Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • U13t4 Peerevaluation m5

    Uploaded by

    api-270052992
    35 views1 page
    Kane Leakey evaluated a peer's website design. He rated different design features as excellent, good, or satisfactory. Kane believed the peer could improve the layout, mix of text and images, and amount of writing. Overall, Kane commented that the website had working links and content, but could be improved.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    u13t4 peerevaluation m5

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Kane Leakey evaluated a peer's website design. He rated different design features as excellent, good, or satisfactory. Kane believed the peer could improve the layout, mix of text and images, and amount of writing. Overall, Kane commented that the website had working links and content, but could be improved.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    35 views1 page

    U13t4 Peerevaluation m5

    Uploaded by

    api-270052992
    Kane Leakey evaluated a peer's website design. He rated different design features as excellent, good, or satisfactory. Kane believed the peer could improve the layout, mix of text and images, and amount of writing. Overall, Kane commented that the website had working links and content, but could be improved.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    Task 4 M5 Unit 13

    Peer evaluation
    Your name: kane leakey

    Please rate the following categories on how you think different features have
    been used:
    Excellent
    1. First Impressions
    2. Shapes
    3. Background
    (colour/picture)
    4. Text/slogans

    Good

    1
    1
    1
    1
    1

    7. Colours
    8. Hyperlinks
    9. Logo
    10.
    Ease of use
    (how easy to use)

    Poor

    5. User form
    6. Map

    Satisfactory

    1
    1
    1
    1

    Looking at the website, what areas do you believe I could improve on?

    Layout
    Mix of text and images
    Quality of images
    Amount of writing

    Comments
    Its good and neat makes it easy to navigate
    Good and nice amount of images and text
    There good quality
    There is quite a lot of writing

    Thinking about different factors including Content, Presentation, Navigation,


    Usability and Purpose, can you give an overall comment for improvement?
    Its a working website that has working links and has all the info it needs and

    You might also like