Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Additional operational rules for the Laplace transform; see also Table 5.3
p. 126.
Table 11.1
f (t)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
(t)1/2 0 cos (2 t ) f ( ) d
(t)1/2 0 cosh (2 t ) f ( ) d
(t)1/2 0 sin (2 t ) f ( ) d
(t)1/2 0 sinh (2 t ) f ( ) d
0 J0 (2 t ) f ( ) d
2 f( s)
f( s)/ s
s 1/2 f(1/s)
s 1/2 f(1/s)
s 3/2 f(1/s)
s 3/2 f(1/s)
f(1/s)/s
t
0 J0 (a
t 2 2 ) f ( ) d
f( s 2 + a 2 )/ s 2 + a 2
t
2
2
0 I0 (a t ) f ( ) d
t
0 J0 (2 (t ) ) f ( ) d
f( s 2 a 2 )/ s 2 a 2
10
11
f (t 2 )
12
t 1 f (t 1 ) (Re > 1)
f(s + s 1 )/s
Much of the usefulness of the Laplace transform arises from the possibility of using the
powerful methods of complex contour integration (17.9.1 p. 463) for the evaluation of the
inverse. A key result for this purpose is Jordans lemma which is given in full in 17.9.1
p. 463; for the present purposes it may be stated as follows:
Theorem 11.3.1 [Jordans lemma] Let there be a sequence of arcs of circle Cn of radius
Rn such that, when |s| = Rn , with Re s less than some xed constant c, the function
f tends to zero uniformly in arg s (Figure 11.2). Then, for any positive t,
lim
Rn
Cn
est f(s) ds = 0.
(11.3.1)
A similar relation holds for arcs to the right of the line z = c when t < 0.
On the basis of this result, the integration path in (11.1.7) can be closed by using a
sequence of large semi-circles which contribute nothing as their radius becomes innite.
When t < 0, the semi-circles must be closed to the right of the line z = c. Since f is