Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1
On November 7, 2008, the Office of the U.S. Attorney General, (the “USAG”), by and through the U.S.
Attorney (SDNY), sua sponte, voluntarily, notified the Court of Appeals in 07-5222cr, Ware-I, that the
United States was not filing a cross-appeal brief in 07-5670, Gov-I, and therefore had terminated,
dismissed with prejudice, and abandoned the United States 07-5670, Gov-I, cross-appeal of the District
Court’s (Pauley, J.), October 2007 post-trial Rule 29 acquittal verdicts, Dkt. 99, S. Tr. 31 L 18-25; S. Tr. 35-
36; and S. Tr. 73-76, entered in favor of Ulysses T. Ware; has triggered the Double Jeopardy Clause’s
absolute finality regarding the Rule 29 rulings; has triggered res judicata against the United States and its
privies in all subsequent proceedings; pursuant to Article II executive branch appellate political authority
terminated a live Article III controversy with respect to the Rule 29 rulings, and terminated the District
Court’s and the Court of Appeals subject matter jurisdiction over all issues, facts, and claims actually or
necessarily resolved by the USAG’s Article II appellate political decision to dismiss with prejudice the Gov-
I cross-appeal; had stipulated and conceded that the Rule 29 rulings were the law of the case; and had
conferred prevailing party status on Ulysses T. Ware regarding the U.S. v. Ware, 05cr1115 (SDNY)
proceedings.
Page 1 of 3
Sunday, April 16, 2023
Re Cover letter for Emergency relief filings.
Dear Ms. O’Hagan-Wolfe:
of Appeals for emergency processing. Enclosed are the following documents for
each of the matters Mr. Ware is requesting that emergency relief be granted.
The following pleadings and documents are being submitted for each of the
below matters:
(i) Omnibus Emergency Petition, (ii) Omnibus Appendices E thru T, (iii) Form
Leave to file and Emergency application for an Order that: (i) recalls the
mandates;2 (ii) orders and directs the immediate disclosure and production
of all judicial public records and all materials that could be considered actual
innocent Brady exculpatory and impeachment evidence in the possession of
the Office of the U.S. Attorney (SDNY), (the “USAO”), and its privies, and the
Chambers of District Judge Edgardo Ramos (SDNY), pursuant to the Brady
2
Applicant is seeking the mandates be recalled in 07-5222cr (Ware-I); 09-0851cr, and 11-4181cv.
Page 2 of 3
Sunday, April 16, 2023
Re Cover letter for Emergency relief filings.
Court Orders, (A) 05cr1115 (SDNY) Dkt. 17 (May 19, 2006), Tr. 5-10 (Pauley,
J.),3 04cr1224 (SDNY) Dkt. 32 (August 10, 2007), (Sweet, J.), the Code of
Conduct for Federal Judges, and the First Amendment right of access to
judicial public records; and (iii) orders the district courts sub judice to conduct
evidentiary hearings to resolve all disputed issues of material fact, conduct
cumulative materiality assessment proceedings, determine the Article III and
28 USC 1332(a) standing of the 02cv2219(SDNY) plaintiffs, and other
disputed material factual issues.
If the Court has any questions I can be reached at (718) 844-1260 or via email,
utware007@gmail.com.
Attachments.
3
See Appx. A, Ex. B, infra.
Page 3 of 3
Sunday, April 16, 2023
Re Cover letter for Emergency relief filings.