Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CETL Residential Presentation
CETL Residential Presentation
Peter Dean
December 2007
Institutional
Perspective
Institutional
Perspective
• How can institutions promote personalised
learning?
If institutions prescribe how learning is
personalised then it isn’t personal
• Communication
Engagement and Learning
• Curriculum
Assessment
University 2.0
Social Construction of Technology not Technological
Determinism (Bijker, Pinch, Latour)
• Communities of Practice (Lave and Wenger)
• Open Culture (Stallman, Raymond)
• Personal Learning Environments
(Downes et al.)
Formal and Informal Learning
(Livingstone, Schugurensky)
Rhizome and arborescent models
(Deleuze)
Social Construction of
Technology
• No technological determinism
Not seduced by “Digital Natives”
• or “Digital Immigrants”
• We get the technology we deserve
• If we fail to engage with these institutional and
social processes then we’ll get the technology
that the enthusiasts think we ought to have.
Personal Learning
Environments
• Online approach to University 2.0
An distinct alternative to the VLE and MLE
approach