Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Fall 2015 Teacher Candidate Handbook
Fall 2015 Teacher Candidate Handbook
Fall 2015
Arizona State University
Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College
Office of Clinical Experiences
7/6/2015
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TEACHER CANDIDATE LETTER .................................................................................................................................. 3
DEFINITION OF TERMS USED IN TEACHERS COLLEGE ...................................................................................... 4
TEACHER CANDIDATE PLACEMENT PROCESS ...................................................................................................... 5
CHANGES IN STUDENT TEACHING PLACEMENT .................................................................................................. 6
CONCERNS WITH CLINICAL EXPERIENCE ASSIGNMENT .................................................................................. 6
STUDENT TEACHING CLINICAL REQUIREMENTS ................................................................................................ 7
FALL 2015 CALENDAR ..................................................................................................................................................... 9
PROGRESSION OF TEACHING RESPONSIBILITIES .............................................................................................. 13
CO-TEACHING STRATEGY DEFINITIONS & EXAMPLES .................................................................................... 14
TEACHER CANDIDATE EVALUATION ...................................................................................................................... 15
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT PROCESS ................................................................................................................ 16
WEEKLY COACHING MEETING AGENDA ............................................................................................................... 17
TEACHER CANDIDATE TIMECARD........................................................................................................................... 17
SUPERVISION OF TEACHER CANDIDATES ............................................................................................................. 17
SUPPORTING ACADEMIC PROGRESS: OUTCOME MAP AND NOTICE OF CONCERN ............................... 18
DISMISSAL FROM CLINICAL EXPERIENCE ........................................................................................................... 19
PROFESSIONALISM ........................................................................................................................................................ 20
DESCRIPTION OF SUPERVISOR VISITS.................................................................................................................... 22
APPENDIX A- POLICIES AND FORMS........................................................................................................................ 24
iTeachAZ STUDENT TEACHING ATTENDANCE POLICY ................................................................................... 25
ABSENCE REQUEST/VERIFICATION FORM ...................................................................................................... 26
LESSON PLAN (DIRECT INSTRUCTION) ............................................................................................................ 27
LESSON PLAN (INQUIRY) .................................................................................................................................. 28
NES TESTS TEACHER CERTIFICATION ........................................................................................................... 31
7/6/2015
7/6/2015
7/6/2015
7/6/2015
7/6/2015
7/6/2015
The physical, cognitive, and communicative demands described here are representative of those that must be met by
interns and student teachers to successfully perform the essential functions of their assigned clinical experiences.
Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable qualified individuals with disabilities to perform these essential
functions.
Accommodations: Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College is committed to student success and ensures an inclusive learning
environment for all students. Students with disabilities or disabling health conditions are required to document their
condition with the Disability Resource Center (DRC) prior to enrolling in the iTeachAZ program. Students who are
registered with DRC will be key participants in establishing reasonable and appropriate accommodations with course
instructors.
Dates for Clinical Experiences (see calendar): Teacher Candidates begin the clinical experience component of student
teaching on or before the official first day as listed below. In the spring semester, Teacher Candidates begin clinical
experience on the first day of ASU classes. The last day of clinical experience/student teaching in both the fall and spring
semesters is the last day of classes per the university academic calendar. However, Teacher Candidates student teaching in
schools with a two week spring or fall break will complete their student teaching on the Friday after the last day of ASU
classes.
Fall, Winter, and Spring Breaks: Teacher Candidates follow the calendar of the district to which they are assigned for
fall and spring breaks and holidays.
Teacher Candidate Evaluation Requirements: University Supervisors will complete a minimum of 3 formal
Performance Assessments during the student teaching semester. Mentor Teachers will complete 14 progress reports per
semester. All evaluations are entered into Tk20 with University Supervisors, Teacher Candidates and Mentor Teachers
having access to data.
7/6/2015
2015 Date
Completed By
Prior to August 14
August 14
August 17
August 17-28
August 21
August 28
TC and MT
ASU, US, TC
September 4
September 7-18
September 11
September 18
September 25
September 28- October 5
October 1
October 2
October 9
October 5-16
October 16
October 22-29
October 23
October 30
November 6
November 9-20
November 13
Progress Report
Reflection
Academic Status Report #1 due
Deadline to apply for graduation, https://students.asu.edu/graduation
Progress Report
Reflection
Progress Report
Reflection
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT CYCLE #2
Progress Report
Reflection
Academic Status Report #2 due
US
TC
MT with TC
TC
MT
MT with TC
TC, US and
TC
US, TC and MT
MT with TC
TC
MT with TC
TC
TC and MT
MT with TC
TC
US
TC
MT with TC
TC
MT with TC
TC
US, TC and MT
MT with TC
TC
US
Progress Report
Reflection
Progress Report
Reflection
Progress Report
Reflection
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT CYCLE #3
MT with TC
TC
MT with TC
TC
MT with TC
TC
US, TC and MT
Progress Report
Reflection
TC completes Tk20 evaluations of US and MT
MT completes evaluation of US
November 20
Progress Report
Reflection
November 27
Reflection
University Supervisor Seminar #2 completed
THANKSGIVING RECESS NOVEMBER 26 and 27
November 30 - December 4 University Supervisors final visit to the school
December 4
Progress Report
Reflection
MT with TC
TC
TC
MT
MT with TC
TC
MT with TC
TC
US and TC
US
MT with TC
TC
7/6/2015
December 7-14
TC EVALUATES US
TC EVALUATES MT
MT EVALUATES US
TK20 BINDER UPDATED AND SUBMITTED
Final grades are due/posted
All TCs
TC
TC
US
TC
TC
MT
US
Office of Clinical Experiences
December 14
TC
TBD
Convocation
TC
December 4
10
7/6/2015
Districts may ask Teacher Candidates to begin early and/or stay later, and as a teacher-in-training you are free to do so.
However, this calendar lists the official first and last days of student teaching required for successful completion of student
teaching. Also, if you are student teaching at a school with a two week fall break, your last day is Dec 11 (not Dec 4).
FALL 2015 CALENDAR FOR DUAL PLACEMENT TEACHER CANDIDATES
NOTE: The calendar is tentative and subject to change. Performance Assessment dates listed below are approximate and
will be scheduled by the University Supervisor (US) in collaboration with the Teacher Candidate (TC) and Mentor Teacher
(MT). Dates will also vary due to Fall Break schedules, when applicable. *During week-long Fall break, a progress report
and reflection are NOT due.
2015 Date
Prior to August 14
Completed By
TC and Mentor Teacher
August 14
ASU, US, TC
August 17
August 17-21
US
August 21
Reflection
TC
August 28
Progress Report
Reflection
Honorarium due in Tk20 by Mentor Teacher, first placement
Academic Status Report #1 due
MT with TC
TC
MT
US
MT with TC
TC
September 28 October 9
Progress Report
Reflection
University Supervisor Seminar #1 completed
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT CYCLE #1 in first placement
Progress Report
Reflection
Progress Report
Reflection
Progress Report
Reflection
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT CYCLE #2 in first placement
October 1
TC
October 2
Progress Report
Reflection
Progress Report
Reflection
LAST DAY OF STUDENT TEACHING IN FIRST PLACEMENT
TC completes Tk20 evaluation of MT
MT completes Tk20 evaluation of US
TIMECARD COMPLETED FOR FIRST PLACEMENT
TC and MT
TC
MT with TC
TC
TC
TC
MT
TC, MT, US
October 12
TC
October 12-16
Introductory Teleconference
US, TC and MT
October 16
Progress Report
Reflection
Honorarium due in Tk20 by Mentor Teacher, second placement
Progress Report
Reflection
Academic Status Report #2 due
Progress Report
Reflection
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT CYCLE #1 in second placement
MT with TC
TC
MT
MT with TC
TC
US
MT with TC
TC
US, TC and MT
September 1-3
September 4
September 7-18
September 11
September 18
September 25
October 9
October 23
October 26-28
October 30
November 2-13
November 6
November 13
Progress Report
Reflection
Progress Report
Reflection
TC completes Tk20 evaluations of US and MT
MT completes evaluation of US
US, TC and MT
MT with TC
TC
MT with TC
TC
MT with TC
TC
US, TC and MT
MT with TC
TC
MT with TC
TC
TC
MT
11
7/6/2015
November 20
November 27
Nov. 30 - Dec. 4
December 4
December 4
December 7-14
December 14
TBD
Progress Report
Reflection
Reflection
University Supervisor Seminar #2 completed
THANKSGIVING RECESS NOVEMBER 26 and 27
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT CYCLE #2 in second placement
MT with TC
TC
MT with TC
TC
US and TC
US, TC and MT
Progress Report
Reflection
LAST DAY OF STUDENT TEACHING
TIMECARD COMPLETED
TIMECARD DUE TO UNIVERSITY SUPERVISOR
VERIFY ALL TK20 EVALUATIONS ARE COMPLETED
TC EVALUATES US
TC EVALUATES MT
MT EVALUATES US
TK20 BINDER UPDATED AND SUBMITTED
Final grades are due/posted
Commencement for MAC/graduate students and Undergraduate students
Convocation
MT with TC
TC
All TCs
TC
TC
US
TC
TC
MT
US
Office of Clinical Experiences
TC
TC
12
7/6/2015
Weeks 3-4
Weeks 5-6
Weeks 7-10
Week 11 and beyond
Co-Teaching Strategies
One Teach, One Observe
One Teach, One Assist
Alternative Teaching
Week 3
Week 4
Weeks 5-6
Weeks 7 and beyond
Co-Teaching Strategies
One Teach, One Observe
One Teach, One Assist
Alternative Teaching
7/6/2015
Definition/Example
One teacher has primary responsibility while the other gathers specific observational
information on students or the lead teacher. The key to this strategy is to focus the
observation where the teacher doing the observation is observing specific behaviors.
Example: One teacher can observe students for their understanding of directions while the
other leads.
One Teach,
One Assist
An extension of One Teach, One Observe. One teacher has primary instructional
responsibility while the other circulates to check for understanding, assists students with their
work, or monitors behaviors.
Example: While one teacher has the instructional lead, the person assisting can be the
voice for the students when they dont understand or are having difficulties.
Station
Teaching
The co-teaching pair divides the instructional content into parts. Each teacher instructs one of
the groups, groups then rotate or spend a designated amount of time at each station often an
independent station will be used along with the teacher led stations.
Example: One teacher might lead a station where the students play a money math game and
the other teacher could have a mock store where the students purchase items and make
change.
Parallel
Teaching
Each teacher instructs half the students. The two teachers are addressing the same
instructional material and presenting the material using the same teaching strategy. The
greatest benefit to this approach is the reduced student to teacher ratio.
Example: Both teachers are leading a question and answer discussion on specific current
events and the impact they have on our economy.
Alternative
Teaching
This strategy allows one teacher to work with students at their expected grade level while the
other teacher works with those students who need the information and/or materials retaught,
extended, or remediated.
Example: One teacher may work with students who need re-teaching of a concept while the
other teacher works with the rest of the students on enrichment.
Team
Teaching
Well -planned, team- taught lessons exhibit an invisible flow of instruction with no
prescribed division of authority. Using a team teaching strategy, both teachers are actively
involved in the lesson. From a students perspective, there is no clearly defined leader as
both teachers share the instruction, are free to interject information, and are available to assist
students and answer questions.
Example: Both instructors can share the reading of a story or text so that the students are
hearing two voices.
The strategies are not hierarchical they can be used in any order and/or in any combination to best meet the needs of
the P-12 students in the classroom. (With adaptations from) Copyright 2011, St. Cloud State University, Teacher Quality
Enhancement Center Research Funded by a US Department of Education Teacher Quality Enhancement Grant
14
7/6/2015
15
7/6/2015
16
7/6/2015
17
7/6/2015
7/6/2015
19
7/6/2015
PROFESSIONALISM
Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College measures Teacher Candidates professional dispositions via the Teachers College
Professionalism Rubric. The rubric is based on the work of Charlotte Danielson. University Supervisors use information
from progress reports from mentor teachers, observation data, notebook and reflection assignments, and student teaching
orientation/seminar participation/attendance to determine professionalism scores. Teacher Candidates must achieve a
performance rating of Applying or higher on rows A-C and Emerging or higher on Row D of the Mary Lou Fulton
Teachers College Professionalism Rubric at the first Performance Assessment (PA) and at each PA thereafter to progress
to the final student teaching semester.
Examples of behaviors that meet and do not meet the standards: this is not a comprehensive list
A: Showing Professionalism
Relationships with others in schools and the profession (university instructors, school leaders,
colleagues, etc.)
Expectation: ASU Students relationships with colleagues are characterized by collaboration
and cooperation. Student presumes positive intent when addressing issues of concern and
demonstrates willingness to learn from others.
Examples of behaviors expected:
Communicates clearly, promptly and in a respectful manner with students, parents, educational
colleagues, instructors, and the public.
Participates in verbal and written interactions in an equitable manner, participating respectfully
without interruption and contributing without dominating or retreating from interaction.
Expresses ideas coherently, articulately and clearly, speaking and writing at a level expected
of college graduates.
Maintains appropriate confidentiality.
Accepts responsibility for his/her behaviors and the consequences.
Examples of behaviors that do not meet this standard:
Is able to follow school district and university policies, practices, and procedures with
minimal guidance.
Dresses in an appropriately professional manner and follows school district dress code or norms
for teacher dress.
Exhibits expected and appropriate workplace behaviors, avoiding tardiness and excessive or
20
7/6/2015
unwarranted absences in the in-person or online classroom or clinical field placements.
Takes initiative as appropriate to setting.
Adheres to high ethical standards and avoids misconduct that could interfere with ability to
perform teaching duties, including but not limited to misuse of electronic media, threats, selfdestructive behaviors, and violations of the law (theft, destruction of property, harassment,
driving while impaired, drug use, and immoral behavior).
Examples of behaviors that do not meet this standard:
Accepts feedback and make good faith attempts to improve performance based on feedback.
Consistently demonstrates awareness of own skills and abilities that is realistic.
Examples of behaviors that do not meet this standard:
21
7/6/2015
First visit (week 1-2): The University Supervisor emails the Mentor Teacher during the first week and introduces
him/herself, provides contact information, and makes an appointment for the first visit. The University
Supervisor then visits the school to meet with the Mentor Teacher and Teacher Candidate to review the student
teaching requirements including the following: the TAP and Professionalism rubrics, the progression of teaching
responsibilities, co-teaching strategies, weekly Progress Reports, and the attendance policy. The University
Supervisor answers any questions and works with the Mentor Teacher and Teacher Candidate to set up the
semesters schedule of observation dates and times. The University Supervisor also checks in Tk20 to see that the
Mentor Teacher completes the honorarium form.
Second visit (approximately week 4): The University Supervisor observes the Teacher Candidates first lesson,
reviews the Teacher Candidates notebook including lesson plans, Timecard, and printed Tk20 Progress Reports.
The University Supervisor facilitates a 3-way conference completing the first Performance Assessment
collaboratively with the Mentor Teacher and Teacher Candidate. Both the Mentor Teacher and Teacher
Candidate have Tk20 access to every Performance Assessment. The University Supervisor completes the
Attendance and Notebook Check in Tk20.
Third visit (approximately week 8): The University Supervisor observes the Teacher Candidates second lesson,
reviews the notebook including lesson plans, Timecard, and printed Tk20 Progress Reports, completes the Tk20
Performance Assessment/Midterm collaboratively with the Mentor Teacher and the Teacher Candidate, and
facilitates a 3-way conference with the Teacher Candidate and Mentor Teacher on todays reinforcement
and refinement areas/next steps. If the TC has any TAP indicators and/or Professionalism indicators which are
not proficient, the 3-way conference includes a collaborative completion of the Performance Assessment
Summary (PAS). The PAS is a hard copy summary of the non-proficient TAP and Professionalism indicators to
date with specific suggestions and resources to guide the TC toward successful demonstration of proficiency on
PA 3. A copy is made of the PAS before the University Supervisor leaves, and the TC keeps the original PAS in
the Notebook, Tab 3, as a reference for TC/MT coaching meetings. The University Supervisor completes
the Attendance and Notebook Check in Tk20.
Fourth visit (approximately week 13): The University Supervisor observes the Teacher Candidates third lesson,
reviews the Teacher Candidates notebook including lesson plans, Timecard, and printed Tk20 Progress Reports,
and facilitates another 3-way conference with the Mentor Teacher and Teacher Candidate to complete the
Performance Assessment/Final. The University Supervisor completes the Attendance and Notebook Check in
Tk20.
Fifth visit (week 15-16): The University Supervisor facilitates a 3-way conference, with feedback from the
Mentor Teacher, which includes reviewing lesson plans, the printed Tk20 Progress Reports, and reviewing the
Timecard. On the last day of student teaching, the Teacher Candidate sends the University Supervisor a copy of
the completed Timecard or uploads it in Blackboard as final attendance documentation. The University
Supervisor uses the completed Timecard to update the Attendance and Notebook Check in Tk20. The
University Supervisor then completes the Final Grade Submission in Tk20 before submitting the Tk20 binder.
The tuition waiver is hand delivered by the University Supervisor at this final visit if the Mentor Teacher chose
this honorarium option in Tk20.
22
7/6/2015
First visit (week 1-2): The University Supervisor emails the Mentor Teacher during the first week and introduces
him/herself, provides contact information, and makes an appointment for the first visit. The University Supervisor then
visits the school to meet with the Mentor Teacher and Teacher Candidate to review the student teaching requirements
including the following: the TAP and Professionalism rubrics, the progression of teaching responsibilities, co-teaching
strategies, weekly Progress Reports, and the attendance policy. The University Supervisor answers any questions and
works with the Mentor Teacher and Teacher Candidate to set up the semesters schedule of observation dates and times.
The University Supervisor also checks in Tk20 to see that the Mentor Teacher completes the honorarium form.
Second visit (approximately week 4): The University Supervisor observes the Teacher Candidates first lesson, reviews the
notebook including lesson plans, Timecard, and printed Tk20 Progress Reports, completes the Tk20 Performance
Assessment/Midterm collaboratively with the Mentor Teacher and the Teacher Candidate, and facilitates a 3-way
conference with the Teacher Candidate and Mentor Teacher on todays reinforcement and refinement areas/next steps. The
conference includes discussion on TAP indicators and/or Professionalism indicators which are not proficient and the
collaborative completion of the Performance Assessment Summary (PAS). The PAS is a hard copy summary of the nonproficient TAP and Professionalism indicators to date with specific suggestions and resources to guide the TC toward
successful demonstration of proficiency on PA 2. A copy is made of the PAS before the University Supervisor leaves, and
the TC keeps the original PAS in the Notebook, Tab 3, as a reference for TC/MT coaching meetings. The University
Supervisor completes the Attendance and Notebook Check in Tk20.
Third visit (week 8): The University Supervisor reviews the Teacher Candidates notebook including lesson plans, the
Timecard, and printed Tk20 Progress Reports. The University Supervisor observes the Teacher Candidates second lesson
and facilitates a 3-way conference with the Teacher Candidate and Mentor Teacher after the observation. A Performance
Assessment/Final is completed in Tk20 at the end of the 3-way conference and the University Supervisor completes the
Attendance and Notebook Check in Tk20. The tuition waiver is hand delivered by the University Supervisor if the
Mentor Teacher chose this honorarium option in Tk20.
Second Placement
Introductory Teleconference: During week 1 of the second 8-week placement, the University Supervisor emails the
Mentor Teacher and introduces him/herself, provides contact information, and reviews the student teaching requirements
including the following: the TAP and Professionalism rubrics, the progression of teaching responsibilities, co-teaching
strategies, weekly Progress Reports, and the attendance policy. The University Supervisor answers any questions and
works with the Mentor Teacher and Teacher Candidate to set up the semesters schedule of observation dates and times.
The University Supervisor also checks in Tk20 to see that the Mentor Teacher completes the honorarium form.
First visit (approximately week 3-4): The University Supervisor observes the Teacher Candidates first lesson, reviews the
notebook including lesson plans, Timecard, and printed Tk20 Progress Reports, completes the Tk20 Performance
Assessment/Midterm collaboratively with the Mentor Teacher and the Teacher Candidate, and facilitates a 3-way
conference with the Teacher Candidate and Mentor Teacher on todays reinforcement and refinement areas/next steps. The
conference includes discussion on TAP indicators and/or Professionalism indicators which are not proficient and the
collaborative completion of the Performance Assessment Summary (PAS). The PAS is a hard copy summary of the nonproficient TAP and Professionalism indicators to date with specific suggestions and resources to guide the TC toward
successful demonstration of proficiency on PA 2. A copy is made of the PAS before the University Supervisor leaves, and
the TC keeps the original PAS in the Notebook, Tab 3, as a reference for TC/MT coaching meetings. The University
Supervisor completes the Attendance and Notebook Check in Tk20.
Second visit (week 7-8): The University Supervisor reviews the Teacher Candidates notebook including lesson plans, the
Timecard, and printed Tk20 Progress Reports. The University Supervisor observes the Teacher Candidates second lesson
and facilitates a 3-way conference with the Teacher Candidate and Mentor Teacher after the observation. A Performance
Assessment/Final evaluation is completed in Tk20 at the end of the 3-way conference. On the last day of student teaching,
the Teacher Candidate sends the University Supervisor a copy of the completed Timecard or uploads it in Blackboard as
final attendance documentation. The University Supervisor uses the completed Timecard to update the Attendance and
Notebook Check in Tk20. The University Supervisor then completes the Final Grade Submission twice, one in each
Tk20 binder for each dual placement, before submitting the Tk20 binder. The tuition waiver is hand delivered by the
University Supervisor at this final visit if the Mentor Teacher chose this honorarium option in Tk20.
23
7/6/2015
24
7/6/2015
25
7/6/2015
District:
Sick
Vacation
Bereavement
Military
Maternity/
Other
Jury Duty
Paternity
Reason for absence:
Dates of absence
Current absence
From: __________
To: __________
Date:
Date:
Approved
Not approved
Comment:
Date:
26
7/6/2015
Teacher:
Subject/Grade:
Standard:
Objective (Explicit):
Key vocabulary:
Materials:
Opening/Anticipatory Set: (state objectives, connect to previous learning, and make relevant to real life)
Instructional Input
Teacher Will:
Co-Teaching Strategy/Differentiation
Guided Practice
Teacher Will:
Student Will:
Co-Teaching Strategy/Differentiation
Teacher Will:
Independent Practice
Student Will:
Student Will:
Co-Teaching Strategy/Differentiation
Closure/Lesson Summary:
27
7/6/2015
Teacher:
Subject:
Standard:
Objective (Explicit):
Key vocabulary:
Materials:
Engage/Set (Make content and learning relevant to real life and connect to student interest)
Explore
Teacher Will:
Co-Teaching Configuration/Differentiation
Explain
Teacher Will:
Student Will:
Co-Teaching Configuration/Differentiation
Teacher Will:
Elaborate
Student Will:
Student Will:
Co-Teaching Configuration/Differentiation
Evaluate
28
7/6/2015
ECD
MAC-EED
EED
ASU Affiliate ID #:
EED/SPE
MAC-SPE
SED/Subject: _____________
Semester:
Fall
Campus:
Downtown
Spring
Poly
Year: ___________
Tempe
West
MAC-SED/Subject: ______________
Student Information:
Students Email:
Address ______________________________________________________________________________________________________
City ___________________________________
State______
Zip____________
Phone (
) _______ - ___________
Mentor Teachers Name:
Placement Information:
District
School
Supervisors Name:
Address
City ___________________________________
Date
State_______
Zip ____________
Phone (
) ______ - __________
1
2
3
4
5
Date
Supervisors Initials
1
2
29
7/6/2015
TOTAL
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
DATE:
DATE:
30
7/6/2015
NES TESTS TEACHER CERTIFICATION: Students must pass the Professional Knowledge Test and Subject Knowledge Tests
in their major, to be eligible to apply for teacher certification. Schedule your tests so that your results are available no later than
graduation: http://www.aepa.nesinc.com.
Major
Professional Knowledge
Subject Knowledge
Elementary Education
Elementary Education
Professional Knowledge Test: pass by the halfway point of your student teaching
Subject Knowledge Test: take/pass when you complete your content area classes
1. Refer to the ADE Website for the most up-to-date certification information: http://www.azed.gov/educator-certification/
2. Contact your advisor with any questions
3. School district requirements may exceed ADEs requirements.
31