You are on page 1of 2

BUILDING CODES

& ENERGY EFFICIENCY:


NEW MEXICO
Updated November 3, 2009

ECONOMIC BENEFITS
Consumers save money by reducing utility bills,
minimizing the negative impacts of fluctuations in
energy supply and cost, and conserving available
energy resources. Retail and office buildings con-
structed to meet the requirements of the IECC can be
over 30 percent more energy efficient than typical
buildings not constructed to meet national model
energy standards.
Monetary savings derived from codes increase a

B
uildings account for roughly 40 percent of the consumer's purchasing power, and help expand the
total energy use in the United States and 70 state’s economy by keeping local dollars in New
percent of our electricity use, representing a Mexico.
significant opportunity for energy savings. Energy BUILDING INDUSTRY BENEFITS
efficiency—through the adoption and enforcement of
strong building energy codes—is the quickest, cheap- The national model code, the 2009 IECC, offers
est, and cleanest way to reduce energy consumption flexibility to New Mexico builders and design pro-
and achieve a sustainable and prosperous future. For fessionals, allowing them to optimize the cost-
the state of New Mexico, this next step should be the effectiveness of energy efficient features in their
adoption of the U.S. model energy codes, the 2009 building products, and to satisfy a variety of con-
International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) sumer preferences.
and ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2007.
The 2009 IECC also simplifies guidelines for build-
ers, providing a uniform code across the state with
In February 2009, the American Recovery and Rein-
multiple options for compliance.
vestment Act (Recovery Act) – the federal stimulus
legislation appropriating funds for a variety of state Uniformity throughout New Mexico will enable lo-
initiatives – allocated $3.1 billion for the U.S. Depart- cal jurisdictions to pool limited resources and com-
ment of Energy’s State Energy Program (SEP) to as- bine personnel to form county-wide, regional, and
sist states with building energy efficiency efforts. As statewide enforcement and educational programs.
one of the requirements to receive this funding, Gov.
Bill Richardson certified to DOE1 that New Mexico UTILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS
would implement energy standards of equal or greater Energy codes improve the energy efficiency per-
stringency than the latest national model codes—the formance of new buildings and reduce demand on
2009 edition of the IECC and Standard 90.1-2007. power generators, therefore improving the air qual-
ity of local communities and throughout New Mex-
Having already received $15.9 million2 in federal SEP ico.
funding, the state is eligible to receive an additional
$15.9 million in grants upon demonstration of the suc- Electricity use is a leading generator of air pollution.
cessful implementation of its energy plans submitted Rising power demand increases emissions of sul-
to DOE. It is in the state’s best economic interest to fur dioxide, nitrous oxides and carbon dioxide. En-
adopt the national model codes statewide and begin ergy codes are a proven, cost-effective means for
enjoying the benefits of an efficient building sector. addressing these and other environmental impacts.
1850 M St. NW Suite 600
Washington, DC 20036
www.bcap-ocean.org
A MODEL STATE ENERGY CODE FOR NEW MEXICO

N
ew Mexico’s current energy code,3 the New
Mexico Energy Conservation Code, is based on
the 2006 IECC for residential construction and
on ASHRAE 90.1-2004 for commercial construction. It
became effective in July 2008. This code, however,
does not achieve the energy savings of the 2009
IECC.
The 2009 IECC4 improves upon the 2006 IECC and will
provide New Mexico households and businesses an esti-
mated 15 percent greater energy efficiency, as well as
lower utility costs, increased comfort, and better eco-
nomic opportunity. In the fall of 2009, the New Mexico
Building Code Commission began reviewing proposals
Desert landscape near Chaco Canyon, New Mexico
to update the state code to achieve energy savings 20
(Credit—James Dale)
percent above the 2006 IECC, enhancing the benefits
realized by the state which are detailed herein.5 43rd in the nation in per capita personal income.8
ENERGY RESOURCES Low-income households typically spend 17 percent of
their total annual income on energy, compared with
New Mexico is rich in fossil fuel and renewable energy four percent for other households. According to some
resources. The state’s crude oil and natural gas account estimates, more than four-fifths of energy expenses leave
for about 3 percent and 10 percent, respectively, of total low-income communities. Higher energy costs deprive
U.S. production. The majority of its coal production is these communities of resources they need to generate
used in-state, providing more that 80 percent of New additional economic activity.
Mexico’s electricity generation.6 Reducing local demand
for electricity and natural gas would free up even more AN UNTAPPED RESOURCE
of the state’s energy resources for export to other Energy prices are projected to rise sharply over the next
states, decreasing costs for consumers and increasing decade. By using energy codes to increase the signifi-
profits for businesses. cant potential energy supply improved building energy
EFFICIENCY AND PERFORMANCE efficiency produces, New Mexico can enhance its energy
security by reducing energy demand within its borders.
Although its population (ranked 36th in 2007) and total Wise management of statewide energy policy should
energy consumption (38th) are small among the 50 states include seizing the low-hanging fruit that is the energy
and D.C., New Mexico’s economy is energy intensive, savings improved building energy codes offer. Among
ranking comparatively high in energy consumption per the opportunities:
real dollar of GDP (16th).7 This can leave the state vul-
nerable to future fluctuations in energy costs and peak If New Mexico updated its energy code to the 2009
demand, as the state has endured energy prices in the top IECC and required adoption and enforcement by all
half of the nation in recent years. By adopting national local jurisdictions, businesses and homeowners would
baseline standards for building energy performance, save an estimated $24 million annually by 2020 and
New Mexico can mitigate the impacts of price uncer- an estimated $47 million annually by 2030 in energy
tainty and remain one of the more efficient states in costs (assuming 2006 energy prices).
the nation. Additionally, adopting and implementing the 2009
HOUSEHOLD PROSPERITY IECC statewide would help avoid roughly 6 trillion
Btu of primary annual energy use by 2030 and an-
Energy expenses comprise an economic drain on low- nual emissions of roughly 360,000 metric tons of CO2
income communities. In 2007, New Mexico ranked by 2030.
** NOTES ** For more information, please visit www.bcap-ocean.org
1 5
US DOE (http://www.energy.gov/media/4076RichardsonNewMexico.pdf) BCAP (http://bcap-energy.org/files/BCAP_Code_Alert_Bulletin_September-7-2009.pdf)
2 6
US DOE (http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/news/progress_alerts.cfm/pa_id=202) US EIA (http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/state/state_energy_profiles.cfm?sid=NM)
3 7
BCAP (http://bcap-energy.org/node/85) US EIA (http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/states/sep_sum/html/pdf/rank_use_gdp.pdf)
4 8
BCAP (http://bcap-energy.org/node/330) US BEA (http://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/regional/spi/2008/spi0308.htm)
1850 M St. NW Suite 600
Washington, DC 20036
www.bcap-ocean.org

You might also like