Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CMR Enterprises: Group 2
CMR Enterprises: Group 2
Group 2
Microsoft Excel
Worksheet
The Blackstone proposal looked good and it was a huge opportunity for CMS to expand
into the residential space
The initial concerns about the contribution margins of 38% as compared to 48% in
commercial spaces were brushed away
Since Blackstone was on a growth spree, this meant growth for CMR as well
They would provide with huge volumes of work
But later
Blackstone's reputation of being hard on their subcontractors was not taken into account
CMR should have hold onto its policies rather than just giving in to Blackstone. They
shouldve spoken about competition in the cabinet industry beforehand
The two companies were not a fit for each other
The industry was price sensitive especially for the residential work
Commercial
Residential
Why
Strategically aligned
and great fit
Residential market
seemed great
opportunity for a
scalable , replicable
business model
Aligning with one of the
biggest customers of
the area resulting in
direct increase in
market share
Standardize processes
into flexible cells
Blackstone ready to
pay full price
What
Blackstone agreed to
specify only CMRs
cabinets in its homes
and CMR to assign the
project manager who
had worked on
previous projects to
work exclusively with
Blackstone
YEAR
2
Problems
Blackstone homeowners were directly working with other
subcontractors
Project co-ordination problems
Marcus was concerned about asymmetry of information and
recommended Info Central for all future orders which was not
taken well due to standardization issues
Differences between estimated and actual cost of each project for
CMR
Contribution margins were 38% of sales in residential as opposed
to 48% for commercial
CMR raised prices by 7% and corrected prices for some individual
items that were mispriced that made Blackstone feel betrayed