Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Assignment On Human Resource Management by Rahul Gupta: Recruitment
Assignment On Human Resource Management by Rahul Gupta: Recruitment
ASSIGNMENT ON
HUMAN RESOURCE
MANAGEMENT
BY RAHUL GUPTA
Q.1 Mention and briefly explain different sources of
recruitment?
Recruitment:
Recruitment refers to the process of screening, and selecting qualified people for a job at an
organization or firm, or for a vacancy in a volunteer-based some components of the recruitment
process, mid- and large-size organizations and companies often retain professional recruiters or
outsource some of the process to recruitment agencies. External recruitment is the process of
attracting and selecting employees from outside the organization. The recruitment industry has
four main types of agencies: employment agencies, recruitment websites and job search engines,
"headhunters" for executive and professional recruitment, and in-house recruitment. The stages
in recruitment include sourcing candidates by advertising or other methods, and screening and
selecting potential candidates using tests or interviews.
Headhunters:
Page 1
In-House Recruitment:
Larger employers tend to undertake their own in-house recruitment, using their human resources
department, front-line hiring managers and recruitment personnel who handle targeted functions
and populations. In addition to coordinating with the agencies mentioned above, in-house
recruiters may advertise job vacancies on their own websites, coordinate internal employee
referrals, work with external associations, trade groups and/or focus on campus graduate
recruitment. While job postings are common, networking is by far the most significant approach
when reaching out to fill positions.
These firms provide competitive passive candidate intelligence to support company's recruiting
efforts. Normally they will generate varying degrees of candidate information from those people
currently engaged in the position a company is looking to fill. These firms usually charge a per
hour fee or by candidate lead. Many times this uncovers names that cannot be found with other
methods and will allow internal recruiters the ability to focus their efforts solely on recruiting.
Process:
Job Analysis
The proper start to a recruitment effort is to perform a job analysis, to document the actual or
intended requirement of the job to be performed. This information is captured in a job
description and provides the recruitment effort with the boundaries and objectives of the search.
[2]
Oftentimes a company will have job descriptions that represent a historical collection of tasks
RAHUL GUPTA, MBAHCS (1ST SEM), SUBJECT CODE-MBOO27, SET-2
Page 2
Sourcing
Sourcing involves
1) Advertising, a common part of the recruiting process, often encompassing multiple media,
such as the Internet, general newspapers, job ad newspapers, professional publications, window
advertisements, job centers, and campus graduate recruitment programs
2) Recruiting research, which is the proactive identification of relevant talent who may not
respond to job postings and other recruitment advertising methods done in #1. This initial
research for so-called passive prospects, also called name-generation, results in a list of
prospects who can then be contacted to solicit interest, obtain a resume/CV, and be screened.
Onboarding
Onboarding refers to the overall process of acquiring, accommodating, assimilating and
accelerating new team members, whether they come from outside or inside the organization. The
prerequisite to successful onboarding is getting your organization aligned around the need and
the role[3]. Some think of onboarding as what follows recruitment. Some think of onboarding as
something to include in the recruitment process for retention purposes. How you think of it is far
less important than that you do think of it as you're thinking about recruitment.
Page 3
Types of Recruitment:
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Guided Interview:
When the aim of an enquiry is to gather information about the opinions of a particular person (an
expert, a representative member of a group) in order to gain qualitative insights into a problem,
guided interviews are used. Guided interviews contain only open-ended questions, and the
questionnaire is only used as a guideline for the interview, the conversation between interviewer
and interviewee does not have to follow it strictly. Guided interviews generate qualitative data,
which is why the number of interviews usually is limited, and quantitative conclusions cannot be
drawn.
Interviewing key individuals in one of the main technique used in the development studies.
Participatory methods have contributed to adjusting the interview to make it more conversational
while still controlled and structured, resulting in semi-structured interview. In this interview,
some of the questions are pre-determined, whilst majority of the questions are formulated in the
interview. Questions asked according to the checklist and not from a formal questionnaire.
Types of Interview
Characteristics
Strengths
Weakness
A. Informal
Conversational
Interview
Questions
emerge
from the immediate
context and are asked
in the immediate
course of natural
things. There is no
predetermination of
questions wordings.
Different
responses
collected
from
different people with
different
questions.
Less comprehensive if
certain questions dont
arise naturally. Data
analysis
and
organization can be
quite
difficult.
Requires
maximum
attentions
by
the
interviewer.
B. Interview
Guide
Approach
Page 8
C. Standardized
The exact wording
Open
Ended and sequence are
Interview
determined
in
advance.
All
interviewers ask the
same basic questions
in the same order.
Respondents
answers
the same questions thus
increase
the
comparability
of
responses.
Reduce
interviewer bias when
several interviewers are
used.
Little flexibility in
relating the interview
to
particular
individuals
and
circumstances.
D. Close
Quantitative
Interview
Questions
and
response categories
are determined in
advance. Responses
are fixed; Respondent
chooses from these
responses
The Unguided Interview is not planned or structured. The applicant determines the process of the
interview by controlling the conversation and doing the most talking. Questions asked by the interviewer
will usually follow on from the applicant's own statements.
Introduction:
Learn how to identify causes of low morale, then apply proven techniques to motivate
employees, prepare individual action plans to solve on-the-job problems and improve overall
employee behaviors. The Process of Motivating Your Employees
RAHUL GUPTA, MBAHCS (1ST SEM), SUBJECT CODE-MBOO27, SET-2
Page 9
Understanding Motivation
Assessing Your Approach
Applying Techniques
Measuring Success
What to Expect:
Motivation is one of the primary concerns and challenges facing today's manager. This Business
Builder will help you learn techniques for creating a proper motivational climate. You will learn
how to apply proven techniques for motivating employees, prepare individual action plans to
solve on-the-job problems, and identify causes of low morale and techniques for improving
overall employee behaviors.
To be a successful manager/motivator you must first understand that you cannot motivate
anyone. You can only create an environment that encourages and promotes the employee's self
motivation. Someone once said that motivation is getting people to do what you want them to do
because they Want to do it. The challenge is to give them a reason to want to do it; doing it will
satisfy a need they have. You have to tune in to their need, not yours. Secondly, you must also
know what kind of behavior you want the employee to demonstrate. In other words, what do you
want the employee to do differently?
Goals:
Set a major goal, but follow a path. The path has mini goals that go in many directions. When
you learn to succeed at mini goals, you will be motivated to challenge grand goals.
Finish what you start. A half finished project is of no use to anyone. Quitting is a habit. Develop
the habit of finishing self-motivated projects.
Page 10
Socialize with others of similar interest. Mutual support is motivating. We will develop the
attitudes of our five best friends. If they are losers, we will be a loser. If they are winners, we will
be a winner. To be a cowboy we must associate with cowboys.
Learn how to learn. Dependency on others for knowledge supports the habit of procrastination.
Man has the ability to learn without instructors. In fact, when we learn the art of self-education
we will find, if not create, opportunity to find success beyond our wildest dreams.
Harmonize natural talent with interest that motivates. Natural talent creates motivation,
motivation creates persistence and persistence gets the job done.
Increase knowledge of subjects that inspires. The more we know about a subject, the more we
want to learn about it. A self-propelled upward spiral develops.
Take risk. Failure and bouncing back are elements of motivation. Failure is a learning tool. No
one has ever succeeded at anything worthwhile without a string of failures.
You also may have to face the unpleasant truth that no matter what you do, you might have some
employees who refuse to change their behavior. If that is the case, you will have to "bite the
bullet" and ask them to leave. It's very demotivating to employees some do not cooperate
perform according to agreed upon expectations.
Page 11
Measuring Success
Understanding Motivation:
Can you motivate someone? The answer is an emphatic "NO!" Motivation comes from within
the individual prompting an action. Motivation is a function of individual will. We do things
because the outcome is appealing and serves as an incentive. Motivation is directly related to
morale, that is, the attitude of individuals and groups toward their work, environment,
management and organization as a whole.
Applying Techniques:
If you want to become an effective leader, use the following techniques to create an environment
in which people want to work:
RAHUL GUPTA, MBAHCS (1ST SEM), SUBJECT CODE-MBOO27, SET-2
Page 12
Is the goal specific? Write the goal so that anyone would be able to identify exactly what you are
going to accomplish. Is it measurable? Identify the deliverable.
Is it agreed upon? All those involved must agree. In most cases, this means the manager and the
employee who make it happen.
Is it realistic? Make sure that you have the appropriate resources (time, skills, equipment,
environment, money) to successfully meet the goal.
Think of an employee you would like to involve in the goal-setting process. Then outline how you are
going to approach him or her. What will you say to communicate the reasons you are asking the
employee to set his or her own goals? Are there any guidelines or parameters he or she should consider?
Page 13
Killer Phrases
o "A great idea, but"
o
Igniter Phrases
o
"Good work!"
Page 14
Introduction:
Many employers might be surprised to know that, in addition to the right to claim unfair dismissal, the
Employment Act 2000 introduced the right for employees to claim that they have been unfairly
disciplined. This wide protection for employees means that employers must think carefully and act fairly
before taking any disciplinary action against members of their workforce. Otherwise an employee could
make a complaint to the Labour Relations Officer / Inspector and, if the Inspector is not able to resolve
the situation, take the matter further to the Employment Tribunal. What general guidelines should an
employer follow to avoid this situation? First, the disciplinary action taken, whether it be a written
warning, final written warning or suspension, should be able to be justified as reasonable. Secondly, the
procedure involved to arrive at this outcome should be fair. In theory, these two aspects should go handin-hand as the fairer the disciplinary procedure, the better informed to make a reasonable decision the
employer will be. In practice, daft decisions are not always prevented by a scrupulously fair procedure.
A Reasonable Penalty:
Various factors need to be considered in assessing what is a reasonable penalty. These include the nature
of the employees conduct and the damage caused by it, the duties and terms of the employees contract,
their length of service, previous conduct, the employees circumstances, and how the employer has
disciplined others in similar situations. How should an employer approach these factors? Obviously, the
more serious the conduct and greater the damage caused by it, the harsher the penalty imposed can be and
still be reasonable. Similarly, if an employee contravenes one of their key duties or terms of their
contract, then a harsher penalty may be appropriate. Taking another example, an employer would be
expected to be more lenient to a long service employee with a good record than someone who has just
joined. The factor of an employees circumstances means that an employees explanation for their
conduct should be considered e.g. a missed appointment at work explained by a family emergency or,
less justifiable, placing an IOU contrary to company policy due to temporary financial difficulties.
Finally, it is very important that an employer needs to be consistent. A verbal warning to one employee
followed by a written warning to another employee for practically the same offence months later, will
make it more difficult to justify the reasonableness of the harsher penalty.
Page 15
A Fair Procedure:
At its absolute minimum, a fair procedure means that employees should be given a chance to explain
themselves before any decision to discipline is made. Ideally, this should be done in the form of a
hearing/ meeting between the employer and employee. The representative of the employer should be (as
far as possible) someone not closely involved in the circumstances leading to the possible disciplinary
action e.g. the manager subjected to the alleged curses of an employee should not be holding the meeting.
At the meeting, the purpose of it should be explained to the employee and he or she should be informed
of the allegations against them. The evidence should then be indicated either in writing or by calling
witnesses. The employee should then be allowed to ask questions, call their own witnesses and put
forwardtheir own arguments before any decision is made. As a matter of good practice, it is usually better
to split the above meeting into two parts to avoid the obvious (and proper) request by an employee that
they would like time to consider their response to the allegations against them before proceeding with the
meeting. Hence it is useful if the allegations and (if available) written evidence against them can be given
to the employee at this first brief meeting. This will then enable the employee to consider and prepare
their response in time for the second meeting a few days later. After this second meeting, the employer
should then adjourn to consider their decision properly. (A decision given immediately after hearing the
employees response only encourages an employee to believe that their employer was merely going
through the motions.) A right of appeal should then be provided to the employee. Employers most often
trip up when the issue seems very clearcut. If it is, then it does not take long to have this confirmed in a
fair manner by hearing the explanation (if any) of the employee as well as listening to any mitigating
circumstances. With the Employment Act 2000 recognising its importance, procedure is now ignored at
every employers peril. For example, should any dispute come before the Employment Tribunal, it is
unlikely that the Tribunal will warm to the employer who argues that even if a fair procedure had been
followed, the resulting disciplinary action would have been exactly the same. Such a failing of procedure
may allow a very undeserving employee in the employers eyes to a technical win and some
compensation.
(1) The board may after hearing, by majority vote, take any or all of the following actions, upon
proof satisfactory to the board that any person or organization has violated the Geologists
Regulation Act or any rules or regulations adopted and promulgated pursuant to the act:
RAHUL GUPTA, MBAHCS (1ST SEM), SUBJECT CODE-MBOO27, SET-2
Page 16
Page 17
Introduction:
In their working life, employees do get dissatisfied with various aspects of working may be with the
attitude of the manager, policy of the company, working conditions, or behavior of colleagues. Employers
try to ignore or suppress grievances. But they cannot be suppressed for long. Grievance acts as rust which
corrodes the very fabric of organization. An aggrieved employee is a potent source of indiscipline and
bad working. According to Julius, a grievance is any discontent or dissatisfaction, whether expressed or
not, whether valid or not, arising out of anything connected with the company which an employee thinks,
believes or, even feels to be unfair, unjust or inequitable.Maintaining quality of work life for its
employees is an important concern for the any organization. The grievance handling procedure of the
organization can affect the harmonious environment of the organization. The grievances of the
employees are related to the contract, work rule or regulation, policy or procedure, health and safety
regulation, past practice, changing the cultural norms unilaterally, individual victimization, wage, bonus,
etc. Here, the attitude on the part of management in their effort to understand the problems of employees
and resolve the issues amicably have better probability to maintain a culture of high performance.
Managers must be educated about the importance of the grievance process and their role in maintaining
favorable relations with the union. Effective grievance handling is an essential part of cultivating good
employee relations and running a fair, successful, and productive workplace. Positive labor relations are
two-way street both sides must give a little and try to work together. Relationship building is key to
successful labor relations.
Forms of Grievances:
A) Factual: A factual grievance arises when legitimate needs of employees remain unfulfilled, e.g., wage
hike has been agreed but not implemented citing various reasons.
b) Imaginary: When an employees dissatisfaction is not because of any valid reason but because of a
wrong perception, wrong attitude or wrong information he has. Such a situation may create an imaginary
grievance. Though management is not at fault in such instances, still it has to clear the fog immediately.
c) Disguised: An employee may have dissatisfaction for reasons that are unknown to him. If he/she is
under pressure from family, friends, relatives, neighbors, he/she may reach the work spot with a heavy
heart. If a new recruit gets a new table and almirah this may become an eyesore to other employees who
have not been treated likewise previously. The importance of grievance handling in an organization
requires am effective approach and attitude on the part of the grievance handling authority. It reflects
Page 18
Causes:
Page 19
Process:
The details of a grievance procedure/machinery may vary from organization to organization. Here, a four
phase model (Figure 1) is suggested. The first and the last stages have universal relevance, irrespective of
the differences in the procedures at the intermediate stages. The four stages of the machinery are briefly
discussed here: The level at which grievance occurs: The best opportunity to redress a grievance is to
resolve it at the level at which it occurs. A workers grievance should be resolved by his immediate boss,
the first line supervisor. The higher the document rises through the hierarchy, the more difficult it is to
resolve. Bypassing the supervisor would erode his authority. When the process moves to a higher stage,
the aggrieved employee and the supervisor concerned may shift their focus to save face by proving the
other wrong. The substantive aspect of any of the grievances may thus be relegated and dysfunctional
aspects come to the fore thus making it more difficult to settle the issue. In a unionized concern, the first
stage of the procedure usually involves three people: the aggrieved employee, his immediate boss and the
union representative in the shop/ department. It is possible to involve the union in laying down the
framework of the grievance procedure and thereafter restrain union involvement in the actual process, at
least in the first two stages.
Intermediate Stage: If the dispute is not redressed at the supervisors level, it will usually be referred to
the head of the concerned department. It is important that line management assume prime responsibility
for the settlement of a grievance. Any direct involvement by personnel department may upset balance in
line-staff relations. At the intermediate level, grievance can be settled with or without union involvement.
Excessive reliance on supervisor at this stage can jeopardize the interests of the employee and affect the
credibility of the procedure.
Organization Level: If a grievance is not settled at the intermediate level also, it will be referred to the
top management. Usually, a person of a level not less than General Manager designated for the purpose
will directly handle the issue. By now, the grievance may acquire some political importance and the top
leadership of the union may also step in formally, if the procedure provides for it and informally, if the
procedure prohibits it. At this level it is very difficult to reconcile the divergent interests.
1. Always ensure that the managers involved in the grievance handling procedures have a quiet place to
meet with the complainant.
2. Always ensure that managers have adequate time to be devoted to the complainant.
3. Explain manager's role, the policy and the procedures clearly in the grievance handling procedure.
4. Fully explaining the situation to the employee to eliminate any misunderstanding and promote better
acceptance of the situation complained of.
5. Try to let employee present their issues without prejudging or commenting
RAHUL GUPTA, MBAHCS (1ST SEM), SUBJECT CODE-MBOO27, SET-2
Page 20
21. The investigator or decision maker acts impartially, which means they must exclude themselves if
there is any bias or conflict of interest.
22. All parties are heard and those who have had complaints made against others are given an opportunity
to respond.
23. Try to look upon the problem on different angles for appropriate understanding.
24. Ensuring that there is proper investigation of the facts and figures related the problem under concern.
RAHUL GUPTA, MBAHCS (1ST SEM), SUBJECT CODE-MBOO27, SET-2
Page 21
Conclusion:
To a great extend the aggravation of industrial problems depends on manager's approaches and
attitude in effective handling of employees grievances. Care should be taken in the way
managers approaches the problem and perceiving the pros and cons of the situation. The conflict
management approaches include the win-win strategy that help in the healthy organizational
practices and which reflects the strong organizational culture.
Page 22
The model:
The model is represented as a grid with concern for production as the X-axis and concern for
people as the Y-axis; each axis ranges from 1 (Low) to 9 (High). The resulting leadership styles
are as follows:
The indifferent (previously called impoverished) style (1,1): evade and elude. In this style,
managers have low concern for both people and production. Managers use this style to preserve
job and job seniority, protecting themselves by avoiding getting into trouble. The main concern
for the manager is not to be held responsible for any mistakes, which results in less innovative
decisions.
The accommodating (previously, country club) style (1,9): yield and comply. This style has a
high concern for people and a low concern for production. Managers using this style pay much
attention to the security and comfort of the employees, in hopes that this will increase
-performance. The resulting atmosphere is usually friendly, but not necessarily very productive.
The dictatorial (previously, produce or perish) style (9,1): control and dominate. With a high
concern for production, and a low concern for people, managers using this style find employee
needs unimportant; they provide their employees with money and expect performance in return.
Managers using this style also pressure their employees through rules and punishments to
achieve the company goals. This dictatorial style is based on Theory X of Douglas McGregor,
and is commonly applied by companies on the edge of real or perceived failure. This style is
often used in case of crisis management.
The status quo (previously, middle-of-the-road) style (5,5): balance and compromise. Managers
using this style try to balance between company goals and workers' needs. By giving some
concern to both people and production, managers who use this style hope to achieve suitable
performance but doing so gives away a bit of each concern so that neither production nor people
needs are met.
The sound (previously, team) style (9,9): contribute and commit. In this style, high concern is
paid both to people and production. As suggested by the propositions of Theory Y, managers
choosing to use this style encourage teamwork and commitment among employees. This method
relies heavily on making employees feel themselves to be constructive parts of the company.
The opportunistic style: exploit and manipulate. Individuals using this style, which was added to
the grid theory before 1999, do not have a fixed location on the grid. They adopt whichever
behaviour offers the greatest personal benefit.
Page 23
The paternalistic style: prescribe and guide. This style was added to the grid theory before 1999.
In The Power to Change, it was redefined to alternate between the (1,9) and (9,1) locations on
the grid. Managers using this style praise and support, but discourage challenges to their
thinking.
Description:
Leaders may be concerned for their people and they also must also have some concern for the
work to be done. The question is, how much attention to they pay to one or the other? This is a
model defined by Blake and Mouton in the early 1960s.
High
Country Club
management
Middle of the road
management
Medium
Low
Team management
Impoverished
management
Low
Authority-compliance
Medium
High
Impoverished management:
Minimum effort to get the work done. A basically lazy approach that avoids as much work as
possible.
Authority-compliance:
Strong focus on task, but with little concern for people. Focus on efficiency, including the
elimination of people wherever possible.
RAHUL GUPTA, MBAHCS (1ST SEM), SUBJECT CODE-MBOO27, SET-2
Page 24
Team management:
Firing on all cylinders: people are committed to task and leader is committed to people (as well
as task).
Discussion:
This is a well-known grid that uses the Task vs. Person preference that appears in many other
studies, such as the Michigan Leadership Studies and the Ohio State Leadership Studies. Many
other task-people models and variants have appeared since then. They are both clearly important
dimensions, but as other models point out, they are not all there is to leadership and
management.
The Managerial Grid was the original name. It later changed to the Leadership Grid.
Developed by the founders of our company, Drs. Robert R. Blake and Jane S. Mouton, The Managerial
Grid graphic below is a very simple framework that elegantly defines seven basic styles that characterize
workplace behavior and the resulting relationships. The seven managerial Grid styles are based on how
two fundamental concerns (concern for people and concern for results) are manifested at varying levels
whenever people interact.
Page 25
I expect results and take control by clearly stating a course of action. I enforce rules that sustain high
results and do not permit deviation.
I support results that establish and reinforce harmony. I generate enthusiasm by focusing on positive
and pleasing aspects of work.
I endorse results that are popular but caution against taking unnecessary risk. I test my opinions with
others involved to assure ongoing acceptability.
Page 26
I provide leadership by defining initiatives for myself and others. I offer praise and appreciation for
support, and discourage challenges to my thinking.
I persuade others to support results that offer me private benefit. If they also benefit, thats even better
in gaining support. I rely on whatever approach is needed to secure an advantage.
I initiate team action in a way that invites involvement and commitment. I explore all facts and
alternative views to reach a shared understanding of the best solution.
Critique - Learning from experience by anticipating and examining how behavior and actions
affect results
Initiative - Taking action to exercise shared effort, drive, and support for specific activities
Page 27
Conflict Resolution - Confronting and working through disagreements with others toward
resolution
Resilience - Reacting to problems, setbacks, and failure, and understanding how these factors
influence the ability to move forward
Grid theory makes behaviors as tangible and objective as any other corporate commodity. By studying
each of the seven Leadership Grid styles and the resulting relationship skill behaviors, teams can
examine, in objective terms, how behaviors help or hurt them. They can explore types of critique that
work best for them and why. They can openly discuss how to improve decision-making and conflict
resolution skills. These and other subjects usually considered "off limits" in terms of productivity are the
very subjects that usually impede productivity. The Grid approach makes these subjects not only
"discussable" but measurable in objective terms that generate empathy, motivation to improve, and
creativity.
Page 28