You are on page 1of 2

BUILDING CODES

& ENERGY EFFICIENCY:


NEW YORK
Updated December 15, 2009
ECONOMIC BENEFITS
Consumers save money by reducing utility bills,
minimizing the negative impacts of fluctuations in
energy supply and cost, and by conserving available
energy resources. Retail and office buildings con-
structed to meet the requirements of the IECC can
be over 30 percent more energy efficient than
typical buildings not constructed to meet national
model energy standards.

Monetary savings derived from codes increase a

B
uildings account for roughly 40 percent of the consumer's purchasing power, and help expand the
total energy use in the United States and 70 state’s economy by keeping local dollars in New
percent of our electricity use, representing a York.
significant opportunity for energy savings. Energy effi- BUILDING INDUSTRY BENEFITS
ciency—through the adoption and enforcement of
strong building energy codes—is the quickest, cheap- The national model code, the 2009 IECC, offers
est and cleanest way to reduce energy consumption and flexibility to New York builders and design profes-
achieve a sustainable and prosperous future. For the sionals, allowing them to optimize the cost-
state of New York, the next step should be the adop- effectiveness of energy efficient features in their
tion of the U.S. model energy codes—the 2009 Inter- building products, and to satisfy a variety of con-
national Energy Conservation Code (2009 IECC) sumer preferences.
and ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2007.
The 2009 IECC also simplifies guidelines for build-
In February 2009, the American Recovery and Rein- ers, providing a uniform code across the state with
vestment Act (Recovery Act) – the federal stimulus multiple options for compliance.
legislation appropriating funds for a variety of state
initiatives – allocated $3.1 billion for the U.S. Depart- Uniformity throughout New York will enable local
ment of Energy’s State Energy Program (SEP) to assist jurisdictions to pool limited resources and combine
states with building energy efficiency efforts. As one personnel to form county-wide, regional, and state-
of the requirements to receive this funding, Gov. David wide enforcement and educational programs.
Paterson certified to DOE1 that New York would im-
UTILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS
plement energy standards of equal or greater strin-
gency than the latest national model codes—the 2009 Energy codes improve the energy efficiency per-
edition of the IECC and Standard 90.1-2007. formance of new buildings and reduce demand on
power generators, therefore improving the air qual-
Having already received $61.5 million2 in SEP funds, ity of local communities throughout New York.
New York is eligible to receive a total of $123 million
in grants upon demonstration of the successful imple- Electricity use is a leading generator of air pollution.
mentation of its energy plans submitted to DOE. It is in Rising power demand increases emissions of sul-
New York’s best economic interest to adopt the 2009 fur dioxide, nitrous oxides and carbon dioxide. En-
IECC and Standard 90.1-2007 statewide and begin ergy codes are a proven, cost-effective means for
enjoying the benefits of an efficient building sector. addressing these and other environmental impacts.
1850 M St. NW Suite 600
Washington, DC 20036
www.bcap-ocean.org
A MODELForSmore information, please visit www.bcap-energy.org.
TATE ENERGY CODE FOR NEW YORK

New York’s built environment will have a major impact on future state energy policy (Credit--Martin Dürrschnabel)

N
ew York’s current energy code3—the 2007 energy intensity and per capita energy consumption
Energy Conservation Construction Code of are among the lowest in the nation, and the state does
New York State (ECCCNYS)—is based on not rely heavily on any one fuel for electricity genera-
the 2004 IECC supplement for residential construction tion, New York must still supply enough energy to
and the 2003 IECC (referencing ASHRAE Standard meet the fourth-highest total demand in the country.8
90.1-2004) for nonresidential construction. The 2007
ECCCNYS became effective in January 2008. This Bearing the third-highest residential electricity prices
code, however, does not achieve all of the energy (almost 60 percent above the national average),9 the
savings potential of the 2009 IECC and Standard eighth-highest overall energy prices,10 and the threat of
90.1-2007. regional blackouts, the state is still vulnerable to fu-
ture fluctuations in energy costs and peak demand.
The 2009 IECC4 improves substantially upon the Reducing local demand for electricity and natural gas
state’s codes and makes it simpler to provide New will decrease costs for consumers and increase profits
York households and businesses lower utility costs, for businesses.
increased comfort, and better economic opportunity. A
limited DOE analysis5 of the changes from the state's AN UNTAPPED RESOURCE
current residential code to the 2009 IECC resulted in Energy prices are projected to rise sharply over the
estimated energy savings of 13-14 percent, or about next decade. By using energy codes to increase the
$260 a year for an average new house at recent fuel significant potential energy supply improved build-
prices. Another DOE analysis6 of the changes from the ing energy efficiency produces, New York can en-
state's current nonresidential code estimates energy hance its energy security by reducing energy demand
savings of 5-8 percent from Standard 90.1-2007. within its borders. Wise management of statewide en-
ergy policy should include seizing the low-hanging
When states regularly update and enforce their energy
fruit that is the energy savings improved building en-
codes (in coordination with the three-year model code
update cycles), they ensure the consistency and contin- ergy codes offer. Among the opportunities:
ued enhancement of the benefits of model building If New York began implementing the 2009 IECC
practice. By maintaining this commitment, New York and Standard 90.1-2007 statewide in 2011, busi-
can demonstrate leadership on energy efficiency nesses and homeowners would save an estimated
issues by meeting national standards. $178 million annually by 2020 and an estimated
$360 million annually by 2030 in energy costs
ENERGY CONSUMPTION AND SUPPLIES (assuming 2006 energy prices).
Although New York’s fossil fuel resources are limited, Additionally, implementing the latest model codes
the state possesses considerable renewable energy po- would help avoid roughly 31 trillion Btu of pri-
tential, including significant hydropower resources.7 mary annual energy use by 2030 and annual emis-
Unlike many states, the commercial and residential sions of roughly 2.1 million metric tons of CO2 by
sectors lead New York’s energy demand. Although 2030.
** NOTES ** For more information, please visit www.bcap-ocean.org
1 6
US DOE (http://www.energy.gov/media/3387PatersonNewYork.pdf) US DOE (http://www.energycodes.gov/implement/state_codes/reports/commercial/
2
US DOE (http://www.energy.gov/news2009/7607.htm) Commercial_New_York.pdf)
3 7
BCAP (http://bcap-energy.org/node/86) US EIA (http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/state/state_energy_profiles.cfm?sid=NY)
4 8
BCAP (http://bcap-energy.org/node/330) US EIA (http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/states/sep_sum/html/pdf/rank_use.pdf)
5 9
US DOE (http://www.energycodes.gov/implement/state_codes/reports/residential/ US EIA (http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/state/state_energy_rankings.cfm?keyid=18&orderid=1)
10
Residential_New_York.pdf) US EIA (http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/states/sep_sum/html/pdf/rank_pr.pdf)

1850 M St. NW Suite 600


Washington, DC 20036
www.bcap-ocean.org

You might also like