Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
This work presents a numerical algorithm that permits the
production optimization of gas wells using the concept of
dynamic nodal analysis. By combining the desirable features
of nodal analysis, material balance technique and decline curve
analysis, the method is able to match the historical
performance of the well data. It is also able to predict the
future performance of the gas well under the existing condition
as well as altered conditions. The proposed technique, which
has several advantages over the classical nodal analysis, can be
used for the selection of the timing and capacity of surface
compressor, the evaluation of the economic viability of a well
stimulation, and the understanding of the effect of individual
production component on the productivity of a gas well over
the life of that well.
Introduction
The production optimization of a gas well requires an
appropriate selection of the individual components in the
production system. Currently nodal analysis is used to
accomplish this task. Nodal analysis involves calculating the
pressure drop in individual components within the production
system so that pressure value at a given node in the production
system (e.g., bottom hole pressure) can be calculated from
both ends (separator and reservoir) [See Figure 1]. The rate at
which pressure is calculated at the node from both ends must
be the same1,2,3. This is the rate at which the well produces.
Once the rate under existing conditions is obtained, by
adjusting individual components, the sensitivity of individual
components on the overall production can be investigated;
Hence an optimum selection of components can be obtained at
a given time. The major drawback of the conventional nodal
SPE 52170
Gj =
Vb * * S g
B gj
(1)
where
Vb= reservoir bulk volume
= reservoir porosity
Sg= gas saturation
Bgj= gas formation volume factor at pressure Pj
4.
SPE 52170
5.
G j +1 =
Vb * * S g
(2)
Bg j+1
G = G j G j +1
(3)
6.
7.
D=
Qj
1
ln
D Q j +1
Q j Q j +1
G
(4)
Q j Q j +1
G j G j +1
D=
1 Q j Q j +1
[
D
Q j +1
Qj
G
ln
(5)
Qj
Q j +1
Qj 1
1
* 1 + +
Qj
b* D
D=
Q 1b
* 1 j +1
(1 b) * G Q j
(6)
Qj
T j +1 = T j + T
8.
9.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Results
This section presents the results obtained by applying the
dynamic nodal analysis technique to several production
systems. Those production systems include synthetic data as
well as actual field data. These results validate the dynamic
nodal analysis technique.
Synthetic Data
These synthetic data have been generated using the results
from a simulation of an actual field well. They represent a gas
condensate well which was open to production for five years.
The characteristics of the reservoir as well as the description of
the completion are summarized in Table 1.
History Match. The computer program was run with the
regression parameters selected to be radius of drainage, skin
and permeability. The result of the history match is shown in
Figure 2 and Table 2. As it can be seen, the predicted rate
matches very well with the observed data. Also, the predicted
reservoir pressure matches very well with the observed data3.
Several runs of the program were conducted in order to
assess the sensitivity of the history match with respect to errors
in the input historical production data. The results of these
SPE 52170
SPE 52170
Q1
conversion equation used is the following:
Q2
[P
[P
PWF 1
2
PWF 2
2
]
]
(7)
Q1 is the actual constant flow rate corresponding to the
flowing bottom hole pressure Pwf1. Since Q1 and Pwf1 are
known, the flow rate Q2 can be computed by assuming a fixed
value of the corresponding bottom hole pressure Pwf2.
This conversion technique works well if the total reservoir
pressure decline is small during the time period considered for
history match calculations, and the reservoir is producing
under pseudo-steady state conditions.
History Match. The computer program was run with the
regression parameters selected to be radius of drainage, skin
and permeability. The results obtained are presented in
Figure 9 and Figure 10. An excellent production history
match is obtained. The reservoir pressure history match is also
very good.
6.
7.
SPE 52170
= exponential
= 50
= 0.000001
Reservoir
= 5011
= 212
= 64.5
= 116.5
= 9108
= 11
= 0.06
= 0.533
Fluid properties
Specific gravity of produced gas
= 0.646
Oil density [API]
= 51.1
Specific gravity of produced water
= 1.0
Completion
Hole diameter [in]
= 8.496
Casing diameter [in]
=5
Perforated interval [ft]
= 17
Perforation diameter [in]
= 0.36
Perforation tunnel length [in]
= 12.33
Perforation density [SPF]
=4
Mode of perforation
= overbalance
Tubing inside diameter [in]
= 1.945
Tubing roughness [ft]
= 0.00015
Tubing length [ft]
= 8688.0
Hole inclination angle [degree]
= 90
Pressure drop correlation: Beggs and Brill
Production
Oil/Gas ratio, [SBBLO/MMscf]
= 145.0
Water/Gas ratio, [SBBLW/MMscf]
= 0.0
Well head pressure, [psia]
= 2250.0
Well head temperature, [F]
= 111.0
Reference separator pressure, [psia]
= 14.7
Reference separator temperature, [deg F] = 60.0
SPE 52170
Regression
Calculated
Initial
Comment
parameters
value
value
Permeability [md]
11.05
10.8
Skin
116.45
101
9107.8
2500.0
Estimated
Regression
Calculated
Initial
Comment
parameters
value
value
Permeability [md]
32.9
24
1950
Skin
4.1
6.4
1900
4532.7
1000.0
Estimated
Rate [Mscf/D]
2000
Observed rate
Predicted rate
1850
1800
1750
Calculated
Initial
Comment
parameters
value
value
Permeability [md]
12.9
10.8
Skin
147.0
101
9204.8
2500.0
Estimated
1700
0
500
1000
Time [days]
1500
2000
SPE 52170
2500
16000
14000
Rate [Mscf/d]
12000
10000
8000
6000
18000
1500
1000
500
4000
2000
0
0
500
1000
0
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
1500
Time [days]
2000
2500
3000
3000
Time [days]
20000
3500
Observed rate
History match [skin=116.5]
Skin=116.5
Skin=50.0
Skin=0.0
3000
16000
Rate [Mscf/D]
Rate [Mscf/D]
2500
18000
2000
1500
14000
12000
10000
8000
6000
1000
4000
500
2000
0
0
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
Time [days]
Time [days]
16000
16000
Observed rate
12000
12000
Predicted rate
10000
Rate [Mscf/D]
Rate {Mscf/D]
14000
14000
8000
6000
10000
8000
6000
4000
4000
2000
2000
0
0
500
1000
1500
Time [days]
2000
2500
3000
1000
2000
3000
Time [days]
4000
5000
6000
SPE 52170
3000
Observed rate [Perforated interval= 17 ft]
History match [Perforated interval= 17 ft]
Perforated interval= 17 ft
Perforated interval= 64 ft
2000
2500
Observed rate
1950
Rate [Mscf/D]
Predicted rate
Rate [Mscf/D]
1900
1850
1800
2000
1500
1000
1750
500
0
500
1000
1700
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
Time [days]
2000
Time [days]
1500
5050
2000
Observed rate [tubing size = 1.995 in.]
4950
1800
1600
1400
4900
Rate [Mscf/D]
5000
4850
4800
1200
1000
800
600
4750
400
4700
200
4650
0
500
1000
1500
2000
0
0
Time [days]
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
Time [days]