Professional Documents
Culture Documents
10
buyer or a promoter just because of the fact that they get hundred times more
money from the purchaser than what the pittance government pays them by way of
of compensation.
Once the purchaser starts construction work on such lands, troubles start one by
one. He will have to walk through the corridors of various courts for decades, to set
right the damage and loss suffered by him. Whether he will succeed or not only time
will tell. In the end, wisdom dawns on him that the system does not encourage true
entrepreneurship.
Various statutory authorities want to enjoy power without the statutory
responsibilities that go with it. Usually they avoid taking statutory decisions and if
by chance they did and thereafter anything went wrong they would find a
scapegoat in the higher or lower echelons of the organizational hierarchy. While the
authorities are very prompt 'in collecting stamp duties, they do not take the legal
responsibility of ensuring that only properties with proper titles are registered.
Irrespective of the rules, the sub-registrars are always ready and willing to register
the property provided a deal is struck successfully, if not they will raise various
objections against registering the property.
According to certain rules, one cannot purchase the land granted by the government
to a person belonging to the schedule caste. If anyone purchases such a land, the
government may direct him to return it, but the chances of getting back the money
invested are remote.
Certain land laws are odd and very confusing. According to Karnataka Land
Revenue Act, only an agriculturist can purchase agricultural lands but his annual
income should be within two lakhs per year and he should be an agricultural labour.
Probably, this peculiar law is in force only in Karnataka and Kashmir. Kashmiris can
buy land anywhere in India, but people of Indian origin of other states cannot buy
land in Kashmir. While the government can acquire any land and form layout by
paying a nominal compensation to the landowners, promoters or developers or
individuals cannot do so because there is no provision in the law to make private
layouts even though they are ready to fulfill all the terms and conditions imposed by
the authorities. What is right for the government is not necessarily right for others.
Agricultural lands located at green belt area cannot be used for any building
construction. Conversion of the land use in green belt is not possible. However, they
are entitled to construct pump set room and small farmhouse.
Another peculiar rule is with respect to the "change of land use." A shopping
complex cannot be constructed on a land earmarked for residential purposes. An
industry cannot be set up on a land earmarked for commercial use. Lands around
Bangalore within a radius of twenty kilometers, have been declared as "Green Belt "
area on which no buildings can come up. Similarly, no construction is allowed other
than what is mentioned on lands earmarked. Likewise, an apartment block cannot
be constructed on a site allotted by the BDA. If the permission to change the use of
land is denied, then the project can never see the light of day.
Even if the promoter is able to cross over all the hurdles and manage to get a proper
land for construction, his problems do not end there. He has to collect various
documents to perfect the title deeds such as betterment charges, clubbing of khata,
etc. To regularize the property, the promoter has to put in great efforts at the
revenue department. Thereafter he has to get the plan sanctioned by the
engineering department. The plan has to move up from the Junior Engineer level
and after passing through various cadres of engineers it finally reaches the commissioner level. After the building plan is sanctioned, the promoter has to obtain the
'certificate of commencement' and finally 'completion certificate' from the concerned
authorities.
Getting the completion certificate from the Bangalore Mahanagara Palike is not an
easy task. One among a hundred flats can get the completion certificate. The work
cannot be completed unless and until the promoter parts with a huge amount of
'speed money'. 'No money - no certificate is the unwritten slogan. None of the
authorities will respond to your application within a fixed time frame if you do not
'take care' of them. In short, public administration has now come to mean public
harassment. Delay in getting clearance and approvals leads to escalation in the cost
of materials, wages and administrative overheads, which eats into the promoter's
wafer thin margin. Apart from the BDA and the BMP, there are several others the
promoter has to contend with. Various squads such as BDA squads, sales tax
squads, income tax squads, revenue squads, KTPCL vigilance and inspection
squads, prevention of unauthorized construction squads, swoop down on the
promoter to collect their periodic 'mamools.' Whether the promoter makes money or
not, these people definitely do. The Lok Ayukta has already nailed some, but many
are still at large fleecing the entrepreneur.
The promoter has to shell out nearly 25% to 40% of the project cost as bribes and
government fees. Then he has to earn something in the thin margin by way of profit.
As a result, there is bound to be deviation from the sanctioned plan, compromise on
standard construction, bad workmanship, poor finish and delay in completion of the
project. That some buildings come crashing down now and then will bear testimony
to these realities.
Then there are cases of missing files and bogus documents. Added to this are cases
of genuine documents executed on bogus stamp papers. A promoter with such
professional qualification as a Bachelors, Masters degree in architecture or civil
engineering learns that his learned knowledge is useless when it comes to getting
clearances, approvals from government officials.
They learn that the only way to get their work done depends on how successful they
are in warming the hands of the officials 'under the table.' Normally, promoters are
not in a position to invest the entire amount on their projects. It all depends on the
amounts they have been able to collect from customers. Some customers don't pay
promptly. Sometimes to make up the deficit, the promoters have to borrow funds at
high rates of interest. Promoters are forced to pay compensation by the consumer
forums to those customers for the delay in the project. On the delayed payments,
however, it is difficult for the promoters to collect interest as such rights can be
enforced in civil courts only which is a long drawn process. Of course, a few
unscrupulous promoters do make fast bucks by throwing ethics to winds.
Under the circumstances, only those few promoters, who have the capacity to hold
on to their apartments till they get high prices, can survive in this business. Those
promoters who desire to construct apartments and budget flats for middle class
citizens at reasonable prices are struggling hard to make both ends meet.
Unless attitudes change and the bribe culture is rooted out, it will be difficult for the
quality conscious and value-oriented promoters to survive in the market.
*************