Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS
Level
Extremely High
Very High
High
Moderately High
Average
Moderately Low
Very Low
Uniform T-Score
85-90
75-80
65-70
55-60
45-50
35-40
30
Percentile Equivalent
>99.8->99.9
98->99
92-96
73-85
34-55
4-15
<1
VALIDITY SCALES
Interrelationships of Scales:
o Hi F, Lo L & K: Client is admitting to personal and emotional problems, may be
asking for help, unsure of abilities to deal w/ problems, good tx prognosis
o Hi L & K, Lo F: Client is attempting to deny problems and feelings, underreporting
of problems, attempt to present self in most positive light, most likely using primitive
defenses, problems usually chronic and therefore may be built into personality,
adequate social adjustment to see world as either good or bad
o L < F < K: Appropriate resources to deal w/ problems and not experiencing much
stress
o L > F > K: Client is nave and unsophisticated but trying to look good, not
distressed by problems, usually uneducated or low SES, poor tx candidate
? (Cannot Say)
Raw Score
ProfileValidity
30
May be invalid
(MMPI Manual);
Invalid, do not
interpret (Graham)
11-29
0-10
Probably valid
Reasons for
Elevation
Reading difficulties
Severe
psychopathology
Lack of insight
Uncooperative
Obsessive
Items not relevant for
pt
Selective item
omission
Interpretation
Examine percentage of
items answered on each
scale
Examine content/scale of
omitted items, dont
interpret scale with
10% of items omitted
Examine omitted item
content; cooperative,
willing to respond
ProfileValidity
65-79
Profile valid,
characterized by
some inconsistent
responding
Profile invalid
Reasons for
Elevation
Reading difficulties
Confusion
Intentional random
responding
Recording error,
careless
Carelessness
Occasional loss of
concentration
Interpretation
Profile uninterpretable
Profile likely
interpretable, make
cautionary statement
about some inconsistent
responding present;
As T on VRIN
approaches 79, use
more caution
40-64
Profile valid
Pt able to understand
and respond consistently
30-39
Profile valid
Responding particularly
cautious & deliberate
Hi VRIN also expect F to be highly elevated; if F also high, increased likelihood
of inconsistent responding; if F low, probably reporting consistently true
psychopathology
TRIN (True Response Inconsistency) pairs of items with opposite content (should
have 1 true, 1 false for each pair)
T-Score
Level
80 T
(raw score
>12)
65T-79T
50-64T or
50-64 F
(raw score 612)
65F-79F
80F
(raw score
<6)
ProfileValidity
Reasons for
Elevation
Acquiescent
response set
Yeasaying, All True
Partial acquiescent
response set
Interpretation
Profile valid,
characterized by
some
nonacquiescence
Partial
nonacquiescent
response set
Profile invalid
Nonacquiescent
response set
Naysaying, All False
Profile interpreted
w/caution; pay particular
attention to L, K, and S
scores may be
artifactually elevated d/t
response set
Profile uninterpretable
Profile invalid
Profile valid,
characterized by
some acquiescence
Profile uninterpretable
Profile interpreted
w/caution; pay particular
attention to L, K, and S
scores may be
artifactually deflated d/t
response set
Profile valid
ProfileValidity
70-74
Nonclinical
May be invalid
May be invalid
Reasons for
Elevation
Faking good
Pervasive
nonacquiescence
Moderate
defensiveness
Moderate
Interpretation
If TRIN >79F, protocol
characterized by
pervasive pattern of
nonacquiescence,
invalid/uniterpretable;
If TRIN WNL, high S
reflects defensive testtaking approach, may
indicate invalid protocol;
examine S subscales to
identify particular areas
of defensiveness
If TRIN w/in 65F-79F,
elevation on S likely
reflects moderate pattern
nonacquiescence
of nonacquiescence, not
faking good;
If TRIN WNL, elevation
on S likely reflects
moderate pattern of
defensiveness; higher S,
greater likelihood profile
may not accurately
represent existing
psychopathology;
examine S subscales to
identify particular areas
of defensiveness
69 Clinical
Likely valid
69
Valid
Nonclinical
5 Factors: (1) belief in human goodness, (2) serenity, (3) contentment with life,
(4) patience and denial of irritability and anger, (5) denial of moral flaws
Positively correlated with K and L in normative sample
ProfileValidity
80-99
Inpatient
70-89
Outpatient
65-79
Nonclinical
May be
exaggerated, likely
valid
May be invalid
55-79
Likely valid
Inpatient
55-69
Outpatient
40-64
Nonclinical
54 Inpatient May be defensive
54
Outpatient
39
Reasons for
Elevation
Random/fixed
responding
All True
Severe
psychopathology
Faking bad
presenting problems
even inpatients dont
Exaggeration of
existing problems
Resistant to testing
procedure
Interpretation
If VRIN/TRIN > 79,
profile
invalid/uninterpretable;
If VRIN/TRIN & Fp WNL,
likely valid profile
reflecting severe
psychopathology
(disoriented, confused,
clearly psychotic bx);
If VRIN/TRIN WNL and
Fp >100, pt overreporting
psychopathology in
attempt to appear more
disturbed than he/she is
Consider exaggeration of
sxs, perhaps cry for
help, psychotic, severe
neurotic, socially or
politically deviant,
moody, restless,
dissatisfied,
unpredictable
Pt. accurately reporting a
number of psychological
problems; T 60-64
deviance in some area of
life
Examine defensiveness
scales, esp. L, to
determine whether pt
may be
denying/minimizing
problems
Implications for treatment: T 50-59 good for therapy, good insight, help-seeking
Indicator of distress/chronicity: if F is low in 6-8 profile, person is used to their
symptoms and not in acute distress (poor treatment indicator)
Higher F indicative of:
o Emotional turmoil, including anxiety, depression
o Feeling sad, hopeless
o Disturbed sleep
o Feel unable to cope with strains of life
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
80-100
ProfileValidity
Consider profile
invalidity
Consider profile
invalidity
Reasons for
Elevation
Random
All True
Faking bad
Malingering
Exaggeration of
problems
65-79
50-64
50
Interpretation
Psychiatric patients may
be disoriented, confused,
show clearly psychotic
behavior
If valid, consider serious
psychopathology
Consider serious
psychopathology
Average
Consider faking good
ProfileValidity
Likely invalid
70-99
Likely exaggerated,
Reasons for
Elevation
Random responding
Faking bad
Exaggeration of
Interpretation
VRIN/TRIN >79, invalid
and uninterpretable
profile; If VRIN/TRIN
WNL, pt. overreporting
psychopathology in
attempt to appear more
disturbed than he/she is
Consider exaggeration of
may be valid
69
existing problems
Reasons for
Elevation
Faking good
Pervasive
nonacquiescence
Interpretation
If TRIN >79F, protocol
characterized by
pervasive pattern of
nonacquiescence,
invalid/uninterpretable;
If TRIN WNL, high L
reflects very strong
pattern of faking good,
likely invalid test protocol
65-79
Clinical
70-79
Nonclinical
May be invalid
65-69
Nonclinical
Questionably valid
64 Clinical
60-64
Nonclinical
Likely Valid
Likely Valid
Unsophisticated
defensiveness
Traditional
background
59
Valid
Nonclinical
T>60: Conventional, conforming, unoriginal, inflexible/rigid, moralistic, lack
insight, poor stress tolerance; repression, denial (defended), unsophisticated,
concrete, primitive
Implications for treatment: Higher L indicates participation/responsiveness;
perfectionistic, rigid, unwilling to hear feedback
Hi L: faking good will artificially lower scores on other scales to make individual
appear better psychologically adjusted
Hi L descriptors (T >55):
o Trying to create favorable impression of selves by not being honest in
responding to items
o May be defensive, denying, and repressing
o Tend to claim virtues to greater extent than most people
o Little or no insight into own motivations
o Little awareness of consequences to others of their bx
o Overevaluate own worth
o Conventional and socially conforming
o Unoriginal in thinking, inflexible in problem solving
o Rigid, moralistic
o Poor tolerance for stress, pressure
Lo L descriptors (T < 50):
o Probably frankly responding
o Confident enough about selves to be able to admit to minor faults and
shortcomings
o May be exaggerating negative characteristics
o
o
o
o
o
ProfileValidity
65-74
Nonclinical
May be invalid
Moderate
defensiveness
Moderate
nonacquiescence
Denial, intolerant,
uninsightful,
40-64
Clinical &
Nonclinical
Valid
<40
May be invalid
May be invalid
Reasons for
Elevation
Faking good
All False
Pervasive
nonacquiescence
Interpretation
If TRIN >79F, protocol
characterized by
pervasive pattern of
nonacquiescence,
invlaid/uniterpretable;
If TRIN WNL, high K
reflects defensive testtaking approach that may
indicate invalid protocol
If TRIN w/in 65F-79F,
elevation on K likely
reflects moderate pattern
of nonacquiescence
rather than faking good;
If TRIN WNL, elevation
on K likely reflects
moderate pattern of
defensiveness; higher
the K, greater likelihood
profile may not
accurately represent
existing psychopathology
56-65: trying to give
appearance of adequacy,
control, effectiveness;
hesitant about becoming
emotionally involved
T <50: Dissatisfaction w/ self & others, critical of self & others; < 40: plea for
help, ineffective in dealing w/everyday probs, little insight, socially
conforming/compliant with authority, socially awkward, cynical, suspicious
about motivations of others
Indications for treatment: High K not open, determined to think well of
self/others, asserting positive mental health, not much to work with in therapy;
Lo K willing to admit/discuss problems
Positively correlated with SES/educational level
56-65: If clinical scales elevated, may be seriously disturbed psychologically,
but have little awareness; if not seriously disturbed psychologically, may have
above-average ego strength and other positive characteristics
F K (raw scores): If difference is 10, likely fake-bad
CLINICAL SCALES*
*Using Grahams T-score levels; MMPI-2 Manual lists different levels
Scale 1 Hypochondriasis (Hs): tendency to manifest physical symptoms as
expression of emotional discomfort, to be preoccupied w/ ones health, to reject
nonmedical (i.e., psychological) explanations for sxs
T-Score Level Interpretive possibilities
Treatment
Implications
>80 Very High Extreme/sometimes bizarre somatic concern, Avoid feelings,
consider somatic delusions, fear of physical
somaticize, looking
breakdown, preoccupation on physical
more for medical
functioning
intervention not
therapy
60-80
Somatic concerns, sleep disturbance, lack
May develop somatic
Moderate/High energy, dissatisfied, demanding,
sxs in times of stress
complaining/whiny, cynical, pessimistic,
unhappy, immature
40-59 Average No interp
<40 Low
No interp
Legitimate physical illness may add 1 SD (10 T-score points)
Treatment
Implications
SI, psychiatric/Rx eval,
no energy/motivation,
helplessness
w/pessimism about
techniques
Some elevation
indicates distress and
motivation for Tx
60-70
Moderate depression/dysphoric,
Moderate/High dissatisfaction w/life situation, worried,
somatic c/os, withdrawn, lack selfconfidence, lack energy, anxiety, introverted,
restricted range of interests
40-59 Average No interp
<40 Low
No interp
2-7 profile is high indicator of current distress
High 2 with moderate 9: high risk of suicide has enough energy to do it
SUBSCALES:
D1-Subjective depression: unhappy, depressed, lack energy for coping w/probs of
everyday life,
not interested in what goes on around them, feel inferior, lack self-confidence,
uneasy
in social situations
D2-Psychomotor retardation: lack energy to cope w/everyday activities, feel
emotionally
immobilized, avoid others, deny hostile/aggressive impulses/actions
D3-Physical malfunctioning: preoccupation w/own physical functioning, deny good
health,
report variety of specific somatic symptoms
D4-Mental dullness: lack of energy to cope w/probs of everyday life, tension,
difficulties
w/concentration, attention, memory; lack self-confidence,
feel inferior, little enjoyment out
of life, life no longer worthwhile
D5-Brooding: lack of energy to cope w/probs, life no longer worthwhile, brood, cry,
ruminate, feel
losing control of thought processes
Treatment
Implications
Difficulty w/deep issues,
use denial, defensive,
nave, lack insight, want
attention, difficulty
tolerating anxiety
60-80
Somatic symptoms, sleep disturabance, lack
Moderate/High insight concerning causes of symptoms,
denial, demanding, immature, self-centered,
suggestible, low energy, feel sad/anxious;
physical complaints are way of getting
attention, not necessarily worries about
physical symptoms
40-59 Average No interp
<40 Low
No interp; conforming, inhibited, critical
thinker/logical
SUBSCALES:
Hy1-Denial of social anxiety: social extroversion, comfortable interacting w/others,
not easily
influenced by social standards and customs
Hy2-Need for affection: strong needs for attention/affection from others, fears that
needs will not be
met if honest about feelings/beliefs; others are honest, sensitive, reasonable
deny negative
feelings about others
Hy3-Lassitude-malaise: uncomfortable, not in good health, weak/fatigued, difficulties
concentrating
and sleeping, feelings of unhappiness
Hy4-Somatic complaints: multiple somatic c/os, deny expressing hostility toward
others
Hy5-Inhibition of aggression: deny hostile and aggressive impulses, feel sensitive
about how others
respond to them
Scale 4 Psychopathic Deviate (Pd): alienation, social disinhibition, tendency to come
into conflict w/ family, authorities, and others thru rebellion, exploitation, misconduct,
poorly developed conscience, and lack of internalized moral standards; admission of
social maladjustment w/social poise, self-confidence; impulsive, hostile, poor
frustration tolerance; judgment compromised; SA risk, sensation seeking, acting out
T-Score Level Interpretive possibilities
>75 Very High
Treatment
Implications
Mandated, acting out
not sitting down and
tolerating anxiety
60-75
Trouble w/law (women), use nonprescription Externalizing I get a
Moderate/High drugs (men), family/marital probs, impulsive, raw deal in life
dissatisfied, angry/irritable/uncooperative
(women), extroverted, superficial
relationships, energetic, creative, rebellious
toward authority, poor judgment, impatient;
may feel bored, empty, depressed;
unconventional, self-centered
40-59 Average Independent, energetic, assertive
<40 Low
No interp
SUBSCALES:
Pd1-Familial discord: describe family as lacking love, understanding, support; feel
families are/have
been critical and not permitted adequate freedom and independence
Pd2-Authority problems: resentment of societal and parental standards and
customs, definite
opinions about whats right/wrong, stand up for own beliefs, admit to having
been in trouble
in school or with law
Pd3-Social imperturbability: not useful b/c only 6 items and not possible to obtain
score >65
Pd4-Social alienation: feel alienated, isolated, estranged; believe others dont
understand them, get
raw deal from life
Pd5-Self-alienation: uncomfortable and unhappy, not find daily life
interesting/rewarding; express
regret, guilt, remorse for past deeds
Scale 5 Masculinity-femininity (Mf): sex-role identification; broad patterns of
interests, activities, attitudes, and sentiments that tend to follow gender stereotypes
T-Score
Level
>75 Males
Very High
60-75 Males
High
40-59 Males
Average
<40 Males
Low
Interpretive possibilities
>75 Females
Very High
60-75
Females
High
40-59
Females
Treatment
Implications
>80 indicates narcissism
No interp
Average
<40 Females
Low
May be ultra-passive,
dependent, selfdeprecating, selfdefeating
Treatment
Implications
Think everyone working
against them, even
therapist; trust issues;
hyperalertness
sensitivity; concerned
about safety;
argumentative,
resistant,
hostile/angry/resentful
Ditto; guarded,
distrustful
60-70
Paranoid predisposition, extremely sensitive,
Moderate/High suspicious, angry/resentful, withdrawn,
grandiosity (center of others
thoughts/behaviors), feel mistreated, blame
others, hostile/argumentative, emotionally
labile
45-59 Average No interp
<45 Low
Very low score may reflect paranoia d/t
extreme guardedness/vigilence, defensive
towards test administrator
<35: callous, not interpersonally sensitive
SUBSCALES:
Pa1-Persecutory ideas: describe world as threatening place, fell
misunderstood/unfairly treated,
delusions/ideas of reference
Pa2-Poignancy: more high strung and sensitive than others, fell lonely and
misunderstood, may seek
out risky or exciting activities to make themselves feel better
Pa3-Naivete: unrealistically optimistic attitudes about others, present selves as
trusting, having high
moral standards, and not having hostile/negative impulses
Treatment
Implications
Tendency to
intellectualize,
obsessive, ruminating,
deemphasize rational
thinking about problems
Some anxiety may be
motivation to work in
therapy, openness to
therapy
Treatment
Implications
Problem-oriented focus,
concrete; crisis oriented,
stabilization/support,
distress may motivate
for therapy
70-80 High
60-69
Moderate
Interpretive possibilities
Consider bipolar disorder, manic type; manic
symptoms, excessive purposeless activity,
hallucinations, delusions of grandeur,
confusion, flight of ideas
Excessive energy, lack direction, conceptual
disorganization, unrealistic self-appraisal,
impulsive, low frustration tolerance, bossy,
talk too much
Active, extroverted, rebellious, energetic,
creative, gregarious, seeks excitement,
enterprising
Treatment
Implications
Less insight-oriented,
distractible, less
cooperative, restless,
impatient
40-59
Average
<40 Low
SUBSCALES:
Ma1-Amorality: describe others as selfish, dishonest, opportunistic; thus feel justified
in behaving in
similar ways; derive vicarious satisfaction from manipulative exploits of others
Ma2-Psychomotor acceleration: accelerated speech, thought processes, and motor
activities; feel
tense, restless, excited; easily bored, seek out risk/excitement/danger to
overcome boredom
Ma3-Imperturbability: deny social anxiety, feel comfortable interacting w/others,
profess little
concern about opinions, values, attitudes of others
Ma4: Ego inflation: unrealistic evaluations of own abilities and self-worth, feel
resentful when
others make demands on them
Scale 0 Social Introversion (Si): hi score = introversion, shyness, social anxiety,
social timidity and awkwardness, social avoidance; low score = extroversion,
outgoingness, social comfort and skill, social intrepidity, social stimulation-seeking
T-Score Level Interpretive possibilities
>75 Very High
Treatment
Implications
Difficulty expressing
feelings, reticence about
relationships, inhibited
60-75
Introverted/shy/timid, depressed, guilty, slow
Moderate/High personal tempo, lack self-confidence, lack
interest, submissive, compliant,
overcontrolled, reliable, dependable, values
work, passive; difficulty establishing
relationships
40-59 Average No interp
<40 Low
Extroverted, gregarious, self-reliant,
Action-oriented, not
energetic, competitive, undercontrolled,
insight-oriented
manipulative, sociable, friendly, outgoing,
verbally fluent
Well Below 40 Very low: immature, impulsive, attentionseeking, competitive, superficial, not able to
disclose emotionally (like scale 3)
SUBSCALES:
Si1-Shyness/self-consciousness: feel shy around others, easily embarrassed, ill at
ease in social
situations, uncomfortable in new situations
Si2-Social avoidance: great dislike and avoidance of group activities and being in
crowds, avoidance
of contact w/ other people
DEFENSE MECHANISMS*
*Trimboli, F. & Kilgore, R.B. (1983). A psychodynamic approach to MMPI
interpretation. Journal of
Personality Assessment, 47 (6), 612-626.
Defense Mechanisms Indicated by Scale Elevations:
3: Repression, channel conflicts into vague physical complaints
4: Externalization, acting out, rationalization, intellectualization
5: Feminine sublimation (mild to moderate level), suppression (high elevation)
Masculine assertive behavior (mild to moderate), inappropriate channeling of
aggressive impulses
(high)
6: Projection, externalization
9: Denial, distraction, acting out (especially 4-9)
0: Avoidance, withdrawal
K: Guardedness, unwilling to acknowledge psychological weaknesses, repression,
rationalization
L: Primitive, repression, rigid denial (high elevation)
F: Lack of effective defensive functioning (high F, low L & K), repression, denial (low
F, high K & L)
Management of Anxiety Using Defenses: Elevations on symptom scales when defense
mechanisms are insufficient to bind anxieties aroused by difficulties
1: Displacement, channel emotional concerns into somatic complaints
2: Elevation is best single index of breached defenses
7-2: Less efficient uses of repression, magical thinking, rumination, rituals;
acute distress
8: Defenses deteriorate to great extent under stress (severe decompensation)
3-2-7: Intensified attempts to repress anxiety
2-7, with 4, 6, or 9: Neurotic decompensation
6-8-0: Psychotic decompensation
o 8-0 > 9: social/emotional isolation, apathy, withdrawal
o 8>7: fragmentation
o 6>7: gross projections (delusions)
Management of Aggression and Hostility:
Direct expression:
o 4: Diffuse focus
o 4-9: Act out w/o regard for consequences