Case 15-1060, Document 95, 06/02/2015, 1522975, Page1 of 2

S.D.N.Y.-N.Y.C.
Griesa, J.*

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE

SECOND CIRCUIT
_________________

At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second
Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square,
in the City of New York, on the 2nd day of June, two thousand fifteen.
Present:
Richard C. Wesley,
Peter W. Hall,
Denny Chin,
Circuit Judges.
Aurelius Opportunities Fund II, LLC, et al.,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.

The Republic of Argentina,

Defendant-Appellant.

15-1060 (L),
15-1047 (Con),
15-1052 (Con),
15-1056 (Con),
15-1059 (Con),
15-1061 (Con),
15-1067 (Con),
15-1073 (Con),
15-1074 (Con),
15-1075 (Con),
15-1084 (Con),
15-1095 (Con),
15-1106 (Con)

Appellees move to dismiss the appeals for lack of jurisdiction. Upon due consideration, it is
hereby ORDERED that Appellees motion is DENIED.
The district court denied a motion that, on its face, sought to modify an injunction prohibiting
interested non-party Citibank from making payments under the terms of certain bonds. In
* The relevant district court docket numbers are: 08-cv-6978; 09-cv-1707; 09-cv-8757; 09-cv-1708; 10-cv-5338;
10-cv-1602; 10-cv-3507; 09-cv-10620; 10-cv-3970; 10-cv-8339; 10-cv-4101; 10-cv-4782; and 10-cv-9587.

Case 15-1060, Document 95, 06/02/2015, 1522975, Page2 of 2

substance, the motion sought to change the terms and force of the injunction, and, thus, it was a
bona fide motion to modify the injunction. Weight Watchers Intl, Inc. v. Luiginos, Inc., 423
F.3d 137, 14142 (2d Cir. 2005). Therefore, we have jurisdiction over this appeal. 28 U.S.C.
1292(a)(1).
FOR THE COURT:
Catherine O=Hagan Wolfe, Clerk