Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Experimental Investigation of Solar Air Heater Using Porous Medium PK
Experimental Investigation of Solar Air Heater Using Porous Medium PK
JOURNAL
MECHANICAL
ENGINEERING
AND
International Journal of
Mechanical OF
Engineering
and Technology
(IJMET), ISSN 0976
IJMET
IAEME
thermal performance of conventional solar air collectors by employing various design and
flow arrangements.
Wao etal.[1] used the sine wave absorber in place of plane absorber plate and numerically
studied the natural convection inside the channel between cover and the sine wave
absorber by single pass flat plate solar air collector. Garg etal.[2]used an absorber with fin
attached in order to improve the thermal performance of single pass solar air collector.
Yeh[3] studied the effect of parallel barriers on the collector efficiency of single pass flat
plate solar collector. Sodha etal.[4] presented the performance of solar air heater with
matrix. Ahmad etal.[5] investigate the effect of absorber matrix, mass flow rates and solar
energy flux on a packed bed single pass solar air collector. Metwally etal.[6]
experimentally investigate the thermal performance of corrugated duct solar air collector.
Dhiman and Tiwari [7] studied performance of a two channel suspended flat-plate solar air
heater. Sahu and Bhugoria [8] reported the augmentation of heat transfer coefficient by
using transverse ribs on absorber plate of solar air collector. Karwa etal.[9] presented the
performance of solar air heaters having integral chamfered rib roughness on absorber plate.
Mohamad [10] analyzed the performance of counter flow solar air heater with a porous
matrix. Naphon etal.[11] applied the mathematical models for predicting heat transfer
characteristics and performance of various configuration of flat-plate solar air collector.
The thermal performance of a packed bed double pass solar air heater was presented by
Ramadan etal. [12]. Sopain.K. [13] carried out the simulation study and the thermal
performance of double pass solar heater with and without porous media. The use of porous
packing material for improving the performance of solar air collector has been proposed by
many investigators including Kolb etal. [14]. Varshney and Saini [15] & Thakur etal. [16]
investigated this kind of arrangement for single pass solar collectors. Paisarn Niphan [17]
has presented the mathematical model for predicting the heat transfer characteristics, the
performance, and heat generation of double-pass solar air heater with longitudinal fins. It
was found that the thermal efficiency increases with increasing the height and number of
fins. Ramani etal. [18] has developed a mathematical model for predicting the thermal
performance of a double pass solar air collector with porous media and reveals that thermal
efficiency of double pass solar collector with porous media is 20-25% higher.
2.0 POROUS MEDIA
A porous medium (or a porous material) is a material containing pores (voids). The
skeletal portion of the material is often called the "matrix" or "frame". The pores are
typically filled with a fluid (liquid or gas). The skeletal material is usually a solid, but
structures like foams are often also usefully analyzed using concept of porous media. A
porous medium is most often characterized by its porosity. Other properties of the medium
(e.g., permeability, tensile strength, electrical conductivity) can sometimes be derived from
the respective properties of its constituents (solid matrix and fluid) and the media porosity
and pores structure, but such a derivation is usually complex. Even the concept of porosity
is only straightforward for a poro-elastic medium. Often both the solid matrix and the pore
network (also known as the pore space) are continuous, so as to form two interpenetrating
continua such as in a sponge. However, there is also a concept of closed porosity and
effective porosity, i.e., the pore space accessible to flow.
The concept of porous media is used in many areas of applied science and engineering:
filtration, mechanics (acoustics, geomechanics, soil mechanics, rock mechanics),
engineering (petroleum engineering, bio-remediation, construction engineering),
388
Manometer
Figure1: Working model of the flat plate single pass solar air heater.
The frame of the solar collector was cuboidal in shape and made of plywood of 10mm
thickness. The internal dimension was 1m0.5m0.15m. The top surface of the collector
was left open for glass cover. Aluminium channels were nailed onto the top of the frame to
secure the glass cover. The inlet was a 10 cm hole drilled on the side surface near the
bottom. For the outlet section 3 holes each of 1 inch diameter were drilled on the adjacent
surface near top. Angle of the stand was set at angle of 28.A glazed glass sheet measuring
1.02m x 0.52m x 5mm was used as the single glass cover for the apparatus. The
characteristics of the glass were: Reflectivity 0.1, Transmittivity 0.88. A thermocol sheet
measuring 0.9m x 0.5m x 2.5cm was secured to the bottom surface of the wooden frame by
nails and glue. It was used to minimize heat loss from the absorber to the surroundings.
Multiple aluminium sheets were used to cover the entire floor area of the collector. To
increase absorptivity of heat the aluminium sheets were painted black.3 pipes of diameter 1
inch were attached to the outlet holes in the collector frame. The three parallel pipes fed a
larger outlet pipe of 1.5 inch diameter through T joint couplers. The outlet section was
insulated with foam wherever possible to minimize or eliminate heat exchange with the
surroundings. To measure the different flow rates achieved while conducting the
experiment, an orifice section from an existing pipe (from scrap) was sawed off and
attached to the end of the outlet section via a 1.5 x 1 reducer. The orifice was of 8mm
diameter and the pipe diameter was of 1. There were two holes on either side of the
orifice which were attached to a U-tube manometer for flow measurement. The outlet from
the orifice led directly to the DC fan creating an induced draught. Glass wool and steel
wool were used as porous medium for experiment.
Glass Wool
Glass wool (UK) or fiberglass insulation (US) is an insulating material made from
fiberglass, arranged into a texture similar to wool. Glass wool is produced in rolls or in
slabs, with different thermal and mechanical properties.
Steel wool
Steel wool, also known as wire wool, is a bundle of strands of very fine soft steel
filaments, used in finishing and repairing work to polish wood or metal objects, for
cleaning household cookware and light painting. Steel wool is made from low-carbon steel
(low enough to be close to plain iron).
U-tube manometer was used to measure the differential pressure between two sections in
terms of difference of height of liquid column in both limbs of the manometer. In this case
the two different limbs were connected to either side of the orifice for flow measurement.
The liquid used was coloured water (blue). The manometer also had a graduated scale
(1mm Least Count) for measuring the difference in liquid levels.
Q = CAc2g(P P )
Where C =
( )
Where:
Q = volumetric flow rate (at any cross section)
Cd = coefficient of discharge
C = orifice flow coefficient
d1= diameter of the pipe, m
P1 = fluid upstream pressure
P2 = fluid downstream pressure
= fluid density
Following are the experimental graphs, which are plotted after calculation.
390
Volume flow
rate (litr./min.)
Efficiency
(percent)
27
55
28
1.5
1.062293
16.56
1.055494
1.69266
962
27
56.5
29.5
1.5
1.057457
16.62
1.054496
1.796468
955
29
54.5
25.5
2.5
1.063915
21.36
1.363513
2.022663
951
29.5
55
25.5
2.5
1.062293
21.42
1.365259
2.033771
935
30
54.5
24.5
2.5
1.063915
21.36
1.363513
1.984912
930
30.5
54
23.5
1.065541
23.4
1.49602
2.100148
900
31
54
23
3.5
1.065541
25.26
1.614935
2.292808
Density (kg/cu.
Metre)
12:06
p.m.
12:14
p.m.
12:36
p.m.
12:48
p.m.
01:00
p.m.
01:05
p.m.
01:15
p.m.
Outlet
Temperature
(deg C)
970
Intensity
of
Solar Radiation
I (W/sq. m)
Ambient
Temperature
(deg. C)
Time (11:15
a.m. - 01:15
p.m.)
Performance of Solar Collector without porous media on Thursday (15th Mar. 2012)
Temp. difference
E
f
f
i
c
e
n
c
y
40
30
20
10
1.5
0
0.5
0
0
0.5
1.5
Fig. 2
391
1
Mass Flow Rate
Mass
Flow
Rate
vs.
Temp.
differe
nce
p (in mm of
H2O)
69
44
1.5
1.018807
16.92
1.03429
2.619970
968
25
68
43
1.5
1.021795
16.92
1.03732
2.559976
962
26
66.5
40.5
1.026309
19.57
1.20509
2.818563
973
27
66
39
2.5
1.027823
20.46
1.26175
2.809665
970
28
64.5
36.5
1.032391
22.44
1.39001
2.905808
969
28
64
36
3.5
1.033923
24.3
1.50746
3.111372
965
29
63
34
1.037
26.1
1.62394
3.178701
E
3
f
f 2.5
i 2
c 1.5
e 1
n
0.5
c
y 0
Mass
Flow
Rate vs.
Efficien
cy
Temp. difference
50
Efficiency
(percent)
40
Mass Flow
Rate vs. Temp.
difference
30
20
10
0
0
T (Outlet
Ambient) (deg
C)
25
Outlet Temp.
(deg C)
965
Density (kg/cu.
m)(average)
Ambient Temp.
(deg. C)
11:10
a.m.
11:30
a.m.
11:45
a.m.
12:05
p.m.
12:20
p.m.
12:40
p.m.
01:00
p.m.
Intensity of
Solar Radiation I
(W/sq. m)
Time (11:10
a.m. 01:40
p.m.)
Performance of Solar Collector with steel as porous media (20th Mar. 2012)
1
Mass Flow Rate
Fig. 3
392
Poly. (Mass
Flow Rate vs.
Temp.
difference)
Ambient Temp.
(deg. C)
T (Outlet
Ambient) (deg C)
p (in mm of H2O)
Density (kg/cu.
m)(average)
Efficiency
(percent)
960
28
60
32
1.5
1.046343
16.92
1.062247
1.967123
960
27.5
59.5
32
1.5
1.047916
16.92
1.063844
1.970082
960
28.5
60
31.5
1.046343
19.57
1.228615
2.239663
960
28.5
59
30.5
2.5
1.049494
20.46
1.288359
2.274013
960
28.5
59.5
31
1.047916
22.44
1.410914
2.531153
960
29
59
30
3.5
1.049494
24.3
1.530162
2.656532
960
29
58.5
29.5
1.051077
26.1
1.645987
2.809988
Mass Flow
Rate vs.
Efficiency
Temp. difference
10.30
am
10.45
am
11.00
am
11.15
am
11.30
am
11.45
am
12.00
pm
Avg.Intensity of
Solar Radiation I
(W/sq. m)
Performance of Solar Collector with glass wool porous media (26th Mar. 2012)
40
30
Mass
Flow Rate
vs. Temp.
differenc
e
20
10
0
0
Fig.4
393
where Ac is the area of the collector, S is the solar radiation incident on the
collector.
The air was heated up relatively quickly with time. However the maximum
temperature achieved was 55-56oC. The heat retentiveness of the collector was
relatively poor as compared to the collector having porous media. Inconsistencies
and undulations in the curves of mass flow rate vs temperature differences occurred
due to the low mass flow rate obtained. However it was generally observed that the
efficiency increased with the increasing mass flow of air and the temperature
difference between inlet and outlet was inversely proportional to the mass flow rate
although the nature of the curve was not determined over the small range of mass
flow. The methods of conducting the experiment for both porous and non-porous
media were almost same. The outlet temperatures obtained for steel wool as heat
transfer media were higher (max 690C) than those for glass wool (max 620C). The
efficiency curves were also of a similar nature.
However, the heat retentivity of the collector with glass wool was observed to be
better than the corresponding characteristic for steel wool although comparative
tables for similar times of exposure without sunlight are not tabulated. It means that
when the collector is used at night, utilizing the stored solar energy, the collector
having glass wool would supply warmer air for longer time than steel wool or
without porous media.
The comparative graphs for the performances of the 3 designs are as shown:
From fig.5 efficiency of the collector is strongly dependent on mass flow rate. The
collector efficiencies increase with flow rate. Efficiency increase is about 39.29% at
mass flow rate of (0.9-1.6) kg/hr when steel wool was used as porous media where
efficiency increased by 32.25 at same conditions when glass wool was used with
respect to the conventional solar air collector.
394
From fig.6 by using porous media that is steel wool highest temperature was noted
i.e 690C when steel wool was used as porous media as compared to 620C when
glass wool was used.
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
CONCLUSION
Performances curves of single pass solar air collector with steel wool and glass wool was
used as porous media and conventional solar air collector have been obtained. These
include the effects of mass flow rate and solar radiation on efficiency of solar collector.
The efficiency of the collector is strongly dependent on the flow rate. It increases with flow
rate. The solar collector with porous media as steel wool has efficiency about 26% more
than the conventional one whereas it is about 10% more when glass wool is used.
REFERENCES
1.
Wao, Wenfeng et. al., (2000), Numerical study on natural convection inside the
channel between the flat-plate cover and sine-wave absorber of a cross-corrugated solar air
heater. Energy Conversion and Management 41, pp.145151.
2.
Garg, H.P. et al., (1989), Performance studies on finned air heater. Energy14 (2),
pp.8792.
395
3.
Yeh, H.M., (2000), Effect of collector aspect ratio on the collector efficiency of
upward type baffled solar air heater. Energy Conversion and Management 41, pp.971
981.
4.
Sodha, M.S., Bansal, N.K., Singh, D., (1982). Analysis of a non porous doubleflow solar air heater. Applied Energy 12 (4), pp.251258.
5.
Ahmad A., Saini J.S., Solanki S.C., (1995). Studies on the performance of packed
bed solar air heaters. Ph. D. Thesis, department of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering,
IIT Roorkee.
6.
Metwally et al., (1997). Performance of advanced corrugated-duct solar air
collector compared with five conventional designs. Renewable Energy 10 (4), pp.519
537.
7.
Dhiman, N.K., Tiwari, G.N., (1984). Performance of a two channel suspended flat
plate solar air heater. Energy Conversion and Management 24 (4), pp.269274.
8.
Sahu, M.M., Bhagoria, J.L., (2005). Augmentation of heat transfer coefficient by
90 broken transverse ribs on absorber plate of solar air collector. Renewable Energy 30,
pp.20572073.
9.
Karwa et al., (2001). Thermo-hydraulic performance of solar air heaters having
integral chamfered ribs roughness on absorber plate. Energy 26, pp.161176.
10.
Mohamad, A.A., (1997). High efficiency solar air heater. Solar Energy 60 (2),
pp.7176.
11.
Naphon, P.etal, (2003). Theoretical study on heat transfer characteristics and
performance of the flat-plate solar air heaters. International Communications in Heat and
Mass Transfer 30 (8), pp.11251136.
12.
Ramadan, M.R.I. et al., (2007).Thermal performance of a packed bed double pass
solar air heater. Energy 32, pp.15241535.
13.
Sopain, K., (2000). Performance of a double pass photovoltaic thermal solar
collector suitable for solar drying systems. Energy Conversion and Management 41,
pp.353365.
14.
Kolb, A. et al, (1999). Experimental studies on solar air collector with metal
matrix absorber. Solar Energy 65 (2), pp.9198.
15.
Varshney, L. et al, (1998). Heat transfer and friction factor correlations for
rectangular solar air heater duct packed with wire mesh screen matrices. Solar Energy 62
(4), pp. 255262.
16.
Thakur, N.S. et al., (2003). Heat transfer and friction factor correlations for packed
bed solar air heater for a low porosity system. Solar Energy 74, pp.319329.
17.
Naphon.P., (2004). On the performance and entropy generation of the double-pass
solar air heater with longitudinal fins. Renewable Energy 30 (2005) pp.13451357.
18.
Ramani.B.M. et al., (2010). Performance of a double pass solar air collector.
Solar Energy 84 (2010) pp.1929-1937
396