tap an Ta yeaa a0 Te 208 12 Vines 39 Te Tapp ew BA 6 “o-aoo| 0 isan | ay 2retra.S |e Ret i ‘o.oo ze glewnaier gr atelt elt meal — Gra) 0 aera 90 bowen tes hg Lom 6 Bar nag Yesear gp evostaucat. dae Taper inp. fangs tenon ge par ele 4 Taper Cop: ene Ten ae per E = a: o-|o0o] 0 fiewazre| ar lari eam 3 fns| oss @tclyiseri216/27_ [218 1 Lalt Ret - ie [ol beal 0° vibes a9 f975|-00 [see re 360 fei: o7s ra-lyhoets 30 (375.7 oa] ha FISAGD Version 811 [O1-\-\Dacumenis obs 2009 Projessi0oT251GnuT SoksrSprawierOnly ra]on ameany Reta. Camb Sact Eg, PO ova 208 TER 68123 Ber KO Ae Geckos By ie ital Xm ER 3 Nt [234i [sige ° ° ° 3 Ne Baa sor ° o 3 NB ‘ee 0 a3 NO 44st [tore | 0 0 ‘ot rst 3 Nie a 0 a Nt ch ° 0 T Pets Nie a a3 N23 at | aes tp 0 a Ns. 3.587 2 0 0 401 5 Ne 4 40.266 | 0 0 0 a a 0 18 N36 0 3ser. o ‘oo 13 N 34 508 0 a 14 Naz ° a a a 4 Naa a7 7514. 0 0 ° 18 ola 0 12.708 | 0 wl 3 Goon: | xa9586 Ly: ta.r17 | 240012 RISKSD Version B17 [C11 WocumentsUobad000 Projclsl00 1281GrNT Soka SpinkerOnlyaq] Page TSee eth oat aot Sea Oot23 sero ne Chace Oy RISAGD Version B11 369 Tae 48 10168 [44a “10-142 | 4.431 61-1. Documents tlobad006 ProjeclsWa1Z3\GrdT-SoksrSpinkierOriy Ga) Page #amour: Rete. Cangbel Srct Eset PC eer e123 3 [as ee |4431 [13782 “1388 13471 348 [4.031 [4736 —| 7.23 4535 19197-4431 10.1421 10.142 105] Ha 7 $ 385 FISATD Verson 81.1 [OX.\.\Documents\oo832008 ProjectsieTZ<\Gnd1-S0csrSprnklerOnlyGa) Page 5eleny _: fygent carter swva earn Po 26, 2000 SooReomoer__ 0123 BETKO AE Gheckos By: RISAGD Version 81 $913) 27 TEX 1. Docume lobeW00e ProjecsWo12S\Gndi GOker SpinkerOniiGa) PagesC20 Seopa fart core meta ere ro ova sce ono 09123, BeTKO Ae Geckos By _Member Section Forces (By Combination) (Continued) Member abel Sac__—_ Asai) Shea ‘sites Manan. fas ae enact. a Stent Tot at 0 RISAGD Version 17 [01 \-\DacumenisUabs12009 Projcisi001251GnaT Soke SpraherOnly ra]Congeny + Reber Consbet Suche Enginee PC ov 24,2000 Bane! = Rts Pa) SooKomoer 09123 Ber KO Ae Greckes By, ‘Member Section Stresses (By Combination) 0 a a —ze—| 01a a er a 462 | tae 0] +et[ state} —g0s8 | 5.038 ““RISASD Version 811 [G1 Documents Jobei2000 ProjenistooT2a\GnaT ox SprnkerOny aa) Pagesenpey «Ret Cone Sra Eon FC yg 2008 so Rimer__ 0429 BETKOAK Checked By {z 60 TesC23 Saopey et cao Ste ee Po e248 S3oRonoer__ 09123 BETO Ae hacked By Member Section Stresses (By Combination) (Continued) es Benn Ba Bardzo Bann. bet Benn. 100. sor -as7e_|—0_ ant pene eres | taeta ‘| 05 313.037 RISAGD Version 811 — [GL WDocumentslobs3Z008 Projecs10STZSGnaT-B0KsI SprnkierOnV 36) Page 10cay equa) eet Canon Shape PE oy 2000 ‘SsoNomber 09123 BET.KOAr ‘Checked By; ‘Member Section Stresses (By Combination) (Continued) ate Starks Soars. yop pda. op Bein al rial Mae sae | tho08 tO iz r 835 Beis 7 2 Ha tie 8 835, scr} a iss: RISKS Version B11 [C11 WDocurentsobs 2008 Projectsl091z281GndT-SokerSprnklerOnly 3] Page TTc2s Wa 20°61 6002 pz "ON aw oraa 2160 | = cr) ‘UU FRIN|ARS [GEES “HERON 'peO7 PUAN 'y 97 '$PEOTe eye) et. Conon sre gre PE oy 208 seater 09128 BETKO A Gheckod By Load Combinations Deon Se Pata SSR Fone BL Fa Face LG Fae ar Fey Foc Facey ee ieee Sli ea peta {poesia jBe {pe a t — Ipc t deg 133 SS ince se_ TG1\.Documentsuobai00e ProjcRWoTENGraT Soke Spmnerony a) Page T RISAGD Version B11Company > Repent, etree Bohm __ 09123 canst Sachin Enger, PC or24 208, BET KO AE Checked By ‘Member AISC ASD Steo! Code Checks (By Combination) -Wenber Snape uo (BL ir eater “01 og na seer Mg_cees a8 EOE SAC! [STAB Fre Taper Cop age enon pe par i agi ha eset 019 one] 0 ypsatase.: Tapa Cop age < Tenn Tage, por “Tepe Con. Rane «Tenn aie, per A oor 508 223 10 [st M0 acct 34 TAT ISL- MT Pre Taper Cop aga enen Tape TA 4215] Miz co. 82 03 1 ane 7g eas ‘2-181 Ma 0062 TaparConp. tage Tnron Tago, par A. 14 L is SLSR 18 ‘Tialt ie 1 736 [a5 Fas fo) wie fester 319. sea 1 1 Be 40 [5] Mie (Pome. Tape Gong. ange «Tes ang, par [ao|s-ao cosa 039, Tz sag) 6.6 pa 5] M21 los. Tap Compan «Tens Fagor A 1MaqFrate_ Tape Comp Ronge < Tension fage por [2s 151 w25 loa ‘16 7, 090 gion Tas be a 24 18 Mae witxte io 1. [.na7 Bt-lyetzree 72a36 916 760) (Bs [5] nes loa. ce 7. 2 {105-0 y58879 39.04s27441 25175) G4 Tape Cas ans = Toso ange eA [B18 Nar Fone. | Tape con. ange Rene Camp SrctenEngnoa, PC Beaieet Ke Seohimeer 09123 RISAGD Version 8.7 Tex\ Docu BETKOAL Checked By, Wa JobaWZ005 Precis DSTZaGnaT Soke SprawerOny a] Page?Company: abt L Carpal Sucka Enger, PC Nor 24,2008 Soper Rus Sori SooRtbor__ 09123, Ber KOA Gheckod By ‘Member Section Stresses (By Combination! Shoals. = Shera ep Bend. Be Benz Bena bat Bard [1.933 [1.933_| 0 378 [4.336 | Hoag [a ‘a6 0 [9702 [cam | 8) 0 azgee 2 gr aaa ose 3 =o S067__Ci6t TRISATD Version 8.1 — [G11 Doeumentloba3000 Projecsi00T2AGraT-BOKel SprnkisrOnV aa] Page 8C34 Company + Robe. Camptl Sructaa Engineer PC Nov 24 2008 Seageet | Ka Serie so Remoee 9128 Ber.K0 Ae Checked by id 108 Mts 113 TISAGD Version 817 [G1-\-Decumentsobs2000 ProjedsloaT2aIGraT SokerSprierOnyyaa] Page SCompany Raber Compl Stu Ergnas, PC Nov 24 2008 Seaieet Kt Soothe SS Rimoee_! 9120 BET-KO AN Checked _-Momber Section Stresses (By Combination) (Continued) ‘i i ei rer. -449_ 0 7063 ‘2a87 ms 2508 34 =t9a_1—9 2861 | 3.087 -3057_| 0 [30s_|3.167 | 9. baer | 67 “SRISAGD Version 811 [G\-\. \Decumonts\lobswZ000 Projecis10012GNaT-SOKsISprnderOny aa) Page 10 —Conpsny Roba. Compl Src Eran, PC No 24,2008 Seige Sot eotimoe | 08123 BerKO Ar Ghee ‘Member Section Stresses (By Combination) (Continued) ear abel See o BsT5_| 2878 25s [2575 RISASD Veron 611 [Ov 1 WosstmentsVoba008 Projectslo8 251GrNT Soke SpinklevOny 30] Page TT