Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Strength Retrogression in Cements Under High-Temperature Conditions
Strength Retrogression in Cements Under High-Temperature Conditions
Strength Retrogression in Cements Under High-Temperature Conditions
ABSTRACT
Cement designs for high-temperature geothermal
applications have typically included 35 to 40%
additional crystalline silica to help prevent loss of
compressive strength and an increase in permeability.
This was based on research performed on Portlandcement systems, which indicated that at temperatures
above 230F, additional silica was required to
provide a high-strength stable crystalline structure.
This standard has been used by the industry for many
years, both in geothermal-well applications and hightemperature oil- and gas-well applications. New
research, however, has shown that 40% additional
silica can be inadequate to provide a high-strength,
low-permeability cement at temperatures typical for
geothermal-well conditions of around 500F or
higher. This research also indicates that larger
amounts of silica might be required to provide longterm strength stability in cements that are typically
used in geothermal-well applications.
Preliminary results of this research are provided,
including strength- and permeability-test results on
cements cured at temperatures from 500 to 650F, as
well as a discussion on the associated crystalline
phases found in these samples. In addition, a
discussion of the practical ramifications, ongoing
research, and additional research needed in this area
is included.
INTRODUCTION
Geothermal wells incorporate some of the most
extreme downhole conditions that a Portland-cement
system will have to withstand. These conditions
include hard and corrosive formations, lostcirculation zones, CO2 and other toxic-gas intrusion,
and extremely high temperatures. Of these issues,
high temperature is the most common. In Portland
cements, a phenomenon known as strength
retrogression occurs when the cement is exposed to
elevated temperatures. Strength retrogression in
cements describes a cement with lower compressive
Silica %,
bwoc
UCS,
psi
YM,
psi
PR,
psi
UTS,
psi
500
40
8,065
1,780,000
0.141
1,039
500
50
7,599
1,740,000
0.132
877
500
60
6,185
1,587,500
0.130
923
500
70
5,522
1,427,500
0.133
773
500
80
7,071
1,860,000
0.132
924
550
40
5,099
1,822,500
0.150
764
550
50
4,540
1,490,000
0.136
532
550
60
6,117
1,703,333
0.107
615
550
70
6,441
1,955,000
0.130
640
550
80
6,670
1,837,500
0.111
872
600
60
9,691
1,912,500
0.134
1,279
600
70
8,861
1,827,500
0.138
1,386
600
80
6,849
1,765,000
0.136
701
650
60
7,676
1,752,500
0.148
865
650
70
7,522
1,667,500
0.138
1,049
650
80
7,227
1,920,000
0.136
1,295
Table 2:
Temp., F
Silica %,
bwoc
UCS,
psi
YM,
psi
PR,
psi
UTS,
psi
500
40
9,313
1,850,000
0.1268
923
500
50
7,689
1,832,500
0.134
800
500
60
4,467
1,682,500
0.127
806
500
70
6,247
1,542,500
0.1155
965
500
80
7,787
1,857,500
0.126
1,115
550
40
6,996
1,980,000
0.1473
1,261
550
50
5,792
1,935,000
0.129
738
550
60
5,686
1,677,500
0.1185
820
550
70
6,642
1,800,000
0.1125
750
550
80
7,512
1,865,000
0.1195
978
Table 3:
Phases
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Xonotlite t
32.3
41.8
26.9
20.1
15.4
Xonotlite m
31.1
37.6
35.1
31.7
30.8
Scawtite
3.1
Killalaite
4.9
4.7
5.8
4.8
2.6
Kilchoanite
9.3
Katoite
3.1
7.7
6.5
7.4
7.5
Hibschite
5.1
Dellaite
11.1
Tobermorite 11
5.8
7.1
8.8
Quartz
2.4
3.8
10.8
14.6
Reyerite
7.3
10
15.7
Hillebrandite
7.5
6.4
6.4
4.25
4.95
4.55
4.86
4.65
Table 4:
Phases
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Xonotlite t
26.7
40.1
24.9
20.5
14.5
Xonotlite m
33.4
39.7
25.2
30.8
31.5
Scawtite
3.1
Killalaite
5.3
0.2
2.3
Kilchoanite
8.9
Katoite
7.8
5.6
8.9
8.5
Hibschite
9.8
Dellaite
12.1
Tobermorite 11
5.5
10.7
12.5
8.2
Quartz
1.6
1.3
9.9
11.7
Reyerite
23.4
17.2
18
Hillebrandite
4.9
5.3
4.48
4.85
4.71
4.52
4.48
Table 8:
Phases
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Phases
60%
70%
80%
Xonotlite m
38.1
40.7
37.6
27.5
34.6
Xonotlite t
33.7
37
42.1
Xonotlite t
24.4
33.9
26.9
16.8
21
Xonotlite m
23.8
21.3
23.7
Scawtite
5.7
6.8
Scawtite
3.6
3.5
5.5
3.3
Poldervaartite
10.3
7.8
7.7
11.1
Killalaite
3.3
4.7
9.1
Hibschite
Katoite
9.1
quartz
Hibschite
11.2
7.3
5.3
8.1
4.76
Tilleyite
2.4
4.4
7.8
4.7
Reyerite
6.2
15.8
11.4
Quartz
1.4
2.9
4.8
7.8
4.93
4.8
3.94
4.4
4.17
Table 6:
Phases
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Xonotlite m
41.1
40.8
33.3
32.1
33.2
Xonotlite t
25.8
26.6
26.8
15.4
20.5
Scawtite
3.6
3.1
5.4
6.1
3.9
Poldervaartite
7.7
8.2
7.3
9.9
Killalaite
4.1
7.3
4.6
5.6
6.2
Katoite
7.8
Hibschite
9.9
8.4
7.4
6.4
7.1
Tilleyite
5.6
4.6
5.4
4.5
Reyerite
10
15.7
16.3
Quartz
0.6
3.4
8.3
4.74
4.8
3.91
4.45
4.97
Table 7:
Phases
60%
70%
80%
Xonotlite t
40.9
34
31.3
Xonotlite m
27.4
28.7
27.8
Poldervaartite
3.1
5.4
5.4
Killalaite
8.3
7.8
7.7
7.1
8.3
17.7
14.4
7.7
4.46
4.27
Scawtite
5.3
7.3
7.9
Poldervaartite
6.7
7.1
Killalaite
4.9
5.9
5.6
CONCLUSIONS
Hibschite
4.8
3.7
4.9
quartz
10
13.3
16.5
4.75
4.73
4.28
REFERENCES
ASTM D266495a, Standard Test Method for
Unconfined Compressive Strength of Intact Rock
Core Specimens without Pore Pressure
Measurements.
2000.
Conshohocken,
Pennsylvania: ASTM International. DOI:
10.1520/D2664-95A.
ASTM D314802, Standard Test Method for Elastic
Moduli of Intact Rock Core Test Specimens in
Uniaxial Compression. 2002. Conshohocken,
Pennsylvania: ASTM International. DOI:
10.1520/D3148-02.
ASTM D3967-08, Standard Test Method for Splitting
Tensile Strength of Intact Rock Core Specimens.
2005. Conshohocken, Pennsylvania: ASTM
International. DOI: 10.1520/D3967-08.
Basso, R., Giusta, A.D., and Zefiro, L. 1983. Crystal
Structure Refinement of Plazolite: a Highly
Hydrated Natural Hydrogrossular. Neues
Jahrbuch fur Mineralogie, Monatshefte: 251
258.
Dai, Y.S. and Post, J.E. 1995. Crystal Structure of
Hillebrandite: A Natural Analogue of Calcium
Silicate Hydrate (CSH) Phases in Portland
Cement. American Mineralogist 80: 841844.
Eilers, L.H. and Root, R.L. 1976. Long-Term Effects
of High Temperature on Strength Retrogression
of Cements. Paper SPE presented at the SPE
California Regional Meeting, Long Beach,
California, 79 April. DOI: 10.2118/581-MS.
Ferro, O., Galli, E., Papp, G., Quartieri, S., Szakall,
S., and Vezzalini, G. 2003. A New Occurrence
of Katoite and Re-examination of the
Hydrogrossular Group. European Journal of
Mineralogy 15: 419426.
Ganiev, R.M., Ilyukhin, V.V., and Belov, N.V. 1970.
Crystal
Structure
of
Cement
Phase
Y=Ca6[Si2O7][SiO4](OH)2. Doklady Akademii
Nauk SSSR 190: 831834.
Grice, J. D. 2005. The Structure of Spurrite, Tilleyite
and Scawtite, and Relationships to Other
Silicate-Carbonate Minerals, The Canadian
Mineralogist 43: 14891500.