You are on page 1of 1

BALURAN V.

NAVARRO
79 SCRA 309
FACTS:
Spouses Paraiso entered into a barter agreement with the spouses Baluran. The former
transferred use of their residential house in favor of the latter in exchange for the latters
riceland.

HELD:
No barter agreement for purposes of transferring ownership can be inferred when it is clear
that the parties merely intended to transfer material possession thereof.

You might also like